Waikato Regional councillor Kataraina Hodge re-elected unopposed to $63,000 role
After that, the new council can carve up a near-million-dollar pay pool, allowing them to lift the base pay for councillors, or add top-ups for roles like committee chairperson.
This pay plan must be signed off by the independent Remuneration Authority, and any rise is back-paid to the start date.
It's the second time Hodge has been elected to the Ngā Tai ki Uta constituency unopposed, the last in 2022.
She has held the seat since 2019.
The Waikato Regional Council is made up of 14 seats in six general and two Māori constituencies.
The six general constituencies are Hamilton with four seats available, Taupō-Rotorua and Thames-Coromandel with one vacancy each, as well as Waipā-King Country, Waihou and Waikato with two seats each.
The two Māori constituencies are Ngā Tai ki Uta and Ngā Hau e Whā with one seat each.
How to vote
You will receive a voting document in the mail so that you can vote by post.
Some regions will also have orange boxes set up in public places to cast your vote. Councils will release these details closer to the election.
Local elections are on October 11, but you don't have to wait until then to vote.
Voting papers need to be posted back by October 7 or put into an orange ballot box by midday, October 11.
Some people also get two votes, such as those who pay rates on two properties. You'll need to check with your council.
Election timeline
August 1, midday: Candidate nominations close and roll closes
August 6: Public notice of candidates' names
September 9-22: Voting documents delivered
October 7: Last day for posting vote by mail. After this date votes must be returned to the council's ballot boxes.
October 11: Election day – voting closes midday, followed by progress results
October 16-22: Declaration of results
October/November 2025: Elected members sworn in
Sign up to The Daily H, a free newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
19 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Facing prospect of election defeat, Government tries to change the rules
There's no good reason to remove election-day enrolment, which has been in place since 2020. And there's certainly no reason to remove the ability to enrol during the advance voting period. You've been able to enrol up to the day before election day since 1993. The idea that election-day enrolment was delaying the official results is also nonsense. Whether people update their enrolment details two weeks before the election or on election day, that form still has to be processed and their information updated. It's the same amount of workers' time, either way. The Government can just hire more people to do it after election day, rather than before, and the job will get done on time. Don't give me the 'well, they should sort out their enrolment details earlier' line. I thought National and Act were against bureaucracy? And now they're saying you should lose your right to vote unless you know about the bureaucracy of voter enrolment and tick the state's forms well ahead of time? We should be making it as easy as possible for people to exercise their right to vote. Aotearoa New Zealand has a good record in that regard. We were world leaders in votes for Māori, votes for women, removing the property-ownership test. We don't have people queuing for hours like in the United States. But now the Government wants to use bureaucracy to trip people up and stop them voting. Even Judith Collins has said it is wrong: 'The proposal for a 13-day registration deadline appears to constitute an unjustified limit on s12 of the NZBORA [the right to vote]. The accepted starting point is the fundamental importance of the right to vote within a liberal democracy. A compelling justification is required to limit that right.' The Deputy Prime Minister says you're a 'dropkick' if you don't get your registration sorted well before the election. But why shouldn't a person be able to come along on election day or in the early voting period, cast their vote, and, if their enrolment details need updating, do it at the same time? Why force us to use an inefficient, two-step process? Since when has the supposedly libertarian Act Party loved bureaucracy? Truth is, we know why the Government is doing this. It's a Government that's failing to deliver and fading in the polls. In most recent polls, Labour has been ahead of National. Forty-eight per cent of voters say it's time for a new Government. Only 38% want to give this Government a second chance. So they're trying to screw the scrum in their favour. David Seymour let it slip with his 'dropkicks' comment. Act MP Todd Stephenson put it even more bluntly: 'It's outrageous that someone completely disengaged and lazy can rock up to the voting booth, get registered there and then, and then vote to tax other people's money away.' Trying to make sure only the 'right' people are voting is dangerous, anti-democratic thinking. We all know this change is about setting up barriers for people who are young, Māori, disengaged or alienated from the structures of power and wealth in this country – because those people are unlikely to vote for a Government that works in the interests of the wealthy and powerful. The Government knows full well that these New Zealanders, who have the same right to vote as anyone else, are less likely to be familiar with the rules around registration. The Government also knows there will be many people, Kiwis not as politically engaged as you and me, dear reader, but no less worthy of the vote, who will turn up to a polling place on election day or during the advance voting period thinking that they can update their registration at the same time as they vote – because that's how it has been and they haven't heard about the change – and be turned away under this new law. Democracy is meant to be a contest of ideas. And it is fundamental to democracy that the voters choose the Government, not the other way around. If the Government wants to be re-elected, it should give people a reason to vote for it, not try to exclude voters it doesn't like.
Scoop
20 hours ago
- Scoop
Comments On The Equal Pay Amendment Bill
The group's chair, Gail Duncan, said: 'The Social Justice Group have sent in their submission to the Peoples Select Committee on Pay Equity. This Select Committee was the brainchild of Marilyn Waring and we were very grateful to have the opportunity to submit ' The Bill was deliberately passed in full with no public consultation, no accompanying Regulatory Impact Statement, no exemption from the Ministry of Regulation, and did not meet Cabinet's requirements. Breaching all requirements with no regard to the long term impact on women or regard that these roles underpin the wellbeing of communities, ignoring that many women in these roles are the sole income earner for their families – they are the breadwinners - and all deserve appropriate recompense for their service and labour. Discrimination is what it is, and this Act embodies and perpetuates it, taking us backwards. The Government introduced the Equal Pay Amendment Bill to the house under urgency on Monday 5 May 2025 and it was passed on Wednesday evening 7 May 2025. The approach not only breached the Bill of Rights Act, but was inconsistent with the international Sustainable Development Goals requirements for delivery of fair pay for women. This government starkly says to New Zealand employers (including the government) that while we can't afford to pay women at pay equity rates, we can afford to deliver tax cuts to landlords and concessions to some industries such as the tobacco industry. The impact of this reduction in due process is being paid for by women across New Zealand as they strive to support themselves and their families. This Bill limits their capability to pursue claims by extinguishing existing cases and denying back pay. The removal of pay equity from the books has undermined the future prosperity of all women in New Zealand, particularly Māori and Polynesian, reducing the productivity and economic contribution of half of New Zealand's workforce. This in turn contributes to child poverty, holding back the next generation. Furthermore, it forces the women of New Zealand to sacrifice their pay equity claims to balance the books for Budget 2025. This, we submit, is unprincipled and ruthless. The National Party has always backtracked on any improvements to women's pay parity . It removed the Employment Equity Act, passed under the Labour government in 1990. That Act aimed to address pay equity and inequality in employment for women, Māori, Pasifika, and workers with disabilities. It also established the Employment Equity Office. The Act was repealed by the incoming National government later that year (1990). Again following Kristine Bartlett and the Food Workers Union Nga Ringa Tota winning the case for care workers in the Court of Appeal in 2014, and a pay equity settlement in June 2017 the National Party publicly stated that its intention was to write off the compensation from the ledger, and rewrite the Bill such that no woman would ever be able to make such claims again. In July 2017 the National Government introduced the Employment (Pay Equity and Equal Pay) Bill 2017 (284-1), to repeal the Equal Pay Act 1972, and create a process for raising pay equity claims within the structure of the Employment Relations Act 2000. The Bill lapsed following the general election. Source: In 2025 the Coalition Government has now achieved this intent with the Equal Pay Amendment Bill. The redacted Cabinet Paper 'Reviewing policy settings' (1 May 2025), justifies pay equity changes on the grounds of the Government's commitment to improve the quality of legislation, reducing complexity and costs. The Equal Pay Amendment Bill was promoted as providing a better pay regulatory framework for a pay equity process, based on the concepts of the Regulatory Standards Bill. New Zealand is not a basket case economically, New Zealand has head space. Policy decisions should enhance wellbeing across the population and this is not evidenced. Instead, the austerity measures being applied are counterproductively pausing the economy against public messaging that growth is the answer. The government is forging a pathway to hardship for hardworking New Zealanders. The Equal Pay Amendment Bill is one strategic part of these austerity measures and their ongoing plan to lower wages across the whole spectrum of workers. This began with the rescinding of Fair Pay Agreement Act, effective from 20 December 2023, by the Fair Pay Agreement Repeal Bill introduced on 12 December 2023 by MP Hon Brooke van Veldon, Minister for Workplace Relations and Safety. The same minister then reviewed the Equal Pay Act 1972, one of the most important pieces of legislation for women on the statute book in New Zealand. The Equal Pay Amendment Bill has set New Zealand back over 50 years, abandoning international obligations to ensure pay parity for women and is another contractionary measure. Treasury has already warned of a slowing economy, slowing spending and lowering business revenue leading to a reduction in the Government's tax take. Taking $12.8 billion out of the economy by reneging on obligations to value women's work appropriately will backfire. This government has introduced a new framework for the use of parties to assess whether there is sex-based undervaluation. The government has raised doubts about the comparison between jobs conducted predominantly by women and other roles of similar responsibility, and implied that prior claims had no merit and determined a reset is required. Differences in remuneration for reasons other than sex-based discrimination? The only one given is the employer will struggle to pay and the Government is threatening that it will reduce funding for those activities concerned. This is as bad as saying businesses and farmers will struggle to make changes to meet our climate change obligations, so we won't foist any requirements upon them. This is setting New Zealand up to fail. St Peter's on Willis Social Justice Group opposes the legislation which has passed giving Brooke van Veldon the power to adjust and further discriminate against women without consultation either publicly or with cabinet. To conclude, St Peter's on Willis Social Justice Group will justify our stance by quoting scripture, as we were asked in the oral hearing for the Regulatory Standards Bill. Jesus is clear about our need to care for the poor and disadvantaged, for instance: in Matthew 25:34-46. He is scathing about influential people who circumvent justice with trickery, for example in Matthew 25:23, 'But woe to you, scribes and Pharisees! For you tithe mint dill and cummin, and have neglected the weightier matters of the law: justice and mercy and faith. It is these you ought to have practised without neglecting the others.' And Luke 11:46, 'Woe also to you lawyers! For you load people with burdens hard to bear, and you yourselves do not lift a finger to ease them.' Using the words of Dr Martin Luther King, quoting Amos 5:24, 'Let justice roll down like waters, and righteousness like an ever-flowing stream.' This government is making decisions which put them on the wrong side of history. Basically, we must pay women what they are worth and reinstate the pay parity obligations lost in the passing of the Equal Pay Amendment Bill.
RNZ News
a day ago
- RNZ News
Small-town surge tops growth of Taranaki council contestants
Hemi Haddon was the only candidate for Stratford's Māori ward, until two more contenders emerged on Friday. Photo: Supplied / Te Korimako o Taranaki Candidates have tripled in contests for Inglewood and Waitara's general wards, and Stratford's Māori ward, spotlighting stronger competition for Taranaki seats in this year's local elections. Most wards and constituencies have more candidates than 2022, countering the trend of ever-lower engagement with local democracy. Only Hemi Haddon had his hand up for the Stratford District Council Māori ward, until David Chadwick and Karley Hemopo joined the race, before nominations closed on Friday. Clive Tongaawhikau, the sole candidate in 2022, resigned recently, due to heavy community and whānau obligations. Likewise, Inglewood's New Plymouth District councillor Marie Pearce is retiring, after taking Kōhanga Moa ward unopposed last time. Mayoral aspirant Sarah Lucas will scrap it out with Jeremy Brooking and Christine Fabish to replace Pearce. Councillor Tony Bedford is calling it quits, after two terms for New Plymouth District's North ward, which has gained four extra candidates to have six contenders for one seat. North ward candidates include Gina Blackburn, Ngāti Mutunga's representative on NPDC's committee Te Huinga Taumatua. In 2022, 10 South Taranaki District councillors were elected unopposed, nullifying votes in all four general wards - Te Hāwera ward even needed a by-election to fill its last seat. In 2025, all but the Pātea general ward are contested. In a rematch for South Taranaki's Te Kūrae ward, sitting councillor Leanne Horo last time won double the votes of Caroline Waiwiri. Sole candidate Cheryl Luke-Maraki is elected unopposed to Te Tai Tonga ward, so Māori roll voters there get a single vote for two-term South Taranaki Mayor Phil Nixon or challenger Clem Coxhead. Similarly, Stratford District's rural ward has four candidates for four seats, so the countrydwellers only get a mayoral vote, as councillor Jono Erwood takes on incumbent Neil Volzke, pitching for his sixth term. New Plymouth's Te Purutanga Mauri Pūmanawa is again a [ two-horse race, with sitting councillor Te Waka McLeod] up against Peter Moeahu, who serves on several Taranaki council committees. Across all New Plymouth wards, there are 37 candidates, six more than 2022. All Taranaki Regional Council general wards are contested, but the candidate count has dropped by four to 20. The TRC chamber has been a bearpit this term, with a fierce fight for freshwater and a Treaty debate shutdown found to be "severely damaging" - all while government ministers discuss abolishing regional councils. As Wellington rebalances freshwater and resource rules to favour the dairy industry, the battle between the farmer lobby and environmentalists will play out in TRC constituencies. Dinnie Moeahu was the only tangata whenua councillor voted on to a Taranaki general ward in 2022. Photo: Supplied / Te Korimako o Taranaki Climate justice campaigner Urs Signer will go head-to-head with dairy stalwarts Donna Cram and Neil Walker - just two South Taranaki constituency seats are up for grabs. Walker hopes to extend his time at the table to 30 years, despite being undermined by a scathing report about his plot to quash debate on the Treaty principles bill. The single-seat North Taranaki constituency has three farm-sector candidates versus two environmentalists. Eco-advocates Tama Blackburn and Chris Wilkes face four-term sitting councillor and fertiliser manager Mike Davey, Farmlands store manager Lee Kennedy and Taranaki Federated Farmers president Leedom Gibbs - who's the Feds' appointee to TRC's powerful Policy and Planning committee. Another new contender for TRC is Spotswood College principal Nicola Ngarewa - sister of Te Pāti Māori co-leader Debbie Ngarewa-Packer, who was South Taranaki deputy mayor, before becoming Te Tai Hauāuru MP. Also up for TRC's New Plymouth constituency is former National MP Jonathan Young, son of even more former National MP Venn Young. Bonita Bigham is again the sole candidate for the Māori constituency at TRC, so she'll be back for what might be the seat's last hurrah. Most Māori wards and constituencies , including the five at Taranaki's four councils, face extinction in this year's ballot. The government changed the law to mandate referendums, saying it would give communities a vote on a significant change to local democracy - and fulfilling National's coalition deals with Act and NZ First. No other type of [ ward can be voted down]. In 2022, Taranaki general ward voters elected just one Māori councillor - Dinnie Moeahu for New Plymouth's district-wide ward. Māori are more than 20 percent of the Taranaki population and hold four percent of general roll council seats. The five Māori wards take tangata whenua representation to 14 percent of all seats. All candidate lists are provisional and subject to confirmation next week. - LDR is local body reporting funded by RNZ and NZ on Air
