Survey Reveals 79% of Women in the UAE See Real Estate as a Key Investment, Yet Remain Cautious
The findings, released at the launch of a new initiative by UK-based property firm Joseph Mews, highlight growing demand among women for resources that enable long-term financial security through real estate. The survey found that 62.5 per cent of female respondents cited lack of access to mentorship and platforms as a key barrier to investing. Remarkably, 100 per cent agreed that real estate investment is essential for building long-term wealth.
Johnny Conran, Managing Partner at Joseph Mews, noted the firm's mission to close this gap by offering tailored education and access to prime UK property opportunities. 'We believe wealth is built through clarity, confidence, and long-term strategy,'
he said.
Complementing these efforts, Merlin Real Estate has introduced peer-based mentorship networks, matching female clients with experienced investors to build trust and confidence. 'Once they get confident, they not only invest but also become our referral partners,'
said co-founder Rohit Bachani.
Despite a growing sense of independence — with 67 per cent of women saying they feel confident making investment decisions — 46 per cent still do not understand the difference between income-generating and capital-growth properties.
In a broader push for inclusion, real estate companies in the region are also nurturing future female leaders. Property Finder's SheForShe programme, now in its third edition, offers mentorship, e-learning, and workshops designed to advance women's careers in the sector.
The message is clear: while interest is high, access and education remain critical to empowering women in the UAE's real estate landscape.
News Source: Khaleej Times
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
2 hours ago
- The National
Rachel Reeves is carrying the can for UK Labour's male-dominated politics
Even before her tearful appearance at Prime Minister's Questions, it was hard not to feel sympathetic towards Rachel Reeves. She is charged with balancing the books of an economy that is weak, suffering next to no growth. Every policy she comes up with to raise income for the public purse ends up being pilloried and worse, reversed. Only the night before, the chancellor found herself presented with an extra £5 billion ($6.35 billion) hole that requires plugging, after Prime Minister Keir Starmer's wriggling capitulation over welfare reform. It is true that Ms Reeves took the job on those terms, she went in with her eyes wide open. It is also the case that she has been her own worst enemy by proving to be an enthusiastic proponent of her divisive measures. Nevertheless, it is worth remembering that she does not act alone, that the steps she takes are collectively agreed, that she works in tandem with Mr Starmer. At times though, it has felt as if he is encouraging her, pushing her on to the balcony, parading her in front of the crowd, to receive not their applause but their baiting. When it suits them, her ministerial colleagues quietly withdraw, adding to her sense of isolation. She is the figurehead on the prow of the boat, Kate Winslet in Titanic, embracing the threatening icebergs. When they do voice their support their endorsements ring hollow, akin to a vote of confidence for the doomed manager in football. Increasingly, Ms Reeves seems to be carrying the weight of a government blessed with a huge majority but lacking in ideas, unable to drive that other revenue earner in economic growth and simultaneously losing the investment community's confidence. It was not like this in opposition. I met Ms Reeves a few times and found her impressive. She was on top of her brief, intelligent and seemingly capable. Along with Mr Starmer, she engaged in a concerted effort to woo the City and they succeeded. The word came back that financiers who were naturally suspicious of Labour were relaxed. This was a soon-to-be prime minister and chancellor who got it, who were not ground down by leftist dogma and appeared to be on capitalism's side. While they were not promising a re-run of Tony Blair, it was clear they were not exactly Gordon Brown, Ed Miliband or worse, Jeremy Corbyn. They were 'OK', which from the bankers was as good as it gets. Doubts were raised with the dissection of her CV. Here, Ms Reeves does merit the blame. She was not a novice; she knew how qualifications could be exaggerated and what a dangerous game that was. She should have known too that in business someone overselling their antecedents is a serious felony – often they either do not reach first base if it is spotted early or they are out if it is highlighted later. She must have realised as well that citing having been an economist at the Bank of England and then the same again at a major commercial bank was tantamount to someone saying they played for the Manchester United first team. They did or they didn't. That means in a competitive match and not sitting on the bench or simply being in the squad. Rather than admitting the error she dug in. The nickname 'Rachel from accounts' stuck. There was undeniably more than a whiff of sexism and snobbishness about her treatment. It was reminiscent of how Margaret Thatcher was dismissed as a 'grocer's daughter'. No disparaging label like that would be attached to a male, not to a son. Likewise, a man who leads is hailed as strong and courageous; a woman who does the same is portrayed as cold and unfeeling, again words that would never be applied to criticise the former. Another female UK politician who endured similar, also from Labour, was Barbara Castle. There must be a reason why the party of the working-class, of the workers, has never had a woman leader. Only male workers count; women are meant to be at home, where they are supposed to be warm and soft, at all times. From the international side, Angela Merkel was portrayed along the same lines. Merkel was the 'Iron Chancellor'. It did not help that Ms Reeves was naturally wary, that she was frequently required to be on the defensive. That could make her come across as brittle and wooden, she stayed glued to a script, robotic, not risking a diversion and a possible run on the markets. She had to get the cash from somewhere. She was damned if she did and damned if she didn't. Ms Reeves could cut benefits and antagonise support on the left; she could increase taxes from the better off and lose support from the right. What made it worse is that the right is bound up with business, so if she hit non-doms, she was not just cracking down on wealthy foreigners who enjoyed tax breaks but hitting inward investment. Again, though, Ms Reeves and her boss should have seen the predictable outcome. That they did not, or if they did and didn't care, only added to the perception of unworldliness, of an administration that is disconnected and adrift. Targeting employers' National Insurance probably felt like another smart ruse but analysis of the likely consequences from an increase would determine that merely supposing they could afford it did not wash. Employers were bound to look twice at the numbers they hired and pass on the rise to customers. The farmers fell into the identical category. Subjecting them to inheritance tax would result in tractors blocking Westminster and stories of upright, honest men (always men) toiling on the land. Nothing cuts through in Britain like drawing on the past and nothing is more representative of that past than the countryside, than proximity to nature and working the soil. Ms Reeves has dug herself a hole and to an extent has jumped right in. There will be plenty of others, however, on seeing her plight who will give thanks it's not them. Look at it another way: if not Ms Reeves, then who? There may be one or two candidates but none leap out. Certainly, given the state of the country, the condition of the global economy, the prime minister and the frustration of the party, it could be a career-ender whoever was to succeed her. Chancellor under Labour is always tough, this is even tougher. A replacement won't provoke a spring in the step, certainly no one will exactly leap at the offer and that should tell you ultimately, it's not all Rachel Reeves' fault.
Fintech News ME
2 hours ago
- Fintech News ME
Saudi's PetroApp Secures $50M to Support IPO and Expansion
PetroApp, a Saudi Arabia-based independent digital platform for fuel payments, fleet management, and vehicle services, has closed a US$50 million funding round. The investment was led by Jadwa Investment through its GCC Diversified Private Equity Fund, with additional participation from Bunat Ventures. Established in 2018, PetroApp is Saudi Arabia's first standalone provider of cashless fuel payment and fleet management solutions. The platform eliminates the need for cash transactions, reduces fraud risk, and offers real-time cost control for corporate and government fleet operators. Over time, the company has expanded its services to include car washes, oil changes, and tyre and battery replacements, while incorporating artificial intelligence to support operational efficiency and predictive maintenance. PetroApp currently manages more than 500,000 vehicles globally for over 10,000 clients, including corporations and government entities. Its network spans 5,000 fuel stations across Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Thailand, and Nigeria. The company forecasts revenue exceeding SAR 10 billion in 2025. The latest capital injection will be used to support PetroApp's plans for an initial public offering on the Saudi Exchange (Tadawul), expand its international footprint, and introduce new AI-powered vehicle management services. The company also intends to increase its offerings to the retail and government sectors. It has recently been named an approved service provider by the Saudi Authority for Government Procurement and Expenditure Efficiency. PetroApp's Founder and CEO, Abdulaziz Al Senan, stated: 'We are excited to embark on this partnership at a pivotal stage in PetroApp's journey. Jadwa's institutional expertise will be critical in strengthening our foundation, accelerating growth, and expanding our leadership in Saudi Arabia and beyond.'
Zawya
2 hours ago
- Zawya
UK services sector grows at fastest pace since August, PMI shows
LONDON - British services sector activity expanded at the fastest rate in nearly a year in June, and the prices they charged rose at the slowest pace in almost four years, according to a survey on Thursday that is likely to be welcomed by the Bank of England. The S&P Global UK Services Purchasing Managers Index rose to 52.8 last month from 50.9 in May. June's PMI was slightly stronger than a preliminary estimate of 51.3 for the month and it marked the fastest pace of growth since August 2024. Prices charged by services firms increased at the weakest rate since February 2021. The BoE is watching service sector prices carefully as it gauges inflation pressure in the economy. Investors largely expect the BoE to follow up on its May interest rate cut with another reduction in August, after it paused in June. "A combination of easing price pressures and lower employment leaves the door open for the Bank of England to resume its run of interest rate cuts at the next policy meeting in August," Tim Moore, economics director at S&P Global Market Intelligence, said. The PMI survey showed the biggest upturn in new business since November, mainly from domestic clients. Still, business expectations for the year ahead weakened slightly as many firms were worried about political and economic uncertainty, in part due to the impact of U.S. President Donald Trump's tariffs. But the survey also showed continued pressure on companies from labour costs, reflecting an increase in employers' social security contributions and a nearly 7% rise in the minimum wage. Firm cut staff numbers in each of the past nine months, largely by not replacing workers who left. New export orders fell for the third consecutive month and at the faster rate than in May, mainly due to weaker demand in Europe and the U.S. The composite PMI, which combines the services data with Tuesday's manufacturing survey, edged up to 52.0 from May's 50.3. The manufacturing PMI showed factories turned more optimistic last month, with some signs of the sector turning a corner in its long slump. (Reporting by Suban Abdulla, editing by Andy Bruce and Hugh Lawson)
