logo
A bumpy ride: Chennai's speed breakers break more than just speed

A bumpy ride: Chennai's speed breakers break more than just speed

The Hindu28-05-2025
For P. Saravanan, a person with disability and a member of the Social Justice Movement, navigating his vehicle over the speedbreakers in Kaladipettai under Tiruvottiyur Zone is a source of physical pain, on a daily basis. His struggle is far from isolated as several residents have complained about speedbreakers that flout the design standards of Indian Road Congress (IRC) across the city.
As per IRC 1988, speedbreakers should be 3.7 metres wide and 10 centimetres high with a 17 metre radius hump, designed for 25 km/h speeds, and marked with reflective thermoplastic paint and warning signs placed in advance. Further, the IRC 2018 adds that placement, gradient, material, and signage are crucial for effectiveness.
https://t.co/PcuOFEs0al
Here's a look at the guidelines under the Indian Roads Congress:
According to Indian Roads Congress IRC 99-2018 (https://t.co/7Eu3Z5dPno)
The degree of the effect of the humps in terms of speed reduction depends upon the profile, height, gradient, length… pic.twitter.com/39B23tgHng — R Aishwaryaa (@AishRavi64) February 28, 2024
'The thin rubber-plastic speedbreaker installed two months ago by the Greater Chennai Corporation in Tiruvottiyur is the toughest to negotiate. Yet, it has not been removed despite repeated complaints,' he said.
Earlier in May, in Anna Main road of K.K. Nagar, a 22-year-old pregnant woman sustained severe injuries after falling from a two-wheeler, as her husband, who was riding the vehicle, failed to notice a speedbreaker there.
Meera Ravikumar, a social activist in Adyar, said that few speedbreakers in Gandhi Nagar under Ward 173 are taller than 10 cm and cause back pain for those forced to frequently pass by them. 'Many are yet to be painted with reflective thermoplastic paint for better visibility at night. The rubber-plastic speedbreaker found in Kastuba Nagar is very uncomfortable for two-wheeler and bicycle riders,' she said.
P. Arunkumar, 39, of Manali, stated that in Kannadasan Nagar, emulsion paint was used on a speedbreaker instead of reflective thermoplastic paint, making markings fade quickly, which lead to minor accidents, especially at night when visibility is low. He said that in areas like Korukkupet, speedbreakers are abruptly laid without a smooth transition from the road.
Prabhu Krishnamoorthy of M.K.B. Nagar said there are over 10 unmarked speedbreakers on the road between Basin Bridge and Madhavaram, and stretches from Kasimedu to Ennore and Moolakadai to Kavangarai had over 30 unmarked humps.
According to a recent complaint submitted by civic activist Balaji Gopalan, speedbreakers in Wards 149 and 150 violate many IRC norms. He said that when a hump in Ward 151 exceeding 10 cm height, was flagged via the Chief Minister's grievance cell, the GCC responded that it was within standards, though it was visibly too high. He added that an RTI filed over eight months ago, seeking details on the number of faulty speedbreakers in the city and action taken against officials responsible, remains unanswered.
According to the audit conducted in June and July 2024 by 1000 volunteers of NGO Arappor Iyakkam, 201 of the surveyed speed breakers in 467 spots across the city, including those under Greater Chennai Corporation, Iyyapanthangal, Agaramthen and Thiruneermalai, do not meet IRC regulations.
A senior official said little progress was made since February, when 41 speed breakers in Teynampet, Royapuram, and Thiru-Vi-Ka Nagar Zones, 29 in Kodambakkam Zone, and 20 in Adyar Zone were corrected ensuring proper height and reflective paint marking, after the speedbreaker committee met with Greater Chennai Traffic Police personnel. No further meetings have been held since, he added.
GCC Commissioner J. Kumaragurubaran stated that nearly 2,000 speedbreakers in the city were identified as not conforming to IRC norms across the city and were taken up for correction before heavy rains hit in 2024. He added that another corrective drive can be undertaken to address the pending issues as raised by commuters.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

HC grants bail to suspended IAS officer in bribery case
HC grants bail to suspended IAS officer in bribery case

Time of India

time25-07-2025

  • Time of India

HC grants bail to suspended IAS officer in bribery case

Cuttack: Orissa high court has granted bail to suspended IAS officer Dhiman Chakma, who was arrested on June 9 by the state vigilance for allegedly accepting a bribe of Rs 10 lakh from a businessman in Kalahandi district. During a subsequent search at the official residence of Chakma, who was posted as sub-collector of Dharamgarh, officials recovered Rs 47 lakh in cash. A case was registered against the 2021-batch IAS officer under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) Act, 2018. The court directed that Chakma be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs 5 lakh and one solvent surety of the same amount, subject to conditions including surrender of passport and not leaving the country without trial court permission. Advocate Devashis Panda represented Chakma. Granting bail, Justice Gourishankar Satapathy observed that Chakma had roots in society and posed no flight risk. "No material has been brought on record to evidence that the petitioner poses flight risk. Even if such apprehension arises, it can be addressed by imposing conditions like surrendering the passport," the court noted in its order uploaded on Friday. The special vigilance court in Bhawanipatna had earlier rejected his bail plea. State govt suspended him on June 10. The court further said that with the complainant and witnesses' statements recorded under Section 183 of BNSS, and Chakma's voice sample already sent for forensic examination, the investigation had substantially progressed. "There appears only formality of submission of chargesheet... there is no justification for further detention," the order stated. The HC clarified that the bail order does not amount to a view on the merits of the case.

UAE warns: Don't transfer money to strangers or risk 10-year jail
UAE warns: Don't transfer money to strangers or risk 10-year jail

Time of India

time23-07-2025

  • Time of India

UAE warns: Don't transfer money to strangers or risk 10-year jail

Transferring money to strangers, no matter the intent, may carry criminal penalties under UAE law/Representative Image TL;DR: Transferring or depositing funds into unknown or unverified accounts especially at ATMs for strangers is a criminal offence under UAE law. Convictions for money laundering under Federal Law No. 20/2018 can lead to 1–10 years in prison and fines from AED 100,000 to AED 5 million. Federal Decree Law No. 34/2021 also applies for similar acts conducted via electronic means, with penalties up to 10 years imprisonment and up to AED 5 million fine. The UAE Public Prosecution urges the public to exercise extreme caution, even compliant intentions don't exempt individuals from legal liability. In light of recent legal cases, the UAE authorities have issued a strong warning: helping strangers deposit or transfer money, even as a favour, can result in criminal charges for money laundering. Under UAE laws, individuals who use their personal identity to deposit or move funds for unknown parties can face up to ten years imprisonment and hefty fines, even if they were unaware of the funds' origin or intent. This latest advisory reaffirms that negligence or good faith does not exempt one from legal accountability under the country's strict anti-financial crime statutes. The Legal Framework: Understanding the Penalties According to Federal Law No. 20 of 2018 on Combating Money Laundering and Terrorism Financing, knowingly transferring funds associated with criminal proceeds with intent to disguise their source constitutes a money laundering offence. Article 22 of this law sets the punishment at: 1 to 10 years in prison Fines ranging from AED 100,000 ($27,225) to AED 5 million ($1.36 million), or both Under Federal Decree Law No. 34 of 2021 on Combating Rumours and Cybercrimes, similar penalties apply when electronic means are used to conceal or move illicit funds: Up to 10 years of imprisonment Fines up to AED 5 million, or both These laws emphasise that intent to obscure a transaction, even unintentionally, can expose individuals to severe criminal liability. Real-World Risks: Why Such Transactions are Illegal The UAE's strict stance stems from its ongoing commitment to combat money laundering, terrorism financing, and financial fraud, all of which can exploit innocent citizens through seemingly minor acts like transferring money on behalf of others. Criminal networks often rely on unsuspecting individuals, sometimes referred to as 'money mules,' to move illicit funds without detection. By using regular bank customers to conduct these transactions, criminals attempt to break the audit trail and avoid scrutiny from law enforcement or financial monitoring units. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 15 most beautiful women in the world Undo Therefore, the law criminalizes not just the act of laundering money, but also any willful or negligent facilitation of such transactions, even when carried out unknowingly. The goal is to close legal loopholes and make it harder for criminal enterprises to mask their financial trails. Public Prosecution: Official Guidance and Risk Advisory The UAE Public Prosecution has issued clear statements advising residents never to accept requests to transfer or deposit money on behalf of strangers. It reiterated that using one's ID card or banking credentials to complete such transactions, even under a seemingly legitimate pretext is legally risky and could lead to formal charges. Authorities emphasise that individuals should treat these cases as non-optional: even if persuaded or tricked, they can still be held responsible unless they immediately report the incident to authorities. Best Practice: If You Receive Unexpected Money or Requests UAE authorities and banks recommend these steps for safety: Refuse to transfer or deposit money for someone you don't personally know. Do not move or withdraw unexpected funds received through a stranger's mistake, they may be traced back to criminal activity. Report immediately to your bank and relevant authorities, such as the Dubai Police via 901 or the anti-fraud hotline. Maintain records of all communications and responses as evidence. These measures help protect individuals from being inadvertently involved in financial irregularities. What may seem like an innocent gesture, transferring money on behalf of a stranger can lead to grave legal consequences in the UAE. Under strict anti-money laundering and cybercrime laws, individuals who facilitate dubious transactions, even unknowingly, could face up to a decade in prison and millions in fines. Legal and security authorities underline that ignorance of the law is no defence, and responsible financial conduct must be the standard in all personal banking interactions.

PSBs flag 1,629 wilful defaulters with dues over ₹1.62 trillion: FinMin
PSBs flag 1,629 wilful defaulters with dues over ₹1.62 trillion: FinMin

Business Standard

time22-07-2025

  • Business Standard

PSBs flag 1,629 wilful defaulters with dues over ₹1.62 trillion: FinMin

The Union Finance Ministry on Tuesday said that public sector banks (PSBs) have classified 1,629 unique corporate borrowers as wilful defaulters, with outstanding loans totalling ₹1.62 trillion as of March 31, 2025. In a written reply in the Rajya Sabha, Minister of State for Finance Pankaj Chaudhary informed the data from the Central Repository of Information on Large Credits (CRILC). He further added that the list of defaulters, excluding overseas borrowers, is updated monthly and made publicly accessible through the websites of registered credit information companies such as CIBIL, Experian, Equifax, and CRIF High Mark. Chaudhary further added that the wilful defaulters and large defaulters, dated July 30, 2024, cases of wilful defaults at overseas branches of banks incorporated in India shall be reported to credit information companies, if such disclosure is not prohibited under the laws of the host country. Further, as per the information received from the Directorate of Enforcement, nine accused who fled the country have been declared Fugitive Economic Offenders under the provisions of the Fugitive Economic Offenders Act, 2018 (FEOA). 'In these cases, as of now, assets amounting to ₹15,298.27 crore (approx.) have been confiscated under PMLA and assets amounting to ₹749.87 crore (approx.) have been confiscated under FEOA. Further, nine accused have been convicted in these cases under the provisions of PMLA,' said the Minister of State for Finance. The Minister further said that comprehensive measures have been taken to deter wilful default and to recover NPAs, including those pertaining to wilful defaulters. 'Wilful defaulters are not sanctioned any additional facilities by banks or financial institutions, and their units are debarred from floating new ventures for five years. Further, wilful defaulters and companies with wilful defaulters as promoters/directors have been debarred from accessing capital markets to raise funds,' he said. He further added that the bar on additional credit facilities to a wilful defaulter or any entity with which a wilful defaulter is associated shall be effective for a period of one year after the name of the wilful defaulter has been removed from the List of Wilful Defaulters (LWD) by the lender.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store