Young people advocate for state ‘Green Amendment' to protect the environment
LINCOLN — A group of young people descended on the Capitol on Wednesday in hopes of convincing state lawmakers to support adding a 'Green Amendment' to the Nebraska Constitution.
Such an amendment — which would require approval by Nebraska voters — would give citizens a legal right to a 'clean and healthy environment,' including 'pure water,' clean air and 'healthy soils.'
Advocates said the language would grant citizens and communities a pathway to sue state regulators if they weren't taking steps to protect the environment, or had taken steps that harm it. Some cited the example of the AltEn ethanol plant in Mead, which had skirted state environmental rules for years before the state eventually shut it down in 2021.
'We are here to fight for the right of a livable environment,' said Sara Holler, a Washington, D.C.-based activist with the youth-led environmental group, Capitol Hill Academy.
'The future for our generation should not be up for debate,' added Lake Liao, the founder and executive director of that organization, who said the younger generation would have to live with the consequences of failing to protect the environment.
But detractors of the effort, including Nebraska Gov. Jim Pillen, indicated such an amendment would empower governmental entities to 'destroy private property rights.'
'Ill-defined constitutional amendments are dangerous to Nebraskans,' said Laura Strimple, the governor's spokeswoman.
Holler and Liao were among speakers attending a rally and legislative hearing Wednesday over the proposed constitutional amendment.
State Sen. George Dungan of Lincoln is the main sponsor of the proposal, Legislative Resolution 22CA. He said Wednesday that he introduced the measure after being inspired by the activism of young people to protect the environment.
Three states, Montana, New York and Pennsylvania, currently have green constitutional amendments, with at least nine states, including Iowa, considering similar proposals.
On Wednesday, more than 20 high school students with the Nebraska affiliate of the national group, Students for Sustainability, and members of Sustain UNL, a group based at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln, wore bright-green T-shirts and carried placards reading 'No Nature? No Future' and 'Protect Our Planet.'
Mia Perales, a UNL student studying environmental engineering, said a Green Amendment would allow citizens in her home neighborhood of South Omaha a way to force regulators to address odor and wastewater issues associated with meat processing plants there.
Evalina Sain, an Omaha Central High School student and executive director of the local Students for Sustainability chapter, said Nebraska loses young college graduates because the state hasn't embraced more progressive steps to protect the environment.
Investment in clean energy and the environment, she added, also provides jobs.
But the lone opponent to testify in person against LR 22CA during the legislative hearing, predicted that lawsuits spawned by a Green Amendment would cost the state billions in court judgments and legal costs.
'Liberal lawyers,' according to Omaha attorney David Begley, would file dozens of lawsuits claiming that the state had failed to protect citizens from contamination in groundwater and chemicals.
'In my opinion, this is the most extreme and expensive bill that has ever been offered in the Unicameral,' Begley said. 'Our budget deficit will skyrocket.'
He said it would be cheaper to ship proponents of the Green Amendment to 'Santa Monica' (California), where they would discover 'mankind can't control the climate.'
Proponents said Green Amendments have not opened 'the floodgates' to more lawsuits in other states or inspired frivolous legal action. Dungan said states with such amendments have seen an average of three to 10 new lawsuits a year.
Senators on the Legislature's Natural Resources Committee asked several questions about what a Green Amendment would allow.
State Sen. Jana Hughes of Seward, for instance, asked whether it would allow her to sue neighbors if the nitrate levels in her groundwater exceeded safe levels for drinking.
Sheridan Macy, an Omaha native and lawyer who drafted the proposed amendment for Nebraska, said it would allow the senator to file a lawsuit against state and local regulators who might have failed to take steps to avoid nitrate contamination in local aquifers.
'Nebraska is a great place to grow up and raise a family,' Macy said. '(But) if we do not take steps to protect our environment, that will change.'
The committee took no action on LR 22CA after the hearing.
Macy said if the Legislature fails to act, people would consider an initiative petition drive to put the issue on the ballot.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
19-07-2025
- Yahoo
Don Bacon won't seek reelection in competitive Nebraska district
Rep. Don Bacon (R-Neb.) announced Monday that he would not seek reelection in 2026, opening up what will likely be a competitive race for Nebraska's 2nd Congressional District. 'After consultation with my family and much prayer, I have decided not to seek reelection in 2026 and will fulfill my term in the 119th Congress through January 2, 2027,' the 61-year-old Bacon said in a statement. 'After three decades in the Air Force and now going on one decade in Congress, I look forward to coming home in the evenings and being with my wife and seeing more of our adult children and eight grandchildren, who all live near my home. I've been married for 41 years, and I'd like to dedicate more time to my family, my church, and the Omaha community,' he continued. 'I also want to continue advocating for a strong national security strategy and a strong alliance system with countries that share our love of democracy, free markets and the rule of law.' The announcement comes days after a source familiar confirmed to The Hill that Bacon would not seek reelection next year. Bacon's decision to retire creates an open seat in one of the most competitive congressional districts in the country. Nebraska's 2nd Congressional District, which includes Omaha, was won by former Vice President Kamala Harris in the 2024 election and presents an opportunity for Democrats to pick up the 'blue dot' district Bacon has held since winning it in 2016. Live updates: Senate debates 'big, beautiful bill' 'The writing has been on the wall for months. Nebraskans are tired of the false promises that Republicans are trying to sell and they want real results,' said Madison Andrus, a spokesperson for the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee. 'Don Bacon's decision to not seek reelection in 2026 is the latest vote of no-confidence for House Republicans and their electoral prospects. Next November, Nebraskans are going to elect a Democrat who will actually deliver for them.' The House Republican campaign arm emphasized it continues to feel confident that Republicans will maintain their hold on Bacon's seat. 'Don Bacon has served our country with honor after nearly 30 years in uniform and nearly a decade in Congress. Thanks to his steadfast commitment to duty and principled leadership, both Nebraska and our nation are stronger today,' said Zach Bannon, a spokesperson at the National Republican Congressional Committee. 'As we look ahead, Republicans are confident in keeping Nebraska's 2nd District red as we maintain and expand our majority in the House,' he added. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
The Hill
17-07-2025
- The Hill
Nebraska sues Colorado over river water rights, proposed canal construction
Nebraska officials on Wednesday announced a lawsuit against Colorado, alleging that the Centennial State is allowing 'unlawful water diversions' from a transboundary resource. Nebraska Gov. Jim Pillen (R) and Attorney General Mike Hilgers accuse Colorado of threatening Nebraska's water supply along the South Platte River in multiple ways. The lawsuit alleges that Colorado has 'deprived' Nebraskans of their water rights during irrigation season, while also 'obstructing' plans to construct a long-disputed conduit called the Perkins County Canal. 'Nebraska must push forward to secure our water for future generations,' Pillen said in a statement, noting that his state had 'made every reasonable effort to resolve our differences with Colorado.' The complaint in large part revolves around the enforcement of the South Platte River Compact, a deal signed by the states in 1923. The agreement limits Colorado's usage of the river and defines how much water Nebraska can receive during the summer irrigation season and the winter non-irrigation season. The headwaters of the South Platte River are located southwest of Denver near South Park, from which it generally heads northeast — through central Denver and the metropolitan region, to Fort Lipton and across the Colorado Eastern Plains, before heading into Nebraska. Because the U.S. Supreme Court has original jurisdiction regarding disputes between the two states, the Nebraska officials argued that the court's input is required to resolve a now irreconcilable dispute. 'Today's action will ensure that Nebraska receives all the water to which it is entitled to under the Compact and that Nebraska's agriculture and economy are protected,' Hilgers said in a statement. 'Water is the essential lifeblood of Nebraska's economy, and it's my goal to protect one of the state's most important assets,' the attorney general added. The lawsuit maintains that the 1923 compact requires Colorado to disconnect certain water users whenever Nebraska is not receiving 120 cubic feet per second of flow during the irrigation season. Currently, the complaint argues, Colorado enables users with 'junior' water rights statuses to take Nebraska's share of summertime water — violating the agreement and Nebraska's 'senior' rights status. The rights in question stem from a historic U.S. West system that adheres to a 'first in time, first in right' approach to water access. This method, rooted in the mid-19th century homesteading and gold rush era, enabled farmers and miners to secure and divert water according to their arrival, rather than their geographical position along the river. The 1923 compact, per the lawsuit, also permits Nebraska to divert 500 cubic feet per second of water flow in the winter, as well as additional water when the Perkins County Canal is constructed. As it stands today, Colorado pumps water in the winter and gradually releases it into the river to compensate for summer overuse, the complaint explains. While this occurs under the theory that the water reaches Nebraska by the following irrigation season, the lawsuit criticizes this method for taking water from the state when farmers are in greatest need. To guarantee that Nebraska can fulfill its rights in the winter and regulate water flow, the state has set out to build the Perkins County Canal, the document explains. The Nebraska state legislature in 2023 approved $574.5 million in funding for the canal's constructions despite pushback from lawmakers who had sought to reduce the cost. While recognizing that Colorado has acknowledged its neighbor's entitlement to build the canal, the Nebraska officials expressed frustrations that negotiations over the project's fine print have persisted for years and ultimately reached a stalemate. 'Despite Nebraska's good faith efforts, Colorado won't agree on such basic things as the location or the size of the Canal, or how much water can flow through it,' a fact sheet issued by the attorney general argued. In response to the lawsuit, Colorado Gov. Jared Polis's (D) office issued a press release that described the complaint as 'meritless.' 'I am disappointed that the states of Colorado and Nebraska will need to waste time and money in court over this meritless challenge,' Polis said. The governor stressed that Colorado has always complied with the South Platte Compact and has met 'in good faith' with Nebraska officials, despite 'attempts to intimidate Colorado landowners.' 'This escalation by Nebraska is needless, and Colorado will take all steps necessary to aggressively defend Colorado water users, landowners, and our rural economy,' Polis added. Colorado Attorney General Phil Weiser echoed these sentiments in his own statement, slamming neighboring leaders for prioritizing politics over agricultural and likely setting in motion 'decades of litigation.' Describing the Perkins County Canal project as 'wasteful,' he said that the canal's operation would require Colorado to build new water infrastructure to offset the impacts of Nebraska's initiative. 'When the dust finally settles, likely over a billion dollars will have been spent—tens of millions of that on litigation alone — and no one in Nebraska or Colorado will be better off,' Weiser added.
Yahoo
10-07-2025
- Yahoo
Dan Osborn launches independent Senate bid against Ricketts in Nebraska
Dan Osborn, an industrial mechanic who lost a Senate bid against Sen. Deb Fischer (R-Neb.) by single digits last year, is launching another bid for the upper chamber — this time for Sen. Pete Ricketts's (R-Neb.) seat. In his launch video, Osborn contrasts his working-class background as an industrial mechanic and military veteran with Ricketts's family wealth, being the eldest son of TD Ameritrade founder Joe Ricketts. 'There's a lot of rich guys in Washington like Pete Ricketts, but not a lot with hands like these,' Osborn says in the ad. 'We fix their cars, grow their food, fight their wars.' 'Politicians like Sen. Pete Ricketts are the problem,' he continued. 'His dad worked for a living, but Petey? He got his money the fast way: his billionaire family.' Osborn's ad also nods to the steamfitter's background, where he led a major strike against Kellogg's in Omaha in 2021, saying, 'I didn't buy my way into politics.' 'I'm running for Senate because Congress shouldn't just be a playground for the rich. We gotta make things more affordable, secure the border and take on corruption in Washington,' he says in the ad. In an interview with The Hill ahead of his announcement, Osborn said he was making another run for Senate to advocate for the working class. He surprised many last year when his long-shot Senate bid against Fischer came strikingly close; he lost to the cattle rancher by close to 7 points, while President Trump handily won the state by more than 20 points. He noted some of the dynamics of next year's race would be different compared to his run against Fischer, including the fact that he's a better-known candidate this time around and he's running against a wealthy incumbent. Osborn said he wanted to show Americans and Nebraskans specifically that 'there's another way forward and create a level playing field for workers to be able to get ahead in this country and stop racing towards the bottom and wealth funneling to the top.' Ricketts campaign spokesperson Will Coup knocked Osborn in a statement following his announcement, suggesting he was a Democrat in sheep's clothing — criticism he also faced last cycle. 'Senator Ricketts has consistently worked for and voted to secure the border and cut taxes for Nebraska workers, families, and seniors,' Coup said. 'Dan Osborn is bought and paid for by his liberal, out-of-state, coastal donors. Dan Osborn will side with Chuck Schumer over Nebraska families and vote with Democrats to open the border, hike taxes, and stop the America First agenda.' While Osborn made last year's race surprisingly competitive, the election underscored the increasingly difficult political terrain for independent candidates in an ever-partisan environment. Beating Ricketts, who was appointed to the Senate in 2023 after former Sen. Ben Sasse (R-Neb.) retired early from his seat, will also be no easy feat. The former Nebraska governor will have a clear financial edge over Osborn. Even before Osborn made his announcement, Trump came out with a strong endorsement of Ricketts on his Truth Social platform in April while deriding the steamfitter as 'a Radical Left Open Border Extremist, who will put our Country, and Safety, LAST.' Osborn could benefit from the midterm environment, however, when the president's party typically faces electoral headwinds. Despite Nebraska's reliably Republican leanings, Osborn thinks there's still an appetite for a middle-of-the-road candidate. 'If you look at the end zones being the two parties, the loudest certainly sit in the end zones. And if you sit around and you either watch Fox News or MSNBC all day long, you know, you would think we're all fighting in the streets with each other, and we hate each other,' Osborn said. 'My world's a different world,' he said. 'I walk around and talk to people all day long, and I think most people operate within the 40-yard lines, somewhere down the middle, either left or right, but certainly, there's a lot of things that we all agree upon no matter what side you fall on.' Osborn said that if he's elected, he wouldn't caucus with either party — something he also pledged the last time he ran. He quipped that he's a 'free agent.' a potentially enviable position in a narrowly divided Senate. 'If I have to bring a lawn chair and then pop it between the two aisles, that's where I sit. I'll eat lunch by myself,' he said. 'I want to challenge the system and show people that you could be an effective senator as an independent.' Updated at 10:32 a.m. EDT Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
