Student loan forgiveness IBR: Why relief is delayed, and what you can do now
What is IBR and why is it important?
So why is forgiveness under IBR paused?
No court is blocking IBR forgiveness
Other program delays are adding to the confusion
Over 1.5 million IDR applications are stuck in a backlog.
The Department recently told borrowers on SAVE to switch to IBR, even though IBR forgiveness is currently paused.
Interest will restart in August for borrowers previously under SAVE forbearance.
Under the recently signed " Big, Beautiful Bill, " a new plan, the Repayment Assistance Plan (RAP), will replace SAVE, PAYE, and ICR.
What can borrowers do right now?
You can continue making payments; any extra payments beyond your qualifying 20 or 25 years should eventually be refunded.
You can also ask your servicer for a temporary forbearance, but be aware that interest will continue accruing during this time.
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel
The US Department of Education has quietly paused student loan forgiveness under the Income-Based Repayment (IBR) plan, a move that has surprised many, given that IBR is the only major income-driven repayment plan not affected by ongoing legal battles.While other plans like SAVE, PAYE, and ICR are currently blocked due to federal court injunctions, IBR was created by Congress and explicitly authorizes loan forgiveness after 20 or 25 years of qualifying payments.Despite this legal clarity, thousands of eligible borrowers who have reached their forgiveness milestone have found their relief stalled with no clear explanation.This sudden pause comes amid overall disruption in the federal student loan system, marked by massive processing delays, legal uncertainty, and significant policy shifts under the Trump administration.The Education Department has attributed the IBR freeze to 'system updates' in response to the SAVE-related court rulings, but critics and legal experts argue that no such updates should interfere with IBR discharges.The IBR plan is one of several income-driven repayment (IDR) options for federal student loan borrowers. It helps borrowers by lowering their monthly payments based on their income and family size. After 20 or 25 years of qualifying payments, borrowers are supposed to get their remaining loan balance forgiven.What makes IBR unique is that it was created by Congress, and unlike newer plans such as SAVE, it has clear legal authority for forgiveness. That's why recent court rulings do not apply to IBR.Despite its legal backing, the Education Department has paused forgiveness processing under IBR, citing "system updates."In a recent update, the department said: 'Currently, IBR forgiveness is paused while our systems are updated… forgiveness will resume once those updates are completed.'There is no clear timeline for when this pause will end. Some borrowers who met the 20- or 25-year threshold have been waiting since mid-2024 without getting their promised discharge.Other IDR plans like SAVE, PAYE, and ICR are blocked due to a court injunction from a lawsuit challenging the legality of the SAVE plan . Since these were created by regulation, not by Congress, they are on hold.However, Congress passed IBR into law, and courts have not blocked forgiveness under it. The Department of Education itself confirmed: 'ED can and will still process loan forgiveness for the IBR Plan, which Congress separately enacted.'The IBR pause is happening alongside massive disruptions across the student loan system:Current IBR borrowers will be allowed to stay enrolled and qualify for forgiveness, but new borrowers won't have access to the plan once RAP takes over.If you've already reached your IBR forgiveness threshold but haven't received a discharge:
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
28 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal rejects Congress' appeal against tax demand on ₹199 crore income
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal on Tuesday (July 22, 2025) has rejected the Indian National Congress' appeal against an income tax demand on an income of ₹199.15 crore, saying that the party filed its returns past the deadline for availing of exemptions due to political parties, and that it also violated cash donation limits. 'We thus conclude that the assessee's return filed on 02.02.2019 is not within the 'due' date to make it eligible for the impugned exemption,' the ITAT said in its order. According to the order, the Congress filed its income tax return for the financial year 2017-18 on February 2, 2019. As per the Income Tax Act, 1961, political parties are allowed a later deadline for filing their returns. For the financial year 2017-18, that deadline was December 31, 2018. In its return, the Congress had declared nil income for 2017-18 after claiming an exemption of ₹199.15 crore under Section 13A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. However, the ITAT ruled that, since the return was filed late, it was not eligible for this exemption. In addition, the assessing officer also found that the Congress had received ₹14.49 lakh as cash donations, which exceeded the limit of ₹2,000 per individual. According to changes made to the Income Tax Act made through the Finance Act 2017, political parties can receive donations above ₹2,000 only through formal banking channels, not cash. Overall, the party's declared total receipts of ₹199.15 crore against expenses of ₹197.43 crore, thereby showing a surplus of ₹1.71 crore. However, the Income Tax Department's assessment order on July 6, 2021, denied that the income could be exempted from tax, making the full receipt amount taxable. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) then upheld this decision on March 28, 2023, following which the Congress approached the Appellate Tribunal.
The Hindu
28 minutes ago
- The Hindu
India-U.S. trade deal: Deadlock over agri continues, but Trump surprise not ruled out
With the August 1 deadline approaching, agriculture continues to loom large as an impediment to a trade deal between India and the U.S. India continues to hold firm against opening up the sector to imports to protect Indian farmers, and the U.S. remains keen that the sector be opened up as such a deal would set the precedent for future deals it strikes with the EU and Japan. Officials, however, are not ruling out a last-minute surprise from U.S. President Donald Trump, similar to what happened with Indonesia and Vietnam. 'The Indian team is back from the U.S. and has left them with what India has to offer,' an official aware of the negotiations told The Hindu. 'Now, whether they accept the terms or not is up to them. Agriculture remains a major issue where there is lack of agreement.' India has been resisting the opening up of the agriculture sector to imports to protect domestic farmers. According to the official, however, opening up the Indian market to U.S. agricultural imports is not just about market access. 'India is one of the few countries that is pushing very hard for a deal,' the official said. 'So, it is likely a deal with India will be concluded before the U.S. concludes a deal with the EU or Japan. If agriculture is excluded from the India deal, then that could set the precedent for the EU and Japan deals, and the U.S. doesn't want to risk that.' However, according to another source, the bulk of India's negotiation points are now aimed at a broader Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA) by September or October this year, rather than a 'mini deal' before August 1. Yet, the government is prepared for a surprise deal announced by U.S. President Donald Trump. 'See what happened with Indonesia and Vietnam; the U.S. President announced details of the deal that both Indonesian and Vietnamese negotiators said were not part of what they agreed to,' the second source said. 'This was done after a phone conversation between Mr. Trump and the heads of Indonesia and Vietnam, respectively. The same can always pop up with India; we have not ruled it out.' Both sources confirmed that, while agriculture and dairy remain hurdles from the Indian side, a key hurdle from the U.S. side is their reluctance to reduce import duties on automotive components to zero.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
28 minutes ago
- First Post
Trump explored ways to cut contracts with Elon Musk's SpaceX after fallout but failed: Report
Following the fallout between Elon Musk and US President Donald Trump, the administration explored the possibility of cutting contracts awarded to Elon Musk's SpaceX, but concluded that it was not possible as SpaceX was involved in critical work for the Department of Defense and Nasa and there were few to no alternatives, according to a report. read more US President Donald Trump talks to the media, next to Tesla CEO Elon Musk with his son X Æ A-12, at the White House in Washington, DC, US, March 11, 2025. (Photo: Reuters) After the public break-up of Elon Musk and US President Donald Trump, the administration explored ways to cut contracts to Musk-owned SpaceX, but concluded that it was not possible, according to a report. After Musk mounted personal attacks on Trump over the 'One Big Beautiful Bill', Trump had suggested he could cut subsidies to Musk's companies like SpaceX and Tesla. Over the years, the US government has given several billions in contracts, subsidies, and tax credits to Musk's companies — most notably SpaceX. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Days after Trump's statement, a senior administration initiated a review of government contracts to SpaceX to see if and how they could be cancelled, as per the Wall Street Journal. However, the review concluded that the Department of Defense and Nasa are so deeply dependent on SpaceX for a host of purposes, ranging from military connectivity to satellite launches, that contracts to SpaceX could not be cancelled, the newspaper reported. As per the latest information available publicly, ongoing US government contracts to SpaceX total around $18 billion. This does not include the money that SpaceX or other companies owned by Musk have got in subsidies or tax credits in ongoing or past contracts. Public estimates say that around 30-40 per cent of SpaceX's annual revenue comes from the US government — mostly from services to Nasa, military, and intelligence services. Trump administration realises US depends too much on Musk The Journal reported that the review of Musk's contracts, which was led by Josh Gruenbaum of the General Services Administration's (GSA), asked the Defense Department, Nasa, and around half a dozen other federal agencies to fill out a spreadsheet with all of their current SpaceX contracts and other transaction agreements, as per the newspaper. The spreadsheet also asked whether a competitor could do the job that had been contracted to the SpaceX, the report said. After receiving the information, the Trump administration realised it could no cut contracts to SpaceX for two reasons. Firstly, SpaceX was doing some of the most critical work for the US military, Nasa, and spy agencies like the National Reconnaissance Office (NRO). Such work cannot be disrupted or stopped. Secondly, even if the Trump administration would have gone for short-term disruption for long-term solution or punishment to Trump, they would have found few alternatives. In most of the cases, the technology and launch capacity of SpaceX is simply unmatched. There are few to no companies that can do the work that SpaceX does — particularly at the scale of SpaceX. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
