
‘Ireland isn't tearing up migration system in relation to this' – Simon Harris on visa refusal for Palestinian children on GAA trip
The Fine Gael leader said there were 'legitimate checks in relation to child protection' involved, even though the tour body from the West Bank says it has repeatedly sent documentation and been ignored.
But the denial of entry to 33 Palestinian children and 14 parents and sports officials was held up as an example of double standards by Peadar Tóibín, leader of Aontú.
"The approach of the West to the war in Ukraine and the war in Palestine could not be more different. Ireland's approach could also not be more different. Is the refusal of visas for the 33 Palestinian children from the GAA Palestine project not an example of this?'
The Tánaiste said: "Every visa has to be issued on its merits", even as he came under pressure from TDs on all sides.
Mr Harris pointed to an appeals process as a possible way forward -- even though the tour was scheduled to take place this month and hosts were in place.
It has been the subject of applications from the territory of the Palestine Authority as far back at least as last January.
But Mr Harris said the Department of Justice 'will continue to "robustly" apply the rules.
This was the case "particularly when it involves minors and particularly when it involves minors travelling without their parents and accompanied by other adults,' he said.
Jennifer O'Keefe (59), a member of the Good Counsel Liffey Gaels GAA club and based in Palmerstown, was due to welcome two Palestinian children into her home later this month.
In all there were 47 participants travelling to Dublin – including 33 children aged between nine and 16.
The athletes were due to come from the West Bank as part of a two-week tour aiming to foster friendship, solidarity and sporting connection through the GAA.
Ms O'Keefe says she was 'devastated' to learn of the refusal of the players visas.
'We're letting these children down. Their mentors and coaches have taken on our national sport as their sport of choice. Why would you do that to a group of 33 children?,' she said.
'These children have been excited and looking forward to this trip for months. They're so grateful to the Irish people for allowing the trip to happen. I just can't imagine how devastated they must feel at the prospect of not being able to travel.
'We have to fight and push and make sure that this does happen. We have to keep fighting, we can't let the children down.'
Donal Dempsey of Fingallians GAA club in Donabate was also due to take two athletes overnight. Mr Dempsey says the refusal of the athletes visas was 'devastating'.
'It's really, really disappointing. I have a 13-year-old boy myself. He was really looking forward to them coming over,' he said.
The new row comes a day after the Taoiseach denied there was any blockage to Palestinian child victims of Israel's war on Gaza coming to Ireland for treatment.
Only two of four promised surgery flights have arrived, but Micheál Martin rejected Sinn Féin suggestions of bureaucratic impediments.
Mr Tóibín called for "a compassionate response", even though there should be a strict visa system in place.
There are 'dozens of children coming into this country unaccompanied on an annual basis,' he claimed, particularly from United Kingdom.
The Tánaiste responded: 'We do try to take a compassionate approach.' He insisted the Government did not doubt the good faith of the organisers of the Palestinian junior GAA tour.
'Unfortunately not all people will be able to demonstrate that they satisfy the conditions to be granted a visa to come to Ireland,' he said
'These applications were given very careful consideration," he said.
"A visa officer has to be satisfied that children are travelling in the company of their parents or an appropriate guardian.
"Additional documents such as birth certs, consent letters are regularly requested to establish the relationship and there is an appeal.'
Solidarity TD Ruth Coppinger said the question had to be asked why a Palestinian tour had been 'faced with all these barriers', and pointed to "massive" GAA child protection safeguards.
Sinn Féin's Donnchadh Ó Laoghaire called for 'some political will' to sort out the issues and to quickly get them rectifiedy.
But Mr Harris insisted: "If children from far flung parts of the world are travelling to this country in the company of adults -- some of whom are not their parents -- there does need to be legitimate checks.'
He added: 'I don't think any immigration system in the world would grant visas, without satisfying itself in relation to visa applications for minors."
GAA Palestine have said they are 'deeply disappointed and shocked' by the decision as they called on authorities to reconsider.
The organisation said the visa applications were submitted in mid-May with 'comprehensive documentation' including detailed itineraries, with all applications fulfilling 'all requested requirements and provided all necessary documentation as per the application process'.
It said that despite this, the visa applications of the 47 Palestinian children, including 33 children aged between 9 and 16 years, and their coaches were refused due to 'insufficient documentation'.
In response to queries, spokesperson for the Department of Justice said each visa application is 'decided on its own merits' and an application will be refused if it does not 'demonstrate compliance' with certain conditions for children and adults.
They said: "Confirming that appropriate child protection requirements are in place is essential when considering visa applications for minors.
'This includes a requirement that a child is travelling with their parents or an appropriate guardian, which requires additional documents to be verified such as birth certificates and consent letters.
'In adult cases, evidence of financial means, employment or other ties that indicate a person intends to return home are important criteria. These help to establish that a person has a legitimate reason to come to Ireland, and that they will comply with the conditions of a short-term visa.
'An application will be refused if it cannot demonstrate compliance with such conditions. An appeals process is available to anyone who has a visa application refused.'
In a statement, GAA Palestine said it was 'under the impression that all necessary documentation and information had been provided and met the requirements for visa approval as stated by the Irish Embassy in Israel'.
"Seven days before these young boys and girls were meant to leave the West Bank, we are told that additional documentation is now required – documentation that was already provided or never previously requested or indicated as necessary,' said GAA Palestine chair Steven Redmond.
"We went as far as sending a volunteer to the West Bank to assist with additional documentation that was requested as part of our application.'
He said GAA Palestine 'remains committed to collaborating closely with the Department of Justice to resolve this matter swiftly'.
"We have a dedicated team of volunteers ready to respond and take immediate action.
'We are fully prepared to see this process through. We kindly ask the Government to partner with us in making this happen.
"Volunteers across Ireland are just utterly and completely devasted after all the work and effort put into making this tour happen. It's heartbreaking to see such a promising cultural exchange fall apart at the very last moment.'
The organisation called on authorities to reconsider the decision and work with them to 'facilitate the participation of these young Palestinians in future cultural and sporting initiatives'.
"We extend our sincere thanks to the Irish host families, clubs, and supporters who have shown unwavering support and solidarity. We remain hopeful that this unfortunate setback will not deter us.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Irish Sun
39 minutes ago
- The Irish Sun
Kevin Kilbane speaks for Katie Taylor fans with complaint about ‘terribly biased' Netflix coverage of Serrano trilogy
KEVIN KILBANE vented his frustration about Netflix's "terribly biased" coverage of Katie Taylor's trilogy fight against Amanda Serrano. Taylor, 39, put her undisputed super lightweight titles on the line against Serrano, 36, at a sold-out Madison Square Garden. 2 Katie Taylor fought Amanda Serrano for a third time at MSG Credit: Stephen McCarthy/Sportsfile 2 Kevin Kilbane complained about Netflix's coverage Credit: Sportsfile - Subscription It was the third bout between the two rivals, with KT having won both of their previous contests. Their first, also at MSG, saw the Bray woman retain her lightweight crown with a split decision victory in April 2022. The sequel, at AT&T Stadium last November, saw the 2012 Olympic gold medalist win via unanimous decision. It was a result that remains contested by Serrano, who lamented Taylor's perceived intentional use of her head which saw her deducted a point in the bout. Read More on Katie Taylor The controversy was alluded to on several occasions during Netflix's coverage, with video packages even featuring lead commentator Mauro Ranallo's claim that the Puerto Rican was "robbed". Former Republic of Ireland international footballer Kevin Kilbane took to Twitter to criticise this element of the build-up. He said: "Terribly biased narrative again around the pre fight build up on @netflix. Anti Katie Taylor as per the first 2 fight. Let's go Katie! #TaylorSerrano3" He followed this up with another post which read: "No respect for greatness! Let's go @KatieTaylor" Most read in Sport It was a sentiment shared by many fans of the Irish boxing legend. One said: "The commentary are a disgrace the stuff their saying about Katie" A second posted: "Disappointing but not surprising, I imagine the commentary will be bias again aswell" A third said: "Yes, they want Serrano to win so bad it's sad lol" A fourth said: "Taylor is going to need a KO to get a draw here. So rigged and their not hiding it" A fifth said: "Oh it's the worst. But like last fight Katie doesn't give a f***" Katie Taylor as she hit back against 's claim that she should have had her hand raised last time out. She said: 'I have my own opinion about the stuff that Amanda has been saying on our team, but the fact is I am 2-0 against her. "Opinions are opinions, but facts are facts and you can't get away from those facts. And yeah, I guess I'm just tired of the complaining and the whining from Amanda's team. "I'm going into this fight already beating Amanda and I plan to stay beating her. I plan to stay 3-0 come this Friday night. 'I feel like people haven't seen the best me yet and I can't wait to showcase that on Friday night. "I can definitely make the fight a lot easier for myself and I just can't wait to step in there now and actually perform. "I know that I can perform and produce the best performance of my career.'


Irish Examiner
2 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Andy Farrell's five key selection posers for first Lions Test
Van der Flier, Curry, Morgan or Pollock? The Lions have barely had a second for reflection lately. Is it Thursday in Canberra or Friday in Adelaide? Either way, there is another game just around the corner. With scant time for proper training, the management have been relying on players sticking their hands up on matchdays but no one, as yet, has nailed down the No 7 jersey. This matters because the Wallabies will be strong at the breakdown and possess an array of jackal threats. If Toulouse's Jack Willis were here the conversation might be different but there is probably one starting spot to be contested between Josh van der Flier, Jac Morgan, Tom Curry and Henry Pollock. Curry had the chance to stake an unanswerable claim against the Brumbies but, in common with many others, had a tricky evening. The other three are all involved against the Australia-New Zealand Invitational XV this weekend and there remains much to play for. The management clearly like the game-breaking ability that Pollock can offer and Morgan, despite not being the biggest of men, can be a real nuisance. Curry's work-rate will be hard to overlook unless Andy Farrell, in his quest for cohesion, simply reverts to his trusted Irish lieutenants and starts Van der Flier. Chessum or Beirne – or both? They appreciate a Big Red in Australia, whether it be kangaroos or a decent shiraz. And the flame-haired Ollie Chessum is already making an impact down under. He has been as consistently good as almost any of the Lions forwards, to the point where it will now be a major surprise if he does not feature in the Test 23. The question is what role he should fill. The back-row balance did not look entirely right against the Brumbies and there is only one tour game left in which to fiddle around with the blend. Tadhg Beirne has played a lot of rugby this season but is he still at his sharpest? Or could the Lions conceivably go for all-out mobility and start both Beirne and Chessum in the same starting XV for the first time on this tour? Beirne, interestingly, is back in the second row this weekend but picking him there for the first Test would mean omitting big Joe McCarthy. If Beirne has a colossal game this weekend, though, it will give the whole debate a vigorous stir. Aki, Tuipulotu or Farrell? Before the tour this was widely seen as Sione Tuipulotu's shirt to lose. But the Scotland captain has been injured and is still shaking off a touch of ring rust. Bundee Aki, on the other hand, offers a powerful simplicity at 12 that gives Finn Russell the option of using him as either a compelling decoy or a straight-up carrier. Teams may think they know what Aki is going to do but stopping him from five metres out remains easier said than done. In theory that simplifies the equation for Tuipulotu against a physical-looking combined Au-NZ Invitational XV: crank things up or accept a Test place may have to be delayed. But what about Owen Farrell? Who would the Lions want coming off the bench in a pressure-laden Test match if, heaven forbid, Russell or even Aki were to go down early on? If Farrell Jr goes well in Adelaide, his ability to operate at both 10 and 12 makes him a genuine option for the matchday 23. Ringrose or Jones? The selection at 12 has wider ramifications. If Aki starts, the temptation to pair him with his Ireland teammate Garry Ringrose clearly increases. Ringrose is a strong defender and may well be seen as the man to defuse the obvious threat of the Wallabies' emerging star Joseph Aukuso Sua'ali'i. The Leinster man is in form, too, having scored tries in Perth, Brisbane and Canberra already on this tour. That may mean Huw Jones will have to be patient unless he rips it up in Adelaide and shows he can offer another dimension to the Lions' attacking effectiveness in the wider channels. Again it also boils down to the collective blend: if the Lions back three is also going to be predominantly Irish it makes Ringrose the safer, more logical pick. Keenan or Hansen? The moment Blair Kinghorn whacked the pitch with his hand in frustration after being injured against the Brumbies it felt ominous for the Lions. Sure enough Ireland's versatile Jamie Osborne has been summoned as cover and Farrell will have to find another full-back for next week's first Test. The situation is complicated by the fact Hugo Keenan has played only once on tour prior to this weekend because of illness. He is also a different kind of player to Kinghorn and a less obvious bench option. So what does Farrell do? Stick with the devil he knows or roll the dice? One option could be to shift his favourite player Mack Hansen to full-back. That would permit him to start both Hansen and Tommy Freeman in Brisbane, with James Lowe's raking left boot also in the back-three mix. Marcus Smith might disagree but, right now, it would be a huge call to select the Harlequin as a starting Lions Test 15. Guardian


Irish Examiner
4 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Book review: The short but extraordinary life of the Border Commission
While the IRB held the higher ground on the battlefields of Ireland during the War of Independence, Lloyd George and his team of negotiators had the advantage of experience in the subsequent Treaty negotiations. It was Michael Collins who first suggested the establishment of a border commission to decide the jurisdictions of the Dublin and Belfast governments. Lloyd George adopted the idea and produced an ambiguous clause that became Article 12 of the Treaty. Notwithstanding the extreme pressure the Irish negotiating team was subjected to, its decision not to refer the wording of Article 12 for legal opinion was, at best, naïve. The story of the Irish Boundary Commission, and the four years it took to establish that body, is outlined in Cormac Moore's latest book, The Root of All Evil. Moore has previous publications on various aspects of Irish history, these include The GAA v Douglas Hyde, Birth of a Border, and The Irish Soccer Split. The Root of All Evil is a thorough and insightful investigation of all aspects of the Border Commission. The book explains in detail the drawn-out attempts to set up the commission, its short but extraordinary life, and its inevitable end. It has long been argued that Sinn Féin had more interest in the Oath of Allegiance than in partition; Moore argues that this opinion does not stand up to scrutiny. He argues that considerable time and effort was spent on using the Commission as a means of rescuing Fermanagh, Tyrone, and possibly south County Down from Ulster. This optimism was ill-founded, as Moore shows that Britain intended to side with unionist leader, James Craig, whose motto was 'not an inch'. Indeed, Craig's description of the Boundary Commission, 'the root of all evil,' gave Moore the title of the book. The Boundary Commission should have begun its work immediately in 1922. The outbreak of the Civil War, however, delayed the process. Political upheaval in Britain, resulting in a change of government, further added to the delay. Even more time was lost as Britain searched the Empire for a 'suitable' independent chairman. Richard Feetham, a judge in the South African Supreme Court, was appointed. Ireland appointed Eoin MacNeill as its commissioner. This was a grave error. MacNeill, who was also minister for education, proved to be inept in the commissioner role. Belfast had to be forced to appoint a commissioner by the British government. The fact that Belfast refused to engage should not be taken to mean that they were preparing to thwart any potential unsatisfactory findings of the commission. Between 1921 and 1925, proportional representation (PR) voting was abolished in Ulster. Following this many local councils had their voting areas gerrymandered to ensure Unionist majorities. Councils with nationalist majorities such as Tyrone and Fermanagh became unionist councils. The three-man commission eventually got to work in 1925. It decided there would be no communication with the London, Dublin, and Belfast governments. MacNeill abided by this decision, but the Ulster commissioner, Joseph Fisher, had no such qualms; he fed everything back to the Ulster Unionists. MacNeill resigned from the commission as it was about to publish its findings. It had become obvious that the proposed changes were little more than the straightening of some jagged border lines. The Irish government decided it would be best to bury the report for all time. In an effort to save face with voters in the South, the Dublin government sought other financial concessions from Britain. Some concessions on war retribution payments were achieved. This left thousands of nationalists, who live near the northern side of the border, believing they were sold out for cash. What The Root of All Evil clearly shows is neither Sinn Féin nor the subsequent Free State government had a coherent plan on how to deal with the Ulster Unionists. As Moore says, '[The Irish government] failed to grasp that Ulster unionism's hatred of Dublin was stronger than its love for the Empire.' One hundred years on, one wonders if anything has changed? Read More Book review: A salacious tale of murder on the border of fact and fiction