Nearly 450,000 Afghans return from Iran as deportation deadline passes, says UN
The influx comes as the country is already struggling to integrate streams of Afghans who have returned under pressure from traditional migrant and refugee hosts Pakistan and Iran since 2023.
The country is facing one of the world's worst humanitarian crises after decades of war.
This year alone, more than 1.4 million people have 'returned or been forced to return to Afghanistan', the United Nations refugees agency UNHCR said.
In late May, Iran ordered undocumented Afghans to leave the country by July 6, potentially impacting four million people out of the around six million Afghans Tehran says live in the country.
Numbers of people crossing the border surged from mid-June, with some days seeing around 40,000 people crossing, UN agencies have said.
From June 1 to July 5, 449,218 Afghans returned from Iran, a spokesman for the International Organization for Migration told AFP today, bringing the total this year to 906,326.
Many people crossing reported pressure from authorities or arrest and deportation, as well as losing already limited finances in the rush to leave quickly.
Massive foreign aid cuts have impacted the response to the crisis, with the UN, international non-governmental groups and Taliban officials calling for more funding to support the returnees.
The UN has warned the influx could destabilise the country already grappling with entrenched poverty, unemployment and climate change-related shocks and urged nations not to forcibly return Afghans.
'Forcing or pressuring Afghans to return risks further instability in the region, and onward movement towards Europe,' the UN refugees agency UNHCR said in a statement on Friday.
Taliban officials have repeatedly called for Afghans to be given a 'dignified' return.
Iranian media regularly reports mass arrests of 'illegal' Afghans in various regions.
Iran's deputy interior minister Ali Akbar Pourjamshidian said on Thursday that while Afghans illegally in the country were 'respected neighbours and brothers in faith', Iran's 'capacities also have limits'.
That the ministry's return process 'will be implemented gradually', he said on state TV.
Many Afghans travelled to Iran to look for work, sending crucial funds back to their families in Afghanistan.
'If I can find a job here that covers our daily expenses, I'll stay here,' returnee Ahmad Mohammadi told AFP on Saturday, as he waited for support in high winds and dust at the IOM-run reception centre at the Islam Qala border point in western Herat province.
'But if that's not possible, we'll be forced to go to Iran again, or Pakistan, or some other country.' — AFP pic
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Free Malaysia Today
26 minutes ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Neutrality difficult in unstable world, says Ukraine's acting ambassador
Denys Mykhailiuk, Ukraine's acting ambassador to Malaysia, says 'neutrality' requires nations to take balanced, visible and consistent actions, including through condemnation when norms are violated. PETALING JAYA : In today's fractured geopolitical landscape, the idea of neutrality is facing unprecedented challenges. As the war in Ukraine drags on and tensions escalate in Asia, many smaller or non-aligned countries, including Malaysia, are left to confront an uncomfortable truth: neutrality may no longer be enough. 'To be really neutral is very difficult in the world, which is not stable,' says Denys Mykhailiuk, Ukraine's acting ambassador to Malaysia. 'Strategic neutrality is typically reserved for strong states that can defend their sovereignty. For many in the Global South, what is described as neutrality is more accurately a form of non-alignment,' he said. Malaysia, traditionally proud of its non-aligned foreign policy, continues to engage with all parties. Yet experts suggest this approach demands closer scrutiny in an era where global powers are increasingly acting outside international norms. Munira Mustaffa. 'Neutrality represents a deliberate political stance of impartiality,' says Munira Mustaffa, executive director of Chasseur Group. 'Silence, conversely, often reflects passive non-engagement.' ISIS foreign policy head Thomas Daniel echoed this sentiment, saying that 'many countries use 'neutrality' or 'non-alignment' to avoid taking positions on issues they perceive as harming their national interests.' Thomas Daniel. Malaysia has the right to stay neutral—but should it? According to Mykhailiuk, neutrality is not simply about not taking sides. It requires balance, visibility and consistent actions, including condemnation when norms are violated. Without this, what is referred to as 'neutrality' risks becoming 'complicity'. Mykhailiuk warns that failure to respond to Russia's war will send a global signal. 'If the aggressor comes out unpunished or rewarded by the new territorial requirements, it will definitely (provoke a) superpower to act on its own discretion, using the threat of force or force itself in relations with the smaller states,' he said. 'Imperial thinking' in the 21st century This concern is especially relevant in an age of rising imperial ambitions. While Russia's invasion of Ukraine and China's assertive stance in the South China Sea differ in method, both reflect a common mindset: historical entitlement as justification for modern-day dominance. In 2016, the Permanent Court of Arbitration ruled that China had no legal basis to claim historic rights within the so-called Nine-Dash Line. The ruling was labelled 'ill-founded' by China, and ignored. 'My perception is that China's actions involve sustained coercion and grey-zone tactics, while Russia's strategy is outright aggression,' says Munira. 'But for smaller post-colonial states like Malaysia or Ukraine, both present serious sovereignty challenges: they must navigate between protecting sovereignty and avoiding confrontation with powers that view international law as secondary to their historical claims.' Malaysia is no stranger to the consequences of great power impunity. The 2014 downing of Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17 over Ukraine, which killed 298 people including 43 Malaysians, remains a wound in the national memory. Russia's 2015 veto at the UN Security Council blocked efforts to establish an international tribunal. 'Deepening ties with Russia without addressing this tragedy sends a troubling signal,' says Munira. 'It suggests that such actions can be overlooked. Any perception that MH17 is being sidelined would undermine confidence in international accountability mechanisms.' This issue cuts deeper when viewed alongside Malaysia's expanding diplomatic and trade ties with Russia, including support for BRICS membership and a recent increase in direct cooperation. 'The balance becomes increasingly complex,' said Munira, pointing to contradictions between Malaysia's humanitarian support for Ukraine and its diplomatic silence on Russian aggression. This imperial logic, where great powers act as though smaller nations exist for absorption or domination, can be useful for some countries, and it is increasingly visible. Beyond Russia and China, other global powers are also demonstrating imperial tendencies. 'The risk of 'imperial thinking' is reinforced by the recent behaviour of—not just Russia—but also China, the United States and Israel,' says Daniel. These trends are particularly worrying for smaller nations that rely on international law as their first line of defence. Asean's role This makes not only the Malaysian position vital, but Asean's as well, being an organisation of countries that want to be important players in the region. The Asean Charter is clear about provisions like the peaceful settlements of disputes through dialogue and consultation, the renunciation of aggression, and upholding international law. However, as Munira explains, Asean's recent diplomatic record has been mixed. Only four of ten Asean members attended the 2024 Ukraine Peace Summit in Switzerland; with only two signing the communiqué. 'This reflects Asean's broader concern that peace efforts must consider multiple perspectives,' she says. Nevertheless, there is space for leadership. 'With over 600 million people and growing markets, Asean can become an important trade and investment partner for Ukraine,' says Mykhailiuk. Not all support has to come with weapons. Malaysia has provided humanitarian support to Ukraine, including medical supplies and essential equipment. In his recent interview with Bernama TV, Mykhailiuk called for more assistance, particularly for post-conflict demining, rescue operations, and energy infrastructure. For Malaysia and other middle powers, the war in Ukraine is not someone else's problem. It is a test of whether the rules that protect the weak from the strong still apply—and whether countries like Malaysia will help uphold them. 'Weakness is temptation,' Mykhailiuk warns. 'So be strong.' Anastasiya Yushchenko is an undergraduate at the City St George's, University of London, and an intern at FMT.
Free Malaysia Today
31 minutes ago
- Free Malaysia Today
US hits Malaysia with 25% tariff
US president Donald Trump warned that any decision to raise Malaysian tariffs on US goods would result in an additional 25% tariff. (AP pic) PETALING JAYA : The US has imposed a 25% tariff on Malaysia starting Aug 1, a rate which US president Donald Trump described as 'far less' than what is needed to eliminate the country's trade deficit with Malaysia. The rate is also higher than the 24% initially imposed on certain Malaysian exports to the US, later placed on a 90-day pause that ended today. In a letter addressed to Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim, posted on Trump's Truth Social platform, Trump said Malaysia's current trade policies had made its trading relationship with the US largely one-sided and non-reciprocal. He also said that he was ready to lower the 25% tariff if Malaysia changed its trade policies. Trump said the tariff would be applied independently of any other sector-specific tariffs already in place, and that any attempt to reroute goods through other countries to avoid higher tariffs would be penalised by the application of the higher rates. He also warned that any decision by Malaysia to raise tariffs on US goods would result in an additional 25% tariff in response. 'Please understand that these tariffs are necessary to correct the many years of Malaysia's tariff and non-tariff policies and trade barriers, which have caused these unsustainable trade deficits against the US,' he said. In his letter, Trump also emphasised the continued commitment of the US to its trading relationship with Malaysia, despite its significant trade deficit with the country. Trump also encouraged greater Malaysian participation in the American economy, which he described as the 'number one market' in the world. 'As you are aware, there will be no tariff if Malaysia, or companies within your country, decide to build or manufacture products within the US,' he said. 'In fact, we will do everything possible to get approvals quickly, professionally, and routinely – in other words, in a matter of weeks,' he said. Trump issued similar letters to several other countries, including Japan, South Korea, Indonesia, Bangladesh, Thailand, and South Africa.
The Star
32 minutes ago
- The Star
Brace for shake-up in supply chains
Urgent need to reshuffle logistics network regardless of US tariffs, say economists PETALING JAYA: Global and local supply chains are set for a major reshuffle, regardless of whether the United States under President Donald Trump moves ahead with new tariffs, according to economists. Bank Muamalat Malaysia Bhd chief economist Dr Mohd Afzanizam Abdul Rashid said the government has done their due diligence and scenario-building exercise in anticipation of the tariff announcement by the United States. 'US President Donald Trump's tariff is beyond the government's control. 'Therefore, they need to be pragmatic on how best to deal with such a problem,' he said when contacted yesterday. The government, added Mohd Afzanizam, remains non-partisan but is also exploring all possible opportunities following the upcoming US tariff policy. 'I suppose there will be reconfiguration of the supply chain, and the Covid-19 shocks have taught us well about over-concentration of the supply chain. 'So, the reconfiguration of the supply chain is occurring with or without the US tariff. 'The way we see it, the US tariff would accelerate the need to reconfigure the business supply chains,' he added. On Friday, Trump said the US government will start sending out letters with details of higher tariff rates that will take effect on Aug 1. Trump said as many as 12 letters will be sent out over the coming days, and the levies will range from '60% or 70% tariffs to 10% to 20% tariffs', but did not name the countries due to receive them. So far, semiconductors are exempt from tariffs, but Trump has threatened levies on them several times, and that uncertainty is making it difficult for businesses to plan for the future. Trump has also threatened to impose an additional 10% tariff on countries aligning themselves with the 'Anti-American policies' of the BRICS group of developing nations, whose leaders kicked off a summit in Brazil on Sunday. Economist Prof Geoffrey Williams said Malaysia could face both direct and indirect impacts should tariff talks fail. 'Directly, there may be some effects on exports to the United States, especially with semiconductors largely excluded. 'Indirectly, if other countries are belligerent, then global trade disruption could hit Malaysia's already-squeezed net trade.' While total trade and exports are rising, Malaysia's net trade has been on a downward trend since August 2023. 'Any further decline will weigh on the 2025 economic outlook,' Williams said. Malaysia's electronics sector may remain relatively insulated, but other industries could be forced to adapt to maintain competitiveness. Williams added that Malaysia should avoid taking sides in any US-Asia trade conflict and instead pursue diverse partnerships. 'The smartest policy is to reduce tariffs and non-tariff barriers. Let consumers decide.' He also called on the government to clearly state where negotiations stand. 'If Malaysia receives a letter in the coming days, the response must be swift and positive. Be smart in the negotiations, not belligerent,' he added. Sunway University economics professor Dr Yeah Kim Leng said the additional 10% on top of the 24% reciprocal tariff, currently under negotiation, will likely raise the price of Malaysian goods imported into the United States. 'It will cause a supply or price shock to US importers as the latter will have to bear the tariffs.' Meanwhile, the Investment, Trade and Industry Ministry in a statement said Malaysia maintains an independent foreign and economic policy. 'Our engagement with any multilateral platform is focused on trade facilitation and sustainable development, guided by national interest, not ideological alignment. 'The US remains one of Malaysia's key economic partners, not only through trade but also through the multi-billion dollar American investments that have been established in Malaysia for more than 50 years,' it said. On April 2, Trump announced his Liberation Day tariff package, imposing staggeringly high tariffs on the entire world, including 20% or higher tariffs on major US trading partners. A week later, he paused some of these tariffs.
