Yale's law school dean will be the Ford Foundation's new president
Yale Law School Dean Heather Gerken will succeed Darren Walker as the president of one of the largest U.S. charitable organizations, the Ford Foundation announced Monday. A leading expert on constitutional law and democracy, Gerken takes the helm of its $16 billion endowment as the philanthropic sector navigates challenges to the tax-exempt status of nonprofits opposed by President Donald Trump 's administration and its sweeping orders targeting trillions of dollars in federal funding for civil society groups.
'I am deeply grateful for this opportunity and look forward to working with Ford staff and the board of trustees to protect democracy and the rule of law and further our mission to create a more just and fair world for everyone," Gerken said in a statement.
Gerken brings an extensive legal background that includes voting rights experience at Washington, DC law firm Jenner & Block and clerkships with Supreme Court justices. The Ford Foundation noted that she prioritized increasing access for underrepresented students as the dean of Yale Law School. The American Bar Association appointed her to a task force that aimed to fortify democracy amid threats to election processes. She is also a trustee of Princeton University, where she completed her bachelor's degree, and the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation.
Her tenure begins in November, making good on Walker's promise to exit the stage by the end of 2025. She called it a 'profound honor' to build upon the legacy of those who preceded her, 'particularly the astonishing Darren Walker.' Since 2013, Walker has focused the foundation's mission around social justice and overseen major investments in gender equity and disability rights.
'Her experience and dedication to philanthropy and the field of law will undoubtedly propel the foundation's mission forward," Walker said in a statement.
The Ford Foundation was created in 1936 by the brothers Henry and Edsel Ford, pioneers of the automobile, and funded with stock in the Ford company. It supported civil rights litigation starting in the late 1960s and helped seed the field of public interest law in the United States.
Then-Sen. J.D. Vance called out the Ford Foundation specifically for supporting progressive causes back before he became vice president, accusing officials of using charitable funds for partisan ends.
Anticipation over who might shape the influential foundation's priorities only grew in recent months as the Trump administration took aim at the very issues of inequality that Walker had championed. The board of trustees and executive search firm Russell Reynolds Associated began looking for Walker's replacement after he announced his departure last July, according to the Ford Foundation.
Walker was an internal promotion at Ford who honed his financial skills and knowledge of the inner workings of philanthropy at the Abyssinian Development Corp. and Rockefeller Foundation, while Gerken is an outside hire from the world of academia. Politico featured her in a 2017 list of the people behind ideas shaping American politics. The magazine highlighted her long push for 'progressive federalism,' or the idea that democracies should empower local governments to pursue innovative social reforms.
Support for Gerken's selection came Monday from scholars, nonprofit leaders and legal professionals who, in statements shared by the Ford Foundation, touted her clear-eyed approach to upholding civil rights, sharp thinking around safeguarding democratic norms and ability to find common ground.
'In a moment when constitutional democracy needs urgent attention and engagement, I cannot imagine a better president for the Ford Foundation,' said Princeton University President Christopher L. Eisgruber.
___
Associated Press coverage of philanthropy and nonprofits receives support through the AP's collaboration with The Conversation US, with funding from Lilly Endowment Inc. The AP is solely responsible for this content. For all of AP's philanthropy coverage, visit https://apnews.com/hub/philanthropy.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
21 minutes ago
- The Guardian
‘A billion people backing you': China transfixed as Musk turns against Trump
Few break-ups have as many gossiping observers as the fallout between the once inseparable Donald Trump and Elon Musk. The ill-fated bromance between the US president and the world's richest man, which once raised questions about American oligarchy, is now being pored over by social media users in China, many of whom are Team Musk. The latest drama comes from Musk's pledge to found a new political party, the America party, if Trump's sweeping tax and spending bill, which Musk described as 'insane' passed the Senate this week (it did). Musk had already vowed to unseat lawmakers who backed Trump's flagship piece of legislation, which is expected to increase US national debt by $3.3tn. On Wednesday, hours after the bill passed the US Senate, the hashtag #MuskWantsToBuildAnAmericaParty went viral on Weibo, a Chinese social media platform similar to Musk's X, receiving more than 37m views. 'If Elon Musk were to found a political party, his tech-driven mindset could inject fresh energy into politics. The potential for change is significant – and worth watching,' wrote one Weibo user. 'When you've had enough, there's no need to keep putting up with it,' wrote another. One comment summed up the mood on the platform: 'Brother Musk, you've got over a billion people on our side backing you.' Musk, the CEO of Tesla and SpaceX, is widely venerated in China for his business acumen and technological achievements. Tesla's electric vehicles are the only western brand on Chinese roads that can rival domestic firms, and the company's biggest factory by volume is in Shanghai. Musk is known to have a close relationship with China's premier, Li Qiang, while Musk's mother, Maye Musk, is a social media celebrity in her own right in China. Musk's popularity in China follows a well-established trend of Chinese audiences enthusiastically embracing US tech innovators. Walter Isaacson's biography of Steve Jobs was a bestseller in China, as was his biography of Musk. Trump, however, is seen by many as being an unpredictable funnyman who has launched the most aggressive trade war on China in recent history. Some internet users commented that Trump and Musk should grow up. 'These two grown men argue nonstop over the smallest things – and the whole world ends up knowing about it,' wrote one user, while another joked: 'Every day, Musk is basically live-streaming 'How Billionaires Argue''. The conversation has been allowed to flourish on China's tightly controlled social media, suggesting that at least some censors are betting that the US political chaos could be no bad thing for China. Additional research by Lillian Yang
Sky News
31 minutes ago
- Sky News
Trump says Israel has agreed conditions for 60-day ceasefire in Gaza - and urges Hamas to accept
Donald Trump has said Israel has agreed on terms for a 60-day ceasefire in Gaza, and is urging Hamas to accept the deal before conditions worsen. The US president announced the development ahead of hosting Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for talks at the White House next week. He has been increasing pressure on the Israeli government and Hamas to work out a ceasefire and hostage agreement to end the war. 1:58 "My representatives had a long and productive meeting with the Israelis today on Gaza," Mr Trump wrote on social media. "Israel has agreed to the necessary conditions to finalise the 60-day CEASEFIRE, during which time we will work with all parties to end the war." Analysis: Many unanswered questions remain Mark Stone US correspondent @Stone_SkyNews In the long Gaza war, this is a significant moment. For the people of Gaza, for the Israeli hostages and their families - this could be the moment it ends. But we have been here before, so many times. The key question - will Hamas accept what Israel has agreed to: a 60-day ceasefire? At the weekend, a source at the heart of the negotiations told me: "Both Hamas and Israel are refusing to budge from their position - Hamas wants the ceasefire to last until a permanent agreement is reached. Israel is opposed to this. At this point only President Trump can break this deadlock." The source added: "Unless Trump pushes, we are in a stalemate." The problem is that the announcement made now by Donald Trump - which is his social-media-summarised version of whatever Israel has actually agreed to - may just amount to Israel's already-established position. We don't know the details and conditions attached to Israel's proposals. Would Israeli troops withdraw from Gaza? Totally? Or partially? How many Palestinian prisoners would they agree to release from Israel's jails? And why only 60 days? Why not a total ceasefire? What are they asking of Hamas in return? We just don't know the answers to any of these questions, except one. We do know why Israel wants a 60-day ceasefire, not a permanent one. It's all about domestic politics. If Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was to agree now to a permanent ceasefire, the extreme right-wingers in his coalition would collapse his government. Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich have both been clear about their desire for the war to continue. They hold the balance of power in Mr Netanyahu's coalition. If Mr Netanyahu instead agrees to just 60 days - which domestically he can sell as just a pause - then that may placate the extreme right-wingers for a few weeks until the Israeli parliament, the Knesset, is adjourned for the summer. It is also no coincidence that the US president has called for Mr Netanyahu's corruption trial to be scrapped. Without the prospect of jail, Mr Netanyahu might be more willing to quit the war safe in the knowledge that focus will not shift immediately to his own political and legal vulnerability. He added that Qatari and Egyptian officials would deliver the final proposal. "I hope, for the good of the Middle East, that Hamas takes this Deal, because it will not get better - IT WILL ONLY GET WORSE," Mr Trump wrote. 2:17 Mr Trump's comments will bring fresh hope of an end to the 20-month war, which has seen Israeli forces lay waste to most of Gaza in the aftermath of Hamas's October 2023 attack on Israel, in which 1,200 people were killed and roughly 250 were taken hostage. The number of Palestinians killed in Gaza since then has reached 56,500, according to the Hamas-run health ministry, which does not distinguish between civilians and combatants in its count. An eight-week ceasefire was reached in the final days of Joe Biden's US presidency, but Israel resumed the war in March after trying to get Hamas to accept new terms on next steps. Talks of a fresh ceasefire between Israel and Hamas have stalled over whether or not the war should end as part of any deal. 3:55 Hamas official Mahmoud Merdawi has accused Mr Netanyahu of stalling progress on a deal, saying the Israeli leader insists on a temporary agreement that would free just 10 of the hostages. Omer Dostri, a spokesperson for Mr Netanyahu, said that "Hamas was the only obstacle to ending the war", without addressing Mr Merdawi's claim. Hamas says it is willing to free all the hostages in exchange for a full withdrawal of Israeli troops and an end to the war in Gaza. Israel rejects that offer, saying it will agree to end the war if Hamas surrenders, disarms and goes into exile - something that the group refuses.
Telegraph
31 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Wall Street has faith in Trump. It could all end in tears
All is forgiven. Wall Street has soared to record highs just months after Donald Trump unleashed tariff chaos on the world. The S&P 500 stock index has surged nearly 25pc from the nadir it reached in the days after the US president announced his ' liberation day ' tariffs on April 2. The benchmark completed its best quarter since December 2023 on Monday as it reached a new high, even as Trump threatens to impose fresh tariffs within weeks. This will please a president who has long viewed the stock market as an unofficial straw poll on his performance. But is such a full-throated endorsement of Trump's economic plans justified? Not everyone is convinced. '[Stocks] are at an all time high and the risks are still there,' points out Luca Paolini, the chief strategist at Pictet Asset Management. 'It is not as bad as it was but it is not as good as it was a year ago. 'Our view is that it's going to get weaker and that's why we don't buy into the strength of the market.' Stocks have surged even as official data, published last week, confirmed that the US economy shrank by half a percentage point at the start of the year. 'The US economy is somewhat slowing and when you have those types of stock valuations, there's not much room for deception,' says Kevin Thozet, a member of the investment committee at European asset manager Carmignac. Stock prices on the S&P 500 are trading at about 22 times earnings, which assumes that companies will experience astonishing growth in profits in coming years. 'This recovery is driven entirely by soaring valuations rather than earnings upgrades, signalling underlying fragility,' Susana Cruz and Joachim Klement, analysts at stockbroker Panmure Liberum, have warned. The current stock market rally is 'built on shaky ground, given the deep economic uncertainty'. There are some good reasons for stocks to have roared back since Trump announced his 'liberation day' tariffs. 'Markets are always navigating a very uncertain environment. The question is, 'Is it worse or better than a few months ago?' And I think the market, correctly so, came to the conclusion that it's probably better,' says Paolini. 'The trade war that was supposed to be terrible for the global economy. It doesn't look like it is going to be that bad because there are going to be deals between the US-UK, US-India, Vietnam, probably Europe and Japan. 'So yes, there will be higher tariffs, but we are probably going to avoid a devastating trade war of everyone against everyone else.' Rory McPherson, the chief investment officer at Wren Sterling, says: 'Corporate earnings have been really strong. The earnings for the rest of the year have not been downgraded by anything like what they were downgraded in previous crises. 'Yes, they have been downgraded and the downgrade for the year is almost 4pc but that's not too far out of whack.' However, Paolini warns that the surge in stocks means there is 'very limited upside from here because equities are very, very expensive'. The big question hanging over the stock market is the future of so-called US exceptionalism – the previously self-reinforcing theory that America is unique and distinct from other nations. This belief has long helped to prop up stock markets, with investors betting that American businesses will pull through even the most difficult patches. But there are signs that this faith is being shaken. The dollar has suffered its worst first half of the year since 1973 and concerns about Trump's plans to borrow hundreds of billions have seen borrowing costs jump, prompting jokes that the president could become 'Donald Truss'. 'If I'm looking further out I think Trump's policies would lead to a lower US dollar and higher interest rates,' says Thozet of Carmignac. 'The Trump administration wants to have more manufacturing, more stuff made in the US and this comes with a lower dollar policy. And there's a risk that these higher interest rates deflates the elevated prices on US equities.' The man who could make or break the Wall Street rally is Jerome Powell, the chairman of the Federal Reserve. Lower interest rates would spur economic activity and help boost corporate profits. Traders are currently pricing in two cuts before the end of 2025 and a 53pc chance of a third, anticipating that policymakers will react to a slowdown in the American jobs market, which added 139,000 jobs in May, down from 147,000 in April. However, Powell warned on Tuesday at the ECB Forum in Sintra that policymakers had kept rates 'on hold when we saw the size of the tariffs'. He also warned that the 'US federal fiscal path is not a sustainable one' as the Senate edged closer to approving Mr Trump's ' One Big Beautiful Bill ', which would cut taxes and add an estimated $3.3 trillion (£2.4 trillion) to the American government deficit over the next 10 years. Those comments will infuriate Mr Trump, who has repeatedly pressured 'Too Late' Powell to cut rates. As the melodrama plays out, Wall Street waits. 'It is not blind hope,' insists McPherson. 'The US has a lot more upside from here.'
