Mother and Baby Home survivors feel re-traumatised by redress scheme exclusion
THE SPECIAL ADVOCATE for survivors of Mother and Baby Homes has called on the Government to stop excluding people from access to redress schemes and to their own records.
Patricia Carey said survivors have told her they have been 're-traumatised' by the Government issuing apologies to them while simultaneously excluding them from redress schemes put in place for those who spent time in institutions.
The mother and baby institution redress scheme was launched in March last year. To date, over €66 million in payments have been issued to survivors.
Around 34,000 people are eligible to apply for redress under the scheme. However, thousands of survivors are excluded, including those who spent less than six months in an institution as a child.
Carey's
first annual report
was published yesterday. It found that these exclusions are 'discriminatory and unjust', and that the State 'should re-examine and revise the current legislation with a view to expanding it to include those currently excluded'.
Speaking on RTÉ's Morning Ireland, she said that survivors who receive redress 'feel guilty because other's can't'.
'The only institutions that are covered are county homes and 14 mother and baby institutions. I know, and we know, that there were a network of over 180 institutions,' she said.
She said there are a 'myriad of exclusions', including that children who were boarded out to work on farms unpaid when they were as young as five have never been included in any redress scheme.
'In Northern Ireland, they're going to bring in a mother and baby redress scheme where people will receive redress for one day spent. In the Republic, it's 180 days. So that has really upset people.'
Access to records
Carey met over 1,300 survivors of institutional abuse while writing her report. She said the 'biggest issue' that was raised with her was survivors being unable to access their own records from mother and baby institutions.
The Birth Information and Tracing Act 2022 was established to grants right of access to birth certificates, birth and early life information, where available, for all persons who were adopted, boarded out, the subject of an illegal birth registration, or who otherwise have questions in relation to their origins.
Advertisement
But Carey's report states that some survivors have been unable to access records relating to their birth and early life and care, education, health and medical records, and their placement for adoption in Ireland and abroad.
'This is due to the records being destroyed, moved, or in private or religious ownership,' the report states.
Survivors have also experienced 'ongoing challenges' in finding accurate information in their search for details of family members, as well as difficulties in accessing records such as burial and death certificates for children that died in institutions.
'Three out of every five people, they're still looking for records,' Carey told Morning Ireland, adding that they are still in the hands of private and religious organisations.
Both the Catholic Church and the Protestant churches, private nursing homes, religious orders, still hold records related to people's times in institutions. They have no right to hold them. They have to hand them over to the State.
She said the Preservation of Certain Records Act 2024 made it a criminal offense to move or destroy records.
'I believe that the next stage of that legislation is to take in charge those records, that they are given to the National Archives and that the people they relate to have access to their own records.'
Carey added that this needs to happen 'immediately'.
'We've had over 200 years of people in institutions before the foundation of the State. People are aging out of this process. I had a woman who was 78 who asked for her records and was told to contact six different organisations for her own records of the time she spent in institutions.'
Carey is also calling for survivors to have access to enhanced health care, enhanced housing supports, and for the Government to include the status of 'Survivor' as a housing status application.
She said this would be at no cost to the Government.
'It would mean that if somebody was making an application for housing, the same way as you would say you had a particular medical issue or a disability, you would receive extra points on the housing application waiting list.
'I believe that survivor status for those people who don't have families, who were forcibly separated from their families, or who didn't have any early life experience at a home should be given additional weighting and status on housing lists.'
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
Learn More
Support The Journal
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Daily Mirror
a day ago
- Irish Daily Mirror
Fianna Fáil senator slates Health Minister over Children's Hospital name
A Fianna Fáil senator has accused Fine Gael Health Minister Jennifer Carroll MacNeill of 'wasting public funds' and 'ignoring political consensus' over the naming of the new National Children's Hospital. Mary Fitzpatrick also accused Minister Carroll MacNeill of a 'failure of judgment'. It is one of the first times in this new Government that a politician has publicly condemned one of their coalition colleagues. As reported by the Irish Mirror earlier this week, €4,500 was spent on the decision to name the new National Children's Hospital the 'National Children's Hospital Ireland.' This was one of 17 names suggested for the hospital with 'the support of a specialist branding agency'. Minister Carroll MacNeill stated that the name was chosen because it would be "the simplest thing for a stressed-out parent in difficult circumstances'. She also acknowledged that many had called for the hospital to be called after Dr Kathleen Lynn. However, she said she will engage with the Youth Advisory Committee in the National Children's Hospital Ireland to see if a wing or an auditorium could be named in her honour. Fianna Fáil Senator Mary Fitzpatrick has now slated Minister Carroll MacNeill over the fact that the hospital was not named after Dr Lynn, a medic and 1916 Rising participant. She said: '€4,500 was spent on consultants just to ignore a name the Oireachtas had already backed. That's not just wasteful, it's dismissive. 'Let's be honest, the name we've been given could belong to any hospital in any country. We had a chance to give it real meaning and the Minister passed. 'This wasn't a fringe idea. It had political support from Government and opposition. The Minister didn't just sidestep it, she overruled it. 'We didn't need branding consultants to tell us what the country had already decided. We needed leadership, and we didn't get it. 'This was a real chance to connect a state-of-the-art hospital with a name rooted in public service, care, and courage. 'Instead, the Minister chose something forgettable and spent public money to do it. That's not just a lost opportunity. It's a failure of judgment.' The Government did not oppose a Seanad Motion in May 2023 to name the hospital after Dr Lynn, who co-founded a children's hospital in Dublin in 1919. Saint Ultan's Children's Hospital closed in the 1980s when it merged with the National Children's Hospital on Harcourt Street. This was later relocated to Tallaght. The motion was brought forward by Senator Fitzpatrick and Catherine Ardagh, who is now a TD. Sinn Féin TD Aengus Ó Snodaigh then submitted a Bill to the Dáil in April 2025 to name the hospital after Dr Lynn. The Bill was not opposed by the Government but has not progressed through the legislative process. The Irish Mirror contacted a spokesperson for Minister Carroll MacNeill for comment. We have also repeatedly asked the Department of Health for confirmation of all names considered for the National Children's Hospital but have yet to receive a response. The Irish Mirror's Crime Writers Michael O'Toole and Paul Healy are writing a new weekly newsletter called Crime Ireland. Click here to sign up and get it delivered to your inbox every week


RTÉ News
2 days ago
- RTÉ News
Long Covid scheme extended after court recommendation
The Labour Court has recommended a final extension of the current special scheme for healthcare workers living with long Covid to run up to 31 December 2025, which the Government has now accepted. At that point, anyone remaining on the scheme should transition to the Public Service Sick Leave Scheme, the court said. Minister for Health Jennifer Carroll MacNeill said she fully supports the decision and will now move to ensure the scheme is extended as per the Labour Court recommendation. Earlier in the Dáil, the Minister said the special scheme would finish at the end of June. Minister Carroll MacNeill said that the Department of Public Expenditure and Reform was clear in June 2024 that that was the final extension, with the scheme originally due to end at the end of this month. The Government said 159 Health Service Executive and Section 38 organisation staff are currently on the scheme and in receipt of full pay. The scheme was put in place in 2022. Speaking before the Labour Court made its recommendation, Labour Party spokesperson on health Marie Sherlock said the response from Government so far had been "disrespectful and downright degrading to those who gave so much and risked so much at a time of such uncertainty and risk for this country". Deputy Sherlock said that these patients contracted long Covid in the workplace, and said "the refusal to extend this scheme" had reflected "a shocking lack of empathy and indeed respect for these workers". She said people had described the scheme as "a lifeline". Minister Carroll MacNeill said there was no intention not to be empathetic. Ms Carroll MacNeill said that health workers had gone beyond the call of duty, particularly during the early days of the pandemic, when the protections were not as strong as they came to be and "when the risk was extraordinarily great". She said a temporary scheme was put in place for 12 months in 2022, and believed there were 159 people in receipt of full pay for the past five years, and that this scheme had been updated four times.


Irish Independent
2 days ago
- Irish Independent
Ombudsman ‘utterly dismayed' by issues around children's needs
Children's ombudsman Dr Niall Muldoon called for the full and direct incorporation of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child into Irish law as he questioned whether ongoing scandals around child homelessness and scoliosis waiting lists would be as severe this year if they had been addressed earlier. Dr Muldoon told the Oireachtas Children's Committee on Wednesday that direct incorporation of the convention is 'the most important thing' that can be done to protect and safeguard the rights of Irish children. He said Ireland had already committed to these rights but there was a need to put 'real force' behind the international obligations. Dr Muldoon told the committee: 'It will put children's rights at the heart of every decision within the public and civil service, and give us a stronger basis to ensure we are keeping our promises to children. 'For example, imagine if five years ago the State had to come up with a child and family-focused home strategy. 'Would there still be 4,775 children in emergency accommodation today?' He added: 'Or if our recommendations around scoliosis as a children's rights issue as far back as 2017 was made against the backdrop of direct incorporation, would there be the same crisis as there is today?' Dr Muldoon said Ireland should be able to better funnel resources to where they are 'needed most', adding that societies are judged on how they treat their most vulnerable. He said: 'As ombudsman for children, I am exasperated and utterly dismayed at the persistent chronic issues around access to affordable housing for children and families, at the unacceptable delays in access to vital surgeries and assessments of need in a country as well-off as Ireland economically. 'We are now at a crossroads in terms of what can be achieved for children, and in the current climate of political uncertainty and change it's more important than ever for the State to bed down its commitments on children's rights.'