DOGE's haphazard takeover of Social Security risked data of millions of Americans ‘leaking into the wrong hands'
Tiffany Flick, a civil servant of 30 years, detailed the speed with which a DOGE associate was parachuted into the SSA to access sensitive data.
Flick, who was forced out last month, said she was 'seriously concerned' that SSA programs can continue to run without disruption and did not rule out that benefits could be delayed or not paid out at all as a result of DOGE's takeover.
The former civil servant's warning, first reported by the Washington Post, was filed in a declaration with a federal lawsuit brought by Democracy Forward, representing a coalition of unions and retirees, seeking emergency relief to halt DOGE's 'unprecedented, unlawful seizure of personal, confidential, private, and sensitive data regarding millions of Americans across the country from the Social Security Administration, in violation of the law.'
Responding to the allegations made by Flick, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a statement to The Independent: 'Any American receiving Social Security benefits will continue to receive them. The sole mission of DOGE is to identify waste, fraud, and abuse only.'
Flick warned in the declaration that 'the stakes are high.' She abruptly retired on February 16, along with acting commissioner Michelle King, after resisting DOGE's demands to gain access to some of the most sensitive and confidential data.
A DOGE software engineer, Akash Bobba, was brought in by newly appointed Mike Russo and 'rushed' through onboarding so he could access the systems that house sensitive data.
'I did not understand the apparent urgency with which Mr. Bobba needed to be onboarded and given access to SSA's systems and data, which are highly sensitive,' Flick wrote in the declaration.
Flick said that she did not believe Bobba had a 'sufficient understanding of the sensitive nature of SSA data or the ways to ensure confidentiality.'
She also noted that Bobba was working on accessing the systems from the Office of Personnel Management, ' surrounded by employees and officials of other agencies and White House components who have, to my knowledge, never been vetted by SSA or trained on SSA data, systems or programs.'
'Others could take pictures of the data, transfer it to other locations, and even feed it into AI programs. In such a chaotic environment, the risk of data leaking into the wrong hands is significant,' Flick warned.
Russo and DOGE officials wanted to access databases containing information about anyone with a Social Security number. It would allow them to see extensive information including a person's name, the name of their spouse and dependents, their work history, financial and banking information, immigration or citizenship status and martial status.
Bobba needed access to 'everything, including source code,' which Flick said that not even the 'most skilled and highly trained experts' would be provided with.
Russo 'was evasive' when Flick asked for justification as to why Bobba required access to this sensitive information.
After Flick pushed back, officials grew 'impatient,' and she was ousted.
'I am deeply concerned about DOGE's access to SSA systems and the potential to inappropriately and inaccurately disclose this information,' Flick warned. 'Especially given the rushed nature in which we were required to onboard and train Mr Russo and Mr Bobba.'
'I am not confident that DOGE associates have the requisite knowledge and training to prevent sensitive information from being inadvertently transferred to bad actors,' Flick added.
She also said that DOGE has 'already used SSA data to spread mis/disinformation' about the amount of fraud in the Social Security benefits programs, including that millions of deceased people are receiving benefits, a false claim that has been parroted by President Donald Trump.
Flick said this is 'invalid and based on an inaccurate understanding' of SSA's data and programs. 'SSA's benefits' file contradicts any claim that payments are made to deceased people as old as 150 years,' Flick wrote.
Democracy Forward is urging the court to block the Trump administration's 'unlawful' attempt to access the private data of millions of Amercians.
'Americans should be able to trust the government to protect their confidential data and yet – again – the Trump administration has shown a blatant disregard for the law and its obligations to the American people by granting unprecedented levels of access to unappointed and unvetted individuals,' Skye Perryman, President and CEO of Democracy Forward said in a statement.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South Wales Guardian
9 minutes ago
- South Wales Guardian
CAS sets date for Crystal Palace verdict over Europa League demotion
The Eagles were demoted from the Europa League to the Conference League by European football's governing body UEFA on July 11 after it determined that as of March 1, American businessman John Textor had control or influence at Palace and French club Lyon. Palace appealed against the decision to the CAS, and the court confirmed on Wednesday that a hearing would take place on August 8, followed by a verdict on August 11. That is the day after Palace, as FA Cup holders, face Premier League champions Liverpool in the Community Shield. UEFA rules state where one or more clubs are deemed to have common ownership, they cannot play in the same competition. Lyon edged out Palace for the sole Europa League place because they finished higher than Palace in the league. Nottingham Forest have taken Palace's Europa League place. Palace are seeking to take either Lyon's or Forest's place in the second-tier competition in their appeal. Textor has now sold his stake in Palace, with the purchase of his shares by New York Jets owner Woody Johnson completed last week.
New Statesman
37 minutes ago
- New Statesman
How do we keep the lid on race-related violence?
A police car set on fire by far-right activists in Sunderland last August. Photo by Ian Forsyth / Getty Images 'Shower upon us abundant rain,' goes a Muslim prayer one learns in childhood, 'swiftly and not delayed.' A prayer for rain that makes sense in the desert. Imagine my surprise on learning the Church of England has one too. Whose idea was it to institute such a prayer in this soggy, inclement land? Its diverse uses have, however, recently become apparent: in the middle of an inconvenient hosepipe ban, to foil defeat in the cricket, or – more seriously – to maintain public order in times so tense that the country is being called a 'tinderbox' at risk of exploding again into nationwide rioting. Last summer, a far-right frenzy gripped towns across Britain. Hotels housing asylum seekers were almost burned down. Now, another such hotel in Epping is subject to anti-migrant demonstrations; these are spreading. Fearing another summer of discord, officials have been appealing to the deus ex machina of the weather. It's well known that hot summers provide the perfect conditions for public unrest to germinate. The London riots in 2011 were a summer affair, as were the 1981 England riots, the worst race-related violence the UK has seen. Tempers flare with temperatures. And rain souses the appetite to indulge in outdoor clashes. A historic heatwave also provides the metaphor for simmering conflict in Do the Right Thing (1989), Spike Lee's classic film about racial tension in a predominantly black Brooklyn neighbourhood. Lee saturates the frame – Gauguin-like – with volcanic hues of red and orange. Our eyes are primed – lava will surely fly – and after a youngster is choked to death by a cop, as George Floyd would be, the community at last erupts into violence. What would be the right thing to do in these circumstances? Lee is a dialectical filmmaker. He ends by quoting from two opposing – though equally compelling – schools of thought about political protest: Martin Luther King Jr's contention that violence is 'both impractical and immoral', and Malcolm X's rejoinder, that when violence is 'in self-defence, I call it intelligence'. The film doesn't say which of these courses of action is, in the end, right. I admire Malcolm X's courage. His insinuation that the bullet may ultimately be more effective than the ballot was born of the chronic failure of American democracy. But rewatching Lee's film, I found myself leaning more towards King. I recoiled during the climactic scene, when the amiable protagonist, Mookie, smashes up the Italian-American pizzeria that provides him with employment, a father-figure and a lively communal space (last year's rioters similarly ransacked their own community centres and amenities). Finally, the rioters threaten the local Asian-run grocery. At this moment, seeing such a familiar character threatened, I fully realised where it was that I stand in this debate. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe For all my sympathy with this community ravaged by the violence of an unjust state, I could not accept this rage against blameless bystanders. I recalled the real-life Bangladeshi family in Minneapolis, whose livelihood – a restaurant – was destroyed in Black Lives Matter protests five years ago. 'Let my building burn,' its immigrant owner, Ruhel Islam, proclaimed, 'justice needs to be served.' The restaurant's name still sticks in the mind: Gandhi Mahal, in homage to the man whose still revolutionary doctrine of non-violence King was an adherent of. By overcoming self-interest and standing with a just cause at personal cost, so clearly was Ruhel Islam. The rioters from Do the Right Thing and from last summer have divergent motives: Mookie and his friends in 1980s New York are crying out for racial justice, while last year's rioters were motivated, I do believe, by racial animus. Nevertheless, in distinct ways, they exemplify anxieties and resentments around race that can stew in any 'melting pot' society. Incidents of police brutality or, as has recently been the trigger in UK unrest, sexual assault, can blow the lid off. When that happens, since time immemorial, immigrant communities like mine are the ones consumed in the fury. How, then, to keep the lid on? This, now, is our challenge. Personally, I'd like to spread the Mahatma's teachings in Epping, but alas, that may fall on deaf ears. Severe sentencing was what the courts opted for – on violent demonstrators, deservedly, but also on inciteful or hateful speech. This, on reflection, seems appropriate. Terror was unleashed by the now jailed Lucy Connolly's call to burn down asylum hotels. But such authoritarianism betrays a political establishment increasingly of the view that the country's diverse ethnic and religious make-up can no longer sustain open discussion of topics sensitive to its respective communities. Note the state's recent activity: a superinjunction to prevent media reporting on Afghan refugee resettlement; an Online Safety Act that is concealing from the public controversial footage; making it a crime even to voice support for Palestine Action; penalising the burning of a Koran. Here, then, is a government that thinks segments of the population are so vexed by migration, or so offended by criticism of Israel, or Islam, that these conversations must be suppressed to keep the peace: ignorance coerced for the sake of bliss. If this is the cost of being tolerated, I don't really feel like paying it. I refuse to believe the country is such a tinderbox. Social cohesion will come, but only by having and withstanding difficult conversations, not by avoiding them. That's how to do the right thing. Failing that, I have my prayer for rain. [See also: One year on, tensions still circle Britain's asylum-seeker hotels] Related
Daily Mirror
40 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
6 unhinged Trump moments as he leaves UK singer feeling 'sick' with weird video
(Image: Anadolu via Getty Images) If I were Donald Trump, I'd have stayed in bed today and slept off the jetlag. He's back in Washington after a nice relaxing trip to Scotland, where he played a lot of golf, signed a trillion dollar trade deal with the EU and met Keir Starmer - costing UK taxpayers tens of millions to police and protect his golf courses. He managed to make even more news on Air Force One last night, giving more details about his falling out with Jeffrey Epstein. He's done a bunch of posting on his Truth Social account - including some which will probably make India a bit nervous. And this morning, his White House has upset a genuine national treasure. Here's everything that went on in Trump World in the last 24 hours that you need to know about. The official White House Twitter account posted this video, which pastiches UK Jet2 holidays ads for some reason. The video juxtaposes footage of people being deported from the US with the well-known Jet2 TV ad, featuring Jess Glynne singing "Hold My Hand". Content cannot be displayed without consent Ms Glynne is not amused. She posted a response, saying: "This post honestly makes me sick. My music is about love, unity and spreading positivity - never about division or hate. Because a day can't go by in Trump World where there isn't talk of the US President pardoning a convicted sex offender, an administration source tells Deadline that "serious consideration" is being given to pardoning Sean "Diddy" Combs. Combs, previously known as Puff Daddy, is facing up to ten years behind bars on two counts of transportation to engage in prostitution. He's been denied bail and remains in prison pending his sentence. Given how his supporters feel about high-profile sex offenders, handing him a pardon would certainly be a ...choice. The Trump administration is moving to scrap the scientific finding that provides the basis for most US action to cut emissions and fight climate change. It would scrap the Environment Protection Agency's 2009 declaration that determined carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases endanger public health and welfare. The so-called "endangerment finding" is the legal underpinning of a host of climate regulations under the Clean Air Act for motor vehicles, power plants and other pollution sources that are heating the planet. Repealing the finding "will be the largest deregulatory action in the history of America," EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin said yesterday. "There are people who, in the name of climate change, are willing to bankrupt the country," Zeldin said on the conservative "Ruthless" podcast. "They created this endangerment finding and then they are able to put all these regulations on vehicles, on airplanes, on stationary sources, to basically regulate out of existence, in many cases, a lot of segments of our economy. And it cost Americans a lot of money." The EPA proposal must go though a lengthy review process, including public comment, before it is finalised, likely next year. Environmental groups are likely to challenge the rule change in court. Donald Trump has claimed Jeffrey Epstein "stole" his most well-known victim from him. The US President described for the first time during his trip to Scotland on Monday the events that led to his falling out with former friend Epstein. He told reporters during a Q&A session with Keir Starmer that the bust-up had been caused by Epstein doing something "inappropriate" - namely, poaching staff from him. Trump said he'd told him not to do it once, but that Epstein had repeated the behaviour, and so he'd ordered him to stay away from his Mar A Lago club in Florida's Palm Beach. Content cannot be displayed without consent As the Mirror noted the same day, Epstein's most well known victim, Virginia Giuffre, was allegedly 'hired' by Ghislaine Maxwell for Epstein while she was working in Trump's spa at Mar A Lago. Aboard Air Force One last night, Trump said he was upset that Epstein was "taking people who worked for me." The women, he said, were "taken out of the spa, hired by him - in other words, gone." "I said, listen, we don't want you taking our people," Trump said. When it happened again, Trump said he banned Epstein from Mar-a-Lago. Asked if Giuffre was one of the employees poached by Epstein, he demurred but then said "he stole her." The White House originally said Trump banned Epstein from Mar-a-Lago because he was acting like a "creep." Trump announced on Truth Social this morning that India is "our friend" but its "tariffs are far too high" on US goods. He threatened to impose a 25% tariff on goods from India, plus an additional "penalty" because they still buy Russian oil. The threat comes after Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi visited the White House in February, not long after Trump took office - and promised to start buying American oil and gas. But months later, the outlines of a trade deal haven't been finalised. As the world attempts to keep up with Trump's antics, the Mirror has launched its very own US Politics WhatsApp community where you'll get all the latest news from across the pond. We'll send you the latest breaking updates and exclusives all directly to your phone. Users must download or already have WhatsApp on their phones to join in. All you have to do to join is click on this link, select 'Join Chat' and you're in! We may also send you stories from other titles across the Reach group. We will also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose Exit group. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. CLICK HERE TO JOIN The federal grand juries that indicted Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell on sex trafficking charges didn't hear evidence from any of Epstein's victims, according to Justice Department officials. Trump has ordered the release of evidence presented to the grand jury - which decides whether a prosecution should go ahead. There had been concerns that releasing the documents would be detrimental to survivors. But according to documents filed in court last night, there were only two witnesses - and both of them were law enforcement officers. While the memo didn't detail what was in the grand jury testimony, it dampened expectations that the transcripts would contain new revelations, saying that "certain aspects and subject matters" contained in them became public during Maxwell's trial in 2021 and that other details have been made public through many years of civil lawsuits filed by victims. Trump ordered the release of the evidence after he faced a huge backlash for failing to publish the files held by the FBI relating to the investigation. We don't know what's in the transcripts, but it seems unlikely his angry supporters will be satisfied by them. BLUESKY: Follow our Mirror Politics account on Bluesky here. And follow our Mirror Politics team here - Lizzy Buchan, Mikey Smith, Kevin Maguire, Sophie Huskisson, Dave Burke and Ashley Cowburn. POLITICS WHATSAPP: Be first to get the biggest bombshells and breaking news by joining our Politics WhatsApp group here. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you want to leave our community, you can check out any time you like. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. NEWSLETTER: Or sign up here to the Mirror's Politics newsletter for all the best exclusives and opinions straight to your inbox. PODCAST: And listen to our exciting new political podcast The Division Bell, hosted by the Mirror and the Express every Thursday.
