I'm no fan of Latin but in any language this pronoun fiddling is ridiculous
Did I mention I wasn't too keen on Latin? I'm still battling to come up for air after the pile-on you beasts gave me recently when I cried hurrah at the news that the Labour government had cut the £4 million Latin Excellence Programme in state schools.
Well, now one of our most prestigious educational establishments has issued an edict that positively defaces the very columns of that ancient patois. Each year, since its founding some nine centuries ago, Oxford University has conferred its degrees upon graduating students in Latin. But now it has been deemed wrong that the wording used in this ceremony is not inclusive. Specifically, it is not gender neutral, and therefore does not cater to those who identify as 'non-binary'.
And so changes are afoot. Indeed, using correct and ancient procedures, a gazette has been issued to alert faculties that a gender-neutral degree ceremony is necessary. Dons will soon vote to change the Latin ceremonial text, unchanged since about the time King John affixed his seal to the Magna Carta.
Unchanged for some 800 years until it was decreed in 2025 that a message of congratulations grammatically gendered masculine or feminine might offend people who very possibly couldn't understand the words anyway. These graduates having likely completed a degree in the forward-thinking subfields of LGBTQ+ histories and gender as a plural category of historical analysis at the university's Centre for Women's, Gender and Queer Histories, for which the study of Latin may have been deemed non-essential.
Consider the low blow of being conferred a degree with the Latin word of 'magistri' (for masters) or the word 'doctores' (doctors), both of which are uniformly, violently, masculine.
One would have to rush to one's gender-neutral toilet to sob gently, before repairing to a café to be consoled by family and friends over sips of, doubtless, alcohol-free, fermented botanicals and resuscitating bites of vegan jackfruit wraps.
All of which must leave the Oxford classicists in a state of desperate flummox. For is not Latin so gloriously dead? Is it not as fixed in history as William's defeat of Harold in 1066, as Queen Victoria's ascent to the throne in 1837? Latin may be tiresome and painful, or, if you're deluded, intellectually dreamy and the base of English, redolent of the beauty of Catholic compositions of Adoro te devote or Ave verum corpus. What it is not is fluid, it cannot evolve. Its sublime perfection lies in its death. If it were a parrot, it would be most definitely deceased.
Yet now, as black holes bend light so Latin must be warped to adhere to the vain manifestations of some of our nation's brightest snowflakes. To whom I'd suggest, you grab your wretched degree, then pile into the boozer for a proper drink and get yourself ready for the real world.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
6 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Catholic bishops try to rally opposition to Trump's immigration agenda
Advertisement The image in Los Angeles and elsewhere of ICE agents seizing people in Costco parking lots and car washes 'rips the illusion that's being portrayed, that this is an effort which is focused on those who have committed significant crimes,' said Cardinal Robert W. McElroy of Washington, in an interview from Rome. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up 'The realities are becoming more ominous,' he said. 'It is becoming clearer that this is a wholesale, indiscriminate deportation effort aimed at all those who came to the country without papers.' McElroy, who has frequently spoken against Trump's immigration policies, was named the archbishop of Washington as one of Francis' final major actions in the United States, reflecting the Vatican's desire to counter the Trump administration's immigration agenda. Immigration arrests are rising sharply, and ICE has a goal of apprehending 3,000 people a day. Advertisement 'A very large number of Catholic bishops, and religious leaders in general, are outraged by the steps which the administration is taking to expel mostly hardworking, good people from the United States,' McElroy said. Trump campaigned on aggressive immigration tactics, and polls before his inauguration captured broad support among Americans for deportations. Since then, Americans have 'mixed to negative views' of the administration's immigration actions, according to an early June survey by the Pew Research Center. The Trump administration has said the aggressive immigration tactics are necessary to protect public safety because some illegal immigrants are violent criminals. Vice President JD Vance, who converted to Catholicism six years ago, articulated his personal views in an interview last month, saying that immigration 'at the levels and at the pace that we've seen over the last few years' was destructive to the common good. 'I really do think that social solidarity is destroyed when you have too much migration too quickly,' he added. 'That's not because I hate the migrants or I'm motivated by grievance. That's because I'm trying to preserve something in my own country where we are a unified nation.' It is not clear how much influence the bishops will have on the issue. In Congress, there has been little debate between the two chambers over the immigration portion of the policy bill. The bishops expressing concern stand in opposition to the voices of key Catholics in executive leadership, including Vance. 'We as a church unfortunately don't have the kind of megaphone that the administration does,' said Bishop Mark Seitz of El Paso, Texas. 'It's a real challenge to reach even Catholics, especially when maybe one out of five who identify as Catholic make it to Mass on Sunday.' Advertisement Leo, an American and Peruvian citizen, has from the beginning of his papacy called for the need to respect the dignity of every person, 'citizens and immigrants alike.' After his election in May, his brother John Prevost said Leo was 'not happy with what's going on with immigration. I know that for a fact.' But so far the new pope has not directly weighed in publicly on Trump's deportation campaign. On Thursday, Archbishop Timothy P. Broglio, president of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, implored Congress to 'make drastic changes' to Trump's domestic policy bill, despite its anti-abortion provisions. He wrote that the bill failed to protect families including 'by promoting an enforcement-only approach to immigration and eroding access to legal protections.' Leading Catholic prelates including McElroy and Cardinal Joseph W. Tobin of Newark, New Jersey, went even further in an interfaith letter to Senate leadership Thursday night, strongly urging them to vote against the bill entirely. In their letter they claimed that the bill, which calls for billions of dollars to bolster ICE, would spur immigration raids, harm hardworking families and fund a border wall that would heighten peril for migrants. 'Its passage would be a moral failure for American society as a whole,' the letter states. The letter was organized by Archbishop John C. Wester of Santa Fe, New Mexico, who attended an ecumenical protest against the bill last week. 'This draconian, heavy-handed, mean-spirited way that the country is dealing with immigrants today, it is not fair, it is not humane, it is not moral,' he said. 'It's something we have to really be earnest about, and do everything we can within the law to make our voices heard.' Advertisement Archbishop José H. Gomez of Los Angeles, a naturalized U.S. citizen born in Mexico, has long supported immigration reform and Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA, a program that shields from deportation people who were brought into the United States as children and did not have citizenship or legal residency. But as the recent raids were executed in Los Angeles, his criticism of the Trump administration became more direct. 'This is not policy, it is punishment, and it can only result in cruel and arbitrary outcomes,' he wrote in a recent column. In an interview, he pointed to the example of Bishop Michael M. Pham of San Diego, the first bishop named by Leo in the United States. Pham, who fled to America from Vietnam as a child, recently went to a courthouse to support migrants waiting for hearings. 'We may have to do that,' Gomez said. More than a third of the Catholic church in the United States is Hispanic. In recent weeks, priests have increasingly reported that families are not leaving their homes to come to Mass because they are afraid. Still, many Catholics support Trump. The president increased his share of Catholic voters in 2024, receiving the majority of their support unlike in 2020, and his support from Hispanic Catholic voters also grew, to 41% from 31%, according to a new analysis from the Pew Research Center. Progressive and moderate Christians have expressed concern over Trump's immigration plans for years, particularly fearing the consequences of his reelection. At his inaugural prayer service, Episcopal Bishop Mariann E. Budde pleaded with the president to 'have mercy' on vulnerable people, particularly immigrants and children who were afraid. Trump lashed out, and a Republican member of Congress called for her deportation. Advertisement At a private retreat in San Diego this month, bishops discussed the crisis at length over meals. 'No person of goodwill can remain silent,' Broglio, the bishops' conference president, said in an opening reflection that was made public for churches, to reach immigrant families. 'Count on the commitment of all of us to stand with you in this challenging hour.' Bishops still oppose abortion, in alignment with church teaching. But immigration 'has become more and more a serious situation' that must be addressed, said Seitz, who chairs the bishops' committee on migration. In his area, auxiliary bishops and religious sisters in El Paso have been showing up at immigration court to stand alongside migrants who are appearing at required hearings. Some of the migrants have been seized by ICE agents. McElroy and several other top prelates have had private conversations with senior members of the Trump administration on this issue this month. They are also working with their priests to address pastoral needs on the ground. Not all priests are in lockstep about how far to take their response, but McElroy said that significant numbers of them feel they need to take strong action. In East Los Angeles, Father Brendan Busse, pastor of Dolores Mission Church in Boyle Heights, rushed to the scene after a call that ICE vehicles had rammed a car, deployed tear gas and hauled out a man, leaving his wife and two babies in the back seat. He said he sensed that some Catholics believe their political allegiance comes before the values of their faith. Advertisement 'My body is tired, my emotions are all over the place,' he said. 'But I have to say, my spirit is strong, I think, in part because there's a kind of moral clarity in moments like this.'
Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
'How Is That Fair?': Victoria Derbyshire Confronts Wes Streeting Over Labour's 'Two-Tier' Welfare Plan
Victoria Derbyshire accused Labour of implementing a 'two-tier' benefits system as she confronted Wes Streeting over the plans. Keir Starmer was forced to make major changes to his government's blueprint for slashing billions from the welfare budget following a backbench rebellion. Under the new plan, current recipients of personal independence payments (PIP) and universal credit will continue to get the same amount of money. However, those who claim in the future will receive less. On the BBC this morning, presenter Derbyshire read out the views of one viewer, called Matt. She said: 'The big concern from a lot of people, including Matt, one of our viewers, is that you are creating a two-tier system. 'He says 'I still don't understand the logic of applying cuts to future applicants. Is that just so there are fewer people who are directly affected to protest the cuts?'. How is it fair that there's a two-tier system?' Streeting, the health secretary, replied: 'You can say that about a number of other systems.' But Derbyshire interrupted to tell him: 'I'm asking about this.' Streeting snapped back: 'Yeah well I'm answering the question, which is when things change and evolve, as you bring in new systems, it does change sometimes from group to group, student finance being an example.' Derbyshire then asked: 'My question is how is that fair?' Streeting said the government needed to make sure the welfare system is 'sustainable'. He said: 'Even before the changes were made this week, the cost of the welfare bill is growing enormously. There's a real risk to it, both in terms of financial sustainability and democratic support and legitimacy.' Disability Charities Urge MPs To Defeat Starmer's Plans For 'Two-Tier' Welfare System Keir Starmer's Authority In Tatters After Humiliating U-Turn On Welfare Cuts 'Has He Got A Grip?': Naga Munchetty Skewers Minister After Starmer's Welfare U-Turn
New York Post
12 hours ago
- New York Post
Blast ‘em: Get rid of the blocky brutalist buildings that blight our nation's capital
There's a reason God created dynamite. The brutalist federal buildings that have blighted Washington, DC for decades deserve the same fate as Carthage after the Third Punic War, and the nation's capital is finally beginning to move on from these concrete monstrosities. The Department of Housing and Urban and Development just announced that it is leaving its godawful headquarters in Washington for less hideous space in northern Virginia. Advertisement HUD Secretary Scott Turner has described the structure as 'the ugliest building in DC,' which is a dubious claim only because there are so many other buildings in Washington that compete for that distinction. He's not the first HUD secretary to hate the building. Jack Kemp called it '10 floors of basement.' Meanwhile, the FBI is also departing its HQ, designated by the UK building materials retailer Buildworld as the ugliest building in the United States and the second ugliest in the world. Advertisement The moves are in keeping with the spirit of President Donald Trump's executive order stipulating that federal buildings should 'respect regional, traditional, and classical architectural heritage in order to uplift and beautify public spaces and ennoble the United States and our system of self-government.' That EO should be considered common sense, but has several trigger words for defenders of the architectural status quo, including 'traditional,' 'classical,' and perhaps foremost of all, 'beautify.' In response, the American Institute of Architects expressed its 'strong concerns that mandating architecture styles stifles innovation and harms local communities.' According to The Nation magazine, Trump's initiative is part of an agenda to 'to make historical architecture on the whole inextricable from Eurocentric white supremacy.' Advertisement In short, it's an unforgivable offense to want a government building to look nice. Brutalism, with its blocky, minimalist structures made of poured concrete, was a creation of a post-war Europe that wanted to embrace the fresh and new and to economize on rebuilding. Although the name 'brutalism' perfectly captures the aesthetic effect, it actually comes from the French for raw concrete, béton brut. To be sure, concrete is extremely important to modern life, but no one has ever said, 'Oh, it's so elegant and uplifting.' Advertisement The brutalist buildings in Washington were largely built between the late 1960s and mid-1970s — an era of grievous architectural mistakes, including cookie-cutter multiple-purpose baseball stadiums and modernist Catholic churches. Get opinions and commentary from our columnists Subscribe to our daily Post Opinion newsletter! Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters The buildings never had a heyday, but were hated when they were erected and are still hated now. The seedbed of the trend was a Kennedy administration commission that advocated contemporary designs and said — laughably, in retrospect — that federal architecture should 'reflect the dignity, enterprise, vigor and stability of the American national government.' Instead, the brutalist buildings speak of a lumbering bureaucracy with no regard for the sensibilities or priorities of ordinary people. They are about what you'd expect if a DMV were headquartered in a maximum-security prison, or in a massive pillbox. These buildings could easily be used as stage sets for docudramas about East Germany. They are a tribute to soulless monumentality and a gut punch to the human spirit. Advertisement If they don't eventually get a well-deserved appointment with a wrecking ball, they should be donated to North Korea. The original justifications of brutalism no longer apply. The buildings aren't new anymore, and they aren't cheap. They haven't aged well in any sense, not aesthetically or functionally. The FBI building is literally falling apart, and the expense of maintaining the HUD building has become ruinous. Advertisement Defenders of the brutalist buildings say that they are now part of our heritage and should be preserved as such. That's not fair, though, to the people who have to work in them, or who walk or drive by them every day. They are a net subtraction to the DC landscape and to human happiness. If one of them has to be kept for historical reasons, it should be made into a Smithsonian museum devoted to idiotic fads that were indulged much too long. Twitter: @RichLowry
