This suburb is booming, and there's more development on the way. What comes next?
Life in Rouse Hill is good. There is a metro stop next to the town centre where driverless trains take residents to the CBD in less than 40 minutes, and the shopping centre features a lot of open space and community facilities.
But behind the omnipresent music and the carefully manicured lawns that define the town centre, and after two decades of unprecedented greenfield development, Rouse Hill continues to experience growing pains.
The shopping centre has virtually no rental vacancy, and the local council says it is struggling to keep up with the service demands of the tens of thousands of new residents.
Rouse Hill is home to more than 11,000 people. But it's set to take on thousands more over the next decade as the council grapples with how to implement the state government-mandated target of 23,300 new homes in the shire over the next five years.
What comes next for one of Sydney's first greenfield developments?
The news
On Wednesday, developer GPT Group announced it had begun construction on the second stage of Rouse Hill's major shopping precinct, Rouse Hill Town Centre.
With its leaders and local Liberal Mayor Michelle Byrne using golden shovels for a sod turning in front of tonnes of already moved dirt, the group said the extension of the shopping centre would allow for extra growth in the suburb, with its established main centre approaching capacity.
The precinct will grow the development by than 10,000 square metres and bring at least 50 new shops, cafes and leisure facilities to the area.
GPT had lodged its development application with plans to include 218 apartments, but Chris Barnett, the head of retail at the developer, said that 'at this time we are just focusing solely on the retail option'.
'It's a point in time in the cycle of residential development … what we have been able to do is future-proof what we're creating today to come back and build residential at the right time.'
Loading
But more people will be coming to the centre regardless of whether GPT builds apartments on top: Hills Shire Council estimates 329,000 residents will join its local government area within 15 years, and is campaigning the state government to urgently provide more infrastructure to keep up with demand.
How we got here
Eastern suburbs residents, beware: Rouse Hill's town centre was once a nine-hole public golf course.
In 1998, the rural suburb was identified as a candidate for future growth as part of the Carr Labor state government's report, Sydney Into Its Third Century, which bucked the in-trend notion of building higher density housing along established train lines and instead identified new areas that were free of development constraints.
Rouse Hill would be the first suburb in the north-west to be developed. Landcom, the development arm of the state government, planned out the area before handing it over to developers GPT Group and Lendlease to build the town centre and homes around it. The first school opened in 2005, and the first part of the centre in 2007. In 2019, the north-west metro, with a stop outside the town centre, also began operations.
What you need to know
Things are slowly changing. Next to the shopping centre is empty land that will one day become Rouse Hill Hospital. After years of uncertainty, the federal Labor government committed in the election to funding a birthing suite after it was revealed that the hospital would be opened without one.
The suburb is part of the state government's North West Growth Area strategy, which has released acres of land across much of the region, with more to come. But even the metro and new bus services are struggling to meet the area's growth: Windsor Road and Old Windsor Road are clogged. The council claims the average travel speed is 20km/h in the morning peak.
The council is now campaigning for the state government to significantly increase its funding for infrastructure.
What they said
Michelle Byrne, Hills Shire Council Mayor: 'At the moment, we're home to over 200,000 people [in the Hills Shire]. By 2041, we'll be home to over 328,000 people. That's an increase in our population of over 71 per cent.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News AU
7 hours ago
- Sky News AU
Near 60 per cent jump in price of offshore wind in the UK a cautionary tale for Chris Bowen and his unprecedented new renewables remit
UN climate chief Simon Stiell has warned that megaâ€'droughts could one day make fresh fruit and vegetables a 'onceâ€'aâ€'year treat' in Australia, alongside a forecasted $6.8 trillion GDP loss by 2050 unless emissions targets are dramatically ramped up. It would be funny if it weren't being parroted so earnestly. An unelected Grenadian bureaucrat, clocking up air miles on long-haul jets, presuming to tell Australian taxpayers what their priorities should be, as though it's his divine right. Another climate hypocrite in the conga line of green evangelists, shrieking about catastrophe while living comfortably above the sacrifices they demand of everyone else. Next month, the Albanese government is expected to lock in its 2035 emissions target once the Climate Change Authority, chaired by former NSW Liberal premier Matt Kean, hands down its advice. The figure will likely fall between 65 and 75 per cent cuts compared to 2005 levels, dwarfing the already ambitious 43 per cent reduction due by 2030. This is less a public mandate than a frantic bid to impress international delegates ahead of Australia's COP31 hosting bid. Yet no one seems to have asked Australians whether bankrupting their country for climate kudos is a good idea. Or if they're prepared to see food and energy become luxuries in the name of 'ambition'. Meanwhile, households and businesses are already paying for this grand experiment. Between 2023 and midâ€'2025, energy bills have soared around 40 per cent nationwide. From July, default market offers climbed up to 10 per cent across NSW, Queensland, Victoria and South Australia; slugging families with an extra $280 a year. That's hardly pocket change for people who already turn the heating off to keep costs down. Small businesses are on life support. A family-run grocer in Wagga Wagga expects a $24,000 annual hike despite rooftop solar. Across the country, policy shifts have added roughly $4 billion to energy costs, squeezing margins, fuelling inflation and driving up food prices. Electricity costs rose 8.1 per cent in the past year alone, feeding directly into the 4.3 per cent spike in grocery bills and 4.5 per cent rent increases. The same policymakers who promise to save the planet are making it harder for ordinary people to afford dinner. And here's the kicker: Australia is one of the most resource-rich nations on earth. It has the largest coal deposits in the world, vast gas reserves, uranium for nuclear energy and critical minerals that the green transition itself depends on. Yet these assets are increasingly politically off-limits. Billions are poured into renewables while the grid can't cope with intermittent supply, new transmission lines face fierce local opposition, and large-scale storage remains a fantasy. The government wants 82 per cent renewables by 2030, yet warns of looming blackouts. The numbers don't add up, but the ideology marches on. Simon Stiell's sermon about fruit scarcity and GDP losses comes with theatrical hand-waving but little mention of the obvious: China, which builds coal-fired plants with impunity, emits more in a fortnight than Australia does all year and faces no comparable scolding. If Australia disappeared tomorrow, global emissions would barely flinch. Yet our leaders are desperate for pats on the back from unelected bureaucrats, ready to sacrifice competitiveness and affordability for a headline moment on the world stage. We've reached a point where even questioning the policy orthodoxy (what the UN frames as ambition) is treated as blasphemy. If you ask why the West should commit economic self-harm while other nations refuse to play ball, you're a denier. Nigel Farage found his bank account closed in part for being climate-sceptical. A climate priesthood is emerging, intolerant of dissent, allergic to scrutiny, and intoxicated by its own rhetoric. Britain's experience should be a cautionary tale. Successive governments have thrown billions at offshore wind, locking consumers into spiralling costs. The latest strike prices in Contracts for Difference auctions are around £60 per megawatt hour, nearly 60 per cent higher than two years ago. With wholesale electricity averaging £70–75/MWh, taxpayers are effectively underwriting inflated returns for developers while grid bottlenecks and storage delays mean intermittency remains unsolved. The supposed 'cheap wind revolution' has never materialised on consumer bills. Instead, households face higher costs and dwindling energy security- all for climate milestones that look impressive on a spreadsheet but feel punishing in reality. This hyperbolic messaging is deliberate. Andrew Neil exposed it live on the BBC when an Extinction Rebellion spokesperson admitted that exaggerated claims about climate-related deaths were used because 'alarmism works'. UN Secretary-General António Guterres took it further in 2023, declaring that 'the era of global boiling has arrived', that 'the air is unbreathable, the is heat unbearable'. Apocalyptic wordplay wins headlines, but it breeds despair, not action. A 2021 University of Bath survey found 56 per cent of young people worldwide believe humanity is doomed. If you think the end is guaranteed, why invest, innovate or adapt? Why train as an engineer or put capital into clean tech when the message from leaders is that it's already too late? In Canberra, politics has devolved into theatre. Labor governs with a majority but faces a Senate pulled between Greens and Teal independents demanding even harsher cuts, and a Coalition that only half-heartedly argues for gas and a slower transition. The tug-of-war has left no space for serious debate about cost, reliability or trade-offs. Real people pay real bills, industries consider offshoring, and taxpayers fund green gambles that threaten jobs and prosperity. Yet politicians fall over themselves to show 'ambition' to the UN, treating pain at home as proof of virtue abroad. There is a saner path. We can slash emissions without strangling growth or making families choose between heating and eating. With Australia's vast natural resources, it should be using cleaner coal, advanced gas technology, nuclear power where viable, and investing properly in energy storage and transmission to make renewables work. Innovation, not ideology, will get us to lower emissions faster than bureaucratic diktats and theatrical targets. But for now, the West seems intent on policy masochism, applauded by the same unelected officials who never pay the price. If climate leadership now means empty wallets, unreliable grids and strawberries rationed like wartime luxuries, we've gone badly wrong. We're not decarbonising the planet. We're decarbonising prosperity. It's time to bring common sense back to the table before the only thing we power reliably is fear. Esther Krakue is a British commentator who has regularly appeared on Sky News Australia programs, as well as on TalkTV and GB News in the UK. She launched her career with Turning Point UK, with whom she hosted a show featuring guests including Douglas Murray and Peter Hitchens
AU Financial Review
16 hours ago
- AU Financial Review
Into the Bear pit: Hockey says new NRL team doesn't hinge on Stokes
Former Liberal treasurer and inaugural Perth Bears board member Joe Hockey says no one person has the power to make or break the NRL's new West Australian team, including billionaire Kerry Stokes. The entire Perth Bears' executive team descended on Perth on Monday ahead of its first official board meeting this week, with Hockey declaring the state's NRL club had the potential to bring two sides of the nation together.
AU Financial Review
2 days ago
- AU Financial Review
Retro remote work rules no fix for Victoria's productivity plunge
Victorian Labor Premier Jacinta Allan's pledge to enshrine in law public servants' and private sector workers' right to work from home at least two days a week may be smart short-term politics. However, it's typically poor public policy from Australia's most far-left government, whose long-term rule has coincided with Victoria's economic and financial decline. This includes cellar-dwelling labour productivity, which has grown more slowly in Victoria over the past decade than in any other state or territory. Allan's proposed legislation is likely to be struck down by a constitutional challenge in the High Court, legal experts warn. Yet the retail political purpose is to wedge the Liberal opposition ahead of the next state election due in November next year. Victorian Labor is aligning itself with the female voters who led the backlash that, during the federal election campaign, forced the Coalition to ditch its plan to force Canberra-based bureaucrats to work from the office full-time.
