Keir Starmer's rarely-seen wife, awkward first meet and important job behind the scenes
Prime Minister Keir Starmer has been married to his wife Victoria for over 16 years, but she's rarely makes public appearances alongside the Labout leader.
Today, however, is an exception. Starmer met with President Trump at his resort in South Ayrshire, Scotland, and Victoria was right by his side.
The couple were greeted by Trump as they arrived this afternoon, with Victoria dressed in a cream blazer and tailored maxi skirt as she shook hands with the US President who affectionately put his hand on her arm.
Starmer, 62, who served in Jeremy Corbyn's top team, moved into the limelight in 2020, though his other half has chosen to stay largely out of the public eye. In an interview, Starmer explained how Victoria talks through ideas on how to improve the country with him - but wants to protect her privacy.
"She's a streetwise grounded, brilliant, gorgeous woman who wants as far as she can to get on with her own life and to protect it," he told the Sunday Mirror. "She loves working for the NHS. She loves the team that she's working with. And she and I are doing our best to raise two happy and confident children and that matters hugely to us."
Just like her husband, Victoria is a trained solicitor who now works in the NHS as an occupational health worker.
The pair married in 2007 - the year before Starmer became Director of Public Prosecutions - and share two children, a son called Tony and a daughter whose name was not made public.
The couple met in the early 2000s when working as lawyers, where Victoria had to supply Keir with documents for a case he was working on. But it seems her first impression of the Labour leader was less than impressed.
According to Starmer's unofficial biographer Nigel Cawthorne, author of Keir Starmer: A Life of Contrasts: "He rang her and, having never spoken to her before, queried whether the brief she had sent him was less than '100 percent accurate'.
"Unflustered, Victoria firmly held her ground against the caller on the other side of the line, reassuring him that she knew her job and, after putting the phone down, said, 'Who the f*** does he think he is?'"
Keir also recalled the first encounter when speaking on Piers Morgan's Life Stories in 2020, explaining: "I was doing a case in court and it all depended on whether the documents were accurate. I [asked the team] who actually drew up these documents, they said a woman called Victoria, so I said let's get her on the line."
He revealed how he ended up hearing her last comment. "She said, 'Who the bleep does he think he is?', then put the phone down on me. And quite right too."
Keir reportedly took her for their first date at the Lord Stanley pub, in Camden, where they now live in a £1.75 million townhouse in his Holborn and St Pancras constituency.
The family of Victoria, who grew up in the nearby Gospel Oak area, is originally from Poland with Jewish heritage.
Although Keir is an atheist, he has mentioned that their children have been brought up in the faith. In an interview on Radio 4's Desert Island Discs, Keir revealed: "It is perfectly true that my wife's father is Jewish - they came from Poland - and my wife's mother converted when they got married. There is a long tradition of family and faith there. We observe some of the practices, for example, Friday night prayers".
And it appears that if ever Keir got into Downing Street, Victoria would be off doing her own thing, according to a Labour insider. "She's quite sassy in that she's quite unbothered by what he's doing," a source told the Telegraph last year.
"If he ever gets into Downing Street, she's going to be very much leading her own life. She's not going to be in the spotlight like Cherie Blair, but more of a background Sarah Brown-type figure.
"They have a great dynamic – she spends quite a lot of time taking the mickey out of him because he can be so serious. I've never known her to be particularly political – she's always had her own interests."
Trump and Starmer are meeting to discuss the situation in Gaza and trade.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
22 minutes ago
- The Independent
Yvette Cooper's fast-track asylum plan revealed after protests across UK
The Home Secretary plans to introduce a fast-track scheme to tackle the asylum backlog that aims to turn around decisions within weeks. Yvette Cooper said Labour was planning a 'major overhaul' of the appeal process in the hope it would help to make a significant dent in the numbers. 'We need a major overhaul of the appeal [process] and that's what we are going to do in the autumn… If we speed up the decision-making appeal system and also then keep increasing returns, we hope to be able to make quite a big reduction in the overall numbers in the asylum system, because that is the best way to actually restore order and control,' Ms Cooper told The Sunday Times. The aim would be to compress the process so decisions and returns could happen 'within weeks', the newspaper reported, citing a source familiar with the plans. The Government faces pressure to cut how many asylum seekers are housed in hotels while awaiting the outcome of a claim or appeal. The Home Secretary has previously said she was eager to put a fast-track system for decisions and appeals in place so that people from countries considered safe would not sit in the asylum system for a long time. 'We should be able to take those decisions really fast, be able to take those decisions, make sure that they go through the appeals system really fast and then also make sure they are returned really quickly as well,' she told the Home Affairs committee in June. 'That would mean a fast-track system alongside the main asylum system, I think that would be really important in terms of making sure that the system is fair. 'That will require legislation in order to be able to do that, as well as a new system design.' The Government is also seeking to reduce the number of Channel crossings. More than 25,000 migrants have arrived in small boats this year so far. Tensions over asylum hotels have flared up in recent weeks, with a protest and counter-protest taking place on Saturday outside the Thistle City Barbican Hotel in north London, and also in Newcastle. Chancellor Rachel Reeves has pledged to end the use of hotels to house asylum seekers by the end of this Parliament. Asylum seekers and their families are housed in temporary accommodation if they are waiting for the outcome of a claim or an appeal and have been assessed as not being able to support themselves independently. They are housed in hotels if there is not enough space in accommodation provided by local authorities or other organisations.
Times
22 minutes ago
- Times
Keir Starmer's not the issue. But nor were Johnson, May, Brown…
'The end is Nige.' That was how The Sun's front page reported my discovery, in 2017, that 'Nigel' had fallen off the official list of baby names. At the time, it seemed not just striking but symbolic: with Ukip at 2 per cent in the polls, and its former leader out of frontline politics, Nigel's best days really did seem to lie in the past. Last week, the list came out again. In the register office as in public life, Nigel was firmly back, with five boys both this year and last — one of whom even joined the Reform leader on the campaign trail in Clacton. Rishi was there, and Kemi too. But poor old Keir had disappeared. Again, the symbolism was irresistible. This time last year, Starmer was at his height as prime minister, delivering a muscular response to the riots that captured the national mood. But he has steadily become more and more disliked. Today, only 19 per cent of voters tell YouGov he is doing a good job, against 69 per cent who disagree. As of the latest polls, he is in the negatives even among Labour voters. • Top baby names in England and Wales revealed — but no new Keirs There are all sorts of reasons why this has happened — which you could fairly summarise as a bad hand, badly played. But what fascinates me is the familiarity of the Labour response. Back in the Boris Johnson days, and the Theresa May days, and the Gordon Brown days, any given setback would usually be accompanied by briefings about the flaws in the No 10 team. The prime minister, journalists would report, was deeply frustrated by the failures they saw, and would be reshuffling their team to get a personal grip. That, or the problem was that they had become overly dependent on — almost hypnotised by — a particular adviser or advisers. Now, with lessons learnt, we would see the real Boris. The real Theresa. The real Gordon. There are two intellectual traditions at work here — one old and one new. The new one is that a generation of politicians have grown up watching The West Wing, and in particular the scene where the struggling administration decides that it needs to cast off caution and pragmatism and allow Martin Sheen's president to be the campaigning, crusading figure who first inspired them: 'Let Bartlet be Bartlet!' goes the cry. But the second tradition is far older. Indeed, it's one of the oldest patterns in political history. In Britain, as in many other countries and cultures, it was not just treason but verging on heresy to criticise a divinely appointed king. So the discontented would always stress that their complaints were not about the wise and goodly monarch, but the evil counsellors around them. As late as the Civil War, the Roundheads blamed the outbreak of hostilities not on Charles I himself, but 'an abounding malignity in those parties and Factions; who doe still labour to foment Jealosies betwixt the King and this Parliament' — godless bishops, sinister Jesuits and treacherous nobles. It took six full years of war for them to adopt the literally revolutionary position that the blame truly lay with 'Charles Stuart, that man of blood'. Studying recent reporting, you can see exactly the same themes. We have had the briefing for and against the prime minister's favourite — aka his chief of staff. The reports of new blood being brought in to freshen things up. Accounts of how the prime minister will take a personal grip on the policy-making process, since decisions were reaching him too late in the day. (By miraculous coincidence, the main mistake cited, making cuts to welfare, was also hugely unpopular with Labour backbenchers.) We have had a cabinet awayday with excited talk of a 'progressive pivot', and rebuilding the government around the prime minister's personal obsession with 'life chances'. 'It was all very 'Let Keir be Keir',' claimed an anonymous minister. • Keir Starmer needs his authority back. Can a Blairite veteran help? But the problem for the government is that it's never the advisers. It's always the king. Just like it was for King John or Charles I or any of the others. Indeed, one of the peculiarities of the British state is that there are surprisingly few formal, institutional structures around the prime minister. Instead, Downing Street functions almost like a royal court, moulding itself around the personality of each new incumbent. And once set, that mould is surprisingly hard to break. Certainly, it is a lot easier to list the excitable articles about prime ministerial relaunches, revamps and resets than examples of such resets actually working. Ironically, for all her intractable reputation, one of the few to manage it is arguably Margaret Thatcher, who retooled her administration in 1981-2 after receiving perhaps the most wounding memo ever sent to a PM by their underlings. ('Your own management competence, like that of most of your colleagues, is almost non-existent … You break every rule of good man-management. You bully your weaker colleagues. You criticise colleagues in front of each other and in front of their officials…').As for 'let Keir be Keir', who will Keir actually be? We've been told, over the years, that the Starmer mission is all about service, or change, or radicalism, or necessary decisions. But it feels like a series of attempts to project a personality, and a narrative, on to a blank screen. Recently, on the train back from Kyiv, my colleague Josh Glancy asked Starmer about standing in the spotlight of history. The PM, he wrote, bristled impatiently: 'I don't do all this self-analysis bit. I thought you'd picked that up a year ago. You're still desperately trying to get in there. Come on.' Starmer's position is that his job is not to construct fancy theories. It is to sit down and do the work — to make decision after decision until there are no more problems left to solve. But all truly successful politicians tell a story about themselves. Whitehall, too, works best when everyone can buy into a single shared narrative, imposed from the centre. Starmer not only hasn't done that, but actively resists it. The result, to steal a put-down from Bismarck, is that he ends up seeming like a Sphinx without a riddle. And the government ends up with a majority but no mission. It may be that the PM can turn things around — that by the time he leaves office, maternity wards will be packed with little Keirs, Morgans and Angelas. But I can't help feeling that progressive Keir will soon be discarded alongside change Keir, growth Keir, and tough decisions Keir with kung-fu grip. Because if there's one lesson from history for our leaders, it's that the fault lies not in their advisers, but in themselves.
Rhyl Journal
27 minutes ago
- Rhyl Journal
Plans for new offence to crack down on promoting Channel crossings online
Ministers are seeking to create a new offence under the Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill already going through Parliament, to widen its scope to tackle illegal entry to the UK. The offence would also outlaw the promise of illegal working being promoted online and could carry a large fine. It comes as the Government grapples with a record number of migrants arriving in the UK after crossing the English Channel. On Wednesday, arrivals passed more than 25,000 for the year so far, a record for this point in the year. Assisting illegal immigration to the UK is already a crime, but officials believe the changes will give more powers to police and other agencies to disrupt criminal gangs. According to analysis by the Home Office, around 80% of migrants arriving to the UK by small boat told officials they used social media during their journey, including to contact agents linked to people smuggling gangs. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said: 'Selling the false promise of a safe journey to the UK and a life in this country – whether on or offline – simply to make money, is nothing short of immoral. 'These criminals have no issue with leading migrants to life-threatening situations using brazen tactics on social media. We are determined to do everything we can to stop them, wherever they operate. The National Crime Agency already works with social media companies to remove posts promoting crossings, with more than 8,000 taken offline in 2024. NCA director general of operations Rob Jones said the proposed new offence will give them more options of how to target gangs and their business models. Previous cases that could have been targeted under the proposed offence include a Preston-based smuggler jailed for 17 years for posting videos of migrants thanking him for his help. Albanian smugglers who used social media to promote £12,000 'package deals' for accommodation and a job in the UK on arrival would also be in scope. The Conservatives said it was 'too little, too late' and that only their proposal to automatically deport people who enter Britain via unauthorised routes can tackle small boat crossings. Shadow home secretary Chris Philp said: 'Tinkering at the edges won't fix the problem. 'Labour still has no clear plan to deter illegal entry, no effective enforcement and no strategy to speed up removals. This is a panicked attempt to look tough after months of doing nothing. 'The only clear and enforceable plan is the Conservative Deportation Bill, a no-nonsense strategy that allows us to detain illegal arrivals immediately and remove them without delay. The British public deserve focused action, not more of Labour's dithering.'
