logo
Secrets, Spies and Sabotage: 40 years on, SBS podcast investigates historic bombing of Greenpeace's Rainbow Warrior

Secrets, Spies and Sabotage: 40 years on, SBS podcast investigates historic bombing of Greenpeace's Rainbow Warrior

SBS Australia17 hours ago
Marking the 40th anniversary of the bombing of Greenpeace's international flagship, the Rainbow Warrior, award-winning investigative journalist Richard Baker has re-examined Australia's part in one of the most far-reaching international scandals of the 1980s, in SBS Audio's latest podcast Fallout: Spies on Norfolk Island.
Uncovering a sealed 374-page Australian government file, Baker travels to the scene of a real-life international spy thriller. After bombing the Rainbow Warrior in Auckland Harbour and killing photographer Fernando Pereira, four French agents escaped to Norfolk Island where they were eventually detained. However, after 24 hours in custody they were allowed to leave, ultimately evading justice.
The Rainbow Warrior had arrived in Auckland after evacuating 300 people from Rongelap Atoll in the Marshall Islands, where they had been subject to fallout from US nuclear-testing, and was next destined for Mururoa Atoll to protest French nuclear testing there.
Baker investigates the role that Australia played in the global headline-making affair, interviewing locals who witnessed the events on Norfolk Island, talking to Pacific Islanders who were exposed to radiation from the US and French nuclear-testing programs, and investigating from the Pacific to Paris to uncover the real story.
Host of Fallout: Spies on Norfolk Island , Richard Baker said; 'The more I looked into it, the more I was drawn to the events that unfolded on Norfolk Island forty years ago. I placed my bets on a 374-page sealed document from the National Archives of Australia and travelled to the region to speak to the locals – and from that, the podcast series Fallout: Spies on Norfolk Island was born. '
'It turned out I wasn't the only one who thought something didn't add up. In this series, I uncover Australia's covert role in an international scandal, the geopolitical situation that was driving the government of the day, and the part Australia still plays today in the ongoing battle for influence over the region.'
The six-part podcast series features interviews with Maurice Witham, detective inspector who was second in command of the Rainbow Warrior investigation; Chris Martin, New Zealand detective who went to Norfolk Island to interrogate the French agents; Hinamoeura Morgant-Cross, French Polynesian anti-nuclear activist and politician; and Lopeti Sentuli, Tongan anti-nuclear campaigner and lawyer on the ongoing fight for a nuclear-free Pacific.
Fallout: Spies on Norfolk Island is the latest offering from SBS, recently named the Australian Podcaster of the Year for the third year in a row . Itlaunches today on SBS Audio, ahead of the 40th anniversary of the Rainbow Warrior bombing. Listen to all of SBS Audio's podcasts on the SBS Audio App, Apple Podcasts, Spotify, LiSTNR or wherever you stream podcasts. Episodes launching weekly.
For a pdf copy of this media release, click here.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

City of Moreton Bay claims homeless people consented to having camps thrown away
City of Moreton Bay claims homeless people consented to having camps thrown away

ABC News

timean hour ago

  • ABC News

City of Moreton Bay claims homeless people consented to having camps thrown away

A Queensland council says homeless campers "consented" to having their tents destroyed and possessions thrown into rubbish trucks during the clearing of a park used by rough sleepers. The City of Moreton Bay denied destroying people's property and said it only removed "unwanted items" from camps that had been "abandoned" by their owners. It comes after the council made homeless camping illegal on public land in March, prompting a crackdown on tent cities in April. Former homeless woman Debbie Bobeldyk said she had not left her camp willingly, nor had she consented to the council throwing out her personal belongings. She said the council threw away an urn containing her daughter's ashes, her fridge, portable air conditioner and several fences. The 58-year-old was one of the homeless campers who left Eddie Hyland Park in April after the council threatened her with a maximum fine of $8,065 if she stayed. Ms Bobeldyk said council officers gave her and her husband, John, one hour to collect what belongings they could before officers demolished their tent site with an excavator. "We couldn't pack everything up in that time, I could hardly breathe because of the panic, we could hardly get any of it," Ms Bobeldyk said. "We never gave them permission. A council spokesperson said it took a sensitive and empathetic approach to homeless campers. "City of Moreton Bay maintains a compassionate approach and supports rough sleepers to gather their personal items," the spokesperson said. "Council officers provide rough sleepers with bags for them to store and retain items such as clothing, medication and toiletries. "Council collects items identified as waste by rough sleepers and items that have been abandoned at campsites." The spokesperson said the council might also take items and hold them for 20 days for homeless people to collect. Homeless man Karl Eichin said he was evicted from his camp at Sweeney Reserve in April, and had not left of his own free will. The 43-year-old said he felt "intimidated" into leaving by a group of about eight council and police officers. Mr Eichin moved to a council-owned bush reserve in Kallangur. He is one of 11 homeless campers in Kallangur being represented by human rights lawyers in a Supreme Court case against the City of Moreton Bay. Mr Eichin said he did not want to live in a tent in Kallangur, but he had not been offered social housing. "I've been on the waiting list for years. I've had to go back and forth with [the Department of] Housing, but there are just so many people." The latest state government figures show that, as of March, there were 5,493 people on the social housing waiting list in the City of Moreton Bay — the highest in the region's history. The number of people on the Moreton Bay waiting list has more than doubled since 2018.

'Political tension': Anthony Albanese, the US and China, explained
'Political tension': Anthony Albanese, the US and China, explained

SBS Australia

timean hour ago

  • SBS Australia

'Political tension': Anthony Albanese, the US and China, explained

As Prime Minister Anthony Albanese prepares to meet with his Chinese counterpart Xi Xinjping, questions have been raised over how the US will view the visit and whether there could be consequences for Australia. The visit comes after US President Donald Trump announced new tariff rates of 25 per cent on some trading partners, including Japan and South Korea. US tariffs on Australian products remain at 10 per cent, but with relations between the two allies strained, could the US respond negatively to Australia potentially strengthening ties with China? Here's what you need to know. Australia's relationship with China Albanese is set to visit China from Saturday, his second trip to the country since he became prime minister in 2022. China is Australia's largest two-way trading partner, and buys almost a third of Australia's exports. Trade between the two countries was worth almost $312 billion in 2024, according to the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade. The relationship appears to be strengthening after a period of volatility, which included China placing restrictions on some Australian exports between 2020 and 2024. China's ambassador to Australia, Xiao Qian, has called for greater collaboration in fields such as AI, healthcare and green energy under a revised free-trade deal between the two nations. In an opinion piece published in the Australian Financial Review, Xiao wrote that it was "time to advance bilateral relations with steady progress". He wrote that China was willing to review the two countries' trade agreement with "a more open attitude and higher standard", including further consolidating traditional areas and actively pursuing new growth areas. Christoph Nedopil, director of the Griffith University Asia Institute, said while there is a "mutual interest" in strengthening the relationship between Australia and China, this has been years in the making. He does not believe China is seeking to take advantage of rocky relationships between the US and its allies, including Australia. "China has been trying to make bilateral and multilateral alliances even before Trump was in office, it's not that the stabilisation of the Australia-China relationship only came when Trump was in office," Nedopil said. "And a number of the topics that are on the agenda are not new topics." In a press conference on Tuesday, Treasurer Jim Chalmers was asked whether the Australian government was considering freer trade with China, Korea and Japan in response to Trump's tariffs. Trump announced on Tuesday he would impose tariffs of at least 25 per cent on South Korea and Japan from August unless the countries can strike deals with the US. The US imposed tariffs on China of 145 per cent earlier this year and average US tariffs on Chinese exports now stand at around 50 per cent, according to the US-based Peterson Institute for International Economics. While Chalmers did not directly address the issue of the US tariffs, he said stabilising Australia's relationship with China was positive for the economy, workers, employers and industries. "A good, stable, reliable trading relationship with China is key to making sure that our economy continues to grow the right way," he said. "We want good, reliable, diverse trading relationships right around the world. We've got wonderful exports, we've got huge opportunities." Chalmers said the government was "optimistic about the future when it comes to Australia's place in the global economy". 'Political tension' between Australia and the US While Australia's ties with China could be building, the relationship with the US is somewhat strained, according to David Andrews, senior policy advisor at the Australian National University's National Security College. "It's a relationship we've had for decades and decades now, and we have consistently viewed that as our most important strategic partner and one of our closest international friends and alliances," he said. "At the same time, it's clear that we're going through a period of political tension and relational tension." Andrews believes much of the tension has come as a result of Trump's tariffs, which he announced in April, along with "heavy-handedness" of the US government. But he said while the relationship is "challenging" at the moment, diplomacy and international relations are constantly evolving. "There is an ongoing, persistent rebalancing of that relationship to understand what is being asked of us and therefore how much we are willing to accept as well," he said. "I think that the prime minister has been very clear that [in] putting a very public sense of boundary or limit on what we will do and how far we'll go and the implications for the relationship." Could the US change tariffs on Australia? At the time of writing, Australia has not received a tariff increase, meaning most of its exports to the US remain subject to the baseline 10 per cent, while there is a 50 per cent tariff on steel and aluminium exports. The government would continue to try to negotiate a total exemption from US tariffs, Albanese said, even though no country in the world had done so. Andrews said the "status quo" of the 10 per cent tariff is likely Australia's "best case scenario", and pointed out that no other trading partners had been unable to negotiate an exemption. "Obviously, it would be great if we could get some sort of exemption on the steel and aluminium tariff, for example, but I don't see any evidence that's likely to change," he said. "It's a dispositional change in the way the United States views the international economic order, and we can't convince them otherwise. "It would be wildly optimistic to think that we could make any, I think, improvement on our situation." While a tariff reduction or exemption may be unlikely, some have questioned whether the US government could raise tariffs on Australia in retaliation to Albanese's meeting with Xi. Nedopil said it's difficult to predict the actions of the Trump administration. "In a way, the US policymaking at this time seems to be very news-driven and so very short-term sentiment-driven," he said. "So what President Trump might consider as disrespect can lead to a short-term decision announcement that might be more negative." The relationship between China and the US is complex, with the two considered economic and strategic competitors. Nedopil said he believes the rivalry has become "much more intense" on a number of fronts, which he says is "undermining US dominance", which Trump may take into consideration. "And I think the other shift that has taken place ... is that actually a lot of Asian countries and emerging economies are not viewing China as negatively as they used to. "I think there are dynamics that make the US seem not as strong and potentially [not] feel as strong and therefore also trying to hold onto power with a number of different means." Additional reporting by the Australian Associated Press

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store