logo
Lead in ammunition to be restricted to reduce toxic pollution

Lead in ammunition to be restricted to reduce toxic pollution

Independent10-07-2025
The use of lead in ammunition will be restricted as part of efforts to protect British wildlife and waterways, the Government has announced.
Environment Minister Emma Hardy said the measures will ban shots containing more than 1% lead and bullets with lead content of more than 3%.
This means ammunition that does not meet these criteria will no longer be sold to the public, except in some circumstances.
Exemptions will include military, police, elite athletes, museum collections, outdoor target shooting ranges with risk management measures in place and some other minor uses.
Small calibre bullets for live quarry shooting – the outdoor shooting of live animals – and airguns are also not in scope of the restriction.
The Government said it will aim to legislate the restrictions by summer 2026 followed by a three-year transition period to give the shooting and hunting sectors the time to transition to more environmentally friendly alternatives.
Lead is highly poisonous to both wildlife and human health, and can contaminate food chains and ecosystems when released into the environment.
The Government said up to 100,000 wildfowl – including ducks, swans, and waders – die from lead poisoning annually.
It claims the new restrictions could help prevent the release of 7,000 tonnes into fields, forests and wetlands each year.
The rules could also stop lead from contaminating soil and leaching into rivers when guns are discharged – spreading the toxic metal, ministers added.
Ms Hardy said: 'Britain is a proud nation of nature lovers, but our rivers are heavily polluted, and majestic birds are declining at an alarming rate.
'Non-lead alternatives are readily available, and we'll continue to work closely with the shooting sector throughout this transition.'
Evidence from the Health and Safety Executive shows lead poses a risk to at least one million birds over the coming decades if usage continues at its current rate.
It also found that around 40,000 birds of prey, such as red kites and white-tailed eagles, are at risk from ingesting lead through carrion.
To help sectors transition away from lead ammunition, the Government said there will also be a two-year period for outdoor shooting ranges where lead is used.
Ministers said they will continue to engage with the shooting industry to support the transition to alternative ammunition types, such as steel and tungsten-based shots.
James Robinson, RSPB's chief operating officer, said: 'Long known to be a poison, we have campaigned for decades to have lead ammunition removed from use.
'Lead is a significant problem for nature conservation, impacting the environment and the health of a large number of wild birds, with estimates of up to a hundred thousand individuals dying each year from poisoning.
'This move, whilst long overdue and stopping short of a full ban, will mean that Britain will become a safer place for millions of birds and other wildlife.'
But Terry Behan, The British Association for Shooting and Conservation's (BASC) deputy director of shooting operations, criticised the decision to give the sector a three-year transition, saying ammunition will not be readily available by 2029.
Along with other sector organisations in 2020, the BASC announced a voluntary five-year transition away from lead shot and single-use plastics for live quarry shooting to give the community time to adapt and invest in sustainable alternatives.
'In doing this, government has shortened the expected timeframe for shotgun ammunition from five years to three years on the assumption that the ammunition is readily available – that is not the case for commercial and supply reasons beyond our sector's control, and we urge government to adhere to a five-year timescale proposed by the Health and Safety Executive,' he said.
'BASC was successful in fighting to ensure that small calibres, airguns and shooting on ranges will be exempt from this proposed legislation.
'However, we have concerns with the proposed reclassification of larger calibres to include .243. This risks adversely affecting around 60,000 deer stalkers and could have a serious impact on the national deer cull, which affects road safety, food production and undermines government environmental priorities.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Labour voters back doctors over five-day strike and think Wes Streeting should meet pay demands
Labour voters back doctors over five-day strike and think Wes Streeting should meet pay demands

The Independent

time22 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Labour voters back doctors over five-day strike and think Wes Streeting should meet pay demands

Labour voters support junior doctors' plans to stage a five-day walkout next week, even as public support for the strike collapses, according to a new poll. Overall people oppose the industrial action due to start next Friday by a margin of 44 per cent to 34 per cent, pollsters More in Common found. However, Labour voters support the strikes, with 47 per cent in favour and 35 per cent against, in a major challenge to the stance taken by the health secretary Wes Streeting who has vociferously pressed doctors' leaders to ditch their plans. Green voters also back the strike with 49 per cent in support, while others oppose it. Some 69 per cent of Tory voters are against the walkouts, followed by Reform voters (63 per cent) and Lib Dem voters (55 per cent). Mr Streeting is set to hold last-ditch talks with doctors ' union leaders on Thursday in an effort to avoid the action, which he has warned could break the NHS. Resident doctors, previously known as junior doctors, in England are set to strike from 7am on 25 July as part of a pay dispute with the government. Professor Robert Winston, a Labour peer who became a household name through his documentaries on child development, has warned that the 'highly dangerous' industrial action risks harming the public's trust in the profession. But the new leader of the British Medical Association (BMA), whose members voted in favour of strike action, has said that the doctors' 29 per cent pay demand is 'non-negotiable' and warned strikes could go on for years if the dispute is not resolved. Mr Streeting has previously told the union that, after junior doctors received a 28.9 per cent pay rise last year when Labour entered government, the public would not understand why 'you would still walk out on strike, and neither do I'. The More in Common poll of more than 3,000 adults conducted between July 11 and 14, also found that many voters feel resident doctors are not paid enough, yet most think the pay rises in recent years have been fair. The survey found 38 per cent think junior doctors are paid too little, 34 per cent think the right amount, and only 10 per cent think they are paid too much. However, asked about the pay rises awarded over the past three years, overall 45 per cent said they have increased by the right amount, compared to 23 per cent who said they have not been generous enough. Some 19 per cent of people said they had been too generous. However, such is the level of concern about the health service, the public may accept a further increase in junior doctors' pay in order to prevent strikes. The majority of voters (58 per cent) of the public believes that preventing strikes later this month should be prioritised, even if it means spending more on doctors' pay. Luke Tryl, from More in Common, said: 'When it comes to the prospect of resident doctor strikes, it looks to be lose-lose for everyone involved. 'The public tend to oppose the strikes, though trickily for the government, Labour's own voters are far more supportive. 'Britons also tend to think the settlement the doctors have received is fair, and they risk ending up on the wrong side of a public who are themselves still struggling with the cost of living. But above all, the public don't want strikes to further disrupt the NHS and grow waiting lists.'

How McAllan can tackle our housing emergency
How McAllan can tackle our housing emergency

Scotsman

time22 minutes ago

  • Scotsman

How McAllan can tackle our housing emergency

The new Housing Secretary needs to put in place a ten-year plan to sort problems Sign up to our Scotsman Money newsletter, covering all you need to know to help manage your money. Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... New Housing Secretary Mairi McAllan has had a busy first month and has announced she is working on a plan to address Scotland's housing emergency which she will announce when Holyrood returns in the autumn. Given that housing charity Shelter Scotland recently named John Swinney's legislative agenda a 'Programme for Homelessness' it is clear that the Scottish Government must produce some positive and effective policies. More housebuilding is required, easier and quicker planning regulations, a long-term focus on addressing social housing shortages, and a much closer working relationship with the private rented sector (PRS) to both maintain existing stock and encourage greater investment. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Ms McAllan said she would act on stalled developments, which she calls an 'untapped area,' and said the Scottish Government is 'brokering' those issues with developers to 'unlock tens of thousands of houses'. David J Alexander is an expert in Scotland's rental sector These developments are stalled due to continued uncertainty over the Scottish Government's direction on the private rented sector. Proposals in the Scottish Housing Bill to introduce rent controls don't help despite proof from the Governments' own data showing this policy results in greater costs for tenants. The most recent statistics reveal that the Scottish Government's intervention in the PRS – through its Cost of Living (Tenant Protection) Scotland Act 2022 which introduced temporary rent controls – resulted in rents rising at a faster rate in two years than they had in the preceding 12. Between 2010 and 2022 average rent rises across Scotland for one, two, three and four-bedroom properties were up £138; £182; £232; and £523 respectively. In the following two years between 2022 and 2024 average rents increased by £130; £157; £230; and £333 for one, two, three and four-bedroom properties. In cash terms rents rose in two years at almost the same level that they did over the previous 12 years. These figures highlight just how destructive the Scottish Government's intervention into the PRS was between 2022 and 2024. A major outcome of this policy has been the freezing of property investment, falling housebuilding levels, with money intended to be invested in Scotland to build more properties being transferred to other parts of the UK. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad If Ms McAllan is to make an impact on the staggering levels of housing need in Scotland, then she must embrace the private rented sector. She should not interfere in the market with rent controls and should be encouraging greater investment through policies which encourage growth over the long-term through support of the PRS. Mairi McAllan 'must embrace the private rented sector' (Picture: Jeff) The new Housing Secretary needs to put in place a ten-year plan which addresses Scotland's enormous housing problems. More housebuilding, more involvement and encouragement of the PRS, more social housing and a plan that ensures there are substantially more homes available in all markets in the future. With 250,000 people on the social housing waiting list, 10,000 children in temporary housing and a private rented sector which has been experiencing unprecedented demand there is an immediate need for clarity and action. Housing policy needs the involvement of all interested parties, and a strategy that looks beyond a single electoral cycle if the housing emergency is to be tackled.

Gas use falls to fresh lows in Europe's main gas trading hub
Gas use falls to fresh lows in Europe's main gas trading hub

Reuters

time23 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Gas use falls to fresh lows in Europe's main gas trading hub

LITTLETON, Colorado, July 17 (Reuters) - Gas-fired electricity production has dropped to record lows in the home country of Europe's largest gas-trading hub, dealing a fresh blow to natural gas bulls who eye Europe as a key growth market for sales of LNG and pipelined gas supplies. The Title Transfer Facility in the Netherlands establishes the main benchmark natural gas price for most of Europe, and the Netherlands' extensive pipeline networks and central location give it insight into gas supply and demand trends. The Netherlands itself has historically been a heavy gas consumer, and from 2000 to 2020 relied on natural gas for well over half of its utility electricity supplies, according to energy thinktank Ember. However, since Russia's invasion of Ukraine in 2022, Dutch utilities have aggressively slashed natural gas use, and over the first half of 2025 gas power plants supplied only a third of the country's electricity. For major natural gas producers and exporters such as the United States, Russia and Qatar, the rapid and sustained cuts to gas use by a formerly integral gas consumer are cause for alarm, as it may herald further cuts for Europe as a whole. Despite its relatively small size and population, the Netherlands wields considerable influence regionally and globally. The country's massive port facilities around Rotterdam are the main entry and exit points for crude oil, refined products, crops and many consumer goods into and out of Europe. The Netherlands is also home to a large high-tech industry and several multi-national corporations which rely on the country's strong infrastructure and global connections. The country's strategic importance is reflected in the status of the Dutch government, which is highly influential within the European parliament and plays a key role in shaping regional policies on trade, agriculture and finance. Dutch utilities have also been leaders in adopting clean energy supplies, despite once being home of the headquarters of oil and gas major Shell (SHEL.L), opens new tab. Between 2022 and 2024, electricity production from clean power supplies jumped by 27% in the Netherlands compared to a 16% rise in clean power output within the European Union over the same period, Ember data shows. That outsized growth was driven by a 57% jump in wind power and a 34% rise in solar power electricity generation. That aggressive increase in renewable energy sources in turn changed the balance of the country's electricity generation mix. Until 2023, the country was primarily powered by fossil fuels, but since then clean energy sources have become the primary fuels for electricity generation and so far in 2025 have generated 57% of the country's electricity. Despite the switches, electricity supplies scaled record highs in 2024 to ensure that the country's electricity output kept up with demand needs. Wholesale power prices in the Netherlands have also remained competitive within Europe as the Dutch power system cut back on gas use and added clean power output, and so far in 2025 have averaged slightly less than those of Germany. Over the first half of 2025, Dutch wholesale spot power prices have averaged around 90 euros per megawatt hour, according to LSEG. That price is roughly a third more than those in nuclear-powered France, but is lower than the average prices recorded in several other European nations including Italy and most of Eastern Europe. The fact that Dutch power costs have remained in line with the regional average despite sustained reductions to fossil fuel use in electricity generation will likely influence the energy planning of other nations in the region. The successful transition from fossil fuels being the main pillar of the country's electricity system until 2022 to a more minor role in 2025 could be seen as a blueprint for other utility networks also keen to cut back on fossil fuel use. And given the country's prowess in rolling out clean energy supplies, Dutch firms with expertise in offshore wind, solar systems and batteries are collaborating with other regional utilities to lift clean power output in other countries. Dutch firms are also pioneering the deployment of green energy to produce green hydrogen, which regional industries are hoping will help decarbonise their power needs and further reduce regional reliance on fossil fuels. All together, the Netherlands has generated strong momentum in its clean-energy push, which looks liable to extend well beyond its national borders and could result in further Europe-wide cuts to gas consumption in the years ahead. The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters. Enjoying this column? Check out Reuters Open Interest (ROI), your essential new source for global financial commentary. ROI delivers thought-provoking, data-driven analysis of everything from swap rates to soybeans. Markets are moving faster than ever. ROI can help you keep up. Follow ROI on LinkedIn, opens new tab and X, opens new tab.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store