
How the Child and Dependent Care Credit can cut summer camp costs in 2025
Many parents might not realize it, but you can get a bit of relief from the high cost of day care bills and summer day camps paid in 2025 when you file your tax return next year.
What is the Child and Dependent Care Credit?
The Child and Dependent Care Credit applies to children who are younger than 13 when the day care is provided. You'd complete Form 2441 to calculate the credit and file the form along with your 1040 federal income tax return. Taxpayers also can review IRS Publication 503 for rules.
"Summer day camp expense can be claimed only if the care was necessary for the taxpayer to do work or to look for work," said Brandon Nishnick, manager for tax practice and ethics for the American Institute of CPAs.
"The primary purpose must be for child care and the camp must be a daytime-only program," he said.
Expenses associated with sending children to an overnight camp would not qualify.
Typically, you're able to recoup only a small portion of your costs. Yet, no one should leave money on the table and ignore the credit if they qualify to claim it.
"In general, to qualify, parents must work or be full-time students and use a day care, summer camp, or another program while they work and the provider must have a Social Security Number or Federal Identification Number that will be needed to apply for the tax credit," said Mark Steber, chief tax officer for Jackson Hewitt Tax Services.
How do you calculate the tax credit for summer camps?
The Child and Dependent Care Credit is calculated as a percentage of your qualifying expenses, which ranges from 20% to 35%, depending on your adjusted gross income, according to Nishnick.
If a taxpayer has a qualifying child under the age of 13, typically they can claim up to $3,000 in eligible care expenses or $6,000 for two or more children.
2026 tax planning: Don't expect a speedy tax refund in 2026 from an understaffed IRS
The maximum credit ends up being up to $1,050 for some taxpayers with one child or dependent. And it can be as high as $2,100 for some taxpayers with two or more children or dependents. Or it can be much less than that.
How much you'd save in taxes would vary based on your income and your expenses. The value of the credit declines as your income goes up.
Consider this example: Take someone who has two children under 13. Say they spend $8,000 in the year for care expenses. Only $6,000 is eligible in this case to be taken into account as an expense for the credit.
If your adjusted gross income is $45,000, you would receive a credit of $1,200, which is 20% of the $6,000 in eligible expenses, Nishnick said.
Again, expenses must be associated with what you'd pay for care during the time you went to work or were looking for work. We're not talking about what you'd pay a sitter on the weekend to go out to a concert.
In order to go to the office or work site, many parents must arrange for care, and paying for the child to attend a day camp program is one such option.
Make sure to keep detailed records now
"As a credit, it is a dollar-for-dollar reduction in tax owed," said Mark Luscombe, principal analyst for Wolters Kluwer Tax & Accounting in Riverwoods, Illinois.
The credit is a nonrefundable tax credit on 2025 returns that can reduce the amount of income tax you owe. But Luscombe noted there is no credit to the extent that no tax is owed. It won't generate an additional refund if your tax liability for the year is less than the credit amount.
What you want to do now is keep good, detailed records of your child care expenses, including the camp expenses and provider information if related to a summer camp.
The biggest mistake that parents make, some experts said, is failing to keep records of child care during the year, including amounts paid and the address and Taxpayer Identification Number of the summer camp or child care provider.
Nishnick said parents should take time now to ensure that their care provider is eligible if they plan to claim the credit.
"They cannot be your spouse, the child's parent, a dependent, or a relative under the age of 19. The care provider must be properly documented with a name, address and taxpayer ID," Nishnick said.
And don't expect to get any credit for an overnight camp. "For example, if the parent works a third shift or overnight such as in a hospital, these costs for an overnight camp would still not qualify," Nishnick said.
Your child's age at the time the care is provided remains a key factor.
"The care must be for a child who is under the age of 13 at the time the care is provided," Nishnick stressed. "For example, if the child turns 14 the second day of summer camp, then the remainder of those expenses would not qualify."
Unfortunately, Steber said, parents often overlook or forget to claim the Child and Dependent Care Credit. Or some try to claim ineligible expenses toward the credit.
Some parents, of course, have been able to work remotely in previous summers since the COVID-19 pandemic hit in 2020.
Yet, we're continuing to hear about more return-to-office initiatives. Ford Motor, for example, announced in June that the automaker is calling the majority of its salaried workforce back to the office four days a week, effective Sept. 1.
More families could be juggling more child care expenses and might want to brush up on available tax breaks.
The Child and Dependent Card Tax Credit can work whether you itemize deductions or claim the standard deduction.
Make no mistake, the rules as they are right now are complicated.
"The credit is calculated based on your income and a percentage of expenses that you incur for the care of qualifying persons to enable you to go to work, look for work, or attend school," according to the Internal Revenue Service.
Currently, Luscombe noted the credit phases down from 35% of expenses for taxpayers with an adjusted gross income of $15,000 or less to 20% of expenses with up to $43,000 in AGI. It never falls below 20%.
The total expenses that you may use to calculate the credit may not be more than $3,000 for one qualifying individual or $6,000 for two or more qualifying individuals.
If you use a flexible spending account at work, though, you're not going to be able to claim what you spent out of that account.
If you saved $1,000 in a flexible spending account and used that money toward day care or summer day camp expenses, for example, you could calculate the dependent care credit based on up to $2,000 in expenses for one child.
The IRS has an online tool that can help you run some numbers to see whether you qualify to claim the Child and Dependent Care Credit.
Who qualifies? It's not just expenses for children.
"A qualifying person generally is a dependent under the age of 13, a spouse or dependent of any age who is incapable of self-care and who lives with you for more than half of the year," the IRS states online.
Some tax rule changes could be ahead
Going forward, some changes in the child and dependent care credit could be ahead for 2026 expenses.
On July 1, the U.S. Senate narrowly approved tax-and-spending legislation that President Donald Trump calls "One, big, beautiful bill." The package went to the U.S. House, where it passed July 3. It was being sent to Trump to be signed into law.
The Senate reconciliation bill includes a proposal to increase the maximum rate to 50% from 35% of qualifying expenses for lower-income families. Luscombe noted that this change is proposed to be effective starting in 2026.
Garrett Watson, director of policy analysis at the nonpartisan Tax Foundation, said a broader range of households would see a higher credit value for eligible dependent care expenses on their tax return under the Senate version.
The 50% credit rate would phase down for taxpayers with adjusted gross income over $15,000.
For example, the percentage used to calculate the credit could be reduced from the new 50% mark by 1 percentage point, but not below 35%, for each $2,000 that the taxpayer's AGI exceeds $15,000.
The percentage would then be further reduced, but not below 20%, by 1 percentage point for each $2,000 ($4,000 for joint returns) that their AGI exceeds $75,000 ($150,000 for joint returns).
Watson noted that the Senate proposal was scored by the Joint Committee on Taxation, a nonpartisan government agency, as costing about $9.3 billion over 10 years.
Contact personal finance columnist Susan Tompor: stompor@freepress.com. Follow her on X @tompor.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
3 Things To Do if You Got an IRS Warning Letter About Your Crypto Activity
If you're a cryptocurrency investor, you might soon hear from Uncle Sam in the form of an IRS letter detailing your tax obligations. Read Next: Find Out: The letters are designed to warn taxpayers that crypto investments they declared on their most recent tax returns might not be accurate, Fortune reported — and there are a lot more of those letters being issued. In May and June alone, the number of support conversations on crypto tax platform CoinLedger that included the words 'IRS letters' totaled nearly 800. That represented a nine-fold increase compared to the same period in 2024, CoinLedger CEO David Kemmerer told Fortune. 'Thousands of investors are getting these,' Kemmerer said. 'Naturally, when that happens, we get a flood of customers coming to us being like, 'Hey, what do I do?'' The letters come in three basic forms, according to a recent blog from Corrigan Krause, an Ohio-based tax, accounting and consulting firm. One of them, titled letter 6173, is sent when the IRS believes you didn't meet your U.S. tax filing and reporting requirements for virtual currency transactions. The others — letters 6174 and 6174-A — are sent when the IRS believes you have or have had 'one or more accounts containing virtual currency' but might not know the reporting requirements, Corrigan Krause noted. You don't have to respond to a letter 6174 or 6174-A. However, you should check your form 1040 filing to determine if it needs to be amended. You should also keep an eye out for further IRS correspondence. If you receive a letter 6173, you are required to act. Depending on the situation, here are three things you might need to do if you get a letter 6173, according to Corrigan Krause. If you failed to file one or more income tax returns, you'll need to file delinquent returns and report your crypto transactions as soon as possible. If you made a mistake on your income tax return, such as not reporting your crypto transactions or incorrectly calculating your income, gain or loss, then you should file an amended return as soon as possible. If you think you met all your reporting requirements and have received a letter 6173 in error, you'll need to follow certain steps. First, check the top of the letter to find an address and eFax number that you'll need to send the following documentation to: Your contact information. A 'statement of facts' explaining your position. This should include a full history of previously reported income from your crypto transactions as well as an explanation of the actions you took to become compliant with U.S. reporting requirements. Provide copies of previously filed documents that confirm your compliance. Your signed and dated letter 6173 section stating that you, under penalties of perjury, are sending the IRS documents proving you are compliant with U.S. reporting requirements. More From GOBankingRates Mark Cuban Warns of 'Red Rural Recession' -- 4 States That Could Get Hit Hard 3 Reasons Retired Boomers Shouldn't Give Their Kids a Living Inheritance (And 2 Reasons They Should) These Cars May Seem Expensive, but They Rarely Need Repairs This article originally appeared on 3 Things To Do if You Got an IRS Warning Letter About Your Crypto Activity


USA Today
2 days ago
- USA Today
Gamblers will pay more taxes in 2026 and beyond when Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' hits
Gamblers lost a bit of a tax break in the nearly 900-page mega tax-and-spending bill that President Donald Trump signed into law July 4. If you won $1,000 betting on the Super Bowl in 2025, for example, you still could claim up to $1,000 in gambling losses if you itemize all your deductions when you file your federal income tax return next year. And you wouldn't be taxed on that win in this example. But the game's over when tax rules for gambling change beginning in 2026. What are the tax rules when it comes to gambling? What remains true: You can claim gambling losses up to the amount of your winnings only if you itemize all your deductions. Most people don't itemize these days because they get a better tax break by taking the standard deduction. The amount of losses you can deduct are limited by your winnings. Deductible losses still will not be able to exceed total winnings for the year. How the new tax law changes things for legal gamblers What's changed: Beginning in 2026, the tax law shifts just enough to irk plenty of people who dream big by heading to the casino, betting online or buying lottery tickets. A $1,000 win in 2026 and afterward will mean that you can only deduct 90% of your losses — or $900 in this example. Someone who wins in this example would pay taxes on $100 in winnings in 2026 when they file that year's tax return. Economic outcomes: Trump's mega tax and spending law will have small economic impact, forecasters say "Instead of gambling losses being deductible to the full extent of gambling winnings, they're going to be limited to 90%," said Tom O'Saben, enrolled agent and director of tax content and government relations for the National Association of Tax Professionals, which has 23,000 members. Make no mistake, the new 90% limit has no impact on the 2025 tax returns that will be filed early next year. It would only apply to winnings and losses that take place in 2026 and after. Casual gamblers cannot deduct expenses related to their lodging, transportation, or food and other incidental expenses during their gambling, Mark Steber, chief tax information officer for Jackson Hewitt Tax Services, told the Detroit Free Press, part of the USA TODAY Network, earlier this year. And that's still true going forward. Yet, he noted, someone who is a professional gambler and considered self-employed would be eligible to deduct travel and lodging expenses while working. The new tax law, though, clarifies that any expense related to carrying on gambling activities — such as travel, admission fees and lodging related to professional gambling — would be treated as a gambling loss and then subject to that 90% cap, O'Saben explained in a presentation on July 9 to tax professionals. As a result, everyone from professional poker players to young gamblers using an app to bet on football are screaming foul and viewing the change as a 10% penalty of sorts. Some already want to see the new tax rule changed On July 7, U.S. Rep. Dina Titus introduced legislation to restore the 100% deduction for gamblers. The Nevada Democrat calls her bill the My FAIR BET Act — which calls for "Fair Accounting for Income Realized from Betting Earnings Taxation." "It gives everyone — from recreational gamblers to high-stakes gamblers — a fair shake," Titus said in a statement. "We should be encouraging players to properly report their winnings and wager using legal operators. The Senate change will only push people to not report their winnings and to use unregulated platforms.' The American Gaming Association applauds Titus for introducing the FAIR BET Act, as the group would like to see congressional leaders and the Trump administration restore the long-standing tax treatment of gaming losses, according to a group spokesperson. The industry group — whose members include DraftKings, MGM Resorts International, Churchill Downs, FireKeepers Casino Hotel, Cherokee Nation Entertainment and other big names — earlier in the spring urged congressional leadership to not only "maintain the deduction for taxpayers who itemize, but — as a matter of fairness — Congress should consider allowing for non-itemizers to net their gambling wins and losses for purposes of reporting adjusted gross income." "Under current policy," according to the letter sent in May to congressional leaders, "most taxpayers do not itemize and many gaming customers are subject to the mismatch of being taxed on the full amount of their gross gaming wins with no ability to net their losses." "As a result, those who are in a losing position at the end of the year are in effect being taxed on income they have not received," according to the letter. Others are speaking out on social media, too. A Nevada-based tax preparer posted on X that high-stakes gamblers will be hurt if this law with the 90% limit stays in place and goes into effect in 2026. "But so will the average gambler who 'gets lucky,' " said Russell Fox, whose profile also proclaims that he's a poker player. "Vegas was built on the dream, and if that dream is removed (or drastically lessened) by a bad law, Vegas will be hurt." I'd imagine the same would be true for casinos in a million other spots where many people choose to legally gamble. Contact personal finance columnist Susan Tompor: stompor@ Follow her on X @tompor.

Wall Street Journal
3 days ago
- Wall Street Journal
Want to Repair Social Security? Enlist the IRS
Trustees estimate that the Social Security Trust Fund will run dry by 2032 ('Fears for Social Security Stir Search for a Fix,' U.S. News, July 7). When this happens, the $1.6 trillion paid out each year will decrease by an estimated 23%, or $368 billion. The Trump administration could head off this problem by providing sufficient resources to the Internal Revenue Service to enable it to close the estimated $118 billion employment-tax gap, the amount of employment taxes the IRS fails to collect every year. If the administration decided to close the entire tax gap of $606 billion and dedicate the additional funding to the trust fund, benefit cuts may be avoided. Yet after the rescission of much of the $80 billion Inflation Reduction Act funding for the IRS, an indefinite hiring freeze, the firing of approximately 7,000 probationary employees and the deployment of special agents to arrest foreign nationals in the country without proper authorization instead of working tax cases, the chances of this happening are infinitesimally small.