Plan to Permanently Displace Palestinians Threatens to Derail Gaza Truce
In recent weeks, Israeli officials have briefed journalists and foreign counterparts on a loose plan to force hundreds of thousands of Palestinian civilians into an area controlled by Israel's military close to the Gaza-Egypt border. Legal experts have warned that the plan would violate international law because the civilians would be barred from returning to their homes to the north, a restriction that would constitute a form of ethnic cleansing.
While the Israeli government has yet to formally announce or comment on the plan, the idea of a new encampment in southern Gaza was first proposed last week by Israel Katz, the Israeli defense minister. He discussed it at a briefing with Israeli correspondents who focus on military affairs, and The New York Times reviewed readouts of the briefing written by its attendees. Several attendees also wrote articles that attracted widespread attention among both Israelis and Palestinians.
A spokesman for Mr. Katz declined to comment on the reports, as did the office of Benjamin Netanyahu, Israel's prime minister.
Now, Hamas has cited Mr. Katz's proposal as one of the latest obstacles to a new truce. During a cease-fire, in exchange for releasing roughly 25 hostages, Hamas wants Israeli troops to withdraw from much of Gaza. The new Israeli plan makes such an outcome far less likely, since it would ensure that Israeli troops remained in charge of a large area over which Hamas seeks to reestablish control.
Husam Badran, a senior member of Hamas, described the establishment of the encampment as a 'deliberatively obstructive demand' that would complicate the fraught negotiations.
Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Washington Post
24 minutes ago
- Washington Post
U.S., Israel pull teams from Gaza ceasefire negotiations
The United States is withdrawing its negotiating team from Doha 'for consultations,' Trump envoy Steve Witkoff said in a statement after the apparent failure of the latest round of negotiations for a Gaza ceasefire. While U.S., Qatari and Egyptian mediators 'have made a great effort, Hamas does not appear to be coordinated or acting in good faith,' he said. Israel released a similar statement saying it was bringing home its negotiators.
CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
France recognizing a Palestinian state is a bold move by Macron, with a hint of desperation
With a single post, French President Emmanuel Macron changed everything, and nothing at all. His late-evening announcement on X that France will recognize a Palestinian state in September, the first member of the United Nations Security Council and the G7 nations to do so, took many by surprise. Although France's recognition has been expected for several months now – indeed the brief Israel-Iran war forced a postponement of the summit on Israel-Palestine with Saudi Arabia and European allies that Paris had been shepherding – it was not expected to land like this. The surprise announcement tells us two things. Firstly, that Emmanuel Macron feels this is the time to act. Leaders from France, the UK and Germany are due to speak Friday to seek urgent action over the new lows of the humanitarian crisis in Gaza. More than a thousand Gazans have been killed desperately seeking food since May, dozens more from starvation itself. Images of skeletal, starving Gazans, including children, have harked back to the darkest corners of the twentieth century, stirring Western revulsion – if not yet concrete action – toward the humanitarian crisis. Macron's decision is a bold one – following a smattering of European allies: Ireland, Norway and Spain – but leading the way for major international powers to follow suit. 'I've had other colleagues on the phone and I'm sure that we won't be the only ones recognizing Palestine in September,' a senior official in the French presidency told CNN Thursday following Macron's announcement. Eyes will now likely turn to the UK, perhaps Germany too. The prospect of the United States, Israel's closest ally even without a Trump presidency, seems impossible. But for those on the ground, the French decision will likely change little. The move was welcomed by Hamas as a 'positive step.' For Israeli leaders, it didn't go down well at all. Recognition 'rewards terror' said Israeli Prime Minister (and long-time opponent of a Palestinian state) Benjamin Netanyahu on Thursday night, with other ministers arguing the move now justifies the official annexation of the West Bank – Judea and Samaria in the parlance of the Israeli far-right. Even if international recognition could magically mete out concrete change for Gaza, the September deadline will come far too late for Palestinians starving to death under the Israeli-controlled blockade of food. Philippe Lazzarini, the head of UNRWA, the main United Nations agency for Palestinian refugees, said Thursday that people in Gaza resembled 'walking corpses' as starvation took hold. All 2.1 million people in Gaza are now food insecure and on Tuesday, Gaza's health ministry said 900,000 children are going hungry. Some 70,000 children already show signs of malnutrition, they said. France's solo announcement also suggests a hint of desperation on Macron's part. He's a man who likes a coalition on the world stage – strength in numbers is usually a winning strategy. A month ago, the stage appeared set for France to recognize Palestine – a summit co-hosted with Saudi Arabia was planned in Riyadh from June 17 to 20. But when open conflict broke out between Israel and Iran on June 13, that plan was torn apart. The expectation among experts was that France and Saudi Arabia would marshal other allies into a joint recognition – a strong signal to Jerusalem and Washington D.C. on the importance of the two-state solution and peace. Macron may still have his win in September if allies join France's recognition but it won't have been without risking France's diplomatic capital and cajoling more reluctant partners. 'The idea is to put a bit of pressure on other countries,' the senior French official told CNN. And Macron's decision holds weight. European nations have proved stubbornly reluctant to formally act upon a two-state solution and recognize Palestinian statehood. Respect for the West's ally Israel, distaste for the Islamist government in Gaza and the shortcomings of the West Bank's Palestinian Authority, and an apparently acceptable decades-long status quo saw muted outrage at Israeli settlements and attacks on Palestinians, with little shift in international action. France is now breaking that glass ceiling. Within France, a country that has long held a sympathetic position toward the Palestinian cause, recognizing Palestinian statehood won't be a controversial move. Post-WWII leader Charles de Gaulle famously rallied France to the Palestinian people following the 1967 war, with Paris engaging with the Palestinian Liberation Organization for decades, even as terror attacks were committed in the group's name on French soil. In 2014, the French parliament called on the government to recognize Palestine, an appeal that the government backed at the United Nations Security Council in an unsuccessful vote to bring about Palestinian statehood by 2017. France has long backed a two-state solution for Israel and Palestine based on the 1967 borders, although the Elysee source said that the French recognition would not specify the borders. Macron staunchly backed Israel's retaliation for the October 7 massacres but over time has hardened his criticism of Netanyahu and Israel's conduct of the war. Publicly, he worried about about 'importing' the conflict into France, home to Europe's largest community of Jews and Muslims. But as casualties in Gaza mounted, France banned arms exports to Israel, orchestrated aid drops into the territory and repeatedly called for a ceasefire and access of humanitarian aid and journalists. In taking this leap of faith, recognizing a Palestinian state ahead of France's peers, the Elysee Palace is surely hoping for a domino effect of recognition across the West. With aid still cruelly beyond the reach of ordinary Gazans, perhaps it's a last ditch effort to bring some relief.
CBS News
an hour ago
- CBS News
Concerns raised over Columbia University's $200 million settlement with Trump administration over antisemitism on campus
There are concerns about how the recent settlement between Columbia University and the Trump administration could impact dozens of other schools under investigation for antisemitism on campus. Columbia will pay more than $200 million to resolve the allegations, but the school continues to deny any wrongdoing. The school's president addressed the issue on Thursday. This fall, the policy changes Columbia promised the Trump administration it would make are going to be monitored by Bart Schwartz, who was most recently the watchdog for the New York City Housing Authority. David Bloomfield, an education law professor at the City University of New York Graduate Center and Brooklyn College, said he's concerned. "It's extraordinary to have a federal monitor looking over the shoulder of a private university the way Rikers was under a federal monitor," Bloomfield said. The New York Civil Liberties Union has called the agreement a form of capitulation, which the university's interim president, Claire Shipman, pushed back on Thursday on CNN. "Courage versus capitulation is just wrong. It's too simplistic," Shipman said. "Yes, we had many other legal options, that's true, but we did look carefully at that, and we saw we could have some short-term victories. But we worried we would have long-term damage." Shipman cited the potential loss of important research, but Bloomfield said what's also troubling is the university agreeing to "maintain merit-based admissions policies" and provide "all-female sports, locker rooms and showering facilities." The NYCLU said it worries the school is losing academic freedom, with a senior vice provost conducting a "thorough review" of the Middle Eastern Studies Department. "They will not allow criticism of Israel. That's not academic," NYCLU Executive Director Donna Lieberman said. "How on earth can students learn if they don't have the freedom to engage in discourse, in discourse dialogue, free from threat they will be expelled or suspended?" In addition to Columbia, New York University had also been under scrutiny by the Trump administration for potential civil rights violations. Gerard Filitti, senior counsel for the group EndJewHatred, said the agreement fails to address the root cause of antisemitism. "For example, Columbia saying masks are not allowed at unauthorized protests, but it's not saying they can't be worn at all. It's saying taking over academic buildings may be bad, but it doesn't completely ban protest from them," Filitti said. Filitti said the school also falls short of acknowledging that antizionism is antisemitism, saying that clarity is needed to protect pro-Israel and Jewish students. The University of Pennsylvania also previously settled with the Trump administration, while Harvard University remains in litigation.
