logo
Officials urge those who left school without lifesaving vaccine to get protected

Officials urge those who left school without lifesaving vaccine to get protected

Glasgow Times21-07-2025
It comes amid warnings that more than 418,000 children have left school with no protection against human papillomavirus (HPV) in the last three years.
The HPV vaccine is offered to boys and girls when they are in Year 8 and is key to wiping out cervical cancer in the UK.
Around 13 high-risk types of HPV are known to cause 99.7% of cervical cancers.
The jab also protects against genital warts and head and neck cancers, such as those in the mouth or throat.
Now, GP practices in England will invite 16 to 25-year-olds to have the vaccine if records show they did not have it in school.
According to NHS England, more than 418,000 children left school without having the jab in the last three years, with concerns there are many more people aged 16 to 25 who are not protected.
Dr Amanda Doyle, national director of primary care and community services, said: 'This vaccine is hugely important in our fight to eradicate cervical cancer but it isn't just for girls and women – it's also vital for boys and men to get vaccinated to protect themselves against cancers of the mouth, throat or genitals, while preventing spreading the HPV infection to sexual partners who could then develop cervical cancer.
'Too many lives are lost to cervical cancer so the hard work of NHS staff across the country in vaccinating and screening as many people as possible will help us to meet our ambition of wiping out this disease.
'Encouraging progress has been made recently in increasing uptake but we know there is much more to do.
'So if you're eligible for a HPV vaccination or are the parent of a child who is eligible, but didn't get the vaccine at school when they had the chance, I would urge you to come forward when your GP contacts you.
'Only a single dose is required and it could save you or your child's life.'
Data shows that in the 2023/24 academic year, some 76.7% of girls and 71.2% of boys aged 14 to 15 were vaccinated against HPV by Year 10.
Uptake in Year 8 increased to 72.9% among girls and 67.7% among boys, from 71.3% and 65.2% respectively a year earlier.
The health service will aim to boost uptake among girls to 90% as part of plans to eliminate cervical cancer by 2040.
It will also aim to increase the number of women attending cervical cancer screening appointments.
Public health minister Ashley Dalton said the vaccine 'is our most powerful tool in our fight to eliminate cervical cancer by 2040' but said there is a 'long way to go'.
'Thousands of young people are still unvaccinated and vulnerable to this disease – which is so easily prevented,' she added.
Last month, the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) warned young women in some parts of England are at greater risk of cervical cancer because not enough children are getting the jab.
Analysis by the agency showed inequalities in vaccine uptake in some regions – by Year 10, HPV coverage in girls was lowest in London (64.9%) and highest in the South East (82.7%).
Among boys, it was also lowest in London (58.9%) and highest in the South East (77.3%).
Meanwhile, at local authority level, Year 10 vaccination levels in girls ranged from 38.7% (Lambeth in London) to 97.6% (Northumberland).
Among boys, it ranged from 28.2% (Lambeth in London) to 92.2% (West Berkshire).
Dr Sharif Ismail, consultant epidemiologist at UKHSA, said: 'We know that uptake of the HPV vaccination in young people has fallen significantly since the pandemic, leaving many, many thousands across the country at greater risk of HPV-related cancers.
'This is a real concern as each HPV vaccine, now just a single dose offered in schools, gives a young person good protection against the devastating impact of these cancers, which includes cervical, genital, mouth and throat cancers.
'This new catch-up campaign is a really important opportunity for us to make sure that no teenage girl or boy, young woman or man is denied that protection.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Report highlights ‘significant concerns' over hospital maternity services
Report highlights ‘significant concerns' over hospital maternity services

The Herald Scotland

time38 minutes ago

  • The Herald Scotland

Report highlights ‘significant concerns' over hospital maternity services

The trust has apologised to families and said that a 'comprehensive improvement plan' is in place. A report by NHS England's Maternity Safety Support Programme highlights how maternity services in Leeds 'had a challenge in responding to families who have experienced harm and poor outcomes' which led to several families seeking an independent inquiry. It highlights a 'challenging' culture in the organisation. The report says learning from incidents was 'not robust' and describes how staff felt safety concerns were de-escalated without being resolved. Around 9,000 babies are born each year across St James University Hospital and Leeds General Infirmary, which are run by the trust. The trust is one of several which are being examined as part of a national review into NHS maternity care. The first part of the review will see experts investigate up to 10 of the most concerning maternity and neonatal units, including Leeds, with a view to give affected families answers as quickly as possible. A major NHS review of Leeds' maternity services has issued more than 100 recommendations for improvement. Our expert @RachelMcPatrick, who's helping families affected by maternity care failings in Leeds, says the report lays bare the scale of problems: — Irwin Mitchell (@irwinmitchell) July 28, 2025 The second will be a 'system-wide' look at maternity and neonatal care, uniting lessons from past maternity inquiries to create one clear set of actions designed to improve national NHS care. The investigation will report back before the end of the year. Law firm Irwin Mitchell said that it is representing a number of affected families, including parents whose babies have either died or been left with life-long disabilities or mothers who have been injured while giving birth. Medical negligence lawyer Rachelle Mahapatra, from the firm's Leeds office, said: 'This latest report yet again lays bare the scale of the problems within Leeds's maternity services. 'That more than 100 recommendations have been made will yet again cause concerns and upset among families, including those we continue to represent. 'One of the most damning areas of concern is issues that have blighted maternity services have been allowed to continue because of a lack of learning. 'It's imperative that when something goes wrong in the NHS, families are listened to, problems are analysed and reviewed – and any recommendations implemented to prevent the same mistakes happening time and time again.' Rabina Tindale, chief nurse at Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, said: 'This report has highlighted significant areas where we need to improve our maternity services, and my priority is to make sure we urgently take action to deliver the recommendations. 'I would like to apologise to all the families who have received maternity care with us which has fallen short of the high standard we aim to provide. 'It is vital that as a trust we listen more to our families and understand their experiences and concerns so we can address these and ensure everyone's experience is of the highest standard. 'We have already started making improvements to our services, and have a comprehensive improvement plan in place. 'Our commitment is to ensure every family feels safe, supported, and respected throughout their maternity journey with us.'

Report highlights ‘significant concerns' over hospital maternity services
Report highlights ‘significant concerns' over hospital maternity services

Western Telegraph

timean hour ago

  • Western Telegraph

Report highlights ‘significant concerns' over hospital maternity services

More than 100 recommendations have been made to improve maternity care at Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust. The trust has apologised to families and said that a 'comprehensive improvement plan' is in place. One of the most damning areas of concern is issues that have blighted maternity services have been allowed to continue because of a lack of learning Rachelle Mahapatra, Irwin Mitchell A report by NHS England's Maternity Safety Support Programme highlights how maternity services in Leeds 'had a challenge in responding to families who have experienced harm and poor outcomes' which led to several families seeking an independent inquiry. It highlights a 'challenging' culture in the organisation. The report says learning from incidents was 'not robust' and describes how staff felt safety concerns were de-escalated without being resolved. Around 9,000 babies are born each year across St James University Hospital and Leeds General Infirmary, which are run by the trust. The trust is one of several which are being examined as part of a national review into NHS maternity care. The first part of the review will see experts investigate up to 10 of the most concerning maternity and neonatal units, including Leeds, with a view to give affected families answers as quickly as possible. A major NHS review of Leeds' maternity services has issued more than 100 recommendations for improvement. Our expert @RachelMcPatrick, who's helping families affected by maternity care failings in Leeds, says the report lays bare the scale of problems: — Irwin Mitchell (@irwinmitchell) July 28, 2025 The second will be a 'system-wide' look at maternity and neonatal care, uniting lessons from past maternity inquiries to create one clear set of actions designed to improve national NHS care. The investigation will report back before the end of the year. Law firm Irwin Mitchell said that it is representing a number of affected families, including parents whose babies have either died or been left with life-long disabilities or mothers who have been injured while giving birth. Medical negligence lawyer Rachelle Mahapatra, from the firm's Leeds office, said: 'This latest report yet again lays bare the scale of the problems within Leeds's maternity services. 'That more than 100 recommendations have been made will yet again cause concerns and upset among families, including those we continue to represent. 'One of the most damning areas of concern is issues that have blighted maternity services have been allowed to continue because of a lack of learning. I would like to apologise to all the families who have received maternity care with us which has fallen short of the high standard we aim to provide Rabina Tindale, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust 'It's imperative that when something goes wrong in the NHS, families are listened to, problems are analysed and reviewed – and any recommendations implemented to prevent the same mistakes happening time and time again.' Rabina Tindale, chief nurse at Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, said: 'This report has highlighted significant areas where we need to improve our maternity services, and my priority is to make sure we urgently take action to deliver the recommendations. 'I would like to apologise to all the families who have received maternity care with us which has fallen short of the high standard we aim to provide. 'It is vital that as a trust we listen more to our families and understand their experiences and concerns so we can address these and ensure everyone's experience is of the highest standard. 'We have already started making improvements to our services, and have a comprehensive improvement plan in place. 'Our commitment is to ensure every family feels safe, supported, and respected throughout their maternity journey with us.'

Travel expert says popular products are a 'waste of money' - what not to buy
Travel expert says popular products are a 'waste of money' - what not to buy

Daily Mirror

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mirror

Travel expert says popular products are a 'waste of money' - what not to buy

The travel experts at Which? have called out the travel health products that are a "waste of money" and have warned consumers against purchasing them ahead of a summer holiday While many of us enjoy making the most of the good weather next to a pool or beach, jetting off during the summer holidays often costs more than it would if you travelled off-peak. ‌ Whether it's sticking to hand luggage or bagging a last-minute flight for less than £20, many of us are also conscious of making our money go further when planning a summer holiday, but there are certain items you could be splashing cash on that simply aren't worthwhile. ‌ There are, however, some things you simply can't plan for, and that's falling ill while travelling. Investing in some mosquito repellent to ensure you don't spend the entire holiday scratching at them, or stockpiling on allergy medicines in local Boots might seem like an essential task to do before travelling, but it could be a waste of time and money depending on what you purchase. ‌ While many of us want to avoid getting sick on holiday, the travel gurus at Which? have revealed the travel health products that are actually a "waste of money", reports the Express. In a clip shared on Instagram, the travel specialists highlighted the popular items many of us buy to ensure we feel our best before jetting off, which aren't entirely essential and could be setting you back more than they're worth. Mosquito wristbands ‌ Remembering to reapply repellent can prove tricky whilst on holiday, which explains why numerous holidaymakers opt for wristbands as an alternative. Emitting a combination of components that deter the insects, Which? warned that they're not actually the most efficient. Whilst it may shield your wrist or at least the upper portion of your body, the specialists noted: "You're better off using a spray or lotion with 20% to 50% DEET on all exposed skin." Travel sickness bands ‌ If you're facing a lengthy car journey from the airport to your accommodation, or need to board a ferry, you might splash out on an anti-travel sickness band. A type of acupressure that's claimed to ease queasiness and nausea, the experts at Which? said: "The NHS says there's little scientific evidence that these work and when we put them to the test at a fairground, they didn't work either." Instead, they recommended buying tablets such as Kwells which contain hyoscine, a medication that prevents nausea signals. ‌ Once-a-day sunscreen Whilst once-a-day sunscreen may appear to be a perfect answer if you forget to reapply it, Which disclosed that they discovered a 74% reduction in protection throughout the day. ‌ It's safer for your skin to use sunscreen that you can reapply during the day, and you should top it up every two hours. Branded medicines Numerous branded medications are frequently pricier than generic alternatives available in supermarkets, despite containing identical ingredients. Which? recommended that whilst brands such as Piriteze and Clarityn might cost you £11, supermarket alternatives of the allergy treatment typically cost under half the price, and the same principle applies to Immodium. Search for the active component loperamide hydrochloride, and save cash by switching to an unbranded alternative.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store