Google's Best Gemini AI Chatbot Is Now Free To Use, But There's A Catch
Just days after its initial release to paying Google Gemini Advanced users on March 25, Google announced that Gemini 2.5 Pro (experimental) is now available to all Gemini users, with or without a paid Google One AI Premium subscription.
In a recent tweet from the Google Gemini App account, the company states:
Gemini users will now see the new Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental model offered alongside existing models in the Gemini app or at gemini.google.com. Just select Gemini 2.5 Pro to use it.
Since its release, Gemini 2.5 Pro has been making waves, outperforming competitors in key areas. According to Google, Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental 'leads common benchmarks by meaningful margins' thanks to its strong reasoning and code capabilities.
These claims are backed up by chart-topping scores on the LMArena leaderboard, where human voters rated it above strong competition from leading competitors Grok 3 Preview and ChatGPT 4.5 Preview. Forbes contributor Janakiram MSV provides more detail about Gemini 2.5 Pro in his recent article, but the key takeaway is that it's significantly more powerful than the previous Gemini 2.0 version. I can provide better responses and generate far superior code than previous iterations.
Google reserves its best AI tools for paying Gemini Advanced users, so free users may wonder what the catch is.
As you might expect, the 'free' version of Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental isn't quite as capable as the full version available to paying customers. While the model itself remains unchanged, free users are limited in terms of the level of access they have to it.
In a follow-up comment from the official Google Gemini App account, the company explains that free users 'have rate limits on this model, which do not apply to Advanced users. Your sub also gets you a longer context window.'
Rate limits are how the company restricts how often you can make requests to Gemini, while the size of the context window determines how much information the AI model can process in one go, i.e., the number and size of documents, images and video it can process in one go.
Gemini 2.5 Pro comes with a large context window of 1 million tokens, roughly equivalent to the complete works of Shakespeare. Google plans to expand this to 2 million tokens soon, further enhancing its capabilities.
Gemini Advanced users can therefore use Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental more frequently and upload bigger documents for processing. Your particular needs will determine whether the paid upgrade is worthwhile.
Furthermore, only the paying Gemini Advanced users can use the latest AI model with Canvas, the shared digital space where you can create and edit documents and code interactively with Gemini. Much of the buzz around Gemini 2.5 Pro's capabilities depends on using Canvas for advanced AI-assisted tasks such as vibe coding, with several praising the tool's abilities to generate graphical apps that can run directly in your browser from a single text prompt. You'll still need Gemini Advanced to take full advantage of these capabilities.
Google's free upgrade to Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental brings a welcome surprise upgrade for all Gemini users, but you'll have to upgrade to Gemini Advanced to see what it can really do. However, it would be helpful if Google made the differences more explicit, as comments to Google's original announcement reveal that Gemini Advanced users are now questioning the need to retain their subscriptions.
Google's API pricing for Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental limits free users to just five requests per minute and 25 requests per day, whereas paying accounts get up to 20 requests per minute and 100 requests per day, along with double the maximum speed. Limits via the Gemini app and gemini.google.com may vary.
Follow @paul_monckton on Instagram.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Atlantic
an hour ago
- Atlantic
The AI Birthday Letter That Blew Me Away
In May, I asked Google's chatbot, Gemini, to write a birthday letter to my best friend. Within seconds, it spat out the most impressive piece of AI writing I have ever encountered. Instead of reading as soulless, machine-generated text, the letter felt unnervingly like something I might've actually written. 'You're probably rolling your eyes,' the letter read, after a sentence that my friend would most definitely have rolled his eyes at. All I had typed into the chatbot was a nine-word prompt containing my friend's first name and the age he was turning. But the letter referenced real moments from our friendship. One paragraph recounted a conversation we had shared on the eve of college graduation; another reflected on a challenging period we had navigated together. Gemini had even included his correct birth date. I hadn't planned to let AI write the birthday letter for me. When I opened Google Drive to type it up myself, Gemini popped up and volunteered to help out. Since the spring, when I first signed up for a free trial of Google's AI Pro subscription—normally $20 a month—Gemini has followed me around the Googleverse. The tool is akin to a souped-up version of Microsoft Clippy: In Gmail, it offers to summarize long threads and draft entire messages. In Sheets, it volunteers to assist with data analysis, generating colorful bar graphs at the click of a button. But Gemini has proved most alluring in Drive, where the chatbot can automatically find and consult relevant files before generating text. That's how Gemini was able to whip up such a good birthday letter: It already knew a lot about me (and, by association, my friend). Of all the things that chatbots excel at, they have generally not been very reliable for individualized tasks. Ask an AI tool to write an essay on, say, the history of popcorn, and you will likely get a decent response. But ask it to write a speech for your sister's wedding, and the result will probably be quite poor. You might get a better speech if you feed the chatbot a decade of your texts and emails, her wedding website, and previous toasts you've given for other loved ones. But that process takes time and effort, which most people don't put in. Tech executives dream instead of hyper-personalized chatbots that automatically have access to all of the information they might ever need. After sucking up the web to build models capable of generating coherent text, AI companies are now mining our personal troves of data to teach chatbots everything there is to know about us. Google, with its colossal data empire in tow, is particularly well positioned to lead the way. If OpenAI introduced us to the Hallmark-card version of AI writing, Google is ushering in a new chapter where chatbots are capable of drafting the sort of intimate letters you might write to your best friend. The birthday letter was just the start. Not only could Gemini write fairly convincingly in my voice; the chatbot, as I quickly learned, was teeming with my personal information. When asked, it accurately described my financial goals, my vaccination history, and my parents' physical appearances. To test the limits of how much Google knew about me, I told the chatbot to make a CIA dossier. The first section ('IDENTIFYING INFORMATION') listed my full name, email address, and current location. Not too crazy. Section two ('RELATIONSHIPS & PERSONAL HISTORY') accurately described the details of both a long-term romantic relationship and a brief high-school fling. By section three ('PSYCHOLOGICAL PROFILE'), the chatbot was dissecting my communication style and emotional intelligence. And in section four ('POTENTIAL VULNERABILITIES'), Gemini had outlined my travel history, citing the time I had spent abroad as an exchange student, and diagnosed me as an overthinker. Not everything in the dossier was accurate. Gemini struggled to disentangle fact from fiction, occasionally confusing details from short stories I've written with real-life anecdotes. When I later asked the chatbot if it knew my birthday, it told me I was born in 2010 (wrong, though it got the date right on a second try). Even though the birthday letter was startlingly good, Gemini occasionally slipped into a more generic chatbot register—at one point, it described the future as 'everything shimmering in the distance.' Still, Gemini knows me much better than other chatbots do. When I asked ChatGPT to create a CIA dossier, it failed miserably: The bot overinterpreted my prompt, explaining that a key part of my personality was my 'taste for espionage tropes.' The other details it added were vague and unimpressive. There's a clear reason for the discrepancy. Unlike Google, OpenAI doesn't have half my lifetime's worth of my data stored up. In Gmail, I have more than 200,000 emails, amounting to 30 gigabytes, some of which date back to elementary school. My Drive contains another 45 gigabytes of files, such as chemistry study guides and travel itineraries, half-written poems and unsent love letters, budgeting spreadsheets and New Year's resolutions, insurance appeals and symptom trackers. Even if you don't spend your free time soliloquizing in Google Docs like I sometimes do, the search giant likely knows enough about you to train your own custom chatbot. Our emails, files, and browsing histories are all already at the company's fingertips. Chrome is the most popular browser in the world; almost o ne-third of the planet's emails are sent with Gmail; and Google's productivity apps have billions of users who store files across Drive, Docs, Sheets, and Slides. That's to say nothing of Maps, YouTube, or the entire Android ecosystem. Google knows it's sitting on a gold mine. In May, at the company's annual software conference, the Gemini team lead Josh Woodward said Google's goal is to make the chatbot the most 'personal' and 'proactive' AI assistant around. He offered education as an example. College students are flocking to ChatGPT, but those same students do much of their work using Google software such as Docs and Slides. 'Imagine you're a student; you've got a big physics exam looming,' Woodward said. Gemini might see the test on your calendar a week out and send you 'personalized quizzes' based on the readings and lecture notes you've already stored in Google Drive. There are countless other ways you might use such personalized AI. When I asked Gemini to write me a cover letter, it automatically consulted several I had previously written. When I prompted Gemini to make me a summer-reading list, it first combed through email exchanges with high-school and college instructors, a list of my favorite books, and two editions of a weekly newsletter I subscribe to. Google is not the only company pushing forward with bespoke AI. Sam Altman recently described the 'platonic ideal state' for ChatGPT as a model with access to 'your whole life.' This chatbot would ingest every piece of information you had ever produced or encountered—including the books you had read, emails you had sent and received, and even conversations you'd had with your friends and family. With the explicit goal of making ChatGPT more personalized, OpenAI recently upgraded the chatbot's 'memory' feature, such that the bot is now able to reference all of a user's past conversations. But building up that data will take time. Legacy tech firms such as Apple and Microsoft do already have plenty of data to draw on, but Google is further ahead in its consumer AI efforts. Then there's Meta: The company's stand-alone AI app, which launched this spring, encourages users to link the assistant to their Facebook and Instagram accounts for 'an even stronger personalized experience.' Facebook comments and Instagram DMs, however, are simply less meaty than email exchanges and PDF documents. Google has faced a bumpy road since generative AI exploded a few years ago. The technology has presented the biggest threat yet to Google's search business, and the company's share of the market recently dropped to its lowest in a decade. At the same time, usage of Google's AI tools has skyrocketed over the past year, and the company recently rolled out a new AI search mode in an attempt to steal search queries back from the likes of ChatGPT. Now, with the company's personalization advantage, Google could surge ahead. Whether Google or another company gets there first, this new era of AI is coming. For years, we have been shedding information online through clicks and likes, photographs and files, emails and search queries. That digital exhaust is now getting a second life. Already, it can be difficult to figure out whether text that you encounter online is generated by AI. Soon, while looking back on old emails, you might even feel that way about your own writing.
Business Insider
3 hours ago
- Business Insider
Want to land a tech internship? A Google engineer explains how networking 'intentionally' can help
It's just not enough to cold apply for tech jobs anymore, said Aashna Doshi, a two-time intern turned software engineer at Google. To land a spot at a tech giant, you need to be networking "intentionally." "Knowing who you want to meet, finding that common bridge between both of you, and then really learning from their experience, was a big game changer for me," Doshi told Business Insider. Doshi suggests reaching out not only to people whose career paths you'd like to emulate, but also those with whom you share common ground, including similar personal experiences. "I was talking to a bunch of people, and saw this software engineer who was working out of Europe, and was super inspired by her story," she said. "She was also a woman. I love to see other women in tech and also, she's European. I grew up in Belgium, so that's kind of my connecting point to her." A foot in the door While Doshi ended up getting a referral from the engineer in Europe, she said she wasn't initially thinking of asking for one. Reaching out because you're genuinely interested in someone's trajectory, she added, has twofold benefits — you're likely to learn more from a less stilted conversation, and the connection you make could last throughout your career. "I reached out to her to learn more about her story, not like, 'Hey, can I get a referral at Google?'" she said. "I actually didn't even have any intention of asking her for this internship referral, but we became friends and she let me into her life, which is what her day-to-day looks like, how she grows in the role that she's in." Remembering that professional connections, like any relationship, are two-way streets, also goes a long way towards helping them endure, Doshi added. "As we move and progress in our life, the way in which I think about it is, we are collecting people, and we are supporting people," she said. "And the people that will come all the way through will be the ones that you have formed a genuine bond with. If you ask someone for a referral and they give it to you, I mean, that's well and good, but five years down the line, 10 years down the line, they might not even remember who you are." If you can't get an internship, complete a project Since you're likely to be taking similar classes as your competition, it's what you do with that knowledge that can make you stand out, Doshi said. Projects are the "one thing that I will say again and again and again for any student," she said. The Google engineer partly credits her success in securing an internship to the projects she developed in her downtime. "This is the way you can set yourself apart from 1000 other people, because if you take data structures and algorithms, and your peers take data structures and algorithms, you all have the same foundational knowledge that you are building," she told BI. "But what you do with that knowledge, what you do with the data structures and algorithms, really, really makes a difference." There's no pressure to specialize in a niche skillset right out of the gate to impress potential employers, either, Doshi said. What you're really aiming for is a broad knowledge base and a flexible personality. "They don't expect you to come in with tons and tons of experience," she said. "They actually care about more — can you think in a specific way, and given a situation changes, are you able to adapt to that? More than doing like 700 LeetCode questions and getting those exactly right, I tried to do more problem solving in adaptive sense." Becoming a 'go-to' person If and when you finally do land an internship, the challenge then becomes securing a full-time return offer. In Doshi's case, she did her best to become integral to the teams she was placed on — being a point person for a particular issue can help you be more memorable, as well as slowly build a positive reputation with senior employees. "If they have a bug, and they trust you enough to be like, 'Oh, Aashna, you've done something like this before. Why don't you take this up?'" she said. "That is not just giving you work. It's, 'Oh, we trust you to take something like this up.' So being that person they can trust, being that go-to person, is an absolute game changer." Doshi also cautions interns against self-isolating. You're not expected to know everything, and shouldn't try to act like you do. "As an intern, you are coming in with, as everyone knows, less experience than the rest of the team. The intention is to show progress," she said, adding, "The key lies in asking the right questions. A lot of people say there are no wrong questions, etc, etc. Maybe there are no wrong questions, but there are questions that are better than others, in my opinion." Knowing how to ask for help can be just as important as knowing when — Doshi suggests presenting your questions in a way that shows you've attempted to solve the problem on your own first. "Do your due diligence before that, which means if you're stuck, ask the right person for help," she said. "I'm going to explain that I already tried to do X, Y, Z, and it didn't work. How do I move forward?" The goal of an internship is, after all, to absorb as much knowledge as possible. Try to avoid letting your fear of looking lost halt your progress, she added. "So this kind of framework really accelerated my learnings, because I wasn't wasting hours and hours on something that absolutely I didn't understand or didn't work," she said. "And while I wasn't spending those hours, I still did my due diligence, which is, do my research, look through the code base."
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
2 Top Quantum Computing Stocks to Buy in July
Alphabet doesn't need quantum computing to be a successful investment. IonQ's approach to quantum computing should allow it to scale more easily. 10 stocks we like better than Alphabet › Quantum computing is an interesting investment sector. Several companies compete in this field, ranging from tech giants to start-ups. However, most companies within this field agree that monetization of quantum computing is still a few years away, but it's getting closer. The tricky thing for investors to balance is getting in at the right time. If you're too early, you might miss the rise of current investment trends, like artificial intelligence (AI). If you're too late and quantum computing becomes the next hot investment trend, you've missed out on potentially huge returns. Right now is a solid time to invest in some quantum computing companies, especially if you pick the right ones. Alphabet (NASDAQ: GOOG) (NASDAQ: GOOGL) is Google's parent company and is devoting significant resources to quantum computing research. Google kicked off the quantum computing investment cycle in December with its Willow chip, which solved an incredibly difficult problem in record time and with superb accuracy. This highlighted other quantum computing stocks, causing the entire industry to rise. Should Google deliver top-notch quantum computing technologies, it stands to benefit in one area in particular: AI. Quantum computing could unlock the next phase of AI, leading to unprecedented performance. This would give Google the leadership position in AI, leading to a huge increase in cash flows in its core business. This gives Alphabet a huge incentive to continue innovating in quantum computing. With its already massive cash horde and cash flows, it has the resources to devote to this field. Even with Alphabet's innovative mindset and top-notch technology, the market doesn't respect it. Investors are still worried about it losing market share from its Google Search business, so it trades at a cheap valuation. It's important to note that 18.5 times forward earnings is unbelievably cheap for a big tech stock like Alphabet. It basically indicates that the market values only its Google Search business, not any of the potential gains from quantum computing. As a result, I think it's a great pick because it offers massive upside if it can win the quantum computing arms race, while also capitalizing on a potential turnaround in the market's perception of its search business. While Alphabet is a conservative choice for quantum computing, IonQ (NYSE: IONQ) is more aggressive. Its only revenue comes from various contracts that it has signed, and there is no backup plan; it's quantum computing viability or bust. However, because it's a small company, incremental market share gains in quantum computing will deliver huge returns. This high-risk, high-reward approach isn't for everyone, and investors must accept that the likelihood of failure is likely greater than success. But if IonQ gets it right, that risk could pay off big time. Regarding a timeline for revenue and profitability, IonQ's CEO believes that by 2030, the company will be profitable and generating nearly $1 billion in annual sales. That's a mere five years away, but if IonQ can hit that timeline, the stock will be a successful investment. I prefer IonQ over many of the other pure-play start-ups due to its partnership with the U.S. Air Force Research Laboratory and its unique approach to quantum computing. It utilizes all-to-all qubit connectivity, enabling superior error correction. It also uses a trapped-ion approach, which allows quantum computing to occur at room temperature versus at nearly absolute zero (which is incredibly expensive to do). This makes IonQ's approach sensible and scalable, making it the most likely to succeed of the various start-ups. I think investors should have significant exposure to Alphabet and a small exposure to IonQ. This strategy involves investing most of their money in a stock that has a higher chance of success, while keeping a smaller bet on a long shot. However, if that long shot works out, it can deliver massive returns despite a small initial investment. Before you buy stock in Alphabet, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Alphabet wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $699,558!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $976,677!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,060% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 180% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 30, 2025 Suzanne Frey, an executive at Alphabet, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Keithen Drury has positions in Alphabet. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. 2 Top Quantum Computing Stocks to Buy in July was originally published by The Motley Fool
