Net migration halved last year in boost to Keir Starmer
The Office for National Statistics (ONS) said 948,000 people came to Britain in 2024, with 519,000 leaving.
The 431,000 net migration figure is around half the 860,000 level of net migration seen a year earlier.
The figures still cover the period before Labour came into power, so they do not account for the impact of measures announced by the prime minister this month to slash the number of people coming to the UK.
The ONS said the sharp fall was driven by a decline in non-EU nationals coming to the UK on work and student visas. There was also an uptick in the number of people who came to the UK on student visas leaving the country following the full easing of Covid travel restrictions.
Net migration climbed to a record 906,000 in the year to June 2023, and it stood at 728,000 in the year up to June 2024. With fewer work and study visas being granted by the Home Office, it is expected that the overall estimated net migration to the UK will fall.
The prime minister has already promised that the government 's new immigration measures will mean net migration falls 'significantly' over the next four years.
Plans unveiled last week include a ban on the recruitment of care workers from overseas, tightened access to skilled worker visas, and tougher English language requirements for spouses coming to the UK.
Though Sir Keir did not set a target for how much the government wants to bring net migration down by, the Home Office estimated that the new policies could lead to a 100,000 drop in immigration per year by 2029.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Channel 4
7 minutes ago
- Channel 4
Aid groups warn against aid drops as Gaza continues to starve
Sir Keir Starmer says the UK has plans to airdrop supplies of aid into Gaza and evacuate sick children – but leading charities say that will do nothing to reverse the deepening starvation. The United Nations says it has been unable to deliver and distribute urgently needed aid that's waiting at the border, because of Israeli restrictions and lack of safety. This report by Zahra Warsame contains highly distressing images.
Telegraph
8 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Give grooming victims role in Islamophobia definition, suggests Badenoch
Grooming gang victims should help draft the Government's definition of Islamophobia, Kemi Badenoch has suggested. The Conservative Party leader has urged the Prime Minister to suspend the current 'secretive process' to draft the definition and introduce 'full public scrutiny'. She suggested such scrutiny would include adding representatives of victims of the grooming gangs, along with counter-terror experts and free speech activists, to the working group drawing up the definition. In a letter to Sir Keir Starmer, seen by The Telegraph, Ms Badenoch said: 'Why has the Government refused to include counter-terror experts, free speech campaigners, and representatives of grooming gang victims in their working group?' She said the definition currently being drafted risked 'enabling a de facto blasphemy code' and letting 'fear of offence compromise national security'. Writing to Sir Keir on Friday, Ms Badenoch said: 'I urge the Government to suspend this process entirely, or at the very least ensure full public scrutiny by reopening the call for evidence, and publishing all the consultation responses and recommendations of the working group.' 'Establishing a definition of 'Islamophobia' will further hinder honest discussion of grooming gangs,' she claimed, adding that 'a definition that chills speech will only make it harder to confront Islamist extremism'. She argued 'the term 'Islamophobia' conflates criticism of ideas with hatred of people'. While the term 'anti-Muslim hatred' has been floated as an alternative title for the definition, Ms Badenoch also appeared to dismiss this in her letter to the Prime Minister. She wrote: 'Anti-Muslim hatred is focused on hatred of a people, and there are existing laws to protect against discrimination.' Though it is not clear which definition would be proposed by the panel, the Labour Party has formally adopted for internal purposes the definition of Islamophobia drafted by the All Party Parliamentary Group (APPG) on British Muslims. Critics of the APPG definition point to one part which appears to state that using the phrase 'sex groomer' in relation to a person of Muslim background may be Islamophobic. Dominic Grieve, a former Tory MP and chairman of the working group drafting the Islamophobia definition, previously wrote the foreword to the APPG's 2018 report on its Islamophobia definition which included the apparent reference to grooming gangs. Ms Badenoch suggested an Islamophobia definition would make the country less secure. She wrote to Sir Keir: 'We must not let fear of offence compromise national security. Islamist extremism remains the UK's most lethal threat. Yet still, people are scared of causing offence.' Ms Badenoch warned Sir Keir that 'the panel is not impartial' and accused some of its leading members of 'minimising the role of Asian Muslim men in grooming gangs'. She went on to characterise the panel's work as a 'secretive process' and said 'it appears the process is predetermined'. Ms Badenoch has identities 'a disturbing trend in religiously motivated intimidation, from the case of the Batley Grammar School teacher still in hiding after being hounded out of his job by angry mobs, to violent threats against MPs, cinemas cancelling film screenings, and schoolboys suspended for dropping a copy of a Quran.' This week, a businesswoman who is helping to draw up the definition of Islamophobia for Angela Rayner, the Deputy Prime Minister, has become embroiled in a conflict of interest row. Akeela Ahmed is one of five people on a working group advising Ms Rayner on the definition. On Monday, Ms Rayner's department announced that the British Muslim Trust – which Ms Ahmed is due to lead as chief executive – would receive up to £1 million a year to monitor incidents of Islamophobia and 'raise awareness' of hate crime.
Telegraph
8 minutes ago
- Telegraph
The IDF are supreme in warfare, so their enemies wage lawfare instead
Belgium this week detained and interrogated two Israelis at the Tomorrowland music festival. Perhaps the fictional Belgian detective Tintin would have been better tasked with handling the case, but it was apparently taken seriously by the equally cartoonish Belgian authorities. The allegations from anti-Israel campaigners were that the two Israelis served in the Israeli Defence Forces, arguably the most effective military in the world and, contrary to anti-Semitic histrionics, the most successful in avoiding civilian casualties. Statistically they are far better in their ratio of civilian to military deaths in conflict than either British or American forces, according to John Spencer, Chair of Urban Warfare Studies at the Modern War Institute at West Point Military Academy, who has spent a career analysing these things. It's curious, isn't it, that the hardline activists pursuing Israelis aren't targeting the 100,000 Druze or the several thousand Muslim and Bedouin Israelis who proudly serve in the IDF alongside their Jewish neighbours. But the IDF are predominantly Jewish and therefore treated differently. They can't be beaten on the battlefield so there are attempts to beat them on the field of lawfare. The seasoned legal antiheroes of the lawfare minefields, wounded occasionally by vicious papercuts and exploding judges, take no prisoners in their courtroom battles against Jews – as the International Criminal Court has shown. You might think the Belgians would be a little more cognisant of their own history before picking on any more minorities. The story of the Belgian Congo would have made Cecil Rhodes blush. The Second World War saw 28,000 Belgian Jews murdered during the Holocaust, from a total of just 66,000 living there in 1940. In Antwerp, in 1941, the Belgian authorities helped organise the conscription of Jews for forced labour in France and aided in the rounding up of Jews for the Nazis in 1942. But these lessons of the past are going unheeded. Won't anyone think of the hypocrisy? Quite a few Belgians join the French Foreign Legion. Has anyone ever prosecuted those soldiers? After all, the Legion's conduct in the Algerian Coup attempt of 1961 is hardly edifying. The UK of course is a world leader in lawfare. We have 147,000 serving military personnel but 177,000 practising lawyers! Our battalions of bewigged barristers vastly outnumber our bedevilled bearskins. The UK certainly isn't immune to this offensive targeting of Israel through the courts. A few months ago, British lawyers attempted to persuade Scotland Yard to prosecute some British Jews who have joined the Israeli armed forces. These are presumably young British Jews wanting to help protect fellow Jews from certain annihilation if no such force existed. Has anyone ever prosecuted Brits who joined the French Foreign Legion? Or those fighting for Ukraine today? Did anyone prosecute idealistic youths who went to participate in the Spanish Civil War? Of course not. Meanwhile, British Foreign Secretary David Lammy's posturing in the Commons this week demanding Israel adopt a ceasefire despite it being Hamas that has rejected multiple ceasefires, was itself akin to a pound-shop Lord Palmerston. Ironically of course Palmerston's reputation for 'gunboat diplomacy' originated in large part because he wanted to protect a Jewish British subject – Don Pacifico – from an anti-Semitic mob in 1850s Athens. Nowadays, by contrast, the only time the Foreign Office ever adopts an imperialist air is when it is disproportionately attacking the world's only Jewish state. Perhaps the Belgians should stick to making chocolates, although to be frank, if the originally Parisian Bond Street chocolatier Charbonnel et Walker are anything to go by, the French are better at that anyway.
