There are many illegal marijuana farms, but federal agents targeted California's biggest legal one
'There are plenty of other places they can go to find illegal workers,' said political consultant Adam Spiker, who advises cannabis companies. 'A lot of people believe there is a hint of politics in this. It's federal enforcement coming into California to go after cannabis.'
What happened during the raids? On July 10, US Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Border Patrol agents executed a search warrant for Glass Houses farms in Carpinteria and Camarillo, court filings show. At the Camarillo site, armored vehicles blocked the road, which is lined with fields and greenhouses, as masked agents deployed onto the property. One farmworker who fell from a greenhouse roof while running to hide later died from his injuries. Outside the farm, officers faced off with demonstrators and fired tear gas to disperse them, a federal agent wrote in court filings. One demonstrator threw a gas canister back at Border Patrol officers, according to the agent. Another demonstrator who is sought by the FBI appeared to fire a gun. More than 360 people were arrested, most suspected of being in the country without legal status. Those arrested included four US citizens, including US Army veteran George Retes, 25, who works as a security guard and was held for three days. The operation came more than a month into an extended crackdown across Southern California that was originally centered in Los Angeles, where local officials say the federal actions are spreading fear in immigrant communities.
Why Glass House? No cannabis was seized, and the criminal search warrants used to enter the farm sites are under court seal. Authorities refused to share them with The Associated Press. The government said the business was being investigated for potential child labor, human trafficking, and other abuses. Agents found 14 children at one site. No information has been released about the minors. The company has not been charged. Federal and state laws allow children as young as 12 to work in agriculture under certain conditions, though no one under age 21 is allowed to work in the cannabis industry. Company officials did not respond to calls or emails. In a brief statement on the social platform X, Glass House said it complied with immigration and naturalization warrants and has never knowingly violated applicable hiring practices and does not and has never employed minors.
Some believe the raid was aimed at the legal marijuana market. After the raid, United Farm Workers–the country's biggest farm worker union–posted an urgent message to its social media accounts warning that because marijuana is illegal under federal law, workers who are not US citizens should avoid jobs in the cannabis industry, including state-licensed facilities. 'We know this is unfair,' it said, 'but we encourage you to protect yourself and your family.' Industry experts point to unwelcome publicity the company received after rival Catalyst Cannabis Co. filed a 2023 lawsuit alleging that Glass House has become 'one of the largest if not the largest black marketers of cannabis in the state of California.' The lawsuit, formally filed by Catalyst parent 562 Discount Med Inc., was dismissed last year, but the headlines might have drawn the interest of federal investigators.
Who runs the Glass House farm sites? The company was co-founded by Kyle Kazan, a former Southern California police officer and special education teacher turned cannabis investor, and Graham Farrar, a Santa Barbara tech entrepreneur. Glass House started growing cannabis in a greenhouse in Carpinteria in Santa Barbara County when once-thriving cut flower operations were being reduced. It later bought property in Camarillo in neighboring Ventura County for $93 million that had six greenhouses and was being used to grow tomatoes and cucumbers. To date, two of the greenhouses have been converted to grow cannabis. Workers' relatives said tomatoes are still being grown in other greenhouses at the location.
How did Glass House do it? The raids have put the spotlight on a company that is alternately admired and reviled because of its meteoric rise in the nations largest legal market. Glass House is the states biggest legal cultivator, dwarfing its nearest rivals. Glass House Farms is part of the broader company Glass House Brands, which has other businesses that make cannabis products. 'There is no farmer in California that can compete with them at scale,' Sacramento-based cannabis consultant Sam Rodriguez said. Many legal operators have struggled despite the passage of Proposition 64 in 2016—which was seen as a watershed moment in the push to legitimize and tax California's multibillion-dollar marijuana industry. In 2018, when retail outlets could open, California became the world's largest legal marketplace. But operators faced heavy taxes, seven-figure start-up costs, and, for many consumers, the tax-free illegal market remained a better deal. But as other companies folded, Glass House took off, fueling envy and suspicion by rivals over its boom at a time when much of the states legal market was in crisis, in large part because of competition from the robust underground market. In a recent call with investors, Kazan said company revenue in the first quarter hit $45 million—up 49 percent over the same period last year. He said he remained hopeful for a federal shift that would end marijuana's classification as a Schedule I drug alongside heroin and LSD. 'But we are a company that does not require federal legalization for survival,' Kazan said. Glass Houses sales grew as many others around the state declined. 'I remain steadfast in the belief that it is not if but when the cannabis industry becomes Americas next massive normalized industry, and I'm excited to participate along with investors in the corresponding reward that that change will bring,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Arabiya
an hour ago
- Al Arabiya
Deportation flights from Florida's ‘Alligator Alcatraz' detention center have begun
Deportation flights from the remote Everglades immigration lockup known as 'Alligator Alcatraz' began in the past few days, Florida Governor Ron DeSantis said Friday. The flights, operated by the Department of Homeland Security, have transferred about 100 detainees from the immigration detention center to other countries, said DeSantis, who expects that number to increase soon. 'I think you're going to see the numbers go up dramatically,' DeSantis said during a news conference near the South Florida detention center. Officials said that two or three flights have departed from the site so far, but they didn't say where those flights headed. Critics have condemned the facility as cruel and inhumane. DeSantis and other Republican officials have defended it as part of the state's aggressive push to support President Donald Trump's crackdown on illegal immigration. Building the facility in the Everglades and naming it after a notorious federal prison were meant as deterrents, DeSantis and other officials have said. The White House has delighted in the area's remoteness – about 50 miles (80 kilometers) west of Miami – and the fact that it is teeming with pythons and alligators. It hopes to convey a message to detainees and the rest of the world that repercussions will be severe if the immigration laws of the United States are not followed. The center was built in eight days over 10 square miles (26 square kilometers) of the Everglades. It features more than 200 security cameras, more than 5 miles (8 kilometers) of barbed wire, and 400 security personnel. It currently holds about 2000 people, with the potential to double the capacity, Florida Emergency Management Director Kevin Guthrie said Friday.
Al Arabiya
an hour ago
- Al Arabiya
Trump dismisses Macron's plan to recognize Palestinian state
US President Donald Trump on Friday dismissed French President Emmanuel Macron's plan to recognize a Palestinian state at the United Nations General Assembly in September. 'What he says doesn't matter,' Trump told reporters at the White House. 'He's a very good guy. I like him, but that statement doesn't carry weight.'
Arab News
2 hours ago
- Arab News
Climate change needs smart solutions, not political point-scoring
More than seven months into President Donald Trump's second term, the US is experiencing a sharp federal reversal on climate policy: withdrawal from the Paris Agreement, rollback of clean energy initiatives, and a halt to key climate finance programs. The reaction of Western 'scholars and watchdogs' to the moves was summed up recently by a columnist in the UK's Guardian newspaper who put this way: 'It's an agenda that in only its first six months, has put back environmental progress by decades.' But there is another way to look at the US climate-policy reversal: as a golden opportunity to transform climate change from a First World wedge issue into a universal challenge in which both the global North and South have equal stakes. And to seize it, countries, cities, businesses and ordinary people must adopt an organic, 'whole of society' approach in the form of carbon literacy, lifestyle shifts, technological innovation and international cooperation. It is easy to forget that climate change is neither a political theater nor a liberal luxury, but a human issue. Record heat this summer has once again scorched the Arab world, Europe and Asia, while devastating floods and wildfires have dominated news headlines. The consequences of more frequent hot days, fewer cold days and increased evaporation transcend national boundaries and public concern has reached historic highs across the spectrum. Extreme heat is the biggest climate-change danger facing large swathes of the world. Mild summers in Europe are being replaced by heat waves that are becoming more frequent. Adapting to it is expected to require huge investments and a major shift in attitude toward air conditioning. Instead of dismissing it as a luxury that only Americans and Arab Gulf states can afford, even Europeans are now viewing air conditioning as a necessity to prevent thousands of unnecessary deaths every year. Nevertheless, climate continues to be a politically charged issue. Some see it as the be-all and end-all of human existence; others regard it as a symbol of out-of-touch American and European elitism. As the Trump administration dismantles industrial policies that many Americans consider economically damaging, the op-ed pages of US and European newspapers are unsurprisingly full of doom and gloom these days. It is high time to refuse to frame climate change as a culture war between left and right or between Global North and South Arnab Neil Sengupta It is true that the Trump administration is seeking to cancel tax credits for electric vehicles and relax emissions standards. It has reversed federal clean energy incentives, blocked new authorizations for renewables on public lands, and ended major resilience and adaptation grants. But the objective is not to flout the Paris Agreement and fill the atmosphere with heat-trapping carbon dioxide. In keeping with his 'America First' ideology, Trump is trying to level the playing field for domestic coal, oil and natural gas producers, who were at a severe disadvantage because of federal government support for wind farms, solar panels, hydrogen production and other clean energy technologies under previous Democratic administrations. Moreover, accelerating the low-carbon transition is not without risks. As Wall Street Journal columnist Andy Kessler pointed out last week, 'Spain (56% renewables) has so much wind and solar power that fluctuations caused a massive blackout in April, taking parts of Portugal down with it. Central planning kills. The US uses 21% renewables.' Not just that, at the grass roots, state and local governments, American businesses and communities are showing what is possible without the heavy hand of politically motivated federal agencies. They are focused on solutions such as energy efficiency, municipal resilience, fast-tracked permits for renewables, and job creation. State and corporate policies are picking up the slack, keeping the EV market and retrofits alive. Across the US, private developers and cities have been switching to solar panels, heat pumps, insulation and mass transit because of rebates and practical incentives. The US may have stepped back to take stock and make sure that the mantra of decarbonization does not turn the country into an economic laggard, but the global energy transition, powered by economic incentives and private-sector leadership, seems to be moving on, anchored increasingly in pragmatism, economics and common sense. While Trump has moved to suspend US climate finance, COP28's global consensus is pushing forward with financing for vulnerable countries and adaptation funds. At COP28 in Dubai in 2023, world leaders operationalized the Loss and Damage Fund and called for tripled climate finance. China is aggressively expanding its solar and EV industries. The EU is pushing forward with ambitious green finance, and both Africa and Southeast Asia welcome clean energy investment. Likewise, business and innovation are receiving prominence. As seen at COP28, even major oil and gas producers can take the lead on the next phase of clean energy. Saudi Arabia and the UAE's strategy of investing in carbon capture, solar, green hydrogen and electric mobility is not a contradiction but realism. Elsewhere, oil companies are diversifying into hydrogen, sustainable aviation fuel and grid resilience when policies point the way. With the right signals from states and the market, private investment is growing rapidly and following global demand. Public engagement matters more than ever. Recent polling shows widespread concern, even among Republicans, about climate impacts as extreme heat, crop losses and wildfires intensify. What the last seven months have shown is that Americans are pragmatic: they want sound environmental and energy policies, not rhetoric. They are interested in practical outcomes, not ideology. That said, without the right politics, progress will stall. The world needs the support of ordinary people who stand to gain or lose the most from climate-change mitigation. This will happen through local jobs, tax relief, cleaner air and healthier citizens. 'Green transition' will not sell in the developing world if it looks like an American or a Franco-German vanity project. It has to deliver flood-proofing in Africa, rural broadband powered by solar in South Asia, and training for wind-turbine assembly in North Africa. The international community must focus on building trust through collaboration, biodiversity management and shared climate research while the US federal government steps back to restore some balance. Climate mitigation and adaptation is a project that needs Africa's ingenuity, Latin America's biodiversity, India's workforce and Gulf Arab entrepreneurship, plus moving away from a mindset fixated on reducing energy use. Time is of the essence. Every year of unchecked warming raises the cost in the form of public health crises, agricultural losses and mass migration. The effects are already visible in small communities. Be it in New Orleans or Kenya, no one wakes up hoping for dinner by lantern light or rolling brownouts. People want reliability in the form of affordable energy supplies and cleaner air. Summing up, global climate action is not about virtue signaling or panic mongering but common sense and patience. Slowly but steadily, the world must pivot to fuel efficiency, clean power, resilience, job training and global cooperation from the ground up. It is high time to refuse to frame climate change as a culture war between left and right or between global North and South.
