logo
Huntington Beach mayor again makes disparaging remark on hot microphone

Huntington Beach mayor again makes disparaging remark on hot microphone

Huntington Beach Mayor Pat Burns made a disparaging remark on a hot microphone Tuesday night, at the same meeting where the City Council said it would not repeat public comment restrictions that the American Civil Liberties Union alleged violated the Brown Act and speakers' 1st Amendment rights.
Burns' remark was made after Wendy Rincon and her daughter Sydney made public comments.
After groaning and calling for the next speaker following Sydney Rincon, the microphone picked up Burns muttering what sounded like 'Another f—ing cow' under his breath, although the last word could have been 'coward.'
Burns did not respond to Daily Pilot requests for comment.
About a year ago, he called then-minority council members Natalie Moser, Dan Kalmick and Rhonda Bolton 'pieces of s**t' after they walked off the dais in protest of an item that Burns had brought forward seeking to affirm the council's commitment to the U.S. Constitution, specifically the 1st and 2nd Amendments.
Burns' comment Tuesday was not immediately heard by meeting attendees in the theater at the Central Library where the meeting was taking place, but it could be heard by people who were watching the livestream of the meeting online.
'You can hear it on the city's recording,' said Wendy Rincon, who was standing behind her daughter during her comments. 'He can't run from it ... Whether he's saying it about my daughter or the lady who spoke after her, it's kind of subjective. No matter what, he shouldn't be saying it, period. But considering that my cease and desist letter was on the agenda, I don't think it's a stretch to assume he was talking about my daughter and me by default.'
The cease-and-desist letter referenced came from Jonathan Markovitz, a free expression and access to government staff attorney for the ACLU, on behalf of Rincon. It claimed that Burns violated the Brown Act, the U.S. Constitution and the state Constitution with his actions during the council's May 6 meeting.
In the letter, Markovitz argued that the mayor should not be warning members of the public that they can't make crude gestures or use foul language when providing public comment. Additionally, he should not stop public speakers from addressing individual council members by name.
Burns did both at the May 6 meeting, prompting clarification from Huntington Beach City Atty. Mike Vigliotta.
'[Speakers] should just address the council, but to the extent they need to mention names, they can,' Vigliotta told Burns.
Huntington Beach's code of ethics, adopted in 2016, states that all city elected or appointed officials should treat their fellow city officials, staff, commission members and the public 'with patience, courtesy, civility and respect, even when we disagree on what is best for the community and its citizens.'
Sydney Rincon, 22, said she has also spoken at council meetings before. Her comments included noting that the 1st Amendment and 2nd Amendment give rights, including freedom of speech and freedom of press. She also commented on Burns wearing an American flag shirt to the meeting, stating that it violated the United States code regarding respect for the flag.
'It does not surprise me that he would respond so maliciously,' said Sydney Rincon, a recent graduate of San Francisco State with bachelor's degrees in cinema and political science, in an interview on Wednesday. 'I think what's important to recognize is that nowhere within my speech that I gave on Tuesday night did I address a personal opinion or a grievance of the council. I merely acknowledged the Constitution and our standing flag code. Even in that commentary, he spoke maliciously of me as a constituent and as a voter in this city.'
The council voted unanimously 6-0-1, with Councilman Andrew Gruel absent, that while it was not admitting that Brown Act violations occurred, it would cease, desist from and not repeat the challenged past action. There was no discussion of the agenda item.
Burns, Mayor Pro Tem Casey McKeon, Gracey Van Der Mark and now-state Senator Tony Strickland were voted into office in 2022. After Butch Twining, Don Kennedy and Chad Williams were elected last fall, they formed a self-proclaimed all-MAGA council. Wendy Rincon has long been critical of them.
She gave the council the middle finger during her public comments at the March 4 meeting and said 'F— you,' critical of Burns limiting the time for public speakers to a single minute.
'After two years of being called a groomer, a pedophile, an indoctrinator, I had reached my limit,' she said following Tuesday night's meeting. 'You know how contentious the library [debate] has been ... and I lost my temper. I stand by it. It's not something that I would normally do, but I think that they kept ratcheting up the hate and the anger. It's like, what do they expect?'
She said Wednesday she was considering filing a lawsuit against the city, and had sent an email to Markowitz seeking feedback.
'In this day and age, men just don't get to say that sort of thing,' she said of Burns' remark. 'I don't think that Pat has received that memo yet.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Between Mamdani and Fetterman, flailing Democrats seek a populist agenda that works
Between Mamdani and Fetterman, flailing Democrats seek a populist agenda that works

New York Post

timean hour ago

  • New York Post

Between Mamdani and Fetterman, flailing Democrats seek a populist agenda that works

Zohran Mamdani is the latest sign establishment Democrats don't know how to handle a populist challenge. They haven't learned anything from the defeats right-wing populism inflicted on them with President Donald Trump. Now they're knocked on their backsides by a new generation of left-wing populism in their own party. Advertisement Making Mamdani mayor of New York is like electing Bernie Sanders president — maybe even worse. But in an era when populism keeps gaining momentum, Democratic insiders habitually turn to political has-beens to rescue the party. First it was Hillary Clinton, who staved off Sanders only to lose to Trump. Advertisement Then it was Joe Biden, who got lucky in an election dominated by COVID lockdowns and George Floyd protests, even as Democrats knew he was far past his best-by date. So the setback Trump's right-of-center populism suffered in 2020 only set the stage for a comeback of historic proportions four years later. Democrats should have noticed their playbook wasn't working even back in 2021, when Terry McAuliffe, the ex-governor and old Clinton crony they trotted out to run for Virginia's top office, went crashing to defeat at the hands of Glenn Youngkin — a Republican who didn't have a populist background but spoke to popular fury at lockdowns and rising crime. Mamdani is the crudest kind of left-wing populist, offering outright socialism, including state-owned grocery stores, as his answer to New York's problems. Advertisement His medicine would in fact make things a lot worse, driving more high earners out of the city, in a second exodus after the one COVID triggered. A city already spending too much will have less revenue to pay for the even higher spending Mamdani wants, but that didn't register with Democratic primary voters last week. What they saw and heard was a young, handsome Mamdani telling them more free stuff could be theirs — all they had to do was end Andrew Cuomo's political career. Advertisement Cuomo didn't take Mamdani's challenge seriously enough — but then, top Democrats didn't take voters seriously enough when they got behind Cuomo in the first place. He was damaged goods as well as yesterday's news, a man who'd left the governor's mansion in disgrace four years ago. At a time when all the old idols are falling, did hauling this one out of the dumpster really seem like a bright idea? The party establishment might as well have run Anthony Weiner — and in fact, he was on the ballot last week too, seeking a City Council seat. He came in fourth. MAGA populism, unlike Mamdani's, doesn't spring from thinking there shouldn't be billionaires. On the right, populism is about getting rid of barriers to middle- and working-class prosperity, by bringing jobs back to America and eliminating taxes on tips, for example. And the right's populism is cultural as well as economic, emphasizing common sense, the rejection of woke ideology and patriotism. In a clash between rival populisms, the conservative kind prevails against what Mamdani and Bernie Sanders represent — in most places. Advertisement But New York is a blue city where Democratic loyalties run deep, and now that Mamdani is the party's nominee, stopping him in the general election will take everything that non-socialist Democrats, independents and Republicans together can muster. The only way center-left Democrats will avoid this kind of debacle in the future is if they end their recycling program for Clintons, Bidens, Cuomos and Weiners and figure out what a mainstream Democratic populism in the 21st century might look like. Democrats need a populism with less socialism and more patriotism, even if that looks a little more like the GOP's formula — after all, it's what works. Advertisement The party of Franklin Roosevelt and John F. Kennedy used to know how to compete with Republicans for voters who were proud of being Americans, before identity politics and the Davos mindset took over the party's elites. But today the few Democrats who point their party back in the direction of Middle America are shunned for doing so: Pennsylvania Sen. John Fetterman, for one. The party that made excuses for Joe Biden up to the minute he was humiliated on national TV has been lately seeding the press with claims Fetterman isn't mentally fit for office. His fitness wasn't an issue when he was elected in 2022 — Democrats stood by him despite the stroke he suffered that May. Advertisement But that was before he started to buck party orthodoxy. Late last month, Susquehanna polling found Fetterman doing better with Republicans than Democrats in his home state, with 45% approval from GOP voters versus just 40% from his own party's. Democrats are shooting the messenger. Advertisement Without a populist message that isn't as far-left as Mamdani's, they're doomed to defeat in the country — and doomed to victories in blue cities that may hurt them even more. Daniel McCarthy is the editor of Modern Age: A Conservative Review and editor-at-large of The American Conservative.

NYC Council passes $116B budget amid potential hits from Trump's ‘Big Beautiful Bill'
NYC Council passes $116B budget amid potential hits from Trump's ‘Big Beautiful Bill'

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

NYC Council passes $116B budget amid potential hits from Trump's ‘Big Beautiful Bill'

NEW YORK — The City Council approved the upcoming fiscal year's budget Monday in an unanimous vote, as the city faces funding threats and the likelihood of intensified immigration enforcement from President Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill.' The election-year budget, at $115.9 billion, is the city's largest ever and was touted by councilmembers Monday as a way to 'Trump-proof' the city. 'This budget finally includes some things that we've been fighting for four years now, to make sure that New Yorkers are OK,' Speaker Adrienne Adams said at a press conference ahead of the vote. The NYC budget passage came as lawmakers in Washington, D.C., Monday debated Trump's proposed budget, which would increase spending on the president's immigration agenda, give tax breaks to wealthy households and corporations and make heavy cuts to health care and nutrition programs. 'We also made sure that, once again, we have been fiscally responsible to our communities, to our city, and making sure that we are Trump-proofing this city to the best of our ability,' Adams said. The city budget includes increased funding for immigration legal services, coming as Trump acts on his hard-line deportation agenda. 'On a day when Senate Republicans are passing a horrific budget bill that adds 10,000 ICE officers to the federal government, further criminalizing immigrants across America, we in New York City are protecting our immigrant communities," Councilmember Shekar Krishnan said at the meeting Monday afternoon. While budget negotiations hit a sticking point over programs for immigrant legal services, the budget allocates $74.7 million for immigration programs. Mayor Eric Adams and the Council have frequently been at odds during budget negotiations in years past. This year, coming in an election year as the mayor seeks a second term, went by more smoothly. Although the two sides of City Hall clashed on some topics, with legal services for recent immigrants a sticking point, the budget has added funding for many areas the mayor has cut in prior years, including libraries and child care. 'This is, in my opinion, the easiest budget we had to pass, because we knew what we expected from each other and what we needed to deliver, and we were able to accomplish that,' Adams said at the announcement of a handshake deal on the budget on Friday evening. Budget watchdogs have warned the city is overspending instead of setting aside money for the city's reserves to protect from potential headwinds out of Washington, D.C. 'Instead of putting aside $3 billion to soften the first blows of federal cuts and protect against a future recession, the budget increases spending more than twice the rate of inflation and leaves future budget gaps of more than $9 billion, after accounting for underbudgeted expenses,' Citizens Budget Commission President Andrew Rein said in a statement Friday. But Council Finance Chair Justin Brannan pointed out that the city's reserves are at a record-high $8.45 billion, and said that, because of the Trump administration's threats to further destabilize vulnerable populations, it made sense to allocate more money to them now. 'We made a conscious decision that right now it is more important to pour money into the communities that need most,' Brannan said. 'We can't run the city on reserves.' ______

NYC Passes $116 Billion Budget With Boost to Migrant Legal Aid
NYC Passes $116 Billion Budget With Boost to Migrant Legal Aid

Bloomberg

time2 hours ago

  • Bloomberg

NYC Passes $116 Billion Budget With Boost to Migrant Legal Aid

New York City Mayor Eric Adams reached a deal with the City Council on a $115.9 billion budget, adding new funding for legal services for migrants and more money for early childhood education. The spending plan for the fiscal year that starts July 1, which the City Council approved on Monday, is the final one in Adams' first term. The budget is more than $3 billion larger than the $112 billion spending plan the city approved last year, and it comes as the mayor, who was elected as a Democrat, is seeking reelection as an independent in November.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store