
The internet of agents is rising fast, and publishers are nowhere near ready
Now imagine one day a robot comes in to buy books on behalf of someone. It ignores the displays, the coffee kiosk, and the tchotchkes near the till. It just grabs the book the person ordered, pays for it, and walks out. The next day 4 robots come in, then 12 the day after that. Soon, robots are outnumbering humans in your store, which are dwindling by the day. You soon see very few sales from nonbook items, publishers stop bothering with those displays, and the coffee goes cold. Revenue plummets.
In response, you might start charging robots a fee to enter your store, and if they don't pay it, you deny them entry. But then one day a robot that looks just like a human comes in—to the point that you can't tell the difference. What do you do then?
This analogy is basically what the publishing world is going through right now, with bot traffic to media websites skyrocketing over the past three months. That's according to new data from TollBit, which recently published its State of the Bots report for the first quarter of 2025. Even more concerning, however, is that the most popular AI search engines are choosing to ignore long-respected standards for blocking bots, in some cases arguing that when a search 'agent' acts on behalf of an individual user, the bot should be treated as human.
The robot revolution
TollBit's report paints a fast-changing picture of what's happening with AI search. Over the past several months, AI companies have either introduced search abilities or greatly increased their search activity. Bot scraping focused on retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), which is distinct from training data, increased 49% over the previous quarters. Anthropic's Claude notably introduced search, and in the same period ChatGPT (the world's most popular chatbot by far) had a spike in users, plus deep research tools from all the major providers began to take hold.
At the same time, publishers increased their defenses. The report reveals that media websites in January were using various methods to block AI bots four times as much as they were doing in a year before. The first line of defense is to adjust their website's robots.txt file, which tells which specific bots are welcome and which ones are forbidden from accessing the content.
The thing is, adhering to robots.txt is ultimately an honor system and not really enforceable. And the report indicates more AI companies are treating it as such: Among sites in TollBit's network, bot scrapes that ignore robots.txt increased from 3.3% to 12.9% in just one quarter.
Part of that increase is due to a relatively new stance the AI companies have taken, and it's subtle but important. Broadly speaking, there are three different kinds of bots that scrape or crawl content:
Training bots: These are bots that crawl the internet to scrape content to provide training data for AI models.
Search indexing bots: Bots that go out and crawl the web to ensure the model has fast access to important information outside its training set (which is usually out of date). This is a form of RAG.
User agent bots: Also a form of RAG, these are crawlers that go out to the web in real time to find information directly in response to a user query, regardless of whether the content it finds has been previously indexed.
Because No. 3 is an agent acting on behalf of a human, AI companies argue that it's an extension of that user behavior and have essentially given themselves permission to ignore robots.txt settings for that use case. This isn't guesswork— Google, Meta, and Perplexity have made it explicit in their developer notes. This is how you get human-looking robots in the bookstore.
When humans go to websites, they see ads. Humans can be intrigued or enticed by other content, such as a link to a podcast about the same topic as an article they're reading. Humans can decide whether or not to pay for a subscription. Humans sometimes choose to make a transaction based on the information in front of them.
Bots don't really do any of that (not yet, anyway). Large parts of the internet economy depend on human attention to websites, but as the report shows, that behavior drops off massively when someone uses AI to search the web—AI search engines provide very little in the way of referral traffic compared to traditional search. This of course is what's behind many of the lawsuits now in play between media companies and AI companies. How that is resolved in the legal realm is still TBD, but in the meantime, some media sites are choosing to block bots—or at least are attempting to—from accessing their content at all.
For user agent bots, however, that ability has been taken away. The AI companies have always seen data harvesting in the way that's most favorable to their insatiable demand for it, famously claiming that data only needs to be 'publicly available' to qualify as training data. Even when they claim to respect robots.txt for their search engines, it's an open secret that they sometimes use third-party scrapers to bypass it.
Unmasking the bots
So apart from suing and hoping for the best, how can publishers regain some, well, agency in the emerging world of agent traffic? If you believe AI substitution threatens your growth, there are additional defenses to consider. Hard paywalls are easier to defend, both technically and legally, and there are several companies (including TollBit, but there are others, such as ScalePost) that specialize in redirecting bot traffic to paywalled endpoints specifically for bots. If the robot doesn't pay, it's denied the content, at least in theory.
Collective action is another possibility. I doubt publishers would launch a class action around this specific relabeling of user agents, but it does provide more ammunition in broader copyright lawsuits. Besides going to court, industry associations could come out against the move. The News/Media Alliance in particular has been very vocal about AI companies' alleged transgressions of copyright.
The idea of treating agentic activity as the equivalent of human activity has consequences that go beyond the media. Any content or tool that's been traditionally available for free will need to reevaluate that access now that robots are destined to be a growing part of the mix. If there was any doubt that simply updating robots.txt instructions was adequate, the TollBit report blew it out of the water.
The stance that 'AI is just doing what humans do' is often used as a defense for when AI systems ingest large amounts of information and then produce new content based on it. Now the makers of those systems are quietly extending that idea, allowing their agents to effectively impersonate humans while shopping the web for data. Until it's clear how to build profitable stores for robots, there should be a way to force their masks off.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US EPA moves to approve dicamba weedkiller use on cotton, soybeans
By Leah Douglas and Tom Polansek WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency on Wednesday proposed approvals for three products containing the weedkiller dicamba, whose use was halted by a federal court in 2024, arguing it does not pose a significant human health or environmental risk. Cotton and soybean farmers had sprayed dicamba on crops that were genetically engineered to resist the herbicide, which controls tough weeds. Environmental groups have criticized the chemical because it can drift from where it is sprayed and damage neighboring plants. A 2024 U.S. District Court ruling found the EPA previously violated public input procedures in its approval of three dicamba products, and vacated the product registrations. As a result, farmers were unable to spray dicamba on crops this year. The EPA has received applications from Bayer AG, BASF and Syngenta for new approvals, the agency said in regulatory documents. Bayer, which sold the dicamba herbicide XtendiMax, said it was pleased the EPA opened a public comment period on its proposal to approve dicamba usage. "We are confident that low-volatility dicamba herbicides, when used according to the label, can be used safely and successfully on-target," Bayer said. BASF said it would work with regulators to ensure farmers can use dicamba. Syngenta did not immediately respond to a request for comment. An EPA review found no risk to human health from the products, but some risk to certain plants, it said in a release. To mitigate that risk, the agency is proposing restrictions on how much of the chemical can be applied and when, the release said. The top pesticides official at the EPA's Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention, Kyle Kunkler, previously worked as a lobbyist for the American Soybean Association, which has supported allowing farmers to spray dicamba on soybeans. The association said it was reviewing the EPA's proposal and that dicamba is a critical tool for farmers.
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
MrBeast CEO and 'Beast Games' winner rally brand partners and rare disease support on Wall Street
NEW YORK (AP) — MrBeast's new CEO hit Wall Street Wednesday as YouTuber Jimmy Donaldson's media empire looks to develop long-term brand partnerships and, in turn, unlock more funding for its charitable content. Venture capitalist Jeff Housenbold took over MrBeast leadership last summer with a mandate to professionalize an ever-growing entertainment company. YouTube's most popular creator had reached record audience levels far outpacing its startup days, while vowing to reassess its internal culture amid multiple controversies. But, despite joining Nasdaq's closing bell ceremony on Wednesday, Housenbold said their strategic plan does not currently include a public offering — or any active funding rounds. 'Do I want to make banger content? Yeah. That's cool," Housenbold told The Associated Press. "But what can we do with that banger content? Generate profits, make a sustainable business that gives us greater ability to impact people's lives around the world.' 'We're marching quickly to profitability, so we don't have to raise additional capital,' he added. Instead, MrBeast is focused on securing multi-year exclusive advertising deals as opposed to single-video brand partnerships. With 416 million subscribers and legions of impressionable young fans, Housenbold argued that MrBeast is uniquely positioned to deliver more bang for companies' marketing bucks by pointing that 'firehouse of attention' at them. Along the way, Housenbold said he is encouraging Donaldson to tout the channel's charitable works — which often feature quantifiable stunts such as building wells, removing ocean plastic or covering cataract surgery costs. The company, in his view, 'can do good while doing well.' 'The more people who like us 'cause we do good, the more people watch our videos," he said. 'The more people watch our videos, the more we're able to drive in fees from our advertising partners... the more we can invest in more content to do more good in the world.' New projects such as the Amazon Prime reality show and a James Patterson novel from HarperCollins aim to diversify the genders and ages of his audience. Housenbold said that base has historically consisted mostly of 8-to-25-year-olds and men. But Housenbold acknowledged missteps in last year's production of 'Beast Games," which prompted allegations of 'unsafe' conditions from some contestants who said an unorganized set led to injuries, irregular food provision and lacking access to medication. While describing most of those reports as 'inaccurate,' Housenbold said they were 'better prepared' for the second season's recently wrapped shoot. 'Building sets for a 10-episode show is different than a 22-minute YouTube video," he said. "The scale, the size, the sophistication, the safety, the security, the cost effectiveness of doing that. We didn't staff up enough for Beast Games.' Ringing Nasdaq's closing bell Wednesday with Housenbold was the winner of the $10 million grand prize awarded in that inaugural 'Beast Games' season. Jeffrey Allen, the father of a child with creatine transporter deficiency, has promised to put some of his winnings toward existing treatments and research for a cure to the rare genetic disorder. He said the Association for Creatine Deficiencies, where he is a board member, added 1,000 new donors in the weeks following the final 'Beast Games' episodes' release. He hopes Wednesday's visit will draw more attention and money to all rare diseases. 'This is where companies that are bringing true change to the marketplace come to listen to other companies," Allen said. "So, there's no better place for a budding rare disease nonprofit to come and show, 'Hey we're trying to change the world, too.'' ___ Associated Press coverage of philanthropy and nonprofits receives support through the AP's collaboration with The Conversation US, with funding from Lilly Endowment Inc. The AP is solely responsible for this content. For all of AP's philanthropy coverage, visit Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Golden Minerals Company Announces Results of Director Elections at 2025 Annual Meeting
GOLDEN, Colo., July 23, 2025--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Golden Minerals Company ("Golden Minerals," "Golden" or the "Company") (OTCQB: AUMN and TSX: AUMN) announces the voting results from its Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on May 27, 2025. At the meeting, shareholders elected five directors to hold office until the 2026 Annual Meeting of Stockholders or until their respective successors are duly elected and qualified. The results of the vote were as follows: Nominee Votes For Votes Withheld Jeffrey G. Clevenger 1,211,954 192,706 Pablo Castanos 1,214,676 189,984 Deborah J. Friedman 1,270,239 134,421 Kevin R. Morano 1,272,722 131,938 David H. Watkins 1,272,604 132,056 There were 4,335,189 broker non-votes for each of the above directors. The Company thanks its shareholders for their continued support. For additional information, please visit View source version on Contacts Golden Minerals Company(303) 839-5060