logo
Norwegian pension fund divests from companies selling to Israeli military

Norwegian pension fund divests from companies selling to Israeli military

Al Jazeera8 hours ago

Norway's largest pension fund, KLP, has said that it will no longer do business with two companies that sell equipment to the Israeli military because the equipment is possibly being used in the war in Gaza.
The two companies are the Oshkosh Corporation, a United States company mostly focused on trucks and military vehicles, and ThyssenKrupp, a German industrial firm that makes a broad selection of products, ranging from elevators and industrial machinery to warships.
'In June 2024, KLP learned of reports from the UN that several named companies were supplying weapons or equipment to the [Israeli army] and that these weapons are being used in Gaza,' Kiran Aziz, the head of responsible investments at KLP Kapitalforvaltning, said in a statement provided to Al Jazeera.
'Our conclusion is that the companies Oshkosh and ThyssenKrupp are contravening our responsible investment guidelines,' the statement said.
'We have therefore decided to exclude them from our investment universe.'
According to the pension fund, it had investments worth $1.8m in Oshkosh and almost $1m in ThyssenKrupp until June 2025.
KLP, founded in 1949 and the country's largest pension fund, oversees a fund worth about $114bn. It is a public pension fund owned by municipalities and businesses in the public sector, and has a pension scheme that covers about 900,000 people, mostly municipal workers, according to its website.
Vehicles and warships
KLP said that it had been in touch with both companies before it made its decision and that Oshkosh 'confirmed that it has sold, and continues to sell, equipment that is used by the [Israeli army] in Gaza', mostly vehicles and parts for vehicles.
ThyssenKrupp told KLP that 'it has a long-term relationship with [the Israeli army]' and that it had delivered four warships of the type Sa'ar 6 to the Israeli Navy in the period November 2020 to May 2021.
The German company also said it had plans to deliver a submarine to the Israeli Navy later this year.
When asked by KLP what checks and balances were made when it came to the use of the equipment the companies delivered, KLP said both Oshkosh and ThyssenKrupp 'failed to document the necessary due diligence in relation to their potential complicity in violations of humanitarian law'.
'Companies have an independent duty to exercise due diligence in order to avoid complicity in violations of fundamental human rights and humanitarian law,' said Aziz.
Previous divestments
This is not the first time that the pension fund has divested from companies linked to possible human rights abuses.
In 2021, KLP divested from 16 companies, including telecom giant Motorola, that it concluded were linked to illegal Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank.
The pension fund said there was an 'unacceptable risk that the excluded companies are contributing to the abuse of human rights in situations of war and conflict through their links with the Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank'.
That same year, KLP also said it was divesting from the Indian port and logistics group Adani Ports because of its links to the Myanmar military government.
Last summer, KLP also divested from US firm Caterpillar. In an opinion piece for Al Jazeera, the KLP's Aziz wrote that Caterpillar's bulldozers undergo adjustments in Israel by the military and local companies, and are subsequently used in the occupied Palestinian territory.
'The constant use of these weaponised bulldozers in the occupied Palestinian territory has led to a series of human rights warnings from United Nations agencies, and nongovernmental organisations over the last two decades about the company's involvement in the demolition of Palestinian homes and infrastructure,' she wrote.
'It is therefore impossible to assert that the company has implemented adequate measures to avoid becoming involved in future norm violations.'
The latest move builds on a series of similar decisions among several large investment funds in Europe that have cut ties with Israeli companies for their involvement in either the war in Gaza or because of links to illegal Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank.
In May, Norway's sovereign wealth fund, the largest in the world, said it would divest from Israel's Paz Retail and Energy because of the company's involvement in supplying infrastructure and fuel to illegal Israeli settlements.
This came after an earlier decision in December last year to sell all shares it had in another Israeli company, Bezeq, for its services provided to the illegal settlements.
Other pension funds as well as wealth funds have also, in recent years, distanced themselves from companies accused of enabling or cooperating with Israel's illegal occupation of the West Bank or its war on Gaza.
In February 2024, Denmark's largest pension fund divested from several Israeli banks and companies as the fund feared its investments could be used to fund the settlements in the West Bank.
Six months later, the United Kingdom's largest pension fund, the Universities Superannuation Scheme (USS), said it would sell off all its investments linked to Israel because of its war on Gaza. The fund, which totals about $79bn, said it would sell its $101m worth of investments after pressure from its members.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

High Court allows UK to keep exporting F-35 jet parts to Israel
High Court allows UK to keep exporting F-35 jet parts to Israel

Al Jazeera

timean hour ago

  • Al Jazeera

High Court allows UK to keep exporting F-35 jet parts to Israel

Britain's High Court has ruled that the government's decision to allow the export of Lockheed Martin F-35 jet parts to Israel is lawful despite accepting that they could be used in breach of international humanitarian law. In a 72-page ruling on Monday, Judges Stephen Males and Karen Steyn said the case was about a 'much more focused issue' than just the jet parts. 'That issue is whether it is open to the court to rule that the UK must withdraw from a specific multilateral defence collaboration … because of the prospect that some UK-manufactured components will or may ultimately be supplied to Israel, and may be used in the commission of a serious violation of international humanitarian law in the conflict in Gaza,' the ruling said. 'Under our constitution, that acutely sensitive and political issue is a matter for the executive, which is democratically accountable to Parliament and ultimately to the electorate, not for the courts,' it added. Currently, the United Kingdom contributes components for F-35s to an international defence programme that produces the bombers. But Palestinian human rights organisation Al-Haq, based in the occupied West Bank, took legal action in January against the UK's Department for Business and Trade (DBT) over its decision to exempt the parts when it suspended some export licences in September last year. During a hearing in May, Al-Haq said the government's decision to send the jet parts was unlawful as it 'gives rise to a significant risk of facilitating crime'. The same month, Defence Secretary John Healey said suspending it would affect the 'whole F-35 programme' and have a 'profound impact on international peace and security'. After Monday's ruling, Shawan Jabarin, the chief of Al-Haq, said, 'Despite the outcome of today, this case has centred the voice of the Palestinian people and has rallied significant public support, and it is just the start.' 'By exposing serious government failings in facilitating international crimes against Palestinians through its arms exports, civil society and human rights organisations have achieved a crucial breakthrough, and we will continue to persevere in the UK and beyond until governments are held accountable, Israel's impunity is challenged and justice for the Palestinian people is realised,' he added. 'Knock on effect' Reporting from London, Al Jazeera's Milena Veselinovic said the building of an F-35 fighter jet is part of a 'global programme' where many nations build different parts, and they are all manufactured in different countries. 'Britain makes about 15 percent of each F-35 jet, however, it doesn't make those parts specifically for Israel,' Veselinovic explained. 'So, what the UK was arguing is that if they stop those parts from being exported that could have a knock on effect on the entire international programme, it would impact the supply chain, it would impact on their NATO allies, even on the ability, they said, for Ukraine to defend itself from Russia's invasion,' she said. However, Al-Haq has argued that by building the parts for the global pool, the UK was in breach of international law, including the Geneva Convention, due to the use of the weapons in Gaza. 'But the High Court sided with the government rejecting that and did accept the UK's argument that this was a strategic objective despite acknowledging that it could mean that the UK is also in breach of international law,' Veselinovic added. Export licences In September last year, Foreign Secretary David Lammy announced that the government was suspending about 30 of 350 export licences of items used during Israel's war in Gaza after a review of its compliance with international humanitarian law. However, according to global advocacy organisation Oxfam International, which joined Al-Haq's case against the DBT, the partial ban did not include British-made F-35 parts, including refuelling probes, laser targeting systems, tyres and ejector seats. Moreover, a report by pro-Palestine activist groups found in May that despite the suspension, military items have continued to be exported to Israel. Since the war began in October 2023, Israeli attacks have killed at least 56,500 people and wounded 133,419 others.

Post-Iran conflict things will be 'complicated' for Israel and US
Post-Iran conflict things will be 'complicated' for Israel and US

Al Jazeera

time6 hours ago

  • Al Jazeera

Post-Iran conflict things will be 'complicated' for Israel and US

Post-Iran conflict things will be 'complicated' for Israel and US Quotable Mohamed Elmasry, a professor at Doha Institute for Graduate Studies, says Israel expected much more than what they got from the conflict with Iran. Video Duration 01 minutes 16 seconds 01:16 Video Duration 01 minutes 29 seconds 01:29 Video Duration 01 minutes 28 seconds 01:28 Video Duration 01 minutes 06 seconds 01:06 Video Duration 00 minutes 44 seconds 00:44 Video Duration 01 minutes 14 seconds 01:14 Video Duration 01 minutes 11 seconds 01:11

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store