Georgia's Brain Dead Woman Delivers Prematurely, Baby On Life Support
The baby of a woman in Georgia who was declared brain dead and has been on life support since February was delivered early Friday morning, her mother said.
April Newkirk told WXIA-TV that 31-year-old Adriana Smith's baby was born prematurely by an emergency cesarean section early Friday, the Atlanta station reported Monday night. She was about six months into her pregnancy. The baby, named Chance, weighs about 1 pound and 13 ounces and is in the neonatal intensive care unit.
"He's expected to be okay," Newkirk told the TV station. "He's just fighting. We just want prayers for him."
Newkirk said her daughter had intense headaches more than four months ago and went to Atlanta's Northside Hospital, where she received medication and was released. The next morning, her boyfriend woke to her gasping for air and called 911. Emory University Hospital determined she had blood clots in her brain and she was declared brain-dead. She was eight weeks pregnant, according to WXIA.
Newkirk said Smith would be taken off of life support Tuesday.
The Associated Press called and emailed Emory Tuesday for comment. It is unclear why Emory decided to deliver the baby. The Associated Press has also tried to contact Newkirk.
Smith's family said Emory doctors told them they were not allowed to remove the devices keeping her breathing because state law bans abortion after cardiac activity can be detected - generally around six weeks into pregnancy.
Georgia Republican Attorney General Chris Carr later issued a statement saying the law did not require medical professionals to keep a woman declared brain dead on life support.
"Removing life support is not an action 'with the purpose to terminate a pregnancy,'" Carr said.
Newkirk said Smith loved being a nurse at Emory. She also has a 7-year-old son. Her family celebrated her 31st birthday Sunday with several advocacy groups. Newkirk did not speak at the event.
"I'm her mother," Newkirk told WXIA. "I shouldn't be burying my daughter. My daughter should be burying me."
(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
'We're with Colbert': Few protesters gather in support of 'The Late Show'; then leave within minutes
A planned rally in New York City to show support for outgoing 'Late Show' host Stephen Colbert fizzled out on Sunday, with fewer than two dozen demonstrators turning up and police packing up not long after the gathering began. The protest, called 'We're With Colbert,' was held outside the CBS Broadcast Center on Manhattan's West Side. Organisers claimed it was part of a nationwide call to defend "integrity" in media and freedom of speech. 'Our country is not perfect, never has been,' said the event's organiser, who identified himself only as Matt, going by the nickname 'Slim.' 'But we've always had the First Amendment, and now Mango Mussolini is trying to take that from us,' he added, using a derogatory nickname for US President Donald Trump. The event followed CBS's decision to axe The Late Show with Stephen Colbert in May 2026, citing falling viewership and declining profits. The 61-year-old host has frequently taken aim at Trump on his programme, prompting speculation that the cancellation was more political than financial. 'This is a First Amendment attack,' one protester told the New York Post. 'We can't stand for that.' A week earlier, CBS's parent company recently completed an $8.4 billion merger with Skydance Media, a deal that required federal approval and was finalised shortly after Colbert was told this season would be his last. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Ohio: These Companies Are Overcharging You for Auto Insurance Smart Lifestyle Trends Learn More Undo Colbert's show has also faced criticism from conservative commentators for perceived political bias. According to MRC NewsBusters, a right-leaning media watchdog, the programme featured 176 liberal guests and just one Republican between 2022 and 2025. Despite the intended message of Sunday's demonstration, most of the attendees had left within minutes, leaving little more than an empty sidewalk and bemused NYPD officers.
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Chatbot culture wars erupt as bias claims surge
For much of the last decade, America's partisan culture warriors have fought over the contested territory of social media — arguing about whether the rules on Facebook and Twitter were too strict or too lenient, whether YouTube and TikTok censored too much or too little and whether Silicon Valley tech companies were systematically silencing right-wing voices. Those battles aren't over. But a new one has already started. This fight is over artificial intelligence, and whether the outputs of leading AI chatbots like ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini are politically biased. Conservatives have been taking aim at AI companies for months. In March, House Republicans subpoenaed a group of leading AI developers, probing them for information about whether they colluded with the Biden administration to suppress right-wing speech. And this month, Missouri's Republican attorney general, Andrew Bailey, opened an investigation into whether Google, Meta, Microsoft and OpenAI are leading a 'new wave of censorship' by training their AI systems to give biased responses to questions about President Trump. On Wednesday, Trump himself joined the fray, issuing an executive order on what he called 'woke AI'. 'Once and for all, we are getting rid of woke,' he said in a speech. Republicans have been complaining about AI bias since at least early last year, when a version of Google's Gemini AI system generated historically inaccurate images of the American founding fathers, depicting them as racially diverse. That incident drew the fury of online conservatives, and led to accusations that leading AI companies were training their models to parrot liberal ideology. Since then, top Republicans have mounted pressure campaigns to try to force AI companies to disclose more information about how their systems are built, and tweak their chatbots' outputs to reflect a broader set of political views. Now, with the White House's executive order, Trump and his allies are using the threat of taking away lucrative federal contracts — OpenAI, Anthropic, Google and xAI were recently awarded Defense Department contracts worth as much as $200 million — to try to force AI companies to address their concerns. The order directs federal agencies to limit their use of AI systems to those that put a priority on 'truth-seeking' and 'ideological neutrality' over disfavoured concepts like diversity, equity and inclusion.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
4 hours ago
- First Post
Mike Johnson calls for 'great pause' on a Ghislaine Maxwell pardon, pushes for life sentence instead
US Speaker of the House Mike Johnson disagreed with Republicans who are floating the idea of granting a pardon or commutation to Ghislaine Maxwell as the Epstein scandal continues to rock the White House. read more US Speaker of the House Mike Johnson disagreed with Republicans who are floating the idea of granting a pardon or commutation to Ghislaine Maxwell as the Epstein scandal continues to rock the White House. While speaking to NBC News, Johnson said that he would have a 'great pause' about taking such measures. The remarks from the Republican speaker are coming at a time when many of the House representatives from his party suggested that the option to pardon Maxwell should be considered as part of an effort to obtain more information about Jeffrey Epstein's crimes. For weeks, US President Donald Trump and his allies, including Johnson himself, have been under immense pressure to disclose more information about Epstein. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Johnson's take on the matter came after Todd Blanche, the deputy attorney general, met with Maxwell, who is serving a 20-year prison sentence for sex trafficking, over two days last week. The former British socialite was Epstein's close confidante for years and his partner-in-crime, literally. The case became more complicated after Epstein killed himself in jail in 2019. I think she should have a life sentence: Johnson While speaking to NBC News on the matter, the House Speaker pushed for a life sentence for Maxwell instead. 'If you're asking my opinion, I think 20 years was a pittance. I think she should have a life sentence at least. I mean, think of all these unspeakable crimes,' he said. 'It's hard to put into words how evil this was, and that she orchestrated it and was a big part of it, at least under the criminal sanction, I think, is an unforgivable thing. So again, not my decision, but I have great pause about that, as any reasonable person would,' he added. When pressed further about whether he would favour a pardon, Johnson deferred to Trump. 'Obviously, that's a decision of the president. He said he had not adequately considered that. I won't get it in front of him. That's not my lane,' he said. It is pertinent to note that House Representative Thomas Massie, a Kentucky Republican who has been pushing for disclosure of more Epstein information, said a pardon should be on the table for Maxwell. 'That would be up to the president. But if she has information that could help us, then I think she should testify. Let's get that out there. And whatever they need to do to compel that testimony, as long as it's truthful, I would be in favour of,' he told Welker on Meet the Press. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD California Democrat Ro Khanna, who has joined Massie's effort to release more information, said he did not support a pardon for Maxwell, who was charged with perjury in connection with a civil deposition in 2016. However, prosecutors did not move forward with those charges once they obtained her sex-trafficking conviction. 'I'm concerned that the deputy attorney general, Todd Blanche, is meeting with her supposedly one-on-one. Look, I agree with Congressman Massie that she should testify. But she's been indicted twice on perjury. This is why we need the files. This is why we need independent evidence,' Khanna told NBC News. Hence, it will be interesting to see how the Trump team would approach the matter.
