
What flood insurance does and does not cover
That's because oftentimes insurance doesn't cover what the policyholder thinks it does — or thinks it should.
The disappointing surprise is that while the standard home insurance policy does cover fire and wind damage, even good property insurance typically doesn't cover things like flooding and earthquakes, which usually require a special and separate policy for each.
Here are the things to know about flood insurance.
Who has flood insurance
Most people who have flood insurance are required to have it.
Although many property owners have the option of purchasing flood insurance, it is mandated for government-backed mortgages that sit in areas that the Federal Emergency Management Agency deems highest risk. Many banks require it in high-risk zones, too.
But most private insurance companies don't carry flood insurance, leaving the National Flood Insurance Program run by FEMA as the primary provider.
Congress created the federal flood insurance program more than 50 years ago when many private insurers stopped offering policies in high-risk areas.
FEMA's Flood Map Service Center has an online tool to check your area. FEMA notes even a 1% chance of flooding is considered high risk because it amounts to a 1-in-4 chance of flooding over the life of a 30-year mortgage.
Who doesn't have flood insurance
Homeowners in high-risk areas who should have it sometimes decide not to get it. Someone who pays off their mortgage can drop their flood insurance once it's not required. Or if they purchase a house or mobile home with cash, they may not opt for it at all.
The rest of us are just rolling the dice, even though experts have long warned that flooding can happen just about anywhere because flood damage isn't just water surging and seeping into the land — it's also water from banks, as well as mudflow and torrential rains.
Mark Friedlander, spokesman for the Insurance Information Institute, an industry group, said only about 6% of U.S. households have a flood policy — primarily in the costal areas prone to hurricanes. That rate has remained steady in recent years despite the increasing frequency of severe flooding events, including in areas that are not formally considered by the government to be high risk.
'Lack of flood coverage is the largest insurance gap across the country,' Friedlander said in an email. 'Ninety percent of U.S. natural disasters involve flooding and flooding can occur just about anywhere it rains.'
What flood insurance covers
Even if a homeowner does have flood insurance, the coverage may not be enough to make a policyholder whole again.
FEMA's National Flood Insurance Program only covers up to $250,000 for single-family homes and $100,000 for contents. Renters can get up to $100,000 for contents, and commercial flood insurance will cover up to $500,000.
There are concerns that such flooding coverage limits are not robust enough, especially at a time when climate change is making strong hurricanes even stronger and making storms in general wetter, slower and more prone to intensifying rapidly.
And what typically happens to the people without flood insurance in a major storm is that they can try to recover some money from their standard home insurance but may end up in a fight to determine what damage is or isn't wind versus rain, or even 'wind-driven rain.'
Don Hornstein, an insurance law expert at the University of North Carolina, said the line between wind and water is a thin but very clear line that technical experts can determine. Should there be a proverbial tie, the law favors the insurance company.
'If the house was simultaneously destroyed by flood and, concurrently (by) wind, it's not covered by private insurance,' Hornstein said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
44 minutes ago
- Reuters
Trump interest in Russia sanctions raises Ukraine allies' hopes
WASHINGTON, July 12 (Reuters) - A bipartisan U.S. bill that would hit Russia with sanctions in a bid to pressure Moscow into good-faith peace negotiations with Ukraine has gained momentum this week in Congress, but it still lacks the presidential push it needs to get over the finish line. Now, Ukraine's supporters in Washington and Kyiv, who have for months hoped for President Donald Trump to throw his weight behind the bill, are anxiously awaiting what the Republican president has said will be a "major statement" on Russia on Monday. Trump, who vowed during his election campaign to end Russia's invasion of Ukraine, has given no details on what his planned announcement would entail, but over the past few weeks he has grown increasingly and publicly frustrated with Russian President Vladimir Putin over his reluctance to accept a ceasefire and the growing civilian death toll of Russian attacks. On Tuesday, Trump approved sending U.S. defensive weapons to Ukraine. Two days later, he came closer than ever to endorsing the sanctions bill, although he has not yet signed off on the legislation's text, according to a person with knowledge of his thinking. Republican Senate Majority Leader John Thune told reporters earlier in the week that the Senate could vote on the bill this month. Mike Johnson, the top House Republican, has expressed similar optimism, while Republican Senator Lindsey Graham and Secretary of State Marco Rubio have privately told European diplomats that the bill will move imminently, according to a source with direct knowledge of the matter. "The Senate will move soon on a tough sanctions bill – not only against Russia – but also against countries like China and India that buy Russian energy products that finance Putin's war machine," Graham wrote on X on Tuesday. Still, it was unclear if Trump had given up on pushing for diplomacy with Russia. And the extensive veto power on sanctions that the White House is demanding could render the bill more symbolic than substantive, some supporters acknowledge. Speaking to reporters in Kuala Lumpur on Friday following his second in-person meeting with Russian Foreign Sergei Lavrov, Rubio said "a new idea" was discussed that he would be taking back to Trump for further consultations. He declined to give further details. "That new concept is – this new approach is not something that automatically leads to peace, but it could potentially open the door to a path," Rubio said. But he also reiterated Trump's frustration over Moscow's unwillingness to be more flexible and said Americans had told the Russians weeks ago that a sanctions bill could well pass. The bill, whose lead sponsors are Graham and Democratic Senator Richard Blumenthal, would levy extensive sanctions against various Russian individuals, government bodies and financial institutions. It would also punish other countries that trade with Moscow, imposing 500% tariffs on nations that buy Russian oil, gas, uranium and other exports. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy has repeatedly urged Ukraine's Western allies to impose tougher sanctions on Moscow to force the Kremlin to agree to a ceasefire as a step towards reaching an end to the war, now 40 months old. Work on the bill has picked up pace over the last week, according to two U.S. officials. One person familiar with Trump's thinking said the text still needs work. The current version, that person said, does not give the president enough flexibility to carry out his foreign policy agenda independent of Congress. The White House was working with Congress and the bill's sponsors to ensure it would be "an enhancement to the president's foreign policy objectives," that person added. One person with knowledge of the drafting process said congressional staff had been ironing out technical issues in recent days, such as how to keep any sanctions from affecting the operations of the U.S. embassy in Moscow. A spokesperson for Graham told Reuters the bill would probably not come to the floor until the week of July 21 at the earliest, due to other legislative priorities. The House of Representatives, which will need to vote on the measure, leaves for August recess in two weeks, meaning floor time is at a premium. That is particularly true if a Trump request to slash $9.4 billion in spending on foreign aid and public broadcasting - which passed the House and is currently in the Senate - heads back to the House following any changes. Some supporters of the bill acknowledge that the legislation is largely symbolic, given that Trump would have broad authority to veto the sanctions, and in any case could simply issue sanctions from the executive branch if he wishes. "The president already has all these authorities," said one Republican Senate staffer.


Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Forget Amazon Prime Day! This Dyson bladeless fan is now a massive $99 off at QVC: 'The absolute BEST fan we've ever owned'
Daily Mail journalists select and curate the products that feature on our site. If you make a purchase via links on this page we will earn commission - learn more Amazon Prime Day might be over, but we've found even better deals in the QVC sale you'd be foolish to ignore, including over 25 per cent off this Dyson fan that's 'perfect for the summer heat'. One of the most sought-after fans, the Dyson AM07 Bladeless Oscillating Tower Fan, is now on sale at QVC for a Black Friday-worthy price of $269.98, down from $368.99. Dyson AM07 Bladeless Oscillating Tower Fan One of the most sought-after fans, the Dyson AM07 Bladeless Oscillating Tower Fan, is now on sale at QVC for a Black Friday-worthy price of $269.98, down from $368.99. Even better, if you're new to QVC you can bag $20 off your first order of $40 or more with code WELCOME20, taking the price down to under $250. $269.98 (was $368.99) Shop Even better, if you're new to QVC you can bag $20 off your first order of $40 or more with code WELCOME20, taking the price down to under $250. That's over $100 in savings on what hundreds of happy QVC customers are calling the ' best fan ever ' and 'fantastic' for 'cooling a large room quickly with minimal noise' - and it's not hard to see why. A popular choice among QVC shoppers, it features a sleep timer, ten airflow settings, and a slim, space-saving design, making it a perfect choice for bedrooms, offices, or smaller living spaces. It's also equipped with Dyson's Air Multiplier™ technology, which draws in and amplifies surrounding air, creating a smooth, high-velocity airflow that reaches across the room. 'I can feel the air blow on me from clear across the room,' one reviewer confirmed. 'And I have a large room.' Not only does it oscillate to cool the entire space, it's also designed with safety in mind, with no fast-spinning blades, which is ideal if you have children or pets. Plus, it even comes with a magnetized remote control you can store right on top of the fan - perfect for those who tend to misplace remotes. If you've air conditioning, the brand says it can help circulate cool air more efficiently, possibly even lowering your energy bills. With over 500 five-star reviews, users rave about the Dyson's performance, calling it ' the gold standard for fans ', which keeps them 'as cool as a cucumber'. Many praise its quiet operation and energy efficiency. One reviewer wrote: 'That fan performs WELL!!! I did NOT expect the fan to perform so well. It puts out the air!!! At times I had to turn it down because it becomes a bit too cool'. 'The absolute BEST fan we've ever owned!!!' a second five-star reviewer commented. 'Blows cool air and covers several rooms!'. With the summer heat showing no signs of slowing down, head to QVC to shop the Dyson AM07 Bladeless Oscillating Tower Fan for over $100 off before this deal ends.


The Guardian
4 hours ago
- The Guardian
Missouri's governor signs repeal of state's guaranteed paid sick leave law
Eight months after voters approved it, Missouri's governor, Mike Kehoe, signed the repeal of a law on Thursday that had guaranteed paid sick leave to workers and inflation-linked adjustments to the minimum wage. The move marked a major victory for the state's largest business group and a frustrating defeat for workers' rights advocates, who had spent years – and millions of dollars – building support for the successful ballot measure. The repeal will take effect on 28 August. Kehoe, who also signed a package of tax breaks on Thursday, described the paid sick leave law as an onerous mandate that imposed burdensome record-keeping. 'Today, we are protecting the people who make Missouri work – families, job creators and small business owners – by cutting taxes, rolling back overreach and eliminating costly mandates,' Kehoe, a Republican, said in a statement released after a private bill-signing ceremony. The new tax law excludes capital gains from individual state income taxes, expands tax breaks for seniors and disabled residents, and exempts diapers and feminine hygiene products from sales taxes. Richard von Glahn, who sponsored the worker benefit ballot initiative, said many parents felt forced to go to work instead of staying home to care for a sick child in order to pay for their rent or utilities. 'The governor signing this bill is an absolute betrayal to those families, and it hurts my heart,' said Von Glahn, policy director for Missouri Jobs With Justice. About one-third of states mandate paid sick leave, but many businesses voluntarily provide it. Nationwide, 79% of private-sector employees received paid sick leave last year, though part-time workers were significantly less likely to receive the benefit than full-time employees, according to US labor department data. Voters in Alaska, Missouri and Nebraska all approved paid sick leave measures last November. Only Alaska's, which kicked in on 1 July, has remained unchanged by state lawmakers. Before Nebraska's measure could take effect on 1 October, the state's Republican governor, Jim Pillen, signed a measure last month exempting businesses with 10 or fewer employees from the paid sick leave requirements. The revision also allows businesses to withhold paid sick leave from seasonal agricultural workers and 14- and 15-year-olds. Missouri's law allowed employees to earn one hour of paid sick time for every 30 hours worked, starting 1 May. By the time it's repealed, 17 weeks will have elapsed. That means someone working 40 hours a week could have earned 22 hours of paid sick leave. If workers don't use their paid sick leave before 28 August, there is no legal guarantee they can do so afterward. The Missouri Chamber of Commerce and Industry had made repealing the law its top legislative priority. The 'paid leave and minimum wage policies were a job killer', the chamber's president and chief executive officer, Kara Corches, said. But Missouri voters could get a second chance at mandating paid sick leave. Von Glahn has submitted a proposed ballot initiative to the secretary of state that would reinstate the repealed provisions. Because the new measure is a constitutional amendment, the state legislature would be unable to revise or repeal it without another vote of the people. Supporters have not decided whether to launch a petition drive to try to qualify the measure for the 2026 ballot.