I tested the latest Instant Pot Pro — this Wi-Fi-enabled multi cooker is perfect for lazy home chefs like me
If I could choose just one kitchen appliance to keep for the rest of my life, it'd be my Instant Pot. So when I found out that Instant was releasing a brand new and improved model of my beloved multi-cooker, I couldn't wait to test it.
The Instant Pot Pro is the successor to the soon-to-be-discontinued (in the U.K., not the U.S.) Instant Pot Pro Plus. While both these models have Wi-Fi connectivity, 10 cooking modes, and a huge 5.7 litre capacity, the Pro sets itself apart with a faster pre-heating time and a WhisperQuiet steam release.
Is that enough to make it the best Instant Pot in 2025? Well, you'll have to keep reading to find out the answer. I'll go through everything in this Instant Pot Pro review.
Price
£249
Weight
6.8 kilograms
Dimensions
35.5 x 35.5 x 32.5 centimetres
Colors
Blue-black
Material
BPA-free plastic, stainless steel
Capacity
5.7 litres
Smart home
Yes
Dishwasher safe
Yes - lid and inner pot
Warranty
1 year
The Instant Pot Pro is £249 from Amazon U.K.. It will not be released in the U.S., so if you're a U.S. reader looking for the newest smart Instant Pot, that would be the fantastic Instant Pot Pro Plus (the model I personally use).
Instant Pot has a huge range of multi-cookers: the Pro Plus (mentioned above) will be discontinued in the U.K., so the Pro (this model) and the Plus (the cheaper model) will replace it. If you only need a super basic Instant Pot and don't care about Wi-Fi connectivity, the £99 Instant Pot Multi-Cooker is a great option: it does everything the pricier models do but without the bells and whistles.
I think £249 is quite expensive for an Instant Pot, but it could be worth it. The Pro has a huge 10 cooking settings (the same as the previous model Pro Plus, but 3 more than the entry-level Instant Pot Duo), which I'll get into fully below. While some people don't care about smart home connectivity, I actually do use my Instant Connect app — I can cook dinner from bed, or even while still at the office.
The new Instant Pot Pro has a few design changes from the previous iteration, the Instant Pot Pro Plus. Whereas the Pro Plus is black with a wide touchscreen, the Pro is a blueish design with a narrower screen.
I don't think the smaller touchscreen impacts usability at all; the screen is still easy to navigate. I will mention that I think the screen could be brighter, but, again, this doesn't negatively impact usability in the slightest.
One of the major changes from the Pro Plus to the Pro is the absence of written modes. Instead of 'Pressure cook', the Pro has graphic icons instead. While most of these icons are quite self-explanatory (saute, for example, is represented by a spatula, and pressure cook is represented by shooting steam), I can imagine that some users might have a bit of trouble memorizing the graphics.
Another major change is the inclusion of a 'WhisperQuiet' steam release cover. This cover sits on the steam release nozzle on the Pro's lid and basically quietens steam release. It's removable for easy cleaning, as is the condensation catch chamber. I must say: do not forget to clean these two.
Like its predecessor the Pro Plus, the Pro also has Wi-Fi connectivity. This is all done through the Instant Connect app, which is a smart home app I actually really like. Other smart home products often have me rolling my eyes at their superfluous apps, but Instant Connect is chock full of recipes, tips, and more.
A word of warning: you'll need to connect the Instant Pot Pro to the app option 'Instant Pot Pro Max (Wi-Fi)', not the product's actual name 'Instant Pot Pro'. You'll also need to ensure you have the newest version of the app, as this is a new product.
As you can see, you can find recipes on the Instant Connect app and save them on your phone. The recipes then walk you through step-by-step and send relevant cooking presets to your Instant Pot. While I don't find myself gravitating towards these (more of an 'I don't follow recipes because I'm too stubborn' issue than anything Instant Pot has done), it's a good option for those who do follow recipes.
Using the app, I was able to switch my Instant Pot on while out of the house, which is a great feature that benefits me monumentally on office days.
As mentioned above, Instant claims that the Pro's pre-heating time is decreased from previous models. When pre-heating from cold, the Pro (2025) took 7 minutes and 9 seconds whereas the Pro Plus (2024) took 10 minutes and 1 second.
Steam release took 10 seconds for the Pro and 50 seconds for the Pro Plus, which meant my whole meal was ready much faster when using the Pro.
One of the main changes from the Instant Pot Pro Plus is the WhisperQuiet steam release. I used DecibelX to monitor sound levels. My Instant Pot Pro Plus peaked at 82dB during steam release, but the Pro peaked at 74dB.
As Instant Pots are known primarily for their pressure cooking capabilities, I thought I'd discuss this first. To be honest, 99% of the time, I'm using the 'Pressure cook' function anyway.
What I love about pressure cooking is that you can go from ingredients to a hot, fully-cooked meal in 10 minutes — give or take. For this review, I cooked a Thai red curry with tofu, potatoes, carrots, curry paste, coconut milk, and stock.
One of the most important hacks I've learnt while using my Instant Pot Pro Plus is that if you're going from sauté to pressure cook, do not stir. Sauté the ingredients as normal, then deglaze with stock or water to ensure the entire bottom of the pot is clean. Then add your liquids first and your solids next. Do not stir — let the liquid line the bottom of the pot. This is to prevent the dreaded 'Burn' notice.
I followed this rule when making my curry, as I first sauteed the onions and curry paste, deglazed with coconut water, then added everything else (liquids first). I put the Instant Pot Pro on for 10 minutes and went to do something else.
As the pot was already hot from sautéing, it skipped the laborious 'Pre-heating' stage that irks me when I use my Pro Plus. I'm glad that Instant Pot seems to have rectified this annoyance.
After 10 minutes, the Pro started steam releasing. I'd set it on 'Quick' (as the flavor differences between 'Quick' and 'Natural' steam release are, in my opinion, minimal) it took only around ten minutes.
Next, I cooked chickpeas. Usually dried beans take around 8 hours to cook on the stove, but I've cooked chickpeas from dried to fluffy in under an hour using an Instant Pot before. I put 3 cups of chickpeas in the inner pot with a 1:3 ratio of water, then set it to pressure cook for 45 minutes.
Preheating took 16 minutes and steam release on 'Natural' took 27 minutes. However, on 'pressure cook', the Pro doesn't beep when it moves onto cooking, unlike the Instant Pot Pro Plus. It does, however, beep on other modes, like 'Sous vide'.
After 45 minutes I had deliciously fluffy chickpeas, cooked to perfection. I probably could get away with cooking them for around 35 minutes and still get a similar result. I stand by my opinion that Instant Pots cook chickpeas better than any other method.
To test the 'Rice' mode, I followed Instant's basmati rice recipe on its website. As directed, I measured 250g of basmati rice and 250ml water. Then I put the Pro on for 6 minutes on 'Rice' (high pressure), let it vent naturally for 10 minutes, followed by a quick release.
The rice was fluffy, but a little underdone. I would recommend a little extra water than listed in Instant's recipe. It was also quite annoying to wash up the inner pot as the rice was very stuck to the bottom.
For the 'Slow cook' test, I cooked another Thai red curry for direct comparison with pressure cook. I put it on for 6 hours with all the same ingredients; at hour 2, the top inch or so was still cold. However, after 6 hours the curry was hot all the way through. Taste-wise, I didn't notice enough of a difference from the pressure-cooked version to warrant slow-cooking.
I think Instant Pot's line really excels with pressure cooking, and while the slow cooker still works, I wouldn't recommend it for saving time (obviously). I use my Instant Pot for pressure cooking 99% of the time.
To put the 'Sous vide' setting to the test, I made some custards. I followed Instant's custard recipe (but made plain ones instead of coffee). Pre-heating the water to 83°C (as specified) took ages — over half an hour.
I will also note that only 4 of my ramekins fit into the trivet and the inner pot, despite the recipe making 6 servings. Instant recommended checking on the custards after 30 minutes, and they were done at 57 minutes.
While a bit of a hassle to set up, I really appreciate the inclusion of a sous vide function and I think this mode levels up the Pro. Instead of just being a pressure cooker or slow cooker, the Pro can also transform into a different cooker for specialty recipes.
I've made yogurt in an Instant Pot before and let me tell you, it's a labor of love. Wait — I don't even think I love it, just tolerate it. However, that's not the Instant Pot's fault. The Instant Pot actually tries to take the pain out of yogurt making. By nature, it's a frustrating and tedious process.
Even so, the 'Yogurt' setting on the Pro really does try. After scalding all equipment, I poured 3 litres of milk into the inner pot and started the 30 minute heating process, all automated by the Instant Pot. After the 30 minutes, the milk is supposed to be 83°C. I checked with my food thermometer, and it was 82.9°C.
Then, the Instant Pot goes through a 30 minute cooling process, after which you put in the yogurt culture and let it ferment for a minimum of 8 hours. I set the fermentation time for 10 hours.
After 10 hours, I had a lot of delicious, thick, perfectly tangy yogurt. For what it's worth, the Instant Pot really does make it easier than preparing yogurt in a pot. While it's not hugely easier than, say, a yogurt maker, this is a multi-purpose product that doesn't just do that one thing.
I will say that washing the pot afterwards is very annoying — the scorched milk (gross) on the bottom of the pot is very tricky to get off, and this remains my biggest annoyance with Instant Pots.
'Sauté' mode is one of the most underrated functions on the Instant Pot. If I'm making soup, stew, sauce, or anything in the Instant Pot, I don't have to use another pan to fry onions. I can just make the entire dish in one pot.
My favorite aspect of the Pro's 'Sauté' setting is that you can now choose the temperature. It ranges from 95°C to 195°C, which is more than enough variation. This wasn't an option on previous models I personally tested.
I sautéd onions and curry paste for my Thai red curry, deglazed (very important) with the water from a tin of coconut milk, and then layered everything else in the pot for the slow cook and pressure cook.
Sautéing works a treat, and I especially love that it's temperature controlled now.
As with all Instant Pots I've tested, the Pro is quite large. I keep mine out of the kitchen between uses as there's not enough space on my counters.
The Pro is a massive 35 centimetres tall and 32 centimetres wide, so unless you've got a massive kitchen (unlike me), I would recommend (like me) keeping it in storage between uses.
Cleaning the inner pot of Instant Pots is always a nightmare — scorched food sticks to the bottom like hair on polystyrene — but you'll be pleased to know that the inner pot is completely dishwasher safe. Even the lid is dishwasher safe, so all you have to do is clean the outer cooker and make sure the condensation catcher and steam release cover are clean.
Instant offers a standard 1-year warranty with all of its products. On top of the warranty, after-purchase care includes loads of downloadable recipe e-books on Instant's website.
I think the Instant Pot Pro is a fantastic upgrade from the Pro Plus. Is it worth trashing your existing Pro Plus to purchase the newer model? No, obviously not. But if you don't have an Instant Pot and are looking to get the best model, the Pro is the only option.
However, if you want a completely basic, beginner Instant Pot, I'd recommend the £99 Multi-Cooker (called Rio in the U.S.). This multi-cooker does basically everything the Pro does without the smart home connection.
If you're in the U.S., the Pro isn't available and won't be available, however the Instant Pot Pro Plus is basically the same product, so I'll point you in that direction. For U.K. customers, though, the Pro is the best Instant Pot money can buy right now.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Tom's Guide
a day ago
- Tom's Guide
iPhone 17 just tipped to get bigger — now more Pro-sized
When the base iPhone 17 arrives later this year, it might be a disappointment for people who prefer more compact phones. A new rumor claims the screen size for the standard iPhone will be getting an increase, following in the footsteps of the current Pro model that debuted last fall. According to regular leaker Digital Chat Station, the iPhone 17 is getting a bump from 6.1-inches to 6.3-inches. the same size as the iPhone 16 Pro. "I mentioned before that there are two new 6.3 small straight screens in the next generation in China, including the iPhone17 screen size has become 6.27/6.3," Digital Chat Station wrote on Weibo, based on a machine translation. Last year, Apple bumped up the screen size on the Pro models, but left the base iPhone 16 alone. The iPhone 16 Pro jumped from 6.1 to 6.3 inches while the iPhone 16 Pro Max increased from 6.7 to 6.9 inches. So far we believe that the iPhone 17 Pro and iPhone 17 Pro Max will retain the sizes of their iPhone 16 counterparts. It's not a big bump in iPhone 17 screen size, but does continue the trend of smartphones growing over the last couple of years. The DCS rumor seems to confirm a previous one from display analyst Ross Young who forecast the same size for the iPhone 17 and iPhone 17 Pro screens last month. Outside of a size increase, the iPhone 17 panel should improve in other ways, some reports claiming that iPhone 17 will feature a ProMotion display. That's Apple's branding for screens with faster refresh rates, a feature currently reserved for the Pro models. Korean publication ETNews also reports that all iPhone 17 models will get 120Hz displays this year. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. Assuming Apple sticks with its usual release schedule, we should see the iPhone 17 in September when Apple typically announces the next generation of iPhone.
Tom's Guide
a day ago
- Tom's Guide
Adding a Hot Girl Walk to my working day with this foldable under-desk treadmill helped me hit my 10,000 steps with ease
I don't know about you, but my social media feeds are a constant stream of 'get your 10,000 steps,' 'go on a Hot Girl Walk,' or '12-3-30.' The pressure to get the steps in seems to be getting heavier, but admittedly, I always feel better for doing them. So, adding the WalkingPad Z1 has changed everything. Adding one of the best under-desk treadmills to my home office is something that has appealed to me for a while now, and since trying it, I'm not going back. Truthfully, I felt like the missing member of the Proclaimers testing this out for my Hot Girl Walk. Despite being on the affordable end of home treadmills, the WalkingPad's understated looks still fit in with any home office. When combined with the companion app, you can get digestible metrics to evaluate your walking. It is also incredibly comfortable to walk on with four-layer shock absorption. It does have its drawbacks, though. The short power cord means you need to be set up near a power outlet, and when you're moving it about, you'll need an extra pair of hands, since it's on the heavier side. You should also avoid any thick carpets since the treadmill is low-profile. And despite the app being great, I wish the remote control would do more. With all that being said, this is a very good walking pad, and these issues are relatively minor. While they don't spoil the user experience, they are worth considering. You can find out more about how I got on in my full WalkingPad Z1 review. Dimensions unfolded 56.1 x 22.0 x 4.1 inches Dimensions folded 31.8 x 22.0 x 5.4 inches Weight 51lbs Max. user weight 242lbs Top speed 3.7mph Incline None Wheels Yes Walking area 47.6 x 15.7 inches The WalkingPad Z1 is available at Amazon U.S. for $348 and at Amazon U.K. for £299, and in dark gray only. If you're ordering from the U.K., you can add expert assembly for an extra £56, but unfortunately, this isn't an option if you're ordering to America, so you'll have to do a little DIY. At this price point, the treadmill is at the lower end of the market, with the price of a decent pad ranging from anywhere between $200 to $1,600. The WalkingPad C2 ($499) is one of the best compact under-desk treadmills, and is foldable like the Z1, but more expensive. The WalkingPad Z1 has a very minimal design, which looks understated and sleek and would fit in with any home office setup or just in front of the television. In my opinion, one of the best-looking under-desk treadmills in the range is the WalkingPad A1 Pro ($699). It is, however, twice the price of the Z1. So, while the look of the Z1 is less premium, it may be a sacrifice worth making if on a budget. It's worth noting that you'll need one of the best standing desks to use the Z1 as your workstation, for obvious reasons, although you can simply use it as a normal treadmill away from your desk. The power cord included with the treadmill is around 2 meters long, so you need to be set up pretty close to a power outlet. But if you're using it at your desk as part of a home office, you're probably next to a power outlet anyway, so it should be fine. It also comes with a remote control that has a wrist strap. The WalkingPad Z1 is low profile and sits just 6.7cm off the floor. Because of the low profile, consider using the Z1 on a hard floor; if you need to use it on carpet, be wary of the pile and height. This is because the friction from the belt rotation can cause friction on the carpet. If that is a concern, you could look at the WalkingPad P1. It's pretty thin and folds in the middle, so it fits comfortably under my desk and doesn't encroach too much into the walkway behind. It's also easy to store, and the wheels mean that if you tip it, it is actually simple to transport. However, if you need to carry it up or down stairs, you'll need an extra pair of hands, since it's pretty heavy at 51 lbs. There is an electronic display at the top of the treadmill that gives the speed, distance, time and calories on rotation. I found this to be a great motivator to check how far I had walked, and it's not too distracting since it sits under the desk. There are two ways you can control the WalkingPad Z1: the app or the remote. Personally, I have qualms with both methods, but in short, I feel like a more advanced version of the remote is all that's needed here. When using the remote, you can only increase and decrease the speed in increments of 0.5km/h. This was slightly annoying, as my ideal walking speed needed to be between 3.0km/h and 3.5km/h — I really felt like Goldilocks. And yes, that's all you really need the remote to do. However, with the KS Fit app, you have much more control over the pad, and I'd have liked to see some of that functionality make it to the remote. In the app, I was able to alter the speed in increments of 0.1km/h and settled on a speed of 3.3km/h, so I could walk and work with ease. In the app, you also see a whole host of metrics, including steps, calories burned, time elapsed, distance travelled, current speed, current pace, average speed, average pace, stride rate, average cadence and average steps. You can also set targets for these metrics. There's also a leaderboard section in the app to compare your stats with other app users, which is pretty great for motivation if you need it. The app can also keep your phone awake to act as a display for the treadmill, and you can switch the data displayed in the app while you walk. I genuinely enjoyed using the WalkingPad Z1. Not only was it easy to set up and use, but it also offered digestible metrics and got me active during my sedentary job. It's very responsive to inputs, and there is no lag when changing speed using the remote control or the app. It can also increase to a speed of 3.7mph/6km/h, so you can jog on it, but this felt a little unstable as I'm used to running on larger treadmills with handles. It doesn't mean you can't run on it, I just prefer the extra stability. The Z1 has four-layer shock absorption, and this had a positive effect after walking 5km. As someone with an old knee injury (yes, I would've made it into the big leagues otherwise), I often experience discomfort on other treadmills or outdoors at these distances. Not so with the Z1. The WalkingPad Z1 has a brushless motor, so it's supposed to be pretty quiet. However, to my ear, it made the same amount of noise as the treadmills I've used at the gym. It gave an average reading of 57.3dB, while the product description said below 45dB. I would certainly recommend the WalkingPad Z1 under-desk treadmill to anyone looking to increase their daily steps. As someone who works an office job, it's been an ideal addition to my work set-up — now I can squeeze in a quick walk and hit my 10,000 steps with ease when working from home. The Z1's foldable design makes it easy to store. It also looks good and is affordable, unlike WalkingPad's pricier models, including the A1 Pro. My only major issue is with the remote. While the app is great for providing digestible metrics from the data the treadmill collects, a more detailed remote control could have negated the need for an app altogether. Nevertheless, this pad is sure to help you hit your steps. If you want to walk 500 miles in your working week (and then 500 more), the WalkingPad Z1 is the way to do it.
Tom's Guide
a day ago
- Tom's Guide
I was wrong — these budget earbuds sound way better than their $79 price
Soundpeats isn't exactly a famous brand in the world of audio, so I was skeptical when I picked up the brand-new (as of June 2025) Air5 Pro earbuds. Considering they're just $79, I didn't have high hopes for the sound quality. However, the Soundpeats Air5 Pro quickly proved me wrong, and made me wonder if they could be some of the best earbuds for the price. The soundscape is expansive, ideal for detail listeners on a budget. While the bass can get a little overbearing and the mids thin in some genres, overall, the Air5 Pro were a solid listen. The pros don't end there, though: these buds also have an awesome IPX5 rating, some premium features, and are very comfy to wear. I'll go through all the specs in detail in this Soundpeats Air5 Pro review. Price $79 / £79 Connectivity Bluetooth 5.4 ANC Yes Battery 7.5 hours (buds), 37 hours (case) Weight 4.8g / 50g0.169 oz / 1.76 oz Drivers 10mm Dimensions 1.9 x 1 x 2.6 inches Colors Black, white Compatibility iOS, Android The Soundpeats Air5 Pro earbuds are just $79 from Amazon U.S. and £79 from Amazon U.K.. This makes them some of the cheapest (decent) earbuds available at the moment, only bested by the EarFun Air range: the EarFun Air 2 and Air 2 NC, respectively, are $49 and $69. For earbuds with LDAC, aptX, and a Snapdragon processor, this is a very reasonable price. However, being loaded up with hi-res streaming codecs doesn't guarantee pristine sound quality, which I'll discuss in full in the 'Audio quality' section below. As someone who didn't realize she had small ears until some earbuds gave her cartilage ache, I was so happy to find the Air5 Pros are relatively small. The earbud nozzle (the part that sits in your ear's concha) is nice and narrow, so it doesn't push on my cartilage. The earbuds come with three tip sizes: small, medium, large. Because of the smaller nozzle, I found that medium suited me perfectly. Other earbuds, like the Skullcandy Method 360 ANC and the Belkin SoundForm Flow, required me to use the smallest ear tip. For budget earbuds, the Air5 Pros don't look too bad. They look like black AirPods, with a similar size tip, stem, and nozzle. The main design difference is the outside of the stem; it's got a brass-colored flourish embossed with the Soundpeats Logo. You'll find the touch controls housed in the aforementioned brass-colored flourish. I found the controls a little counterintuitive, but not as unresponsive or laggy as other budget brands. It's very odd that increasing the volume is just one tap on the right but, but skipping songs is a long press — I found myself accidentally deafening myself when I was moving hair out of my face or trying to remove the buds. I was able to change what the controls do with the Soundpeats app, but you're forced to use the defaults while in a call.. I found adjusting the volume quite annoying, as there's no tone (unlike AirPods) to alert that the adjustment has been activated. If you've got a phone compatible with hi-res streaming codecs (Android phones, sorry iPhone users (me included)), then you'll be able to take advantage of the Air5 Pro's Snapdragon processor and activate LDAC and aptX codecs. Unfortunately, I am a poor, unfortunate iPhone user, so I had to dig out the office Asus Zenfone 12 Ultra to test these hi-res codecs. If you're going to buy a new phone, find out what you need to know about Bluetooth codecs before you buy your next phone. I'll talk more about the hi-res codec playback in the 'Sound quality' section below, but the long and short is that it's nice to have, but I don't think it did that much. A misfortune is the lack of wear detection and easy multipoint connectivity. There's a 'Dual Device Connection' toggle in the PeatsAudio app, but it's frustrating to have to download an app to enable this feature. Lack of easily-accessible multipoint and ecosystem integration is one of the main things holding me back from using anything but AirPods. Even high-end buds like the Final ZE8000MK2 ($349) struggle to seamlessly connect to my phone and laptop. Wear detection I can get over — pausing the music requires just a tap, anyway — but it's still not great for a pair of $80 earbuds. The $99 EarFun Air Pro 4 have wear detection, so I'd like to see this feature on Soundpeats' future offerings. However, I love to see the IPX5 rating. This is the same as the aforementioned EarFun earbuds, and means the buds can withstand rain or sweat. ANC at this price point isn't going to be Bose-beating, let's be clear. However, I'd expect it to be just a little better, especially seeing as Soundpeats shouts about it. The EarFun Air Pro 4 earbuds I mentioned earlier have good ANC for budget earbuds, so it is possible. In my quiet apartment, I could still hear myself typing even while listening to Nirvana. I could hear myself rustling paper as I worked, and I could hear my mouse clicking over Kurt Cobain's chugging grunge guitars, which, if you don't know, are pretty heckin' loud. Walking around the city, I could still hear traffic noise. So, considering these buds are just $79, the ANC is about as good as you'd expect. No, it won't shut out the rest of the world, but it also (hopefully) won't get you hit by a car, so swings and roundabouts. There are three ANC modes: 1) pass through, which is basically just ambient aware mode, 2) 'normal', which is no ANC or ambient aware, and 3) ANC. Honestly, I found 'normal' mode was better at blocking out surroundings, which probably isn't the intended purpose. To test sound quality, I listened to a variety of music on Qobuz, the best streaming service for audiophiles. Seeing as the Air5 Pro buds are loaded up with hi-res codecs, a Snapdragon processor, and 10mm drivers, I was excited to get stuck in and test some (hopefully) great budget buds. Don't get me wrong, the Air5 Pro earbuds don't sound awful. They're a far cry from the Belkin SoundForm Play buds I've reviewed recently. But would I say they're audiophile-quality? No. Absolutely not. That doesn't mean they're trash, though. The Air5 Pro earbuds are very bassy, almost too much so. On the heavier tracks I listened to, a few moments made me grimace. I'll chat about everything in depth here. With aptX activated, I listened to 'Money' by Pink Floyd and 'If She Could See Me Now' by Lorde. While these tracks both sounded good, and the immersive cash register sound effects of the former were impressive, I didn't notice a huge difference between the standard and hi-res codecs. I think you'd need higher-quality hardware to take full advantage of this. On standard AAC codec, I listened to 'Milky Sleep' by Brian Eno, which is an ambient, spacey track with gentle strings and bass. It's a very sparse soundscape, which can be a challenge for some budget earbuds. However, I found the soundscape to be quite expansive; the warbled motifs sounded as if they were coming from all around me. Next, I switched it up massively and went for 'Smells Like Teen Spirit' by Nirvana. The grunge guitars were throbbing and messy, but there was a touch of tinniness in the percussion. Still, the vocals were arresting and raw, just as they sound on much pricier earbuds. After the heavier track, I switched back to a more minimal sound. I played 'Innadream' by Pretty Girl, which is a house track with a syrupy, sticky vocal. The synth notes were clear, with no hissing in the treble, and the bass was groovy. This song was one of the most impressive tracks I listened to on the Air5 Pro buds. I switched back to something heavy to re-analyze the muddy bass situation. I played 'Strange to Be Here', a song by HotWax that I know really well, which has punky, grunge guitars. The chorus was definitely a little muddy and unclear, like the guitars were fighting for dominance rather than living together harmoniously. In the second verse, there's a scratching guitar effect in the left ear, which sounded pretty good, but not as affecting as it usually is. After this, I played 'Unravelling' by Muse, which has a metal breakdown at the end of the track. Strangely, the vocals were quite fizzy across the track. I've listened to this song enough times to know that this isn't in the music itself. I wondered why this lack of clarity was on this track and not others, so I listened to a few more Muse songs to test this. Of the tracks I listened to, this fizzing vocal happened on 'Won't Stand Down', 'Will of the People', and 'Propaganda', but no tracks on pre-2018 albums. Either this strikes me as the earbuds struggling to catch up with the hi-res streaming quality, or a new mixing technique that the earbuds don't like. Muse are my favorite band, so I know their tracks well enough to immediately notice when something doesn't sound quite right. I will say this, though: in 'The Dark Side' (no fizzing vocals), I could hear the background whispered vocals really well. I was surprised, as my AirPods Pro 2 sometimes can't translate this subtlety as competently. The Air5 Pro buds are compatible with Soundpeats' PeatsAudio app. It's pretty boring looking, but it's relatively easy to use. I guess that's a valid trade-off. However, it did ask for access to my entire music and video library, which has never happened before with other music apps, and I'm always wary of accepting such sweeping permission requests. As you can see, there's a range of features, such as a custom EQ, presets, and a personalized 'adaptive' EQ. This is basically just a hearing test that plays a series of sounds in various frequencies. However, I could hear all of these sounds instantly (unlike the JBL Live 770NC personalized EQ, which really pushed my hearing to the edge of its ability), which just meant my 'personalized' EQ was a mostly flat line. You can also adjust touch control settings in the app and change the ANC modes, but honestly, I think this app is pretty pointless once you change the touch control settings. I deleted it promptly after testing. To test the call quality of the Soundpeats Air5 Pro, I called my boyfriend and recorded myself reading on my iPhone's Voice Memo app. The mic is fine — you'll be heard, but you won't sound good. It's a little metallic and quiet, and has a tendency to clip out momentarily, which is annoying. Soundpeats says the earbuds have wind resistance and a Snapdragon-powered AI ambient noise reducer, but honestly? This felt very minimal to me. They're just budget earbuds with a budget level mic. With the standard AAC codec, Soundpeats says the Air5 Pro earbuds should last for up to 7 ½ hours on a single charge. In reality, I found this was more like 5 hours. This is a pretty meh battery life: yes, the notoriously poor AirPods 4 ($129) have just 5 hours, but the aforementioned EarFun Air 2 ($49) have a whopping 9 hours. While this seems like just an extra 1.5 hours, it's enough to do a full day of work and a half-hour commute in either direction. The Air5 Pros will have you recharging before the end of the shift. If you use one of the hi-res codecs, too, the battery life will certainly be less than 7 ½ hours. Considering these buds are $79 and the EarFun offering is $49, I think the Air5 Pros can do a little better than that. Considering these earbuds are just $79, the sound quality is excellent for the price. I could hear elements of ambient tracks I wouldn't usually hear, and even louder tracks managed to perform quite well. No, they can't rival Bose, Sony, or Apple audio gear, but they're also a fraction of the cost. Some bass is trying a little too hard and results in muddiness, and some of the treble is tinny. thankfully, these issues didn't raise their heads too often. For the price, the Soundpeats Air5 Pro are decent earbuds with great sound. The buds are mostly let down by middling ANC, a boring app, and lack of premium features. However, all that being said, if you need a pair of cheap and cheerful earbuds that won't have you wincing at the sound quality, the Air5 Pro are the ones for you.
