Letters: Forget the laptops and AI, schools need to go back to the basics
We congratulate the schools that are eliminating phones from classrooms. However, phones are only half the problem.
Kindergarteners do not need iPads. We need to get technology and artificial intelligence out of the classrooms.
Everyone tells me we need to prepare our kids for the future workplace, that technology is inevitable. Research shows that putting kids behind Chromebooks may not help them learn. Global test scores show that we are falling behind.
All this screen time filled with unfocused distractions is not neurologically appropriate for proper brain development, studies show. The scrolling, swiping and gaming are not teaching our children the skills they will need to succeed when they graduate from high school.
Administrators like the tidy workflow that tech provides them. But at what expense to our future generations?
We need to prioritize printed textbooks, handwritten note-taking and hands-on assignments. We should return to the old proven methods of learning.
Patti Fletcher, Roseville, Placer County
Take care of pets
Regarding 'San Francisco is euthanizing more stray dogs. Here's why' (San Francisco, SFChronicle.com, June 20): It hurt to read about the 'easy-going and friendly' pit-mastiff mix with no medical issues, 'but after a short time in the facility, the dog became so anxious that he had to be put down.'
At least the words 'put down' were a welcome reality check in what is too often a sea of euphemism. Every definition of 'euthanize' notes the intent to relieve pain and suffering, yet we misuse the term to make ourselves feel better about killing healthy animals that we have failed to find homes for.
Would we use 'put down' if we were killing humans under similar circumstances?
Let's abandon language designed to alleviate the shame of our sins and work on doing better by the animals over whom we have claimed dominion.
Karen Dawn, Santa Barbara
Mask bill misdirected
Regarding 'Can California make officers show their faces during protests? Experts appear doubtful' (Politics, SFChronicle.com, June 16): State Sen. Scott Wiener's proposal to ban law enforcement officers from wearing masks is political grandstanding and an effort to appease his base.
It would be more productive to ban masks from the demonstrators who destroy Waymo vehicles, deface buildings and create a lawless atmosphere. I am sure they choose to wear masks to hide themselves from law enforcement, their families and employers.
John McGurk, San Francisco
Applause for theaters
Regarding 'End of an era nears as San Francisco movie theater owners seek buyers for historic venues' (Arts & Entertainment, SFChronicle.com, June 16): Thank you to Frank and Lida Lee for bringing interesting foreign and independent films to the Presidio, 4 Star and Parkside theaters over the years.
As a movie fan who prefers the quirky, unique stories that have traveled the film festival route rather than the Hollywood production formula, it has been great to have the Lee's theaters showing quality films.
I hope there is a buyer out there who can continue this tradition of excellence.
Charlotte Seekamp, San Francisco
Keep the peace
When I visited my son in the Peace Corps, his wife met me, and as we walked down a main street, a tank came rolling down, with military men and guns, and I grabbed my camera.
But before I lifted the camera to take the photo, my daughter-in-law pushed my hand down and said, 'No!' quite firmly. Not safe. Not a democracy. Different rules here.
I took many pictures on that trip, but of nature — gigantic birds, forests, monkeys running through tree-tops. But not the tanks with guns pointed at us. That was also breathtaking, but not worth the risk. Different country, different culture, different life.
It made coming home to the U.S. with no tanks pointed at citizens truly grand. Hopefully, with luck, we can keep it our way.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
San Francisco Chronicle
a day ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Letters: Don't overlook these negative impacts from Bay Area casual carpooling
Regarding 'Some commuters want to bring back the Bay Area's casual carpool. Here's when' (Bay Area, June 24): It's important to differentiate the 'casual' practice from actual carpooling. In the 50-some years of taking on an extra rider or two to skirt the Bay Bridge back-up, drivers have congested traffic in HOV lanes and skimmed fare-paying riders from AC Transit's transbay service. Before COVID, the line serving San Francisco from my neighborhood had fewer than half as many buses scheduled for the morning commute as there were returning in the afternoon. Carpools are great for people who are heading to the same off-the-transit-grid destination, who share resources, and who are granted parking or a stipend for making the effort to minimize one driver per car commuting. Casual carpooling promotes personal car driving and is, essentially, a fare-jumping tactic for would-be transit riders. Cynthia Ahart Wood, Oakland Upzoning is un-Berkeley YIMBY arguments misstate the excesses of the proposed Middle Housing upzoning. It will encourage dense, taller market-rate rentals (5 to 7 units per lot). The increased bulk is counter to the intimate scale and openness that people seek out in Berkeley. The outcome of the proposed upzoning will make land even more expensive; the rosy vision of equity building for economically disadvantaged residents, as touted by Owens, will not happen. We don't need this gentrifying upzoning. Previous zoning regulations can provide more cost-accessible infill housing. Huge numbers of high-rise developments have been built or approved; we can reach our quota of state-required units without adopting extreme infill upzoning. For the Chronicle to disingenuously advance the developer-serving YIMBY arguments is a real disservice. Peggy Radel, Berkeley Attack may unleash Iran The U.S.-Israel strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities have inspired two opposing narratives. Former National Security Adviser John Bolton calls them a decisive blow, potentially triggering the end of the Iranian regime. He envisions a crumbling theocracy, weakened by unrest and economic strain, and believes the attacks may finally eliminate a looming nuclear threat. But Carnegie Foundation's nuclear policy expert, James M. Acton, offers a more sobering assessment: Iran's program is damaged, not destroyed. Its stockpile of highly enriched uranium was likely moved beforehand; its scientists and technical infrastructure remain intact. Iran could easily reconstitute its program within a year, or sooner. More troubling, Acton warns the strikes may push Iran to abandon its long-held threshold status and build a bomb. The message to Tehran is stark: strategic ambiguity no longer ensures security. Worse, the attacks risk unraveling global nonproliferation norms, especially as Iran further reduces cooperation with the IAEA. Military action cannot erase expertise. Small, hidden facilities could soon replace bombed-out ones. If diplomacy is not revived, the strikes may mark a dangerous miscalculation. We've seen this movie before — in Iraq and Libya. If Acton is correct, the ending may not bring resolution, but an emboldened nuclear adversary. Andrew D. Forsyth, Berkeley Create real fixes Regarding 'Adding freeway lanes doesn't fix traffic. Why does California keep wasting billions on it?' (Open Forum, June 24): I have heard that building wider freeways is like loosening your belt to solve your obesity problem. The difficulty stems from how much our state government is siloed, making it hard to share resources to most effectively come up with solutions to problems that cut across departmental boundaries. As the op-ed points out, affordable housing, highways, public transit and climate change adaptation must all be factored into a truly holistic solution.
San Francisco Chronicle
2 days ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Letters: Allowing denser housing in Berkeley won't rectify past wrongs. Here's why
Regarding 'Is Berkeley finally ready to atone for its single-family housing sins?' (Open Forum, June 25): Darrell Owens, a former California YIMBY staffer (not mentioned in the Open Forum), says that Middle Housing will redress historical redlining and displacement in Berkeley. But, in a letter to the City Council, I, along with representatives from South Berkeley, the historically African American neighborhood, write that, 'These proponents of MH are engaging in moral grandstanding at our expense. MH will destroy our already impacted communities' by accelerating gentrification. As a city report states, Middle Housing projects are more feasible in neighborhoods where existing housing is relatively cheaper, and they will be most impacted. The affluent hills will be exempt because of fire concerns. Owens is also wrong about Middle Housing ending exclusive single-family zoning. He does not mention SB9, which allowed up to four homes on an existing parcel, effectively eliminating single-family only zoning. While the photo published with the op-ed shows beautifully articulated facades of buildings, the proposed Middle Housing rules will allow three-story, box-like buildings. Nico Calavita, Berkeley Another office tower? Regarding 'S.F.'s first new office tower in years is closer to construction, even as vacancies remain high' (San Francisco, June 24): The latest proposal to 'set the stage for San Francisco's future' — with a 41-story glass monolith — is irresponsible. The new building would diminish the prominence of the nearby elegant, iconic Transamerica Pyramid and undermine the thoughtful preservation of historic Jackson Square and its harmonious surroundings. Although the development promises benefits for the city, why does it have to be so big and uninspiring? We already have too many empty office buildings and hotels. If this is the future of San Francisco, we are doomed to mediocrity. Aesthetics matter. Please, do not build this monstrosity. Richard Hutson, San Francisco Keep widening freeways If the population of drivers were fixed, then widening roads would improve traffic. But road widening projects are too slow, so at best, they keep up with the increasing number of drivers, and traffic congestion remains mostly unchanged. But it's magical thinking to assert that improving the roads doesn't alleviate traffic problems. If roads had not been constantly improved and widened in the past, we would be suffering utter paralysis now. Projects such as widening Highway 37 are decades overdue. As a side benefit, they are also good for the environment because cars will once again whiz through the area instead of grinding along in a stop-and-go fashion. Mike Drew, Vacaville Masks invoke terror Regarding 'Mask bill misdirected' (Letters to the Editor, June 23): The letter writer objects to state Sen. Scott Wiener's proposed law to ban police from wearing face masks because it also doesn't ban masks worn by demonstrators. This is perhaps a valid critique, but it overlooks a crucial point. It is now common for Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents and officers from other agencies to wear masks in public. The explanation is that unmasked officers may be identified and subject to retaliation. Masks make their wearers seem robotic, less human. They inspire terror and hopelessness, which is one reason why masked police are the hallmark of despotic regimes. Phil Kipper, San Francisco War nothing to celebrate Regarding 'World is safer now' (Letters to the Editor, June 23): Paul Bacon's letter applauding President Donald Trump's order to strike Iran's nuclear sites is a dangerous mix of blind loyalty and warmongering. Celebrating military escalation as 'decisive leadership' ignores the human cost and global consequences of pushing us closer to nuclear war. Trump didn't make us safer — he gambled with millions of lives, destabilized the region and once again made America look like a bully, not a leader. Real leadership is diplomacy, not dropping bombs and daring a nation to retaliate. War isn't strength. It's failure. And letters like Bacon's prove how easy it is to cheer for war when you're not the one sent to fight it. Alex McMurray, Castro Valley
Wall Street Journal
2 days ago
- Wall Street Journal
Podcast: Stocks Rise Despite Shaky Start for Iran-Israel Cease-Fire
All three major U.S. stock indexes ended the day higher as Israel and Iran's cease-fire got off to a shaky start. Meanwhile, Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell testified before Congress, reaffirming the central bank's wait-and-see stance on rate cuts. Plus: Uber shares rose after the company launched its robotaxi partnership with Waymo. 🎧 Listen: Danny Lewis hosts the Minute Briefing podcast.
