New Zealand draft infrastructure plan outlines need for more hospitals, electricity
WELLINGTON, June 25 (Reuters) - New Zealand on Wednesday released a draft 30-year national infrastructure plan, which highlighted a need for the country to invest more in hospitals and electricity production and to prepare to spend more on responding to national disasters.
The plan aims to improve infrastructure preparations and introduce a less politically driven approach to infrastructure investment, which critics say has been impacted by electoral cycles with the stop-start results being costly for large projects.
'We want the National Infrastructure Plan to help build common ground about our areas of need and what is affordable for Kiwis, giving the Government of the day guidance for making decisions about infrastructure,' said Geoff Cooper, chief executive of the New Zealand Infrastructure Commission.
The draft plan said the country needed to establish affordable and sustainable funding, make it easier to build new infrastructure, prioritise maintaining current infrastructure and assess the readiness of projects before they are funded.
While New Zealand was in the top 10% of the OECD in its infrastructure spend as a percentage of gross domestic product, it was not getting the returns it should, it added.
To meet demand, annual capital investment would need to increase from around NZ$20 billion ($12 billion) today to slightly more than NZ$30 billion by the 2050s, according to the plan.
The New Zealand government has outlined plans to boost the infrastructure build in the country, and earlier this year hosted an infrastructure investment summit to promote foreign investment in the country's infrastructure.
'The Government is determined to improve New Zealand's infrastructure system and to work alongside the industry and other political parties to establish a broad consensus about what needs to change,' said Chris Bishop, Minister for Infrastructure.
The finalised plan is expected to be released at the end of the year and will be discussed by parliament in early 2026.
($1 = 1.6565 New Zealand dollars)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
7 hours ago
- The Guardian
Thames Water court case shows there are alternatives to massive infrastructure
Britain is running out of water, we are told. Soon there will be curfews, banning people from turning on their taps, as happens in Italy. Standpipes will sprout on the side of parched roads where trees once stood. Rivers will run dry and rural communities will begin digging wells in response to a water apocalypse destined to arrive courtesy of the ravaging effect of climate change. The water companies argue that major investment is needed to cope with the changing weather patterns, with those funds primarily channelled into building massive new infrastructure. They are happy to carry out the work, as long as payment is charged directly to customers. It is what we might call the HS2 fallacy. Except that rather than build a high-speed line to increase the rail capacity between London and Birmingham when other much less sexy options were available at much lower cost, we find ourselves agreeing to construct reservoirs as tall as high-rise buildings. Importantly, the assets boost the balance sheets of privatised water companies, because while billpayers will have funded the projects, the shareholders will own the new infrastructure. Last week a group of experts took Thames Water to court to try to persuade a judge that an alternative to one reservoir, near Abingdon in Oxfordshire, is not only possible but presents a much more sustainable and cheaper option for customers, and that this needs to be tested in a public inquiry. At the heart of the argument is a dispute about how to manage Britain's water resources, with campaigners urging a move away from grands projets to something more humdrum, allowing for the money to be spent instead on cleaning up rivers polluted in the first place by Thames Water et al. However, what Thames and its consultant friends appear to want, like so many in the infrastructure game, is an edifice you can see from space. Nine new reservoirs are at the heart of this plan and some will have walls to hold in the water that are the height of the average house. The reservoir destined to replace farmers' fields near Abingdon will have walls 25 metres high. They are destined for the south and east of England, where population numbers are increasing and dry summers scorch the earth. Politicians have backed the plans, and it is easy to see why. Britain has failed to build reservoirs over the last 40 years, and who doesn't like a nice lake to look at? Reservoirs are cheap and easy to build when they are situated in a valley and the river that runs through it is capped at one end. The ground should be impermeable, which usually means clay sits under the water. Unfortunately at Abingdon there is what can only be described as a puddle of clay, which is why the reservoir must sit on top, with skyscraper walls all around. A reservoir planned for Lincolnshire will likewise have 13-metre walls because the clay layer there is so thin. Much of the south is dominated by chalk and gravel, so is unsuitable for reservoirs. Land that has clay that has already been built on – London, for example. Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion What the south boasts is chalk and underground aquifers. The anti-reservoir campaigners say this aquifer water, and that of the slow-moving lower reaches of rivers that feed the Thames, such as the Lea, can be extracted with no environmental harm. The problem for CPRE, formerly the Council for the Protection of Rural England, and the campaign group Saferwaters, which are backing the campaign, is that Thames Water is working with the grain of people's emotions. Reservoirs good, aquifers and river extraction bad. Climate change, though, means wetter winters and drier summers. So aquifers fill up in the winter and suffer little evaporation in the summer, while reservoirs suffer huge losses during hot days, especially when the new ones must pump water uphill from nearby rivers, are relatively shallow and with a large surface area. Thames Water relies on forecasts that show 2 million more people will live in London and the south-east by 2050, and when taking into account the depletion of other water sources from climate change, it will need to find an extra 1bn litres of water every day. The Environment Agency's figures, though, show a steep decline in water use, much of that related to the switch from water-hungry oil, gas and coal power stations to renewables such as solar power. Again, we might have an attachment to old-fashioned ways of generating energy, but renewables have many benefits, including water use. Another arrow in the campaigners' quiver relates to leakages. Why, they ask, is Thames being asked to cut its leakage rate by 50% to 11.4% by 2050 when water suppliers in Germany have already cut the rate to about 7%? Reservoirs let Thames off the hook. The company should be spending money plugging leaks amd preventing sewage spewing into rivers. Instead, it is asked to embark on projects paid for by customers that boost its asset base. What's not to like, from the water company's point of view? The government should be more sceptical. There is a price to be paid and voters will not be kind when higher bills fall through their letterbox.
BBC News
10 hours ago
- BBC News
Cormack Park upgrades part of £8m Aberdeen investment
Aberdeen say they have secured investment of £8m, mainly to be used to improve the club's training ground, Cormack installation of a new full-sized indoor arena will be part of the project."The vision is for a new covered 4G facility to be situated on the current undeveloped Neale Cooper Pitch 6, to allow for all-year-round use for our men and women's teams, both academies, AFCCT programmes and other local junior and amateur teams," the club said."We will also be making some additional improvements to Pittodrie Stadium over the next two years, in line with our previously announced medium-term plan of remaining at our current home."And chairman Dave Cormack added: "Together with our investors, I remain committed to driving Aberdeen FC forward and continuing to make our supporters and the region proud of its football club."
Telegraph
12 hours ago
- Telegraph
Ocado faces £20m loss on vertical farming start-up
Ocado is facing a potential £20m loss after a major UK farming start-up backed by the company fell into administration. The logistics group, led by Tim Steiner, had been a major backer of Jones Food, which was hailed as a game-changer for Britain's farming industry, allowing vegetables to be picked next door to delivery depots. But the farming venture fell into administration this year after Ocado signalled that it was not willing to provide more cash to the start-up and it failed to find a new backer. Ocado risks losing £21.7m on the collapse, filings for Jones Food's administration now suggest, and the company is unlikely to recoup the millions of pounds it pumped into the start-up. This includes £8.6m of initial investment in 2019 and a £3.7m cash injection in 2023. Administrators for the start-up said funds from the sale of Jones's assets would go on paying off expenses and creditors. The collapse of Jones Food is a fresh setback for Ocado, which has been battling to stem losses and churn out more cash in the face of higher debt costs. Ocado has been making heavy cuts in its research team in an attempt to help it shift into profit and was hit by a tripling of its debt interest costs after it refinanced looming bonds last month. Jones Food was among a series of investments made by Ocado into tech start-ups in an attempt to shrug off its image as an online grocer. Ocado struck a deal with M&S in early 2019 to run the online grocer Ocado Retail as a joint venture. Since then, Ocado Group has been focused on its robotic warehouses, which it sells to other companies including Kroger in the US. The collapse of Jones Food comes just over a year after the start-up opened its second vertical farm, which involves growing crops vertically in temperature controlled conditions rather than naturally on the ground. At the time, Ocado claimed the farm was a 'coming-of-age for agricultural technology in the UK' and said Jones Food had 'cracked the code for accessible, sustainable, premium food being grown all-year-round, at a super-competitive price'. The vertical farm, where fresh produce is grown indoors in shelves, provided herbs including basil, coriander and flat-leaf parsley for Ocado and Asda. However, vertical farming start-ups have struggled to become profitable. In filings for Jones Food, administrators said it was loss-making as soon as it was operational because it was running at around a third or half of its factories' capacity, and demand from customers was variable. Other vertical farming start-ups have also collapsed, including US-based Aerofarms which filed for bankruptcy in 2023. It has been seen as a sign of the bubble bursting for agricultural innovations, including cultivated meats. At the time of the administration, Ocado said: 'Jones Food is an innovative business, and Ocado Group has been a supporter and shareholder of the company for a number of years. As we await the outcome of the administration process, our thoughts are with all those involved with Jones Food.'
