Texas lawmakers consider bat protection bill
Testimony was held on a bill that would provide new protections for bats in Texas
Senate Bill 1285 would restrict how and when bats can be removed from buildings
Operators of Austin Bat Refuge in east Austin also testified
AUSTIN, Texas - Texas lawmakers heard testimony on a bill that would provide new protections for bats.
Senate Bill 1285, filed by Austin Democrat Sarah Eckhardt, would restrict how and when bats can be removed from buildings.
The backstory
At the Austin Bat Refuge, more than 100 bats are being nursed back to health.
Lee Mackenzie and Dianne Odegard operate the refuge in East Austin. The two are preparing for summer when bat activity picks up, especially for young pups.
"We're making sure we have all the powders that we use to make the different formulas for the different species of bat babies. And we're hiring our summer interns to help us during the summer when we're raising all the bat pups to release," said Dianne Odegard.
There are 47 bat species in the United States and 32 are located in Texas.
Lee spoke about two bats that recently arrived at the refuge. One bat was found at UT and is not a local frequent flyer.
"Classic Free Tail bats right here, this guy (the larger bat) is supposed to be in Big Bend right now. We have no idea how he got here. He was found in the Astronomy Building at UT and who knows he might have hitched his ride with the astronomers," said Lee Mackenzie.
Dig deeper
Earlier Monday, Dianne and Lee were before the State Senate Water, Agriculture and Rural Affairs committee for a hearing. They were among a group testifying on legislation regarding bat remediation and explained why sealing up exterior holes should never be the first step in the removal process.
"We've seen bats, both dead and alive, hanging half out of an exit encased in hardening, expanding foam, or dead and dying on glue traps," said Dianne Odegard.
SB 1285 amends the state parks and wildlife code. It mandates non-lethal techniques, and the bill also prevents removals between May and August, when bat pups are still learning to fly.
Under current law, it's a class c misdemeanor to hunt, purchase, or sell bats, and a special permit is needed to possess them. All that remains in place with Senator Eckhardt's Bat Bill.
The committee also heard about an incident in Abilene at a mall. The controversial removal made headlines two years ago.
"The property manager sealed a bat roost on the side of the mall. When their natural exit to the outside was blocked, these bats ended up flying through the mall directly in the path of the shopping public," said Amanda Lawler with Bat World Sanctuary.
Most of those who testified voiced opposition to an exception in the bill. It allows animal control experts and health officials to deal with bats, anytime when found in occupied buildings.
"They are the ones who do most of the exclusion or removal work around Austin and in occupied buildings, and we want to make sure that they do it, not during baby season, that they exclude bats rather than simply entombing them in a wall," said Mackenzie.
What's next
The bill was left pending in committee with an uncertain future, like the tiny creatures being cared for at the refuge in East Austin.
What you can do
Bat World Sanctuary has more information on the bill and is asking for help.
For more information, click here.
The Source
Information from a Texas legislative committee hearing and interviews conducted by FOX 7 Austin's Rudy Koski
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
an hour ago
Immigration judges fired by Trump administration say they will fight back
CHICAGO -- Federal immigration judges fired by the Trump administration are filing appeals, pursuing legal action and speaking out in an unusually public campaign to fight back. More than 50 immigration judges — from senior leaders to new appointees — have been fired since Donald Trump assumed the presidency for the second time. Normally bound by courtroom decorum, many are now unrestrained in describing terminations they consider unlawful and why they believe they were targeted. Their suspected reasons include gender discrimination, decisions on immigration cases played up by the Trump administration and a courthouse tour with the Senate's No. 2 Democrat. 'I cared about my job and was really good at it,' Jennifer Peyton, a former supervising judge told The Associated Press this week. 'That letter that I received, the three sentences, explained no reason why I was fired.' Peyton, who received the notice while on a July Fourth family vacation, was appointed judge in 2016. She considered it her dream job. Peyton was later named assistant chief immigration judge in Chicago, helping to train, mentor and oversee judges. She was a visible presence in the busy downtown court, greeting outside observers. She cited top-notch performance reviews and said she faced no disciplinary action. Peyton said she'll appeal through the Merit Systems Protection Board, an independent government agency Trump has also targeted. Peyton's theories about why she was fired include appearing on a 'bureaucrat watchdog list' of people accused by a right-wing organization of working against the Trump agenda. She also questions a courthouse tour she gave to Sen. Dick Durbin of Illinois in June. Durbin blasted Peyton's termination as an 'abuse of power,' saying he's visited before as part of his duties as a publicly-elected official. The nation's immigration courts — with a backlog of about 3.5 million cases — have become a key focus of Trump's hard-line immigration enforcement efforts. The firings are on top of resignations, early retirements and transfers, adding up to 106 judges gone since January, according to the International Federation of Professional and Technical Engineers, which represents judges. There are currently about 600 immigration judges. Several of those fired, including Peyton, have recently done a slew of interviews on local Chicago television stations and with national outlets, saying they now have a platform for their colleagues who remain on the bench. 'The ones that are left are feeling threatened and very uncertain about their future,' said Matt Biggs, the union's president. Carla Espinoza, a Chicago immigration judge since 2023, was fired as she was delivering a verdict this month. Her notice said she'd be dismissed at the end of her two-year probationary period with the Executive Office for Immigration Review. 'I am personally committed to my career. We're not political appointees,' she told AP. 'I'm entitled to a reason.' She believes the firings have disproportionately affected women and ethnic minorities, including people with Hispanic-sounding surnames like hers. She plans to take legal action before the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, which has also shifted focus under Trump. 'There's a very strong pattern of discriminatory factors,' she said. Espinoza thinks another reason could be her decision to release a Mexican immigrant falsely accused of threatening to assassinate Trump. Ramón Morales Reyes was accused of a writing a threatening letter by Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem. But the claims quickly fell apart as Wisconsin authorities determined that Morales Reyes was actually framed by a man who had previously attacked him. Espinoza said she felt pressure with public scrutiny, media coverage and Noem's statements about Morales Reyes, which weren't corrected or removed from social media. 'It's hard to silence the noise and just do your job fairly when there's so much distraction," she said. 'I think I did. And I stand by my decision as having been a fair one to release an individual who I believe was twice victimized.' The Executive Office for Immigration Review, part of the Justice Department that oversees the immigration courts, declined to comment on the firings through an agency spokesperson. Peyton said she isn't sure that working as an immigration judge is still her dream job. 'It's important that everyone in our country knows what's happening in our immigration courts,' she said. 'The Department of Justice that I joined in 2016 is not the same one now.'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Filing underway for November 4 election
The November 4, 2025 election will include several positions locally, with positions in state and federal positions as well. The 2025 election is a Constitutional Amendment Election for the country. For Walker County, voters will have a long list of seats up for election. Some seats will be sought by incumbents, however, several will have new names and faces filing for the position. Filing for a place on the ballot opened on July 19 and runs through Aug. 18, with each respective entity or the political chairs for the Republican and Democrat parties. The entities locally looking to fill positions are Walker County Commissioners Court, City of Huntsville, Huntsville Independent School District and New Waverly Independent School District. The City of New Waverly does not post its election information to the website. Voters new to the county or first timers must submit registration applications at least 30 days before Nov. 4 which is Monday, Oct. 6. Early voting in person will take place countywide at the Walker County Storm Shelter, 455 State Highway 75 North, from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. Monday through Friday, Oct. 20-31. There will be two 12-hour voting days from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. Thursday, Oct. 30, and Friday, Oct. 31. The last day to register to vote by mail is Friday, Oct. 24. All applications must be submitted by mail, email or fax. An original application is required. For more information on voter registration requirements, email walkervr@ or go by 1301 Sam Houston Avenue, Room 114. Sample ballots will be posted on the Walker County website, under 'CURRENT ELECTIONS' as soon as they are available. On Election Day, voters may visit any of the nine polls to cast their ballots. Curbside voting is available at all locations in a designated area for qualifying voters. For more information regarding curbside voting, call 936-436-4959. Gerald (Jerry) Spurbeck is the Democratic Chairperson for Walker County. Headquarters are located at 1210 University Ave., Huntsville, TX 77340. The office can be reached at (936) 293-8110 or by email at chair@ The party website is Linda McKenzie is the Republican Chairperson for Walker County. Headquarters is located at 1205 University Ave., Huntsville, TX 77340. The office can be reached at (936) 755-8084 or by email at gopwalkerco@ The party has a Facebook page under Republican Party of Walker County. Positions up for Election on November 4, 2025 U. S. REP DISTRICT 8 Solve the daily Crossword
Politico
2 hours ago
- Politico
Trump administration pushes states to exclude immigrant students from in-state tuition
Discounting tuition for undocumented immigrants brought to the U.S. as children has a long bipartisan history. Texas' law was signed by Republican then-Gov. Rick Perry and 23 red and blue states, plus the District of Columbia, followed, a political mood that's now reversing: Florida repealed its 2014 in-state tuition law this February. There are about 408,000 undocumented students representing less than 2 percent of those in college. The Justice Department argues these tuition laws unfairly offer a benefit to foreigners that is unavailable to U.S. citizens and legal residents living in a neighboring state. The legal offensive to roll back these laws, which is poised to spread, serves as another sign of how thoroughly the second Trump administration is going about enacting the president's promise to discourage illegal immigration and promote 'self-deportation.' 'This was something that used to not be political,' Kentucky Gov. Andy Beshear, a Democrat, said of the in-state tuition policies for undocumented students. 'It was the idea that if this is the only country you've ever known, that more than likely you will be here your entire life, and we should want you to be educated and productive.' But Kentucky's Republican attorney general, Russell Coleman, sided with Trump this summer, urging the state's council on postsecondary education to 'withdraw its regulation rather than litigate what I believe will be, and should be, a losing fight.' Texas, the first state the DOJ targeted with a lawsuit this year, ended its policy in coordination with the White House. The maneuver came after Attorney General Ken Paxton entered into a joint motion with the Justice Department, agreeing that providing in-state tuition to undocumented students wasn't constitutional. 'In-state tuition for illegal immigrants in Texas has ended,' Republican Gov. Greg Abbott wrote in a post on X last month. The policies are crumbling at a time when college enrollment — and the tuition dollars it brings in — fell about 15 percent between 2010 and 2021, according to the National Center for Education Statistics' most recent report.
