logo
How gen Z is rewriting money rules: ‘I thrift, I splurge, I save 25%'

How gen Z is rewriting money rules: ‘I thrift, I splurge, I save 25%'

The Guardian2 days ago
From no-buy-years to second-hand shopping, gen Z seems to have its own unique spending habits. A global rise in the cost of living combined with a highly competitive job market means that 69% of gen Z use some sort of budget to manage their finances.
Their priorities, and what they choose to save for, are different from their boomer counterparts. Gen Z is more likely to spend money on subscriptions, from meal kits to Spotify. There's also the trend of 'doom spending', which is purchasing non-essential items to cope with either personal or wider political issues.
To better understand their spending, four gen Zers tell us about budgeting, saving and what makes them splurge.
Occupation: buyer for a food production companySalary: $64,000 (£47,000)
Rent (including water): $1,150 (£849)
This is my main expense. Fortunately, I inherited a good vehicle from my uncle which should last for 10 years or so. Also my medical and dental healthcare are provided by my employer and they reimburse me for using my mobile. I'm not working towards saving for a house as I don't want to buy one until I'm living in an area where I know I'll be staying for a good few years. I'm thinking of maybe going back to school to study, so I'll probably be leaving Ohio soon.
Utilities: $80 (£60)
$40 for electricity
$40 for internet
Travel: about $195 (£144)
About $85 on average for gas
$110 for car insurance
Retirement savings: $1,230 (£908)
I came up with the goal of 25% of my pre-tax salary through research on modern money management. I mix this payment between an employer-sponsored retirement plan (401K), a Roth individual retirement account (IRA) and a health savings account (HSA). There are some suggestions that you should save 10% or 15% of your salary for retirement, but if I feel like I have a little bit extra I'll put in 20%. I don't think I'll get great market returns which is why I aim for 25% as it helps me feel safe. I don't trust that by the time I retire we'll have a strong social security system.
Food: about $475 (£351)
I prefer to shop locally for my groceries which can make it more expensive. I love to cook, and I like buying the pricier grass-fed milk or small-farm eggs for $12 a dozen. As someone who works in food production, it's worth it for me to know exactly what's in my food.
Medical/healthcare: about $309 (£230)
$100 for upcoming medical procedure [not included in medical healthcare]
$530 for six months of medical testing, so about $89
$120 for supplements such as painkillers, vitamins, collagen powder and protein powder
Subscriptions: $15 (£12) for Spotify which is my only subscription
Fitness: $40 for gym membership (£30)
Cosmetic care: about $175 (£130)
I don't wear makeup but I use a ton of moisturizer due to eczema and dry skin. I guess skincare is where I 'splurge', but for me it's worth it.
Clothes: annual spend is around $500 so about $42 a month (£31)
Sometimes I go months without buying anything and other times I spend $200 in one day. In May, I spent $4 for a bra at Goodwill and $62 to get two dresses tailored. I mostly buy clothes secondhand or vintage, but I'll splurge on a new pair of jeans, because the sizing is so particular.
Eating out: about $250 (£185)
I've almost completely stopped getting takeout for myself. I only save it for social events. Although I will treat myself to a coffee once or twice a month. Most of the money I spend on meals outside the house is for my friends' birthday dinners.
Very few of my friends save as much as I do, although one of my closest friends gets to save 60% of his income through living at home. If I wanted to save more, the first thing I would cut out is probably eating out and social drinking. After that, I would swap some of my bougie food choices with alternatives from Aldi.
Monthly total: about $4,139 (£3,054)
Occupation: customer service adviser for a campervan rental companySalary: about $700 a week so $2,800 monthly and $33,600 annually (£24,792)
My income is only temporary as my job is seasonal. Prior to last month, I was barely making $1,000 a month. I finished my postgraduate degree last year and spent six months applying for jobs before graduating. It still took nearly two years before I landed my current job. My wife works as a barista and her salary is similar to mine – I just created a shared bank account for us so all our expenses come out of it.
When it comes to saving, we put away money for emergency expenses like car breakdowns or vet bills. I don't believe in having a lot of money just sitting there in a savings account. Anything I do save I plan to put in safe investments but I'm pretty pessimistic about the stock market right now. We would love to build our own small home on vacant land since housing is so unaffordable, but that's a major long-term goal.
Rent: monthly spend for my wife and me is $1,700, so alone it's about $850 (£628)
Utilities: $78 so about $39 (£29)
$45 for phone
$25 for internet
$8 for renters' insurance
Travel: $575 so about $288 (£213)
$150 for gas
$250 for car insurance
$100 for car repairs
$75 for public transport
Food and household: $285 so about $143 (£106)
$250 for food
$25 for bathroom supplies
$10 for household supplies
Dog bills: $216 so about $108 (£80)
$111 for insurance
$105 for food
Fitness: $17 (£13)
Subscriptions: $40 so about $20 (£15)
$20 for Spotify
$12 for Hulu
$8 for Apple arcade
Eating out: $100 so about $50 (£37)
Monthly total: about $1,515 (£1,121)
Occupation: data scientist for a bankSalary: $72,000 (£53,1325)
I paid off my student debt about two years ago and started saving straight after I finished my undergraduate degree. I have high variable entertainment and travel costs as my significant other lives in the UK. My at-home entertainment costs are pretty low. I have no streaming services and if I do spend money, it's mostly on going out with friends, soccer leagues and seeing movies.
Rent and utilities: about $1,850 (£1,366)
About $1,825 for rent
$25 for phone
Renting is insanely expensive. My aim is to save enough for a down payment on a house and even though I make a pretty good salary, I am still nowhere near able to afford one in an area where I want to live.
Travel: $160 (£119)
$60 for gas
$600 for six months of car insurance, so about $100
This month it was $1,200 as I took a road trip and needed to buy new tires.
Groceries: about $300 (£222)
I'm at home two to three times a week so I tend to cook and bring any leftovers I have into the office.
Dog bills: about $50 (£37)
$10 for food
About $40 for medicine and vet bills
Fitness: annual spend is around $300 so about $25 a month (£19)
I run, play soccer, or use the gym in my apartment block. Equipment like running shoes, football boots and league fees are the only costs and they're pretty infrequent.
Cosmetic care: about $4 (£3)
I don't really spend much on skincare or cosmetics but when I do, it definitely averages out to less than $5 a month.
Clothes: I mostly thrift so spend only about $20 a month (£15)
Eating out: about $100 (£74)
I eat out only two or three times a week – nothing fancy. This can be higher when I'm traveling, which is fairly often.
Miscellaneous: about $267 on average for four return flights a year to the UK (£197)
I try to visit my partner in London every couple of months. Round-trip flights are around $800 and we spend a bit more on dates, eating out and entertainment while there, but I do have a place to stay when visiting so there are no big lodging costs.
Among my friends my expenses are pretty average but it depends on where they live as my friends who live in Washington DC spend way more. Nationwide I'm definitely in the higher-earning, higher-spending category though.
Monthly total: about $2,776 (£2,049)
Occupation: part-time teacher and writer Salary: about $700 a month and $8,400 annually (£6,198)
I'm self-employed and still live at home with my family so don't have any rent or utility expenses. I'm also still on the family's health insurance. I do not actively budget my money in terms of allocating a specific percentage for different expenses. Rather, I keep a record of my income and expenses and I adjust my spending as necessary.
For me, non-essential spending is money spent on things that I can technically live without and be content, such as a special TV/streaming subscriptions, new clothes, decoration for my room, books, CDs/digital music, hobby-related goods, or 'fun' purchases, like an antique.
Splurges just come at random times for me. Sometimes it's because I find something really special that I want to purchase, other times it's because I find something that is the only one of its kind left for sale. My passions are music and history, so it's usually one of those two things I'm spending money on. For instance, I splurged once on buying antique newspapers from the first few weeks of the second world war. Another time, I splurged on buying an antique first (and only) edition of an old English book by Jane Porter. I will also sometimes give to charities (mostly overseas) that I appreciate – more so lately.
Food: $140 (£104) as I don't eat out much at all.
Savings: $455 (£336)
I'm young and because of my lifestyle I don't have certain expenses that I will probably have in a few years (like a car, gas, auto insurance etc.) so I save most of my money.
Miscellaneous: about $95 (£71) for TV subscriptions and work-related software costs.
Monthly total: about $690 (£510)
All names have been changed
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Washington has crushed Trump's Maga revolution
Washington has crushed Trump's Maga revolution

Telegraph

time28 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Washington has crushed Trump's Maga revolution

New presidential administrations often spur talk of revolution in Washington, and that goes double for Donald Trump. Supporters promise an end to the old politics; opponents warn of the end of America as we've known it. But the minute anything needs to be done through Congress, the forces of politics as usual reassert themselves. So it is with the 'One Big Beautiful Bill'. The gigantic tax and budget bill isn't just the centrepiece of Trump's legislative agenda. Given the narrow Republican majorities in both houses of Congress, the power of the Senate filibuster to block party-line bills outside of the tax and budget context, and the disinterest of all sides in forging bipartisan compromise, the bill is likely to be Trump's entire legislative agenda for 2025-26. There was a lot of talk about how the bill would do big, dramatic things and break with Republican policies of the past in favour of a new, populist agenda. Perhaps, Trump suggested, Republicans would raise taxes on the wealthy. There was fierce lobbying to undo some provisions of the 2017 Trump tax bill. But the forces of political gravity are not so easily defied. From the beginning, Republicans understood that this was a must-pass bill. Without it, not only would many of the 2017 tax cuts expire, but the GOP would likely miss the opportunity to satisfy priorities such as funding more immigration enforcement. In the end, the bill passed the House by just one vote, 215-214 (with two Republicans voting no and three others absent or abstaining), and did the same in the Senate, with vice-president JD Vance casting the 51-50 tiebreaker (with three Republicans voting no). The bill's passage followed a 'vote-a-thon' of record length in the Senate, as Senators voted down one amendment after another. When a must-pass bill needs every single yes vote to pass, that's a lot of people who have to be appeased or outright paid off. If the House baulks at the Senate's changes, the same dynamic is apt to repeat itself. So, the broad outlines of the bill look a lot more like traditional conservative policymaking with some Trump flavouring. Tax cuts for businesses and the wealthy are preserved, and coupled with working-class tax relief such as eliminating taxes on tips, overtime, and car loans. There's more money for warships and other weapons, and also for the tools of border enforcement (a wall, more agents, and more detention facilities). Poverty programmes such as Medicaid are subjected to work requirements, tightened eligibility rules, and restrictions on benefits for immigrants. The bill cuts back on subsidies for student-loan repayments and green energy. Republican moderates got their own concessions. The deduction for state and local taxes, which effectively subsidises high-tax blue states, was raised from $10,000 to $40,000 (at significant cost to the budget deficit) to secure a few votes from blue-state Republicans, mainly in the northeast. The child tax credit was expanded, which amounts to a payout to many lower-income taxpayers. Alaska was given more generous treatment in some benefits programmes once Senator Lisa Murkowski's vote became a must-have. Hospital and nursing-home lobbies made out like bandits. Fiscal hawks who wanted deeper spending cuts are instead presented with a bill that does nothing to alter the debt-ridden nation's grim fiscal trajectory. Other conservative ambitions were scaled back or ended on the cutting room floor. Abortion giant Planned Parenthood was defunded from the Medicaid programme – a long-time goal of pro-lifers – but the Senate cut the duration of that defunding to one year. The Senate version also cut out plans to ban Medicaid funding for gender transitions, sell public lands in the West, tax third-party funding of lawsuits, or prevent states from regulating artificial intelligence or giving state-funded healthcare to illegal immigrants. A Senate effort to reduce the federal subsidy for Obamacare health insurance plans was scrapped. The end result is a bill nobody likes – which is how lawmaking in Washington usually works. Among Republicans, only the handful of purist fiscal conservatives casting 'no' votes are truly at peace with their votes. Trump and Vance can doubtless sell the deal to Maga diehards as a necessity, and the donor class will be pleased. Democrats are back in their happy place, complaining that Republicans are cutting taxes on the rich and paying for it with welfare cuts for the poor – a hymn they've been singing since the 1930s. Voters instinctively dislike the bill because it's huge and messy, but that's precisely why they're unlikely to remember much about it a year and a half from now at midterm election time other than the Medicaid cuts, which Democrats aim to make the centrepiece of their campaigns. The more things change, the more they stay the same.

The US has just exposed the green industry's dirty little secret
The US has just exposed the green industry's dirty little secret

Telegraph

time34 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

The US has just exposed the green industry's dirty little secret

The cat is out of the bag. Electricity made from renewable sources is not as 'cheap' as its advocates sometimes claim. It evidently cannot survive without billions annually in tax credits. That's the message from the latest skirmish over America's renewable energy future, where the House and Senate have unveiled duelling visions for the rollback of energy tax credits – each with its own tempo and tone. The vitriolic reaction from the green lobby, and the predictions of disaster for renewables should any of these changes be passed into law, have exposed just how economically unsustainable even the fiercest backers of these energy sources clearly accept them to be. Supporters of renewable energy have assured us for years that the wind blows and the sun shines free of charge. But although these technologies have received hundreds of billions in subsidies globally over the past 20 years, proponents still demand more – for a few years, we're told, until renewables can stand on their own feet. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said: 'Eliminating these tax credits radically and irresponsibly rolls back all the progress we have made in recent years. It turns America's clean energy boom into a bust.' But the boom was always something of an illusion. It is often asserted that electricity in the United States made with wind and solar is less expensive than electricity made by natural gas and coal. But rather than declining, average American electricity prices have risen considerably over the past 20 years as wind and solar have entered the electricity mix. One dirty little secret is that, on a state-by-state basis, nine out of the top 10 states in electricity prices in the United States in 2024 required renewable energy as part of their electricity mix. The bottom 10 states generally did not require renewable energy. It can cost utility companies more to provide people with electricity using intermittent sources than continuous sources such as natural gas, coal, and nuclear power. The utility company is likely to need to put other energy sources in place, to provide back-up should demand not be met when the wind doesn't blow and the sun doesn't shine. For instance, when the wind stops, an alternative such as a natural gas power plant will likely need to be turned on to meet demand. Then it's turned off when the wind starts. With America's low natural gas prices, it is always likely to be cheaper to have one set of equipment and to operate one power plant continuously, rather than having it sit idle as the wind blows. Taxpayers are paying multiple times for renewables. In their electricity bills, they pay not only for wind and solar, but for the backups to the wind and solar. In their tax bills, they pay for the energy tax credits. They also give up faster economic growth when electricity prices rise. Another dirty secret is that renewable energy is often neither green nor clean. About 70 per cent of solar panels, wind turbines, batteries and their components are made in China, which remains reliant on coal-fired power plants to fuel its industries. Wind turbines kill birds, and, when offshore, can harm sea mammals. Solar power can take over agricultural land, which is likely to drive up the price of food. Green and clean are marketing hype used to push renewables onto unsuspecting consumers. While both chambers agree on tightening the purse strings by reducing tax credits, the House opts for a cliff-edge approach, while the Senate favours a more gradual wind-down. The House draws a hard line at Dec 31, 2025. From clean vehicles to home energy upgrades, nearly all credits vanish at the stroke of midnight. Even the clean hydrogen and nuclear incentives face sharp cut-offs, with added restrictions on foreign influence. Transferability of credits? Many are axed. The message is clear: the era of generous subsidies is fast ending. The Senate, by contrast, offers a more calibrated exit. Clean vehicle credits expire by Sep 30, 2025, but major production and investment credits are phased out over years, some as late as 2036. The Senate also tightens rules on foreign entities, but with more nuanced thresholds and timelines. Both bills close ranks on national security. Credits are denied to entities with ties to China, Russia, and other adversaries. The clean hydrogen credit in the House bill expires at the end of this year, but in the Senate bill by the end of 2027. Carbon capture faces identical construction cut-offs and foreign ownership bans. But only the House repeals credit transferability, an investor-friendly feature the Senate preserves. With the end of these tax credits, Americans may well discover that the true costs of renewable energy are higher than utility companies are willing to bear. Developers are already saying that they will halt projects without the tax credits. If the age of renewable energy tax credits is drawing to a close, Americans will be the beneficiaries. The question is how abruptly Washington will pull the plug – and whether other countries will follow.

Amazon Prime members can save $1/gallon of gas on Fourth of July weekend
Amazon Prime members can save $1/gallon of gas on Fourth of July weekend

Daily Mail​

time37 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Amazon Prime members can save $1/gallon of gas on Fourth of July weekend

Daily Mail journalists select and curate the products that feature on our site. If you make a purchase via links on this page we will earn commission - learn more The ability to save money on gas is one of many deals shoppers can snag ahead of the Amazon Prime Day sales event. Amazon Prime members, who are some of over 60 million drivers set to travel during the Fourth of July weekend, can save $1 per gallon of gas at participating locations from July 3 to July 6. Drivers can access the deal by linking their Prime membership to Earnify, the BP loyalty program. Once that is linked, they will receive the discount on one fuel purchase of up to 35 gallons of gas. Prime members can use this deal at one of more than 7,500 Amoco, BP and other participating locations nationwide, ahead of the Prime Day sales event from July 8 to July 11. Amazon Prime membership Customers can sign up for a free 30 day trial, giving them access to this discount without paying a cent. $14.99/month Shop Drivers can access the Earnify app's store locator for nearest locations, and redeem the offer by typing in a phone number or linked payment, or by selecting the gas station and pump being used in the app. In addition to this deal, Prime members can continue to receive a 10-cent-per-gallon discount every day at participating locations. Shoppers who aren't interested in gas saving can check out other early offerings, including a three-month free trial of Audible. Amazon Prime Day is available for all shoppers who don't mind spending $14.99 a month or $139 a year on a membership, but you can also sign up for a free 30 day trial which will give you access to all the deals. Young adults and government assisted shoppers could be eligible for discounts. Launched in 2015, Prime Day lasted for 24 hours that July in nine countries, including the US, the UK, and Canada. It became one of Amazon's most popular events, leading the company to add an October Prime Day in 2017. Today, the event is accessible in over 20 countries, and after racking in $14.2 billion in revenue last year, the company expects high earnings in what will be its first-ever four-day Prime Day from July 8 to July 11. Other benefits of a Prime membership include free same-day and next-day deliveries, Whole Foods discounts, and free Grubhub+ memberships. But it comes as thousands of shoppers have recently been turning away from Prime memberships despite the event hype. The service has been cutting some perks, including axing Amazon Today from various neighborhoods, eliminating its Try Before You Buy service, and raising the price of Amazon Music Unlimited subscriptions. While the company is expanding same-day and next day delivery to over 4,000 small cities, towns, and rural communities, some customers have begun exploring the idea of deactivating Prime in favor of Target 360 memberships. Amazon's annual Prime Day sales event will launch on July 8 and end on July 11 Prime Day comes after Amazon sent a grim warning of potential price hikes from tariffs. Experts have also predicted that the company could raise Prime memberships by $20 next year. JPMorgan analyst Douglas Anmuth forecast that Amazon customers may need to pay $159 instead of the usual $139 annually for a Prime membership starting next year. The prediction is based on Amazon's pattern of raising prices on significant features every four years. 'A $20 U.S. Prime price increase is seen driving about $3 billion in incremental annualized net sales,' Anmuth wrote in a note via TheStreet. The e-commerce giant will release its second quarter results on August 1.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store