Hong Kong court hears appeals by jailed campaigners
HONG KONG: A Hong Kong court began hearing appeals on Monday from 12 democracy campaigners jailed for subversion last year during the city's largest national security trial. They were among 45 opposition figures, including some of Hong Kong's best-known democracy activists, who were sentenced in November over a 2020 informal primary election that authorities deemed a subversive plot. Critics including the United States, Britain and the European Union said the case showed how a Beijing-imposed national security law has eroded freedoms and quashed peaceful opposition in Hong Kong. Ex-lawmakers 'Long Hair' Leung Kwok-hung, Lam Cheuk-ting, Helena Wong and Raymond Chan are among those contesting their convictions and sentences in hearings that are scheduled to last 10 days.
Owen Chow, a 28-year-old activist who was sentenced to seven years and nine months in jail—the harshest penalty among the dozen—has also lodged an appeal. Former district councilor Michael Pang withdrew his appeal application on Monday morning, leaving a total of 12 appellants.
Some of them have already spent more than four years behind bars. The activists were accused of organizing or taking part in an unofficial primary election that aimed to improve the pro-democracy camp's chances of winning a majority in the legislature. They had hoped, once a majority was secured, to force the government to accede to demands such as universal suffrage by threatening to indiscriminately veto the budget—a plan that trial judges said would have caused a 'constitutional crisis'. Defense lawyer Erik Shum said that vetoing the budget was a form of 'check and balance' built into Hong Kong's mini-constitution that lawmakers could deploy as a last resort. 'In order to check the unpopular exercise of powers by the executive, one of the important measures is to tie the purse,' he told the court. Shum said lawmakers should not be answerable to the courts over how they vote because of the separation of powers.'Let politics remain in (the legislature) and let the public decide, not the judges.'
Prosecutors also challenged the acquittal of lawyer Lawrence Lau, one of two people found not guilty in May 2024 from an original group of 47 accused. Lau's 'overall conduct' showed that he was party to the conspiracy and he should be tried again because the lower court made the wrong factual finding, the prosecution said. Lau, representing himself, said the trial court's findings should not be 'casually interfered' with. 'I have never advocated for the resignation of the chief executive, I have never advocated the indiscriminate vetoing of the financial budget,' Lau told the court, referring to core tenets of the alleged conspiracy. Beijing has remolded Hong Kong in its authoritarian image after imposing a sweeping national security law in 2020 following months of huge, and sometimes violent, pro-democracy demonstrations. Authorities arrested figures from a broad cross-section of the city's opposition in morning raids in 2021, the group later being dubbed the 'Hong Kong 47'.
Aged between 27 and 69, they included democratically elected lawmakers and district councilors, as well as unionists, academics and others ranging from modest reformists to radical localists. Dozens of police officers were deployed outside the West Kowloon court building on Monday morning as people queued to attend the hearing. 'They made a sacrifice... I hope they understand that Hongkongers have not forgotten them,' said a public hospital worker in his thirties surnamed Chow.
Amnesty International's China director Sarah Brooks said the appeal would be a 'pivotal test' for free expression in the Chinese finance hub. 'Only by overturning these convictions can Hong Kong's courts begin to restore the city's global standing as a place where rights are respected and where people are allowed to peacefully express their views without fear of arrest,' Brooks said. – AFP
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Kuwait Times
6 hours ago
- Kuwait Times
Iraqis face difficult return from Syria camp for IS families
MOSUL: After years in a Syrian detention camp, Ibrahim Darwish was relieved to be allowed to return home to Iraq, but his joy was quickly punctured by the harsh reality that he had to disown his sons accused of being jihadists. 'All I wanted was to return to Iraq,' the 64-year-old said of his time in the Kurdish-controlled al-Hol camp, where family members of suspected Islamic State group fighters are held in prison-like conditions alongside refugees and displaced people. But back home in Iraq, 'I had to disown my sons. My house is gone,' he said. 'I am back to square one.' Thousands of Iraqi returnees from the camp have faced major obstacles reintegrating into their communities, their perceived affiliation with IS casting a dark shadow over their prospects. AFP spoke to more than 15 returnees, humanitarian workers and a lawyer, most of whom requested anonymity for fear of reprisals. They described armed groups and local authorities in some areas pressuring returnees to cut ties with relatives suspected of IS links as a precondition for going home or obtaining essential documents. A lawyer for many returnees equated the pledges of disownment to denunciations, 'essentially complaints by one family member against another'. He also warned of a widespread misconception among returnees that they must comply in order to obtain identity cards and other government papers. But a senior Iraqi official insisted that the authorities supported reintegration, including when it came to the issuance of documents. Requesting 'disownment statements has become illegal, and anyone who asks for it should be reported', the official told AFP. Darwish said he was allowed to leave al-Hol after receiving Iraqi security clearance and support from his tribal leader. Back in Iraq, he spent the first several months at al-Jadaa camp, presented by the authorities as a 'rehabilitation' center where returnees wait for further permission to return home. There, 'we felt the most welcome', Darwish said. But when it was time to go home to Salaheddin province, Darwish said local authorities told him he first had to disown his sons, who are locked away on suspicion of joining IS—a charge he denies. Reluctantly, he complied. Otherwise, 'how was I going to farm my land and make ends meet?' he said. In the northern city of Mosul, one woman in her thirties told AFP she was afraid to return to her hometown in Salaheddin, where her father was arrested upon his arrival and later passed away in prison. She is currently squatting with her sister and children in a dilapidated house, living in fear of eviction. When the family first returned to Iraq, she said, people 'looked at us differently, just because we came from al-Hol'. Now her concern is obtaining new identity cards, which are essential for accessing healthcare, education and employment, and she fears she will have to disown her husband to do so. The authorities, she said, 'did well' by bringing them back from al-Hol, where many speak of increased violence, but they must now solve the issue of reintegration. 'We need them to support us so we can stand on our feet,' she added. Thanassis Cambanis, director of New York-based Century International, said the returnees 'face a murky future', especially since some of those tarred as IS families are denied documentation. 'At a minimum, collective punishment of the ISIS families is an injustice and a moral error,' Cambanis warned. 'At a maximum, Iraq's policy creates a ripe pool of potential recruits for violent sectarian extremists.' While many countries refuse to repatriate their nationals from al-Hol, Baghdad has so far brought back around 17,000 people, mostly women and children. Local and international organizations facilitated reintegration, but their operations have been affected by US President Donald Trump's decision to cut foreign aid. The Global Community Engagement and Resilience Fund (GCERF), a Geneva-registered organization that focuses on preventing extremism, supports several centres that have so far assisted around 6,000 returnees. – AFP
Kuwait Times
7 hours ago
- Kuwait Times
HK opens probe into AI-generated porn scandal at university
HONG KONG: People cross a street in Western district of Hong Kong on July 15, 2025. -- AFP HONG KONG: Hong Kong's privacy watchdog said Tuesday it has launched a criminal investigation into an AI-generated porn scandal at the city's oldest university, after a student was accused of creating lewd images of his female classmates and teachers. Three people alleged over the weekend that a University of Hong Kong (HKU) law student fabricated pornographic images of at least 20 women using artificial intelligence, in what is the first high-profile case of its kind in the Chinese financial hub. The university sparked outrage over a perceived lenient punishment after it said Saturday it had only sent a warning letter to the student and demanded he apologize. But Hong Kong's Office of the Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data said Tuesday that disclosing someone else's personal data without consent, and with an intent to cause harm, could be an offence. The watchdog 'has begun a criminal investigation into the incident and has no further comment at this stage', it said, without mentioning the student. The accusers said in a statement Saturday that Hong Kong law only criminalizes the distribution of 'intimate images', including those created with AI, but not the generation of them. There is no allegation so far that the student spread the deepfake images, and so 'victims are unable to seek punishment... through Hong Kong's criminal justice system', they wrote. The accusers said a friend discovered the images on the student's laptop. Experts warn the alleged use of AI in the scandal may be the tip of a 'very large iceberg' surrounding non-consensual imagery. 'The HKU case shows clearly that anyone could be a perpetrator, no space is 100 percent safe,' Annie Chan, a former associate professor at Hong Kong's Lingnan University, told AFP. Women's rights advocates said Hong Kong was 'lagging behind' in terms of legal protections. 'Some people who seek our help feel wronged, because they never took those photos,' said Doris Chong, executive director at the Association Concerning Sexual Violence Against Women, referring to cases at the group's crisis centre. 'The AI generations are so life-like that their circulation would be very upsetting.' Asked about the case at a Tuesday press briefing, Hong Kong leader John Lee said most of the city's laws 'are applicable to activities on the internet'. HKU said on Saturday it will review the case and take further action if appropriate. – AFP
Kuwait Times
7 hours ago
- Kuwait Times
UK launched secret scheme to relocate Afghans after data leak
LONDON: Britain's Defence Secretary John Healey making a statement to MPs on the in the House of Commons in London on July 15, 2025, following the lifting on reporting restrictions relating to the relocation of Afghans who worked with the UK government.-- AFP LONDON: Britain set up a secret scheme to relocate thousands of Afghans to the UK after people's personal details were disclosed in a data leak, risking reprisals from the Taleban after their return to power in Afghanistan in 2021, court documents showed on Tuesday. Concerns that individuals named could be targeted by the Taleban led the previous Conservative government to set up the relocation scheme, involving thousands of people and estimated to cost the government 2 billion pounds ($2.7 billion). British defense minister John Healey apologized for the data leak, which included details about members of parliament and senior military officers who supported applications to help soldiers who worked with the British military and their families relocate to the UK from Afghanistan. 'This serious data incident should never have happened,' Healey told lawmakers in the House of Commons.? 'It may have occurred three years ago under the previous government, but to all whose data was compromised I offer a sincere apology.' Healey said that around 4,500 affected people 'are in Britain or in transit ... at a cost of around 400 million pounds'. But he added that no-one else from Afghanistan will be offered asylum because of the data leak. News of the leak comes as Britain's public finances are tight and the right-wing, anti-immigration Reform UK political party leads in the opinion polls. British forces were first deployed to Afghanistan in 2001 following the September 11 attacks on the United States, and they played a major role in combat operations there until 2014. The government is facing lawsuits from those affected by the breach, further adding to the ultimate cost of the incident. A Ministry of Defense-commissioned review of the data breach, a summary of which was also published on Tuesday, said more than 16,000 people affected by it had been relocated to the UK as of May this year. The details emerged on Tuesday after a legal ruling known as a superinjunction was lifted. The injunction had been granted in 2023 after the MoD argued that a public disclosure of the breach could put people at risk of extra-judicial killing or serious violence by the Taleban. The dataset contained personal information of nearly 19,000 Afghans who had applied to be relocated to Britain and their families. A High Court said in a summary of its ruling to lift the injunction that the data 'contained personal information about more than 33,000 applicants'. It was released in error in early 2022, before the MoD spotted the breach in August 2023, when part of the dataset was published on Facebook. The former Conservative government obtained the injunction the following month. Prime Minister Keir Starmer's centre-left government, which was elected last July, launched a review into the injunction, the breach and the relocation scheme, which found that although Afghanistan remains dangerous, there was little evidence of intent by the Taliban to conduct a campaign of retribution. – Reuters
