logo
Fragmented, weakened Africa braces for impact as US tariffs strike

Fragmented, weakened Africa braces for impact as US tariffs strike

Zawya6 hours ago
As global superpowers clash over trade, Africa stands at a crossroads, faced with rising tariffs, disrupted exports and shifting supply chains. It's also the end of an era as the Africa Growth Opportunity Act (Agoa) expires in two months' time.
Faced with weakened bargaining power against the Trump administration's aggressive tariff onslaught, African nations may have to prepare individual, direct negotiations with the US after President Donald Trump re-imposed higher trade tariffs from August 1.
Economists say trade wars and the attendant fragmentation is hurting sub-Saharan Africa more than the rest of the world. According to Standard Bank's chief economist Goolam Ballim, Africa is set to forego four percent of its GDP over a decade.
Trump has already written letters to six countries across the globe, including South Africa, giving them three weeks to reach a deal with the US or pay a higher premium.
International trade has been crucial in propelling African growth over the past two decades, and experts have highlighted the relationship between gains in per capita income and openness to trade. But the ongoing trade wars not only herald a new world order but also signals the fraying of trans-Atlantic ties.
For Africa, the new wave of tariffs, coming after the 90-day pause, mean that Trump is interested in dealing directly with countries, rather than cutting a bloc-wide tariff arrangement.
President Trump this week met with leaders of Gabon, Guinea-Bissau, Liberia, Mauritania and Senegal and said the five nations were unlikely to face US tariffs.
His Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said Washington would look at a possible extension of Agoa, which provides duty-free access to over 1,800 products from sub-Saharan African countries, but would need to address many tariffs and non-tariff barriers still in place on the continent.
Oil initially dominated Agoa trade but it has recently been surpassed by manufacturing and mining.
Greer, asked about a possible extension of the Agoa beyond September, said that would be up to Congress, but said the decision should factor in the existing tariff and non-tariff barriers in place in Africa.'We still see a lot of tariff and non-tariff barriers in Africa, so I think any discussion about that act would also have to think about how we address those kinds of barriers,' he said.
But South Africa continues to face a threat from Washington after Trump, on July 7, in a letter addressed to the country's President Cyril Ramaphosa, announced Pretoria's exports to the US market would be subjected to a new 30 percent tariff with effect from August 1.
The US had set a July 9 deadline for countries to agree to a trade deal, but US officials now say tariffs will begin on August 1, with only a few countries coming to the negotiation table.
Trump's new wave of tariffs has relegated discussions on Agoa to the backburner, and trade experts advise that the 33 sub-Saharan countries that trade with the US under Agoa seek alternatives.
African business leaders are pushing for a continental response to the tariff threat.
Economic powerAt the Standard Bank Africa Unlocked 2025 Conference in Cape Town this week, speakers pushed for the continent to claim its economic power in the face of Trump's tariffs, amid fractured alliances, consolidation of digital power and climate-shaped industry.
They recommended a continental response prioritising acceleration of the African Continental Free Trade Area, increased participation in the global value chains and increased service trade. They also want Africa to improve the domestic investment climate, deepen financial markets and spread the tax base.
Speaking on the sidelines of the conference, he expressed optimism that America's new tariff policy was going to 'save the international order.''African nations, realising that they will have to foster relationships with allies -- that they will have to encourage relationships with near geographies -- will need to increase their participation in global value chains where we've been underrepresented,' he said.
He sees the brewing trade war as an opportunity. On the 30 percent tariff on South African goods, he is optimistic that it will settle lower than the 30 percent Trump announced – 'an equilibrium that is not as penalising as it now appears.'But he acknowledges that the relationship between Pretoria and Washington is materially changed.'We must operate under the notion that the benefits from Agoa will be whittled down, if not substantially reduced. That said, strengthening ties and almost finding opportunities brought out of America's friction with Europe and with the Far East could mean that South African firms can insert themselves into the global supply chains at the expense of the United States. I'm already seeing anecdotes emerge where our clients are telling us that they are getting orders emanating, for instance, out of the Middle East and the Far East, and I think in this craziness of the moment is a certain opportunity South African manufacturers are harnessing,' the economist said.
Johnson Weru, who was Kenya's Trade Principal Secretary when Nairobi began trade talks with Trump 1.0 under President Uhuru Kenyatta's tenure, said that Trump's contempt for the World Trade Organisation, which granted a waiver for Agoa 25 years ago, and his latest tariffs on six countries including Japan and South Korea, signals the end of an era.
'The Agoa waiver was granted by WTO on the request of USA in 2015. It was extended to September 2025. So, unless USA seeks another waiver from WTO -- which is highly unlikely -- the duty-free, quota-free market access for sub-Saharan African countries will come to an end,' he said.'Agoa will officially elapse on 30th September 2025. So, the choice of August 2025 by President Trump is quite strategic. Legally speaking, USA will not be bound by any international instrument not charge higher tariffs.'The trade talks between Trump's first administration and Kenya were not completed but President Joe Biden, who took over from Trump started new talks which suffered a similar fate.
Mr Weru suggested that Trump's preference for bilateral trade agreements was consistent with policy in his first term in office.
In his latest letter to President Ramaphosa, Trump said he wanted to move away from 'long-term, and very persistent, trade deficits engendered by South Africa's tariff and non-tariff policies and trade barriers.''Our relationship has been, unfortunately, far from reciprocal. Starting on August 1, 2025, we will charge South Africa a tariff of only 30 percent on any and all South African products sent to the United States, separate from all sectoral tariffs,' he said.
He further warned that any retaliatory tariffs from Pretoria would be met with further hikes, indicating his relentless pursuit of tariffs even after countries such as China declined to fight over them.
In response, in a statement on Monday night, Ramaphosa said South Africa maintained that a '30 percent reciprocal tariff is not an accurate representation of available trade data.''This 30 percent tariff is based on a particular interpretation of the balance of trade between South Africa and the United States. This contested interpretation forms part of the issues under consideration by the negotiating teams from South Africa and the United States,' the president's office said in a statement. South Africa and other countries around the world, have been pushing to negotiate trade deals with the US to prevent Trump's sweeping tariffs. But only two preliminary deals -- with the UK and Vietnam -- have since been announced.
A significant number of countries have remained silent or sent emissaries with the hope that the tariffs would be lowered.
Trump said he would send letters to countries telling them what the tariff rate would be if an agreement is not reached.
Other near-identical letters with varying tariff rates were sent to the leaders of Japan, South Korea, Myanmar, Laos, Kazakhstan and Malaysia.
Trump said another 10-15 letters would be sent to countries.
Dr Kizito Sabala, a lecturer at the University of Nairobi's School of Diplomacy and International Studies, said Trump is sinking multilateralism.'It wasn't there in the first place, but we believed it was. Agoa will only survive if in the mind of Trump, the US is benefiting. if not, he will just crush it and go bilateral,' Dr Sabala told The EastAfrican.
Trump has also warned that countries that side with the Brics+ alliance, which goes against US interests, will be hit with an extra 10 percent tariff.
'That is precisely why Africa should prioritise integration. That way, Trump and his ilk would have no option but to negotiate with the continent through such a framework – exactly what is happening in his engagement with members of the EU,' said Dr Benson Musila, a lecturer at Riara University in Nairobi.'He cannot, for instance, circumvent the EU to negotiate with, say, Germany. He must do so within the EU framework.'Meanwhile, China is still offering 53 African countries duty-free entry into its market.
According to Reuters, President Trump, reacting to this, on Wednesday told African leaders that he was shifting the US approach to the continent from aid to trade and that the United States is a better partner for Africa than China.
Trump has shuttered the US Agency for International Development and slashed funding for programmes that help Africans.'We're shifting from aid to trade,' he said at the White House meeting. 'There's great economic potential in Africa, like few other places. In many ways, in the long run, this will be far more effective and sustainable and beneficial than anything else that we can be doing together.'Mr Ballim predicts that Africa could become the epicentre of the global manufacturing system, affording the continent clout to look Far East, West to South America, 'and hopefully to the United States too.''It's possible to manage all of these new relationships. Economic diplomacy has become a lot more ardent. There are going to be trade-offs that governments are going to have to make, and clearly the United States is choosing a very assailing position.'
© Copyright 2022 Nation Media Group. All Rights Reserved. Provided by SyndiGate Media Inc. (Syndigate.info).
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Roger Hutson tried to keep Trump from a second term
Roger Hutson tried to keep Trump from a second term

Gulf Today

timean hour ago

  • Gulf Today

Roger Hutson tried to keep Trump from a second term

Mark Z. Barabak, Tribune News Service Roger Hutson was never a huge fan of Donald Trump. In 2016, he supported Marco Rubio for president, helping raise hundreds of thousands of dollars for his Republican primary bid. In 2024, Hutson worked with "No Labels," a group of Democrats, Republicans and independents, to forge a bipartisan ticket with the express purpose of keeping either Trump or Joe Biden from winning the White House. Is this "really the best we can do in a country of 330 million people?" Hutson asked in a Denver Post opinion piece after the effort collapsed and another Trump-Biden matchup seemed inevitable. The failure, he suggested, was "a sad commentary on the status of leadership in America." But something unexpected happened over the last six months. Trump won Hutson over. He's not gone full-fledged MAGA. "No, no, no!" he insisted, scoffing at the notion of driving down the street, Trump flag waving. And he's not about to jump on JD Vance's political bandwagon, the likeliest vehicle for extending Trumpism in 2028 and beyond. "I'm acknowledging the accomplishments of the man in the office," Hutson said, with emphasis on the White House's current occupant, whom he supported over Kamala Harris. "I'm very impressed." It's not, as one might suppose, because the Denver oil and gas executive is enamored of Trump's exhortations to "Drill, baby, drill! ("No, baby, no!" is more like it, as Hutson believes oversupply would drive prices down.) Rather, Hutson credits Trump with achieving a good deal of what he promised during the 2024 campaign. Securing America's borders. Forcing US allies to cough up more for defense. Bringing Iran's nuclear program to heel. Taking on the country's unfair trade partners. He still doesn't much care for Trump's abrasive personality, the name-calling and denigrating of people. But Hutson's conversion shows that in a country deeply dug into oppositional camps, where political views appear cement-hardened into place, there are still those open to persuasion and even willing to change their minds. As confounding as that might seem. Hutson, 65, was a Republican his whole life, until leaving the party sometime in the 2010s. Or, more precisely, he felt "the party left me." A growing stridency around abortion and same-sex marriage was particularly off-putting to Hutson, who describes himself as a conservative on fiscal issues and a live-and-let-live type on social matters. "If you're lucky enough in life to find somebody you love," he said, "God bless." Hutson has long been active in civic and political affairs, serving on various boards and commissions under Democrats and Republicans alike. He recalled attending a meeting some years ago when GOP leaders gathered to discuss Colorado's increasingly blue coloration. "If winning means nominating an African American lesbian with antennae coming out of her head," then Republicans should do so, Hutson suggested. That didn't go over well. But it fit Hutson's approach to politics. He grew up an Army brat, moving around the world until his father completed his military career and settled in Golden, Colo., to take a job at a family lumber business. For all the impermanence — packing up and relocating just about every two years — Hutson said his upbringing was in many ways ideal, shaping his outlook to this day. The military, he said, reflects the best of America: unity, shared purpose, teamwork. "I think it teaches you a lot of tolerance," he said. "I think it teaches you a lot of acceptance." His GOP pedigree came from his father, the Army colonel. But it wasn't the scorched-earth version of today's Republican Party, in which Democrats and their philosophy are regarded as the root of all evil. Long ago, as leader of the Jefferson County Republican Men's Club, Hutson invited Colorado's governor, Democrat Roy Romer, to speak. "I was catching such hell from people. 'How dare you invite a Democrat to speak to this group?' " Hutson remembered being chastised. "And I said, 'Well, he's our governor, isn't he? I think it'd be an honour.' " After some initial puzzlement from the governor's office — are you sure? — Romer came and spoke, holding just the kind of cross-party conversation that Hutson wishes occurred more often among politicians in worlds-apart Washington. "I'd love for Trump to have a weekly meeting with (Democratic House leader) Hakeem Jeffries," Hutson said as he sat high above downtown Denver, his office decor — dark leather, rugged mountain landscape. "I would love for Trump to sit down weekly with (Chuck) Schumer" — the Democratic Senate leader — or bring Schumer and the GOP Senate leader, John Thune, together and say, ''How do we work our way through this?'' Could you imagine that, Hutson asked, before answering his own question. Nope. Never gonna happen. Nothing, and no individual, is perfect. But Hutson looks to the bottom line, and he's willing to accept trade-offs. Trump is loud and uncouth. But he's respected on the world stage, Hutson said, in a way the shuffling Biden was not. Trump may be toying with tariffs — up, down, all around. But at least he's addressing the country's one-sided trade relationships in a way, Hutson said, no president has before. He may be off base calling for a drastic ramp-up of domestic oil production. But in general, Hutson said, Trump's welcoming message to business is, "What can we do to be more helpful?"

African Development Bank Approves $62 Million Emergency Grant to Restore Critical Services in Conflict-Affected Sudan
African Development Bank Approves $62 Million Emergency Grant to Restore Critical Services in Conflict-Affected Sudan

Zawya

time2 hours ago

  • Zawya

African Development Bank Approves $62 Million Emergency Grant to Restore Critical Services in Conflict-Affected Sudan

The Board of Directors of the African Development Bank Group ( has approved a $62.13 million emergency grant to support the Sudan Integrated Social Sector Infrastructure Rehabilitation Project (SISSIRP). This vital support aims to restore essential health, education, and water services that have been severely disrupted by the ongoing civil conflict in Sudan, which erupted in 2023. The funding package, approved on 11 July 2025, comprises $44.57 million from Pillar 1 of the Transition Support Facility and $17.56 million from the African Development Fund, the Bank's concessional financing window for low-income countries. Sudan is currently facing one of the world's gravest humanitarian crises. An estimated 30.6 million people are in urgent need of assistance, including 11.5 million internally displaced persons, 54% of whom are women. The conflict has devastated critical infrastructure and services across the country, leaving healthcare facilities, schools, and water systems destroyed. This breakdown has deepened poverty, widened inequalities, and significantly limited access to basic services, particularly in conflict-affected areas. Commenting on the project, Mary Monyau, the Bank's Country Manager for Sudan, highlighted the initiative's importance: 'This project is a crucial step towards rebuilding lives and livelihoods. By restoring access to clean water, healthcare, and essential infrastructure, we are not only addressing immediate humanitarian needs but also laying the foundation for long-term resilience and development.' The two-year project (2025-2027) will focus on four Sudanese states-- Aj Jazira, River Nile, Sennar, and White Nile – and is designed to improve the resilience and well-being of the population by rehabilitating and strengthening social sector services. The SISSIRP is structured around three core components: Strengthening Social Infrastructure and Systems: Rehabilitation of key education, health, and WASH (water, sanitation, and hygiene) facilities to ensure continued access to safe drinking water and essential public services. Capacity Development and Community Engagement: Strengthening the capacities of individuals, institutions, and communities to manage and sustain the delivery of social services and infrastructure. Governance and Implementation Support: Ensuring transparent, accountable, and effective project implementation with robust monitoring and mechanisms to guarantee equitable access for targeted beneficiaries. The initiative aligns with the Bank's extended Country Brief for Sudan. It also supports the Bank's Ten-Year Strategy (2024–2033) and contributes directly to one of its key "High 5" priorities, ' Improve the Quality of Life for the People of Africa.' It further aligns with sub-themes including access to basic drinking water services, coverage of essential health services, and youth inclusion in employment, education, and training. Distributed by APO Group on behalf of African Development Bank Group (AfDB).

Tariffs bite into Europe as earnings season begins – which sectors will be hit hardest?
Tariffs bite into Europe as earnings season begins – which sectors will be hit hardest?

Arabian Post

time3 hours ago

  • Arabian Post

Tariffs bite into Europe as earnings season begins – which sectors will be hit hardest?

A tide of tariffs is sweeping across Europe, and the damage is becoming visible just as earnings reports begin to drop. President Trump's trade decisions are no longer a future threat; they're now a present force reshaping European corporate performance. The timing is brutal. What was expected to be a modestly positive second quarter for European earnings has shifted into decline, with weakness now concentrated in a few critical sectors. ADVERTISEMENT Investors are bracing for confirmation that Europe's earnings engine has stalled. The continent's largest firms are being squeezed between softer demand and policy-driven pricing pressure. The hardest-hit? Energy, consumer-facing multinationals, and financial institutions—all of which are deeply entwined with global trade flows, dollar liquidity, and sentiment cycles. The latest data point to a shallow contraction in European earnings per share for the second quarter—just months after analysts were still forecasting robust growth. This kind of whiplash signals something deeper than seasonal volatility. It reflects the speed and scale at which expectations have been rewired in response to Trump's aggressive trade stance and the rising cost of doing business across borders. The energy sector has been among the swiftest to feel the impact. Oil prices, already under pressure through much of Q2, found no relief in tariff announcements. On the contrary, producers now face increased uncertainty around demand, pricing structures, and the stability of international supply chains. ADVERTISEMENT Crude has recovered somewhat since Trump's latest volley of trade threats, but that rebound masks the structural challenges beneath. Tariffs hit everything from upstream investment to downstream distribution. The big European energy names are not just contending with weak prices—they are navigating a much more unstable commercial environment than their US counterparts, who now benefit from friendlier domestic regulation and renewed geopolitical leverage. The consumer sector has its own set of problems, and they are compounding quickly. Currency pressure from a weakening dollar has lifted the euro to multi-month highs—bad news for exporters relying on US demand. But it's the tariff shock that has most dramatically reset the mood. European brands selling into the US market now face an awkward mix of falling margins and unclear guidance. From luxury icons to mass-market manufacturers, the story is turning sour. Investors are no longer looking for growth; they're looking for resilience. That's especially true for discretionary names with high exposure to the US consumer. As inflation softens stateside but tariffs rise, spending patterns are shifting in unpredictable ways. European brands reliant on price stability and repeat purchases may now struggle to justify forward earnings multiples. Some will hold the line. Others will crack. Commentary accompanying these results will be closely parsed for signs that demand has deteriorated faster than expected. Then there's the financial sector—until recently, the unshakable pillar of European earnings growth. That pillar is now wobbling. Bank profits have ridden high on rising rates, deal speculation, and net interest income. But tariffs, by design, depress cross-border investment. They cloud merger activity, discourage capital flow, and introduce costs that even the most efficient lenders can't hedge away. While forecasts still point to slight profit expansion this quarter, the momentum is clearly fading. The bigger concern for investors is whether this is the beginning of a trend. European banks are heavily exposed to global supply chains, especially those facilitating trade between the EU and the US. Tariff policy disrupts those flows. It also raises credit risks for firms caught in the middle—many of which are mid-sized manufacturers or logistics players dependent on transatlantic trade routes. The revaluation of these risks is already underway, and the sharp rally in European bank stocks earlier this year now looks increasingly out of step with the operating reality on the ground. Put simply: the Europe-versus-US divide is growing. While Trump's tariffs are raising costs in Europe, the US is simultaneously offering support to its domestic industries, including energy and digital assets. This divergence is altering the investment case for entire sectors. Europe is still the world's largest trading bloc—but trade is exactly what's under siege. It makes this earnings season less about individual company performance and more about policy drag. For long-term investors, this is a wake-up call. Valuations built on the assumption of stable, rules-based global commerce are being tested. In a world where tariffs can be imposed by tweet, diversification across regions isn't enough. Sector exposure, policy sensitivity, and forward guidance credibility all need to be reassessed. This reporting season will deliver more than financial updates. It will reveal which companies are best-positioned to survive the age of economic confrontation—and which are still clinging to a fading version of globalisation. Nigel Green is deVere CEO and Founder Also published on Medium. Notice an issue? Arabian Post strives to deliver the most accurate and reliable information to its readers. If you believe you have identified an error or inconsistency in this article, please don't hesitate to contact our editorial team at editor[at]thearabianpost[dot]com. We are committed to promptly addressing any concerns and ensuring the highest level of journalistic integrity.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store