Harbour Learning Trust proposes half-day Friday plans
According to the letter, seen by the BBC, teachers currently spend one afternoon a week away from class to plan lessons.During these times, pupils are taught by other school staff, or external sports coaches.By introducing the revised timetable, pupils would only be taught by a fully qualified teacher in their lessons, it stated.Activities would also run until 14:45 BST on a Friday, but would not be part of the formal school day.As for a proposed reduction to the hour-long lunch break, the letter stated that this was often a time when pupils "make poor behaviour decisions".By cutting it to 45 minutes, there would be less opportunity to "get it wrong", it said.The trust's chief executive officer Richard Briggs said: "This is a genuine consultation and we are seeking the views of our parents on these planned changes."If these proposals go ahead, our pupils will spend all of their time in school in front of a fully qualified teacher, which means they will make more progress and increase their life chances."We understand that some parents may have childcare concerns, which is why we have started this consultation early and will make final decisions early in June to allow parents nearly three months to make alternative arrangements if necessary."
'Financial hit'
However, parent Joe Barker, who is campaigning against the plans, told the BBC: "One of the big gripes parents have is more households than ever have two working parents - with the motto at the moment to 'get Britain working again'."One of the arguments they have is this will create more family time. It won't because it will force parents to alter their working patterns and either make the time up elsewhere, or take a financial hit," he added.Under the plans, Mr Barker said each child would have considerably less learning time and miss out on "play time", which he said was an "absolutely essential part" of a child's learning."They are dressing it up as a benefit to the children - when there is no real benefit," he said.Others shared similar views on social media.One parent wrote: "I have already discussed with my daughter about potentially moving schools as both myself and her dad work full time."Another said: "Absolutely shocking idea. Reduced dinner times, kids will be rushed to eat. They don't get long enough as it is."Harbour Learning Trust consists of eight academies: Healing Academy, Healing, GrimsbyErmine Primary Academy, LincolnHartsholme Academy, LincolnGreat Coates Primary School, GrimsbyHealing Primary Academy, Healing, GrimsbyWilliam Barcroft Junior School, CleethorpesSt Giles Academy, Healing, GrimsbyWoodlands Academy, GrimsbyThe trust's secondary school, Healing Academy, is not affected by the proposals, according to the Local Democracy Reporting Service.A consultation runs until 2 June, and any changes would only come in at the start of the 2025/26 academic year.
Listen to highlights from Lincolnshire on BBC Sounds, watch the latest episode of Look North or tell us about a story you think we should be covering here.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
4 hours ago
- The Guardian
Talking is the key that unlocks all education
Simon Jenkins says the teaching of oracy 'was launched about 10 years ago by progressive educationists' (Another way we are failing an entire generation: we must teach young people to speak, 24 July). There has been enthusiasm for spoken English in schools for much longer than that. In 1989, the government published the report English for Ages 5 to 16. In it, Brian Cox argued for the greater inclusion of oracy by asserting that 'talk is now widely recognised as promoting and embodying a range of skills and competence – both transactional and social – that are central to children's overall language development'. Much effort had already gone into legitimising spoken English opportunities in the classroom, including by its appearance in examinations for CSE English. This was not only for formal oral presentations (debates, rehearsed readings etc) but more for the dynamic use of language arising from the multiplicity of environments with effective communication at their heart. Jenkins is right when he argues that the narrow focus on the three Rs is archaic and irrelevant to the real world. What we need is a learning environment in which children can experience and explore talk in all its forms, as the backbone of language and its Mike DavisBlackpool, Lancashire As a teacher of mathematics and computer science, I cannot let Simon Jenkins' assertion that maths 'is not needed by 95% of jobseekers' pass without comment. I accept that a lot of the maths taught for GCSE (eg trigonometry, quadratic functions, laws of indices) is irrelevant in daily life, but I imagine the same is true of all subjects, since most of us do not need, for example, to recall shapes of molecules or understand chromatography (science), or be familiar with medieval or early modern Britain (history). In her delightful book Is Maths Real?, Eugenia Cheng likens the study of maths to exercising core muscles. 'There is no activity in life that involves only core muscles, but it's helpful to have a strong core because it enables us to use the rest of our muscles to greater effect,' she writes. 'It gives us better access to the rest of our strength, as well as protecting us against things like balance issues, tripping over and hurting our back.' All study for GCSE qualifications strengthens our brains – different subjects in slightly different ways. Hence studying a variety of subjects, including maths, is vital. Moreover, if we strip several of these subjects down to the core useful bits, what will be left for students to talk about in oracy practice sessions?Chris WillisOxford I couldn't agree more with Simon Jenkins. When I was a child my parents had no money for books and, as I had a twin, an ideal playmate, the idea of sitting and quietly reading was a non-starter. My parents talked a lot. To each other and to us. Opinions, family jokes, quickfire wit, stories and a lot of questions and most important, how to listen as well as talk. All this was, of course, informal. My English teacher assumed I read all of the time at home, such was my ability to communicate. Sadly, with so many distractions in the home these days, the teaching of oracy in the curriculum seems more essential than ever for a child's development and ability to communicate and to take their place in the increasingly complex CameronFormby, Merseyside Have an opinion on anything you've read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.
Daily Mail
2 days ago
- Daily Mail
$1,000 bonus among efforts by schools to counter chronic absenteeism
Schools are paying students $1,000 bonuses to attend class as absenteeism continues to stalk American campuses five years after the pandemic. The rates of 'chronic' non-attendance - defined as students absent for 10 per cent or more of teaching per year - jumped 31 per cent year in the 2021-2022 academic year. But rates remain stubbornly high even four years after the coronavirus crisis, the Department of Education (DoE) figures show. Absenteeism has dropped to 19.3 per cent but student absences are 'more common' and 'more extreme' following the pandemic, a study by the American Enterprise Institute (AEI) has found. The latest data, which includes figures through March 2025, shows absenteeism rates still remain 50 per cent higher than before Covid. Absenteeism declined 0.3 points since last year, but experts warn that at the current rate it will take at least two decades for student absence rates to return to pre-pandemic levels. Educators are trying to incentivize students to come to school, with some districts even paying students for their attendance. Others have encouraged teachers to have attendance count towards grades or limit the number of assignments that can be completed online, The Boston Globe reports. Twenty states reported that more than 30 per cent of their students missed at least three weeks of school in 2022-23, according to latest figures from the DoE. Absenteeism remains highest in Oregon, Hawaii, New Mexico and the District of Columbia, the report - published earlier this year - revealed. Oregon recorded absenteeism levels of 44 per cent during the 2022-23 academic year, followed by Hawaii and New Mexico at 43 per cent. Washington DC, however, recorded an absenteeism rate of 47 per cent - the highest in the country, according to the data. The AEI report, which includes data from last year, found the highest rates of absenteeism are in Hawaii, which recorded a level of 34 per cent in 2024. Connecticut followed at 30 per cent and DC came ranked third worst at 29 per cent, according to the AEI data. Researchers say that absences derive from multiple - but often interconnected - factors including student disengagement, lack of access to student and family supports, and student and family health challenges. They allege absenteeism is highest among 'high-needs populations,' including students who come from low-income households. Students with disabilities are 36 per cent more likely to experience chronic absenteeism than students without disabilities, the DoE has found. Absenteeism is also 20 per cent higher among students who are English language learners than those who are fluent or native speakers. The DoE has called on states and school districts nationwide to address the factors driving absences and 'send a clear message' to students and families that children 'need to be in school.' District officials in Detroit, Michigan and Oakland, California, have used money to motivate students to come to school. Detroit spends up to $1,000 per student per year to encourage attendance, which experts allege increases attendance by as much as several days annually. A Boston School Committee member has called on officials to launch a similar program in the Massachusetts city, the Globe reports. Massachusetts recorded a statewide absenteeism level of 15 per cent last year, latest figures reveal. Other experts have encouraged schools to create 'negative nudges' or punishments for students who fail to meet attendance requirements. Robert Balfanz, of Johns Hopkins University School of Education, suggests that having attendance affect academic grades could get students who are on the verge of skipping to turn up to class. Tim Daly, CEO of education nonprofit EdNavigator, has suggested that schools increase attendance rates by helping tackle students lacking sleep. A survey conducted by the organization found that after sickness, 'not enough sleep' was the most common reason for student absences. Daly suggested schools could 'help kids with their nighttime routines' by disabling capabilities on district-issued technology at certain times. 'Sometimes when kids stay up too late, they're using the devices to "do homework" but really they're using them to stream,' he said during AEI's chronic absenteeism symposium in May. 'Not only would [disabling them] prevent them that, [schools] can message to parents, when that goes off, it's time to go to sleep.' Some school districts have even adjusted high school start times to better align with adolescent sleep cycles. Mary Beth Miotto, a pediatrician and former president of the Massachusetts chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics, has also urged medical professionals to treat school attendance like a 'vital sign.' Miotto argued that high absenteeism negatively affects physical and mental health, such as increasing high school dropout rates and lowering life expectancy. She said it is critical for doctors to encourage parents to get their children to school and have positive conversations about attendance without sparking fears about truancy. The pediatrician believes that all primary care physicians, ER staff and urgent care doctors should be asking families about school attendance. 'We can pour all the money into schools and teachers, but if kids aren't showing up, it's not helping,' Miotto told the Globe.
The Sun
2 days ago
- The Sun
You could be handed up to £2,600 in compensation following child benefit error – check if you'll get the cash
HUNDREDS of families could be in line for thousands of pounds in compensation after a 2014 error in child benefit rules. HMRC has announced a major effort to correct the mistake, which left around 500 families without payments they were entitled to. 1 The error mostly affects parents of 16 to 19-year-olds who continued their education or training outside of regular schools between April 2014 and August 2025. Due to the blunder, these families were improperly denied child benefit. Now, HMRC is launching a 'correction exercise' to identify affected families and ensure they receive the money they're owed. The compensation process is expected to cost £1million and will wrap up by October 2026. This means that if each of the 500 affected families has one child impacted, they could be entitled to payouts of up to £2,600 per family. To track down those impacted, HMRC will work alongside local authorities, the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP), and other stakeholders. A communications campaign will also be rolled out to raise awareness and help families come forward. The error is set to be officially reversed in new amendments to child benefit regulations, which will take effect from September 2025. These changes will restore eligibility for young people in certain educational settings, ensuring no one else misses out in the future. If you think you might be affected, keep an eye out for updates from HMRC or reach out to your local authority for guidance. All the freebies you can get on Universal Credit Families who qualify could see significant payouts, so it's worth checking your eligibility. An HMRC spokesperson said: "About seven million families received child benefit last year. "We have identified that a very small number, about 500 over 10 years, may not have been paid their correct entitlement. "We are working with stakeholders to help reach them and will share details on how they can claim soon." What is the child benefit payment? Every parent in the UK can apply for child benefit to help with the costs of raising their child. You can get it if you're responsible for bringing up a child who is under 16 or under 20 and in approved education or training. The benefit is worth £26.05 a week for your eldest child, and then £17.25 a week for any subsequent children. For a family with two children who qualify, this adds up to £2251.60 a year. For just one child, you get £1354.60 a year. While child benefit is available for all to apply, there is a caveat for higher earners. If one parent in the household earns over £60,000 per year, a portion of the benefit must be repaid, this triggers the so-called high income child benefit charge. This means a portion of the benefit must be repaid. Once an individual's income exceeds £80,000, the entire benefit must be repaid. What is the high income child benefit charge? IF you apply for child benefit but earn over £60,000 or live with a partner who does, you'll have to pay the high income benefit charge. This is calculated as 1% of your child benefit payment for every £200 you earn over the threshold. The calculation is done based on your adjusted net income, which is the money you earn after paying things like pension contributions. However, if you earn slightly over the threshold, you can increase your retirement savings to put you back under the limit and continue to claim. If you do have to pay the charge, the money is paid back via the higher earner's self-assessment tax return. Once either you or your partner earns £80,000 you will have to repay all of the child benefit money. What other childcare help is available? Up to 30 free childcare hours You may be able to get free childcare for your child aged nine months to four years old if you live in England. The number of hours working parents can claim depends on the age of their child. If your child is: Nine months to two years old, you can get 15 hours per week of free childcare Three to four years old, you can get 30 hours per week of free childcare From September 2025, children aged nine months to two years old will qualify for 30 hours per week of free childcare To qualify, you'll need to earn at least the equivalent of the national minimum wage for 16 hours a week. Both parents will need to earn the equivalent of at least £166 per week, each with a taxable income of no more than £100,000. Your two-year-old can also get free childcare if you live in England and get any of the following benefits: Income support income-based jobseeker's allowance (JSA) income-related employment and support allowance (ESA) Universal Credit and your household income is £15,400 a year or less after tax, not including benefit payments The guaranteed element of pension credit Child tax credit, working tax credit (or both), and your household income is £16,190 a year or less before tax Universal Credit childcare costs Parents on Universal Credit and in a paid job can have up to 85% of their childcare costs covered, up to £1,031.88 a month for one child and £1,768.94 a month for two or more children. It doesn't matter how many hours you work. If you live with a partner, you both need to work to qualify. You usually have to pay for the childcare and claim back the costs, but if you go back to work or increase your hours you can request for the money to be paid upfront. Are you missing out on benefits? YOU can use a benefits calculator to help check that you are not missing out on money you are entitled to Charity Turn2Us' benefits calculator works out what you could get. Entitledto's free calculator determines whether you qualify for various benefits, tax credit and Universal Credit. and charity StepChange both have benefits tools powered by Entitledto's data. You can use Policy in Practice's calculator to determine which benefits you could receive and how much cash you'll have left over each month after paying for housing costs. Your exact entitlement will only be clear when you make a claim, but calculators can indicate what you might be eligible for.
