Decisions On Christchurch Intensification Plan
The Minister Responsible for RMA Reform, Chris Bishop, has today released his decisions on 17 recommendations referred to him by Christchurch City Council on its Intensification Planning Instrument (Plan Change 14).
'In December 2024, the Council accepted the majority of the Independent Hearings Panel's (IHP) recommendations on those parts of Plan Change 14 subject to Policies 3 and 4 of the National Policy Statement on Urban Development 2020 (NPS-UD),' Minister Bishop says.
'These recommendations were incorporated into its district plan. The Council rejected 20 of the IHP's recommendations and referred them, along with its own alternative recommendations, to me for a final decision in early 2025.
'I have carefully considered this matter and taken extensive advice from officials. The law requires that I only consider matters that the IHP could have taken into account when making its recommendations.
'I have made decisions on 17 of the 20 recommendations referred to me by the Council, which relate to a range of issues including qualifying matters, zoning and built form standards.
'Together, these decisions will enable a greater level of development in and around Christchurch City's urban centres as required by Policies 3 and 4 of the NPS-UD.
'I have not made decisions on three recommendations relating to Daresbury House, Antonio Hall and the Piko Residential Character Area.
'I intend to consider these recommendations once the Council has decided on the zoning of these areas. The Council may refer these decisions to me again ahead of deciding on the balance of Plan Change 14.
'I thank the Councillors, the Independent Hearings Panel and Council staff for the work undertaken on the Intensification Streamlined Planning Process so far.'
Minister Bishop's decisions, made under Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991, are final and cannot be appealed to the Environment Court.
A table outlining the decisions is attached here.
Policies 3 and 4 of the NPS-UD are set out on page 11 of the National Policy Statement on Urban Development 2020.
The Minister's decision making process is set out in Section 105, Schedule 1 of the RMA: .
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
8 hours ago
- Scoop
Local Water Done Well: Central Hawke's Bay Remains At The Regional Table For Local Water Done Well
Central Hawke's Bay Councillors voted unanimously to remain at the table for the next stages of the design of a Regional Water Services Council-Controlled Organisation in Hawke's Bay under the Government's Local Water Done Well policy. Deliberations were held to consider the community's submissions on three options, a Regional CCO with our Hawke's Bay councils, in-house delivery, and a standalone CCO, and the views heard during the five-week consultation period. 'Now's the time we need to sit at the table with Government and our regional partners to ensure the challenges of the district's three waters infrastructure are turned into opportunities for generations to come,'Central Hawke's Bay Mayor Alex Walker said. From the submissions it was clear that those residents connected to and paying for water, supported change to the Regional CCO the most – it's this group of people that are most impacted, she said. 'But we also recognise this is a complex issue of ownership, control, Government reach, trust, confidence, as well as affordability. 'We've listened to these points, and they helped strengthen our response. Your voices have armed us with the support for clear advocacy in the region and to push back at Government policy, and how to better right-size our investment. 'Addressing the challenges of our water infrastructure is one of the most significant – if not the most significant issue for this district. We have been advocating to Government, and anyone who will listen that the system is broken and must change to support districts like ours," Walker said. 'I have called on Local Government Minister Simon Watts, imploring him to consider changes that would benefit smaller rural communities, including Central Hawke's Bay.' Local Water Done Well isn't the silver bullet for making water services delivery affordable in Central Hawke's Bay. However, it begins to address the wider challenges with water services delivery in New Zealand, said Chief Executive Central Hawke's Bay District Council Doug Tate. Council will continue working to understand how it can make the investment options more affordable, he said. 'The hard reality is that this won't come without its risks or trade-offs to the resilience and performance of our networks. 'Nothing about what we need to do is new. We have been highlighting the challenges and need for major investment in our infrastructure since 2017. The regular water shutdowns our community face are a reminder of the investment required for our ageing infrastructure.
Scoop
11 hours ago
- Scoop
Hutt City Council Affirms Commitment To Free Speech, Free Speech Union Settles Court Case
Following a legal battle between Hutt City Council and the Free Speech Union over the Council's censorship of inserts on Council sites, the parties have agreed to settle. The Council will make several public statements affirming its commitment to free speech, and its role as a gateway for information, not a gatekeeper, says Jonathan Ayling, Chief Executive of the Free Speech Union. 'It is not the role of local councils to decide what ratepayers do and don't read. We took Hutt City Council and its Chief Executive, Jo Miller, to court when they refused to resolve the matter with us. Local ratepayers deserve better. 'The Hutt City Council removed a paid advertisement insert by the New Zealand Centre for Political Research (NZCPR) from newspapers from all council sites. The insert was from 'Treaty of Waitangi – An Explanation' by Sir Āpirana Ngata and was published in 31 NZME and Stuff newspapers. 'However, we now welcome Hutt City Council's agreement to settle with us and their commitment to free speech and the right to impart and receive information and opinions as a critical part of our society. They've also acknowledged that if similar situations arise in the future, the Council would be likely to adopt a different approach. They've confirmed that the role of the local library is not to act as a gatekeeper of information, and that ratepayers should be free to access information. 'Local councils around the country should take note. They can't pick and choose when Kiwis' speech rights apply. Ratepayers not only deserve, but also have a right, to decide whether to engage with content or not. Local councils must respect this.'
Scoop
12 hours ago
- Scoop
Mounting Legal Threats And Property Deal Patterns Spark Fresh Call For National Inquiry
Tauranga, NZ – Civic watchdog and advocacy group Lobby for Good is renewing its call for an independent investigation and a full Auditor-General inquiry after its legal advisor, Kirsten Murfitt (Principal at KM Law), uncovered another high-risk land transaction involving Tauranga City Council. The deal saw land at 57 Pitau Road, sold to a developer for $6.65 million, then bought back within seconds the same day for $13.59 million. No open tender. No clear explanation. Even more concerning, the land appears to have been subject to the Public Works Act, which legally requires it to be offered back to the original owner. That offer-back isn't recorded on the title, and Council's justification relies on a vague reference to a 'successor.' 'This isn't just about one deal,' says Erika Harvey, Director of Public Affairs at Lobby for Good. 'It's about a pattern, deals that quietly transfer public value to private hands, often without oversight or genuine public input.' Harvey says that in investigating other developments across Tauranga, Lobby for Good and her legal advisor Kirsten Murfitt have already encountered legal threats aimed at stifling scrutiny and public questioning. 'These legal threats didn't arise from the Pitau Road development, but based on the behaviour we've seen elsewhere, we are concerned that the same approach could be used to silence public concern here too,' Harvey says. Lobby for Good, in partnership with its external legal advisors at KM Law, have now documented at least seven concerning property or governance decisions made under Tauranga's unelected commissioners, including the undervalued sale of the Marine Precinct, hidden influence over candidate selection, heavily redacted information requests, and clauses in elder housing contracts requiring Council to repurchase land before on-selling it. 'This is soft corruption,' Harvey says. 'Legal-looking deals that quietly shift public value into private hands. And now, instead of transparency, we are seeing patterns of legal intimidation being used to discourage public scrutiny.' Lobby for Good reports that residents from the Pitau Road community have contacted them, feeling helpless, angry, and voiceless. They're deeply concerned that this high-rise development will overshadow their homes, devalue their properties, destroy the neighbourhood's character, increase traffic and stormwater problems, and set a dangerous precedent for suburban intensification without proper consultation. Residents say they've been shut out of the process from day one, with decisions made behind closed doors under fast-track consenting rules that silenced the community's voice. 'We hear you,' says Harvey. 'This is your neighbourhood, your skyline, your home. You deserve to be heard.' Lobby for Good is calling on residents affected by the Pitau Road development to visit and register their interest to attend a community meeting about the Pitau development. If there is sufficient interest, Lobby for Good will support residents in bringing their voices into the mainstream, connecting them with wider networks, and working together to prevent this from happening to other everyday Kiwis in communities across New Zealand. 'In a healthy democracy, journalists and advocates shouldn't need legal defence just to ask questions,' says Harvey. 'That's why we're again calling on the Office of the Auditor-General and the Department of Internal Affairs to investigate the full scope of governance failures, and whether legal intimidation is being used to suppress public participation in Tauranga.' Lobby for Good is calling for: A public-facing, independent investigation into all land and asset sales approved under Tauranga's unelected commissioners. A formal inquiry by the Office of the Auditor-General into Council financial decisions, consultation failures, and conflicts of interest. An immediate review of the use of legal threats to suppress scrutiny of public decisions. 'If nothing improper occurred, there should be no need for threats, only answers,' says Harvey. 'And if this is happening in Tauranga, what else is happening behind closed doors across New Zealand?'
