logo
President Al-Mashat offers condolences on Sheikh Issa Hussein Al-Daws passing

President Al-Mashat offers condolences on Sheikh Issa Hussein Al-Daws passing

Saba Yemen2 days ago
Sana'a - Saba:
His Excellency Field Marshal Mahdi Al-Mashat, President of the Supreme Political Council, sent a message of condolence and sympathy on the passing of Sheikh Issa Hussein Al-Daws, who died at the age of 70 after a life dedicated to serving the nation.
In the message addressed to the deceased's son, Sheikh Issa Hussein Al-Daws, his brothers, family, and the entire Al-Daws family in Al-Hodeida province, President Al-Mashat praised the virtues of the deceased and his honorable national stances in confronting the American-Saudi-Emirati aggression. He also highlighted Sheikh Al-Daws' contributions to social work and mediation.
The President expressed his deepest condolences to the deceased's children and the entire Al-Daws family, asking Almighty Allah to bestow His vast mercy and forgiveness upon him, grant him paradise, provide his family , loved ones with patience and solace.
"Indeed, to Allah we belong, and to Him we shall return."
Whatsapp Telegram Email Print
more of (About President)
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Meeting of Foreign Ministry Leadership reaffirms full support for Military Front in confronting aggression
Meeting of Foreign Ministry Leadership reaffirms full support for Military Front in confronting aggression

Saba Yemen

time5 hours ago

  • Saba Yemen

Meeting of Foreign Ministry Leadership reaffirms full support for Military Front in confronting aggression

Sana'a – Saba: A meeting was held in Sana'a today, chaired by the Minister of Foreign Affairs and Expatriates, Jamal Amer, and attended by the leadership of the political and consular sectors. The meeting discussed diplomatic and administrative issues, focusing on elevating the level of political engagement to confront aggression through a strong diplomatic front. Diplomacy, it was noted, should serve as a solid support and complement to the armed forces led by Sayyed Abdulmalik Badr al-Din al-Houthi, which have proven to be a deterrent force and an unignorable strategic actor. This strength has granted Yemen's political role increased effectiveness in negotiations and consultations with various international powers to confront military escalation. Minister Amer stressed that the diplomatic front must exhibit the same strength and clarity as the Yemeni armed forces. He stated: 'The next stage does not allow for half-solutions or neutrality. One must choose either the national liberation path that rejects hegemony and foreign dependency, or align with those who have betrayed their homeland and become mere tools and mercenaries for regional and international powers of dominance.' He emphasized the need to keep pace with the current transformative stage, which leaves no room for ambiguity or indecision. Amer reiterated: 'Sana'a clearly declares that peace is its strategic choice and war is the exception,' affirming Yemen's readiness to confront any imposed aggression. The minister praised the growing military capability and the popular unity around the leadership, stressing the continued role of the diplomatic front in defending Yemen's grievances and those of the Palestinian people in Gaza on the international stage. Regarding the Red Sea situation, Amer affirmed Sana'a's clear and unwavering stance. He underscored Yemen's commitment to the safety and security of international maritime navigation in the Red Sea, Bab al-Mandab, and the Suez Canal. He clarified that the decision to prevent the passage of Israeli ships is a temporary measure, directly linked to ending the aggression on Gaza and allowing unrestricted humanitarian aid. He described this stance as humanitarian, religious, and moral, especially in light of international and regional silence on the Zionist crimes in Gaza. The minister also called for continued efforts to develop and improve diplomatic performance in line with local, regional, and global developments. He announced the completion of procedures to adopt the financial bylaw for the diplomatic corps, in accordance with Law No. (5) amending certain provisions of the Diplomatic Corps Law, which is supported by the President of the Supreme Political Council. Participants in the meeting affirmed their commitment to keeping pace with ongoing developments and standing by the leadership until victory and stability are achieved. Several issues related to strengthening diplomatic efforts and countering external conspiracies were discussed during the meeting. The meeting was attended by the Deputy Minister for Financial and Administrative Affairs, Ambassador Mohammed Hajer, as well as heads of departments and general directors from the political and consular sectors of the ministry. Whatsapp Telegram Email Print more of (Local)

Trump Administration's Policy failure in face of Iran's victory in recent war
Trump Administration's Policy failure in face of Iran's victory in recent war

Saba Yemen

time5 hours ago

  • Saba Yemen

Trump Administration's Policy failure in face of Iran's victory in recent war

By: Abdulaziz Al-Huzzi – Saba News Agency, Sana'a The administration of U.S. President Donald Trump deliberately approached global relations with disdain and arrogance—sometimes issuing military threats, at other times imposing sanctions, tariffs, or engaging in blackmail, weapon sales, or forced trade deals. However, this tired American policy failed in its latest confrontation with Iran. Whenever the Trump administration failed to secure gains through diplomacy or enticements, it would revert to threats and punitive measures or outright military action. It often sought to coerce the other party—whether a state, entity, or organization—into alignment with U.S. hegemonic interests by offering economic or diplomatic incentives to soften their position. Every political negotiation with another party was accompanied by unrealistic, even humiliating demands—akin to surrender terms. If diplomacy didn't work, the U.S. would impose economic sanctions and threaten military action, as seen in its approach to Iran, a strong and defiant power in the region. If all else failed militarily, Washington would return to the table begging for negotiations—just as it is now doing with Iran. Meanwhile, it continues to provide unwavering support to Israel against Palestinian resistance, proposing conditions that are unacceptable to the resistance factions. This carrot-and-stick approach—mixing intimidation with enticement—has long been a staple of U.S. foreign policy. Yet, it ran up against the unwavering stance of the Islamic Republic of Iran, which firmly upholds the principles of its revolution, prioritizes national security, and confronts Western powers, especially the U.S. and Israel. Iran's resolute policies reflect its determination to preserve independence and sovereignty, assert itself as a regional power, and resist perceived external and internal threats. This stance is evident in several key areas: Commitment to Revolutionary Principles: Iran sees these as the foundation of its statehood, applying them in all political, economic, and social spheres, while rejecting foreign domination. Strengthening Defense Capabilities: Iran emphasizes the need to bolster its military and defense capacities to safeguard sovereignty, including a proactive deterrence strategy and defense of its nuclear program, considered part of its national security despite international controversy. Strategic Alliances: Iran seeks stronger ties with Russia and China to counterbalance Western influence and circumvent sanctions. It has joined the Shanghai Cooperation Organization and aspires to join BRICS to cement its role in the evolving global order. Before the U.S. encouraged Israel to attack Iran recently, Tehran and Washington were at the negotiating table discussing the nuclear file. Yet behind the scenes, the U.S. and Israel were plotting a blatant attack launched on June 13, targeting Iran's peaceful nuclear facilities, military commanders, top nuclear physicists, and air bases. Iran, in defending itself, thwarted the U.S.-Israeli aggression after 12 days of intense conflict, emerging stronger and more empowered. Today, after this blatant aggression on its nuclear infrastructure, the Trump administration is desperately seeking to bring Iran back to negotiations. Meanwhile, IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi—accused by Tehran of sharing nuclear facility information with Israel—is fueling tensions by suggesting Iran may have moved part of its enriched uranium stockpile prior to the U.S. airstrikes, contradicting Trump's earlier claims that Iran's nuclear program had been 'completely destroyed.' Grossi told American media that while some uranium might have been destroyed, 'it's possible another portion was relocated,' noting that Iran's nuclear program remains 'broad and ambitious' and parts of it may still be operational. Earlier, Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf accused the IAEA of collaborating with Israel in targeting Iranian nuclear sites. He posted on X (formerly Twitter): 'The IAEA gambled its already fragile credibility by sharing our nuclear site info with the criminal Israeli regime, paving the way for aggression, without even publicly condemning the attacks.' Last Wednesday, Iran's parliament passed a bill to suspend cooperation with the IAEA until Iran's nuclear facilities are guaranteed protection. Ali Reza Salimi, a member of the parliamentary committee, confirmed that the decision to cut ties with the IAEA will be sent to Iran's Supreme National Security Council for ratification. The law also imposes penalties on anyone who allows IAEA personnel access to Iran. In this context, retired Turkish Air Force colonel and political analyst Ihsan Sefa, a member of the central committee of Turkey's Vatan Party, stated in an interview with Russia's Novosti Agency that Israel failed to achieve its goals in the recent confrontation with Iran and suffered unexpected human and material losses. Sefa emphasized that Tehran emerged stronger and more respected in the region, shifting the balance of deterrence in its favor. He explained: 'Tel Aviv sought to destroy Iran's nuclear capabilities, demoralize its people, and trigger regime change. None of that happened—instead, Iran's regional standing grew.' He added: 'Iran stands today as it did before the 12-day conflict, but with greater regional respect. So who is the real victor?' Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei declared his country's victory over Israel following the 12-day conflict, congratulating the Iranian people on their triumph. Whatsapp Telegram Email Print more of (Reports)

Muscat: Iran Nuclear talks to resume if conditions are right
Muscat: Iran Nuclear talks to resume if conditions are right

Saba Yemen

time5 hours ago

  • Saba Yemen

Muscat: Iran Nuclear talks to resume if conditions are right

Muscat – Saba: Omani Foreign Minister Badr Al-Busaidi stated on Tuesday that negotiations on Iran's nuclear program will resume if the appropriate conditions are met. According to Iran's Tasnim News Agency, Al-Busaidi emphasized that resolving the Iranian nuclear issue can only be achieved through diplomacy and that aggression will be of no benefit. He added, 'The use of force and the imposition of solutions through aggression is ineffective; the resolution of Iran's nuclear program lies in negotiations.' Whatsapp Telegram Email Print

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store