German palliative care doctor goes on trial for murder of 15 patients
The prosecutor's office brought charges against the 40-year-old doctor 'for 15 counts of murder with premeditated malice and other base motives' before a Berlin state court. The prosecutor's office is seeking not only a conviction and a finding of 'particularly serious' guilt, but also a lifetime ban on practicing medicine and subsequent preventive detention.
Murder charges carry a maximum sentence of life in prison. If a court establishes that the defendant bears particularly severe guilt, that means he wouldn't be eligible for release after 15 years as is usually the case in Germany.
Parallel to the trial, the prosecutor's office is investigating dozens of other suspected cases in separate proceedings.
The man, who has only been identified as Johannes M. in line with German privacy rules, is also accused of trying to cover up evidence of the murders by starting fires in the victims' homes. He has been in custody since August 6, 2025.
The doctor was part of a nursing service's end-of-life care team in the German capital and was initially suspected in the deaths of just four patients. That number has crept higher since last summer, and prosecutors are now accusing him of the deaths of 15 people between September 22, 2021, and July 24 last year.
The victims' ages ranged from 25 to 94. Most died in their own homes.
The doctor allegedly administered an anesthetic and a muscle relaxer to the patients without their knowledge or consent. The drug cocktail then allegedly paralyzed the respiratory muscles. Respiratory arrest and death followed within minutes, prosecutors said.
The doctor did not agree to an interview with a psychiatric expert ahead of the trial, German news agency dpa reported. The expert will therefore observe the defendant's behaviour in court and hear statements from witnesses in order to give an assessment of the man's personality and culpability.
So far, it is unclear what the palliative care physician's motive might have been, dpa reported. The victims named in the indictment were all seriously ill, but their deaths were not imminent.
The defendant will not make a statement to the court for the time being, his defence lawyer Christoph Stoll said, according to dpa.
The Court has initially scheduled 35 trial dates for the proceedings until January 28, 2026. According to the Court, 13 relatives of the deceased are represented as co-plaintiffs. There are several witnesses for each case, and around 150 people in total could be heard in court, dpa reported.
Among the cases now being heard in court is that of a 56-year-old woman who died in September.
On September 5, the doctor allegedly administered an anaesthetic and a muscle relaxant to the physically weakened woman in her home without any medical need. However, fearing discovery, he then made an emergency call and falsely stated that he had found the woman in a 'condition requiring resuscitation', according to the indictment. Rescue workers were able to resuscitate the woman and took her to hospital, dpa reported.
The indictment said that 'in continuation of his plan of action and in the knowledge of the injured party's living will', according to which the woman did not want any life-prolonging measures, the doctor is said to have called one of her daughters and apologized for violating this will. With the consent of both daughters, artificial respiration was discontinued and the woman died on Sept. 8 in a Berlin hospital.
An investigation into further suspected deaths is continuing.
A specially established investigation team in the homicide department of the Berlin State Criminal Police Office and the Berlin public prosecutor's office investigated a total of 395 cases. In 95 of these cases, initial suspicion was confirmed and preliminary proceedings were initiated. In five cases, the initial suspicion was not substantiated.
In 75 cases, investigations are still ongoing in separate proceedings. Five exhumations are still planned for this separate procedure, prosecutors said.
Among the cases still being investigated is the death of the doctor's mother-in-law, who was suffering from cancer, court spokesman Sebastian Büchner said. Local media reported that she died during a visit by the doctor. In 2019, a German nurse who murdered 87 patients by deliberately bringing about cardiac arrests was given a life sentence.
Earlier this month, German investigators in the northern town of Itzehoe said they were examining the case of a doctor who has been suspected of killing several patients.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
6 hours ago
- The Hindu
Sri Lankan Supreme Court orders $1 bn compensation over X-Press Pearl disaster
In a landmark judgment that could redefine environmental accountability in South Asia, the Supreme Court of Sri Lanka has ordered non-state actors — including the owners, operators, and local agents of the ill-fated MV X-Press Pearl — to pay $1 billion as interim compensation to the Sri Lankan treasury. The ruling relates to the catastrophic maritime disaster in May 2021, when the Singapore-flagged cargo vessel caught fire and later sank off the Western coast of Sri Lanka, unleashing what experts have described as the worst marine pollution event in the island's history. The verdict followed the hearing of four Fundamental Rights petitions filed by fishermen, Catholic clergy, and environmental groups. Among the petitioners was Sri Lanka's most senior Catholic prelate, Cardinal Malcolm Ranjith. Nearly 20 respondents were named, including former President Gotabaya Rajapaksa (represented by the Attorney General), several ministers, senior public officials, and heads of agencies responsible for marine environmental protection. The vessel's owners, operators, and local agents were collectively referred to by the Court as the 'X-Press Pearl Group.' Upholding the 'polluter pays' principle, the Court found that both the X-Press Pearl Group and state actors had violated the fundamental rights of the petitioners — and, by extension, the people of Sri Lanka. In a rare move, the Court also ruled that Sri Lanka's Attorney General's Department (AGD) had violated citizens' rights by failing to pursue appropriate legal action against the responsible parties. A slow-burning disaster The MV X-Press Pearl was a Singapore-registered container ship operated by X-Press Feeders. On May 20, 2021, while anchored off Colombo, it caught fire while carrying a highly hazardous cargo — including 25 tonnes of nitric acid, methanol, caustic soda, lubricants, and an estimated 400 containers of plastic nurdles (small, pre-production plastic pellets used in manufacturing). The ship burned for nearly two weeks before sinking, triggering a major marine pollution crisis. An estimated 1,600 tonnes of plastic nurdles tonnes of plastic nurdles were spilled into the ocean and along Sri Lanka's western coastline, causing extensive and lasting environmental damage. These lentil-sized pellets, which absorb and concentrate toxic chemicals, are often mistaken for food by marine species. The United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) later described the incident as potentially the worst marine plastic pollution event from a single vessel in history. A recent BBC investigation found that the nurdles continue to absorb pollutants like heavy metals from the sea and are getting more toxic over time, compounding the long-term threat to marine ecosystems. In the weeks that followed, tonnes of dead marine animals — including dolphins, turtles, and fish — washed ashore. Coastal fishing communities, especially in the Western Province, were devastated by fishing bans, leading to severe economic and cultural impacts. Attorney General's department under fire The Court was sharply critical of the Attorney General's Department, particularly for its decision to file a civil compensation claim in Singapore rather than pursuing legal proceedings in Sri Lanka. The Court described this move as 'unreasonable, irrational, and arbitrary.' It was revealed during the hearings that the AGD had entered into an agreement with the shipowners granting 'exclusive jurisdiction' to Singaporean courts — effectively sidelining Sri Lanka's own legal system. The Court concluded that the AGD had infringed upon the rights of Sri Lankan citizens by failing to indict the ship's owners and operators, thereby undermining national sovereignty and accountability. The Court also held former State Minister of Urban Development Dr. Nalaka Godahewa, the Marine Environment Protection Authority (MEPA), and its former chairperson Darshani Lahandapura responsible for violating the fundamental rights of citizens due to their failure in prevention, oversight, and timely response. Corruption allegations and police investigations In 2023, several parliamentarians alleged that the shipowners had paid a USD 250 million bribe to certain AGD officials to derail the compensation process. The police launched an investigation based on a complaint filed by a senior MEPA official — but the inquiry has since been stalled. In its ruling, the Court has directed the police to resume investigations into all criminal aspects of the case, including the bribery allegations, and to submit a progress report within three months. Additionally, the Court announced the formation of the MV X-Press Pearl Compensation Commission, which will undertake a comprehensive assessment of the environmental and economic damages. The USD 1 billion ordered is considered an interim payment and may be revised upward based on the commission's findings. Beyond the petitioners' demands Dr. Ravindranath Dabare, who represented several petitioners, told The Hindu that the judgment had exceeded expectations. 'The Supreme Court went well beyond what the petitioners asked for. It recognised not only the environmental loss but also the systemic failure of the state in its duty to protect the people's fundamental rights,' he said. The ruling has been welcomed by environmentalists, legal experts, and affected coastal communities as a rare and powerful assertion of environmental justice in South Asia — where foreign corporate polluters often avoid liability. Legal scholars suggest that the ruling may set a regional precedent for addressing transboundary environmental harm and enhancing corporate accountability, particularly in the context of hazardous maritime cargo. Can the ruling be enforced? One of the AGD's primary justifications for filing the civil case in Singapore was uncertainty over whether a Sri Lankan court judgment could be enforced internationally. However, Dr. Dabare argues that the Court has addressed this concern by defining the 'X-Press Pearl Group' to include the vessel's local agents — thereby ensuring domestic enforceability. 'If they fail to comply, local agents will face the full force of Sri Lankan law,' he said. Meanwhile, the Singapore civil suit remains on hold, pending an appeal in the UK Admiralty Court. The UK court is reviewing an earlier decision to limit the shipowners' liability to £19.8 million — a fraction of the damage Sri Lanka claims to have suffered. With the Supreme Court's ruling now far exceeding that liability cap, Dr. Dabare contends that it is no longer viable for Sri Lanka to pursue both legal avenues. 'This ruling marks a definitive legal stance,' he said. The shipowners have yet to publicly respond to the judgment. -Saroj Pathirana is a Fellow at the Pulitzer Ocean Reporting network.
United News of India
8 hours ago
- United News of India
SC displeased over stay on trials in 1984 Anti-Sikh Riot cases, urges Allahabad HC to expedite
New Delhi, July 25 (UNI) The Supreme Court today expressed dismay over the Allahabad High Court staying trial proceedings in three out of eleven cases related to the 1984 Anti-Sikh Riots, where trials had commenced after re-investigation and filing of chargesheets by a Special Investigation Team (SIT). A Bench comprising Justice Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi observed, 'What really bothers is that in 11 cases where trials commenced pursuant to chargesheets filed by SIT, such trials have been stayed by High Court in three cases. "While we do not wish to impact the right of a suspect or accused to avail his/her remedy, including quashing of chargesheet, all that we request the High Court is to take up these matters out of turn and expeditiously for their adjudication in accordance with law.' The Court highlighted that the conclusion of these trials would take reasonable time, and availability of witnesses becomes increasingly difficult with the passage of time. 'It is only with repeated efforts made by this Court that the investigations were revived, SIT was constituted, and chargesheets have now been filed… judicial notice of the fact that conclusion of trial will take some reasonable time… most importantly, availability of witnesses, with passage of time, becomes a difficult task,' the Bench noted. During the hearing, the Court went through a compliance report filed by the State of Uttar Pradesh, which revealed that the contents of one FIR dated November 9, 1984, could not be recovered even by the CFSL. The CFSL report stated that, except for some sections, the rest of the FIR was fragmented. Considering its previous orders and the CFSL findings, the Court said no further action could be taken at this stage, but added that if any duplicate copy or related document is recovered, it should be brought to the Court's notice. Regarding four appeals filed before the High Court challenging acquittals in riot cases, the Court noted from the status report that these appeals were being actively pursued for hearings on the merits. The Bench impressed upon the UP Advocate General to deploy the 'best of the state law officers' having requisite expertise to handle these sensitive matters. In April as well, the Court had directed the State to appear in cases where trial proceedings were stayed and to take all necessary steps for their early disposal. Reiterating its stand today, the Court stated it had no reason to doubt that the High Court would conduct the cases expeditiously and take them up out of turn. Advocate Jagjit Singh Chabra appeared for the petitioners, while Advocate Ruchira Goel represented the State of Uttar Pradesh.
Mint
11 hours ago
- Mint
Made to sit on shoe rack, 3-year-old falls to death from 12th floor in Mumbai's Naigaon West
A three-year-old toddler fell to her death from the 12th floor of a residential building in Mumbai's Naigaon on Tuesday evening. She accidently fell after her mother made her sit on a shoe-rack outside her apartment, a Hindustan Times report said. According to the police, the incident occurred at 8.15 pm on Tuesday when the toddler, along with her parents, was visiting her relatives next door on the 12th floor of the Navkar Complex in Mumbai's Naigaon West, and was returning home. The mother of the girl made her sit on the show rack while trying to put on her shoes. The toddler stood up on the rack and tried to sit on the windowsill on top of the shoe rack. As the mother bent down to pick up her shoes, the toddler slipped and fell through the window before she could balance herself. The neighbours rushed to aid after hearing the woman's screams. According to the police, the girl suffered serious head injuries and was taken to the Sir DM Pettit Hospital in Vasai, where she was declared dead, the HT report said. According to an NDTV report, the incident has been reported from Navkar City in Mumbai's Naigaon. A case has been registered, and the investigation is underway. In another news, a 21-month-old German toddler died after reportedly slipping from her father's arms while going down a waterslide at the Aquagan waterpark in Lopar, Croatia. According to The Independent, the girl fell nearly four metres onto a concrete surface. She was airlifted to a hospital but later died from severe brain injuries. A Slovenian doctor at the scene performed CPR immediately, but efforts to save her were unsuccessful. Witnesses at the scene reported hearing sudden cries and shouting before seeing medical help arrive. One bystander mentioned initially thinking the child had drowned. Lopar's mayor, Zdenko Jakuc, said the town is "deeply shaken" by the tragedy, which is believed to be the first major accident at the waterpark in decades.
