logo
Seeing farther, striking deeper, this brigade is pushing its drones

Seeing farther, striking deeper, this brigade is pushing its drones

Yahoo02-06-2025
Soldiers with the Hawaii-based 25th Infantry Division are in the midst of a training exercise with Philippine allies that has them pushing farther and striking deeper with the help of new drones.
The 2nd Mobile Brigade Combat Team, 25th Infantry Division, is forward deployed in the Philippines, training with the 7th Infantry Division of the Philippine Armed Forces as part of a Joint Pacific Multinational Readiness Center, or JPMRC, exercise.
Maj. Gen. Marcus Evans, 25th Infantry Division commanding general, told Army Times on Monday that the most challenging part of the exercise so far has been the environmental factors. High temperatures and monsoon conditions have slammed troops as they've operated across islands and jungles in the Luzon area of the Philippines.
The exercise marks the brigade's second evolution of the Army's Transformation in Contact, or TIC, initiative following its first evolution in 2024. As part of the initiative, which seeks to modernize and evolve formations as they prepare for real-world deployments, soldiers received new drones, counter-drone equipment and electronic warfare tools.
First armor brigade conducts combat training center rotation with new tools
Since then, the unit has been issued farther-reaching drones with both medium- and long-range capabilities, giving soldiers nearly 10 times the range of previous drones.
Last year, units were limited to about a 3-kilometer distance for drones to scout enemy locations. Now they can see, sense and strike targets as far as 30 kilometers out, Evans said.
'It creates increased survivability,' Evans said of the striking range. 'It enhances their ability to protect themselves with greater standoff and strike with loitering munitions or weaponized drones.'
Meanwhile, the brigade also brought 3D printing capabilities, which it has used to make replacement parts for equipment and build nearly 50 first-person-view drones so far during the exercise, he said.
The brigade brought an estimated 2,000 soldiers from Hawaii and Guam for the exercise, with Philippine partners bringing about the same amount of manpower.
They're facing off against a simulated battalion-size enemy force equipped with its own drone, counter-drone and electronic warfare capabilities.
During its Philippine rotation last year, which was also an exportable combat training center evolution, the brigade didn't have infantry squad vehicles. This time, however, it does, and the vehicles have made a major difference for troops in both mobility and sustainability, Evans said.
The Army's TIC initiative first focused on the brigade level with dismounted units. The second iteration is looking to make similar changes in mechanized or armor formations. That also ties in division-level assets.
On this run for the 2nd Mobile Brigade Combat Team, the 25th Infantry Division is using its headquarters to simulate a larger force and bringing division assets, such as long-range fires, to the brigade.
Troops are also using the 25th Infantry Division headquarters to synchronize and integrate with the Philippine's 7th Infantry Division headquarters, Evans said.
'[Their] main objective is procedural interoperability,' Evans said. 'U.S. and Philippine forces train sustainment, movement and maneuver together. See further, sense better and be able to strike.'
Following the initial field training, the units will gather at Fort Magsaysay, Philippines, and then conduct a combined maritime, land and air movement of more than 400 kilometers into 'enemy' territory north of the outpost to Camp Melchor F. dela Cruz in mid-June, he said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

National security-focused VC firm America's Frontier Fund is raising $315 million for its debut fund
National security-focused VC firm America's Frontier Fund is raising $315 million for its debut fund

Business Insider

timean hour ago

  • Business Insider

National security-focused VC firm America's Frontier Fund is raising $315 million for its debut fund

A national security-focused VC fund, America's Frontier Fund, is raising a large new fund, capitalizing on the sector's support as the Trump administration rallies behind defense tech. The firm is raising up to $315 million for its first fund, called the Frontier Fund, according to a pitch deck viewed by Business Insider. In early 2023, the target for the fund was $500 million, per an SEC filing. The fund will consist of $140 million of private capital from limited partners and $175 million of government loans, according to the deck. The fundraise hasn't closed yet, and the terms of the deal could change. Part of the funding will come through the Small Business Investment Company Critical Technology Initiative, a program launched by the Defense Department and the Small Business Administration to grow private investment in biotech, quantum science, advanced materials, AI, space, and more. A spokesperson for the venture firm declined to comment on the fundraise. America's Frontier Fund will receive government-guaranteed loans, matching private investments up to $175 million. The firm will repay the loan with interest over a ten-year period, according to Washington Business Journal, which first reported the fund's government loans in 2024. The fund has also raised $100 million from the state of New Mexico, Bloomberg reported in 2023. The private capital raise has not been previously reported. The Frontier Fund will give the Arlington, Va.-based firm fresh cash to back startups building frontier technologies — advanced manufacturing, compute solutions, energy, and other highly technical fields — that support American economic and geopolitical influence. America's Frontier Fund recently invested in Venus Aerospace, which makes hypersonic engine technology, and Foundation Alloy, a metal production startup. $315 million is large for a first fund; market downturn, delayed initial public offerings, and more have hampered venture firm's capacity to raise large sums of money from limited partners. In 2024, 121 US-based venture capital firms raised funds for the first time, notching $5.7 billion in commitments. That year, the average size of a US-based firm's first fund was just under $41 million, over $270 million smaller than the Frontier Fund, according to data firm Pitchbook. Investments in the defense tech space have surged up to $1.4 billion in the first quarter of 2025, compared with $200 million the same period last year, according to Pitchbook. The firm also invests out of its Roadrunner Venture Studios, which backs pre-seed and seed stage startups building frontier tech primarily in New Mexico. Silicon Valley heavyweights like former Google CEO Eric Schmidt and Founders Fund partner Peter Thiel have invested in the firm's separate nonprofit arm, the America's Frontier Fund Foundation, an initiative to support US technological competitiveness, like partnering with the Austin Community College District on expanding its advanced manufacturing program. Gilman Louie, the CEO of America's Frontier Fund, previously cofounded and ran In-Q-Tel, the CIA-funded investment firm. Cofounder and managing partner Jordan Blashek formerly worked at Schmidt Futures, Eric Schmidt's family office, now Schmidt Sciences, a philanthropic organization that funds research in AI, advanced computing, biotech, climate, and other industries.

North Sea 'Very Unprotected' Against Russia—NATO Admiral
North Sea 'Very Unprotected' Against Russia—NATO Admiral

Newsweek

time2 hours ago

  • Newsweek

North Sea 'Very Unprotected' Against Russia—NATO Admiral

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The North Sea is "very unprotected" and vulnerable to possible Russian sabotage attempts on critical undersea infrastructure NATO nations heavily rely on, according to a senior Dutch military official. Moscow's presence in the North Sea has increased, "and so the threat as well," said Rear Admiral Paul Flos, one of the founding members of the multinational Seabed Security Experimentation Center (SeaSEC) set up in The Hague to protect underwater infrastructure. The North Sea is "very much" at risk from Russian activity, Flos told Newsweek, adding: "They're not there because they like our waters." Critical Undersea Infrastructure Crisscrossing beneath our oceans and seas are cables and pipelines vital to everyday life, including ensuring the lights stay on and that bank payments are processed. Roughly 1.3 million kilometers of cables—equivalent to about 800,000 miles—are used for $10 trillion in financial transactions each day, NATO chief Mark Rutte said at the start of 2025. Undersea cables carry more than 95 percent of all internet traffic, Rutte said. Photo-illustration by Newsweek/Getty But these networks are exposed, and there are simply too many cables and pipelines to shield at any one time, said Laurence Roche, from NATO's Italy-based Centre for Maritime Research and Experimentation. It is "really hard to protect" critical undersea infrastructure, Roche told Newsweek. NATO is certainly trying. In 2024, the alliance established a new United Kingdom-based center, specifically tasked with developing strategies to protect undersea networks, reporting to NATO's Maritime Command. The alliance then launched its "Baltic Sentry" initiative to track ships moving through the Baltic Sea after several cables and pipelines were damaged or severed in late 2023. The U.K. also launched the Proteus, a first-of-its-kind surveillance ship, to monitor underwater activities and control uncrewed underwater vehicles (UUVs) nearly two years ago. North Sea and the Baltic The Baltic Sea is better known than the North Sea for highlighting the vulnerability of the alliance's critical undersea infrastructure. It is occasionally dubbed a "NATO lake," the water bracketed by alliance members and Kaliningrad, the Russian exclave home to a formidable military footprint and Moscow's Baltic Fleet. NATO countries have logged a spate of incidents involving critical undersea infrastructure in the past year and a half, largely blamed on suspected sabotage by Russia in the wake of its full-scale invasion of Ukraine. Accidental damage can, and often does, happen, but officials are increasingly speaking out about attacks blamed on Moscow. The most high-profile incidents include damage to a power cable and two communications lines in the Baltic Sea on December 25, 2024. Authorities quickly cast suspicion on the Eagle S, a Cook Islands-flagged oil tanker believed to be part of Russia's "shadow fleet" of vessels used to circumvent sanctions. Finnish authorities stated in mid-June that they had concluded a criminal investigation and suspected senior officers aboard the ship of "aggravated criminal mischief and aggravated interference with telecommunications" in connection with the dragging of an anchor. Helsinki's prosecutor general is weighing up charges, the country's National Bureau of Investigation said in a statement. Unnamed Western intelligence officials told the Associated Press in January that the recent damage to undersea infrastructure could be caused by anchors accidentally dragging on poorly staffed and decrepit ships. High-voltage cables that connect electricity systems between countries, when disrupted, can cost around $14 million each day, according to the Rand think tank. The total bill for oil and gas pipelines being knocked out for months can reach the tens of billions, the organization said in June. Admiral Sir Tony Radakin, the U.K.'s top military official, said in early 2022 that there had been a "phenomenal increase" in Russian underwater activity in the past two decades, with Moscow able to "potentially exploit the world's real information system, which is undersea cables that go all around the world." Former British Defense Minister Ben Wallace, still in post in 2023, stated that Russian submarines had taken "strange routes that they normally wouldn't do," including in the North Sea. The Baltic and North Seas have a relatively similar shallowness, but the North Sea is more sandy where the Baltic is rocky, said Flos. "So, often, cables are easier to destroy in the Baltic than in the North Sea," Flos said. "But the threat is the same," he said. Sabotage acts like dragging anchors can only be used at certain places in the world because of the shallowness of the water, like in the Baltic, said Sidharth Kaushal, a senior research fellow for sea power at the U.K.-based Royal United Services Institute (RUSI) think tank. To the west, several NATO countries look out onto the North Sea, including the U.K. and the Netherlands. British Defense Secretary John Healey said at the start of the year that the Yantar, a Russian vessel spotted in the North Sea, was a "spy ship" on a mission to gather intelligence and map the U.K.'s seabed network. The Yantar was spotted in November 2024 "loitering over U.K. critical undersea infrastructure," Healey said. The Russian embassy in London hit back at the remarks, stating in January that the claims were "completely groundless." "Russia has never posed such threats," the embassy added. The Yantar is one of the vessels operated by Russia's Main Directorate of Deep-Sea Research, or GUGI, a shadowy branch of the military that answers directly to the Russian defense minister and, ultimately, to Russian President Vladimir Putin. The GUGI has a collection of submarines and surface ships, such as the Belgorod submarine, that can simultaneously carry nuclear-armed torpedoes and control small submersibles capable of diving deep underwater. GUGI performs a variety of roles for the Kremlin, ranging from laying sensors on the seabed to surveillance, espionage, and larger strategic functions, Kaushal told Newsweek. In the North Sea, rather than relying on anchor dragging, GUGI could use ships like the Yantar to detect critical infrastructure before deploying UUVs or remotely operated vehicles, he said. Within GUGI's ranks, Kaushal said, the organization has hydronauts—specialized personnel who pass "punishing" entrance criteria to steer submersibles at extreme depths. These hydronauts are pulled from Russia's 29th Separate Submarine Division, based at the submarine hub of Gadzhiyevo in the northwestern Murmansk region and close to the Northern Fleet headquarters. Who's Responsible for Protecting Cables and Pipelines? "We see you," the U.K.'s Healey told lawmakers in January this year. "We know what you are doing." Flos is less sure. "What they're doing there, nobody knows," he said. "That's the challenge." Although allied militaries can detect where Russia is poking around in the North Sea, their goals are murky, but there is "very strong evidence that they also used unmanned underwater vessels," Flos said. Reports in British media earlier this year indicated the U.K. military had found Russian drones close to critical undersea infrastructure. Western militaries are well-acquainted with unarmed surveillance ships like the Yantar, making this type of vessel much easier to track than some of Russia's advanced submarines, Kaushal said. And there has been rapid improvement on what the alliance can observe of Russia's activity in the North Sea, even since the start of the year, Flos said. "We're not blind anymore," he said. Cooperation between allied countries has improved over the last year, particularly in cultivating a better understanding of how civilian ships and support vessels are utilized by the Kremlin, Kaushal said. But a big question remains: Whose job is it to bat away Russia's interest in the North Sea's critical undersea infrastructure? Cables and pipelines are, the vast majority of the time, owned by private companies. "Are the asset owners responsible? Are the nations responsible? Is the Coast Guard responsible?" Flos asked. It's "hugely complicated," he said, adding that the conversations were still happening. NATO has emphasized the need to establish rapid connections with private companies and industrial players to more effectively detect threats to pipelines and cables, as well as to maintain infrastructure. "We have to increase out cooperation with industries on all kinds of levels," Flos said. The Dutch Navy official said he had emphasized in recent days that there needed to be more trust between governments, militaries and industry. There does seem to be a growing consensus within NATO that protecting infrastructure used by its members is a "collective military responsibility," added Kaushal. But it's often opaque which powers exist to stop suspicious ships operating in international waters, he said.

Bangladesh tribunal sentences Hasina to jail for contempt over a claim she had a license to kill

time3 hours ago

Bangladesh tribunal sentences Hasina to jail for contempt over a claim she had a license to kill

DHAKA, Bangladesh -- A special tribunal has sentenced Bangladesh's former leader Sheikh Hasina to six months in jail after she was found in contempt of court for allegedly claiming she had a license to kill at least 227 people. Wednesday's sentence was the first in any case against Hasina since she fled to India during a mass uprising last year that toppled her 15-year rule. The contempt case stemmed from a leaked audio recording of a supposed phone conversation between Hasina and a leader of the student wing of her political party. A person alleged to be Hasina is heard on the audio saying: 'There are 227 cases against me, so I now have a license to kill 227 people.' The Criminal Investigation Department confirmed the audio's authenticity through forensic analysis. The recording showed Hasina's anger at the charges of murder and numerous other crimes against her under the interim administration of Nobel Peace Prize laureate Muhammad Yunus, who vowed to punish Hasina and her top aides for the deaths of hundreds of people in the uprising against her. The sentencing by the Dhaka-based International Crimes Tribunal came as a trial against her being held in absentia on charges of crimes against humanity began in June. The tribunal had ordered Hasina and her former home minister to respond by May 15. When they failed to do so, the tribunal summoned them May 25 to appear in court June 16. Later the tribunal asked for notices to be published in newspapers asking Hasina to appear. The prosecution said later neither of the suspects appeared before the court or explained their absence through a lawyer. In such circumstances, the tribunal has the authority to issue a sentence under the law. Hasina and her Awami League party had earlier criticized the tribunal and its prosecution team for their connection with political parties, especially with the Jamaat-e-Islami party. The Yunus-led government has banned the former ruling Awami League party and amended laws to allow for the party to be prosecuted for its role during the uprising. In February, the U.N. human rights office estimated that up to 1,400 people may have been killed in Bangladesh over three weeks in the crackdown on the student-led protests against Hasina, who was the country's longest serving prime minister. The tribunal was established by Hasina in 2009 to investigate and try crimes involving Bangladesh's independence war in 1971. The tribunal under Hasina tried politicians, mostly from the Jamaat-e-Islami party, for their actions during the nine-month war against Pakistan. Aided by India, Bangladesh gained independence from Pakistan under the leadership of Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, Hasina's father and the country's first leader.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store