
Luxury shopper recovery faces four key headwinds
But better-than-feared results from bellwether fashion house LVMH moved luxury stocks higher Friday, as investors bet on the emergence of green shoots of recovery.
LVMH posted a 4% year-on-year drop in second quarter sales to 19.5 billion euros after the market close Thursday, slightly below a consensus forecast for a 3% decline.
"This was not a stellar quarter for LVMH," Deutsche Bank's Adam Cochrane, a luxury equity research analyst, wrote in a Friday note. "However, we see some glimmers of hope with a sequential improvement in cFX [constant currency] sales expected from 3Q onwards and most of the sales weakness related to weaker tourism."
Here's a look at four key trends to look out for as earnings season rolls on, with fresh numbers due next week from Kering, Hermes and Prada.
Foreign exchange fluctuations are a perennial concern for luxury firms, but that's even more the case this quarter as they face high comparable sales from last year.
A sharp decline in the Japanese yen sparked a surge in tourist flows and luxury shopping in the country in 2024. But now brands are battling a rebalancing.
Richemont saw sales in Japan drop 15% year-on-year in the three months to June, following a 59% jump over the same period the year prior. Burberry also cited a "challenging performance" in Japan in the second quarter, and Moncler said Japan was its only negative-performing Asia market — both without providing specific figures.
Some firms noted, however, that a downturn in tourism to Japan — and to a lesser extent Europe — has resulted in an uptick in domestic spending in certain other markets.
"[In China] we have seen tangible improvement locally," said LVMH's Chief Financial Officer Cécile Cabanis during an earnings call Thursday, citing a "repatriation from the big drop we've seen in tourism to Japan."
Several luxury firms have also pointed to a strengthening of U.S. sales in the second quarter, even as consumers wait with bated breath for the impact of tariffs.
Burberry, Richemont, Moncler and Brunello Cucinelli all reported increased sales in their American markets over the second quarter, while LVMH noted that American demand was "broadly unchanged."
Still, the extent to which that uptick is driven by U.S. customers frontloading purchases ahead of the full onset of tariffs is not yet clear, according to the firms.
"To tell you that this was driven by an anticipation of buying links to the tariffs? Honestly, I cannot tell you," Roberto Eggs, Moncler's chief business strategy and global market officer, said on an earnings call Wednesday.
Luxury companies have also been honing in on the U.S. market in recent quarters in a bid to compensate for continued soft demand in the key Chinese market.
Burberry CEO Joshua Schulman said the company's recent U.S. growth indicated the "diversity of the luxury consumer that exists in that market," from elite, high-spenders to high-traffic mall shoppers.
U.S. tariffs are nonetheless weighing on the outlook for most European luxury houses, who rely heavily on localized production as part of their cache.
As such, many have suggested that they will need to raise prices in the coming quarters to offset added costs.
Brunello Cucinelli flagged price hikes of 3% to 4% in the U.S. while Moncler said it was implementing "mid-single-digit" percentage increases for the coming 12 months. Burberry, meanwhile, said it began adjusting prices last year as part of broader overhaul plans.
LVMH, on the other hand, said Thursday that prices rises would need to come with an "improvement in the product" or modest rebalancing around inflation.
However, the French luxury conglomerate then went on to cite price hikes among "several levers" at its disposal to counter the impact of tariffs.
It comes as the cost of luxury goods has risen by an average of 3% so far this year — the slowest pace since 2019 — according to UBS' evidence lab, as brands have sought to reconcile consumer retention with higher input costs following a Covid-era surge in prices.
Finally, category mix remains a fundamental factor in the divided luxury picture, with brand appeal playing as much of a role as the product type itself.
Jewelry remains a winning play for Cartier-owner Richemont, even as high-end watches — both its own and those of other luxury watchmakers — remain a weak point.
Tiffany-owner LVMH, however, continues to battle softness in its jewelry and fashion and leather goods maisons, despite leather handbags going from strength to strength for ultra-luxe brand Hermes.
Carole Madjo, Barclays' head of European luxury goods research, told CNBC that she expects leather goods dominance to continue to play out when Hermes reports on Wednesday.
"[Hermes] is always very good, thanks to leather goods mostly," she told "Squawk Box Europe" on Tuesday.
Meanwhile, investors will be eagerly awaiting more color on Tuesday from Gucci-owner Kering on its product overhaul under artistic director Demna Gvasalia and incoming CEO Luca de Meo.
"Bringing newness, something fresh which has not been seen before, is I think what could make Gucci great again," Madjo said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Politico
27 minutes ago
- Politico
Businesses got some clarity on Trump's trade deal. They aren't reassured.
That's a reference to the fact that Trump's much-hyped trade agreements were verbal — there hasn't been any documentation backing up what the two sides agreed to. Already, major trading partners like the European Union and Japan have cast doubt on whether they could meet their investment and purchasing pledges, and Vietnam has not even publicly confirmed it agreed to the terms Trump announced in their supposed deal inked in early July. 'I think the lens has become a little clearer' in terms of tariff rates, said Stephen Lamar, the president of American Apparel and Footwear association, which represents brands like J Crew and L.L. Bean that rely heavily on imports from countries like China and Vietnam. Lamar predicted that many of those duties 'are probably going to be it for a while,' but added, 'We don't yet have enough information to make the kinds of long term decisions that need to be made right now, and even the shorter term decisions of, 'how I'm going to price my spring collection?'' The White House has largely dismissed complaints from business warnings that the tariffs will drive up costs for importers and, ultimately, American consumers. Trump has singled out specific companies, like Wal-Mart, demanding that they 'eat the tariffs' and has repeatedly suggested to business leaders that they should avoid the duties by shifting production to the U.S. 'President Trump's trade deals have unlocked unprecedented market access for American exports to economies that in total are worth over $32 trillion with 1.2 billion people,' said Kush Desai, a White House spokesperson. 'As these historic trade deals and the Administration's pro-growth domestic agenda of deregulation and The One Big Beautiful Bill's tax cuts take effect, American businesses and families alike have the certainty that the best is yet to come.' The administration also claims economists overestimated how much the tariffs would affect the economy, pointing to the fact that inflation is still largely meeting its targets and that there has yet to be a recession, like some economists predicted. 'I think they are looking at the current numbers as support for the lack of impact of these tariffs,' said Greg Ahearn, the president and CEO of the Toy Association, whose members are largely small and mid-sized businesses that have a harder time absorbing higher duties. 'But I think most people believe wholeheartedly that the impact of these tariffs is going to be felt in the months ahead. And the reason why is that production and manufacturing and the goods as they flow through the supply chain takes time.' Ahearn pointed to Friday's weak jobs report, including signs that there were actually fewer new jobs created in May and June than previously estimated, as evidence the impact of Trump's trade policies are just starting to show up in the data. There are already signs that the tariffs have begun driving up prices on purchases such as furniture, apparel and toys, which helped push up the inflation rate in June. And Lamar warned that, 'Once those prices go up, they have a hard time coming down.' Many business leaders fear that this week's worrying economic numbers are only the beginning of a more sustained downturn. 'Inflation and price increases are coming,' Ahearn said. 'Layoffs have already been occurring. And supply is going to be lower as we head into the holiday season. These are all happening.'

Miami Herald
40 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Ford CEO Says Its Newest EVs Are Ready for Its "Model T Moment"
During Ford's second-quarter earnings call with investors on the evening of July 30, Ford CEO Jim Farley revealed that the automaker is set to reveal its new strategy centered around a new line of electric vehicles underpinned by a new platform. In his remarks, Farley said that the future plans would be a "Model T moment," referring to the 120-year-old model that was the world's first mass-produced, affordable car. He hinted at a transformative breakthrough that would help position Ford to sell a new line of electric cars aimed at competing against low-cost Chinese models from known names like BYD. "On Aug. 11, that will be a big day for all of us at Ford. We will be in Kentucky to share more about our plans to design and build a breakthrough electric vehicle and a platform in the U.S.," Farley said. "This is a Model-T moment for us at Ford. A chance to bring a new family of vehicles to the world that offer incredible technology, efficiency, space, and features." In the past, the Ford CEO admitted his admiration for his Chinese competition. Late last year, he revealed on a podcast appearance that he daily drove a Xiaomi SU7 that Ford used for benchmarking, adding that he was having a hard time giving it up. On the earnings call with Wall Street insiders, he acknowledged that Ford is falling behind its East Asian rivals, pegging them as their new competition to beat. Farley noted to the investors and Wall Street insiders listening in that the next EVs developed by its internal California-based "Skunkworks division" are set to be released within "the next year or two - starting," adding that its strategy against its Chinese counterparts "is to go and really push ourselves to radically reengineer and transform our engineering, supply chain and manufacturing process." "We really see, not the global (automakers) as our competitive set for our next generation of EVs, we see the Chinese. Companies like Geely, BYD," Farley said. "That's how we built our vehicle. How we've engineered what kind of supply chain we've used and the kind of low content in our manufacturing." Despite this, Farley's announcement underscores that Ford has yet to make any money selling its electric vehicles. Its internal "Model e" division, which is dedicated solely to EVs, has been hemorrhaging money for several quarters. During Q2 2025, Ford reported that the Model e division lost $1.3 billion, a worse quarter than the division's loss of $1.1 billion just a year earlier. Farley told the Wall Street analysts on July 30 that over the past three years, the automaker saw EV consumer demand and government regulations and support rapidly change, which pushed it to think carefully about its next moves. As part of its new EV strategy, Ford's CEO said it will offer EVs in select body styles in segments where it "can actually make money on EVs." Another part of that strategy is its investment in LFP, or lithium-iron-phosphate batteries -a cheaper, longer-lasting form of EV battery, particularly used in Chinese-market electric vehicles. Starting next year, it plans to build them at the BlueOval Battery Park in Marshall, Michigan, which he touts as "a big advantage for the company." But despite this, Ford feels that its investment in EVs is part of a larger lineup puzzle, which includes gas-powered cars like hybrids and extended range electric vehicles. "We think that's a much better move than a $60,000 to $70,000 all-electric crossover," Farley said. "We think [offering a variety of powertrains] is really what customers are going to want long term, and we're investing a lot in more durable internal combustion engine powertrains." This development feels like a preview of the end result of something that Farley and his Blue Oval engineers have been working on since he and other Ford executives learned of the level of innovation that Chinese automakers were capable of. In a September 2024 profile written by Mike Colias and published by The Wall Street Journal, Farley was described less as a traditional businessman than as a hands-on executive obsessed with his competition. The piece centered around a trip to China in 2023, during which Farley and other Ford executives got the full picture of their Chinese competition. According to the Journal, Farley's fascination with Chinese automakers began when he and Ford CFO John Lawler test-drove an electric SUV made by Changan, Ford's joint venture partner in China. "Jim, this is nothing like before," Lawler said to Farley after the drive, per the Journal. "These guys are ahead of us." In light of the signing of the "Big Beautiful Bill" and its provisions against EVs, Ford's EV announcement comes at an interesting time. Nonetheless, I wonder what kind of vehicle Farley will reveal in Kentucky come August 11. Copyright 2025 The Arena Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Underutilized workforce capacity may be costing CFOs millions
This story was originally published on To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily newsletter. American businesses are losing millions in productivity each year, often with most CFOs not realizing it. The analysis is from workforce productivity software provider ActivTrak's Workforce Utilization Benchmarks Report 2H 2025, which analyzed 5,619 organizations and 304,083 workers and found that companies operate at just 87% of expected productivity. Across industries, this translates to the equivalent of 130 employees per 1,000 workers producing no output — or $11.2 million in wasted salary annually per 1,000 employees. For CFOs facing tight margins, talent shortages and pressure to optimize every dollar, the findings highlight how much value can be unlocked by keeping teams motivated and productive. The hidden productivity gap and the state of work ActivTrak CFO Jana Wilson told the findings underscore a growing challenge not only for businesses operating in all types of work structures, but also for finance leaders trying to do more with smaller teams. 'Many finance teams are operating leaner than ever because of talent shortages, and automation can only fill so much of the gap,' Wilson said. 'Workforce utilization data shows leaders where they're getting the most out of their people and where capacity is being left on the table. That insight allows finance leaders to redeploy resources with precision instead of over-hiring or over-relying on technology without clear ROI.' The report found that nearly six in 10 (58%) employees fail to meet daily productivity goals. For Wilson, that was the most alarming finding. 'CFOs tend to assume their teams are operating at full capacity because financial results often mask underlying inefficiencies,' she said. 'Our analysis shows there's significant untapped potential, particularly in back-office roles where contributions are harder to measure but critical to operations.' Even small inefficiencies multiply at scale, according to the report: Organizations with 251 to 1,000 employees lose $1.3 million to $1.7 million annually, and enterprises with more than 1,000 employees see losses of $3.7 million to $3.9 million per year. Industry comparisons reveal where the losses are concentrated. Computer hardware teams have nearly 71% of employees below productivity goals, the highest rate in the report. Aerospace organizations face the greatest untapped capacity at 19%, with average productivity losses of $1 million annually per company. On the other end, logistics organizations have the lowest rate of underperformance at 41% and the least untapped capacity at 9%. 'Workforce utilization data provides a place to start and helps leaders see how time is being spent and whether activity is aligned with company priorities,' Wilson said. Data also indicates that for finance leaders balancing lean teams and automation, the ability to pinpoint underutilization is key to avoiding common challenges in contemporary finance like poor hires or investments in technology that do not deliver ROI. How CFOs can measure and respond Wilson said CFOs should start with a simple approach to productivity measurement. 'Focus first on the work that directly ties to business outcomes — how much time is spent there versus low-value tasks? That alone can highlight where capacity might be misaligned,' she said. She cautioned that capturing accurate workforce data is difficult for CFOs if they don't have proper systems designed for it. 'It's very difficult to collect this data or calculate productivity metrics consistently without a system built for it,' Wilson said. 'Workforce analytics tools make it easier to capture the right data objectively, but the real value comes from how you use it,' she added. 'Treat productivity metrics like financial metrics: Track them consistently, benchmark them and use them to drive action, not just as a reporting exercise.' Wilson added that workforce insights can also support morale and engagement. 'Help people see how their work contributes to the bigger picture, especially in back-office roles that don't always have a direct line to revenue,' she said. 'Be transparent about the why behind decisions and use data to show teams how they're performing against benchmarks,' she said. 'That clarity builds trust and engagement. Finally, create space for feedback and recognition — when people feel heard and valued, they're more resilient during change.' Recommended Reading 25% of workers 'very likely' to seek a new job