logo
The No Kings Playbook to Confront Trump's ‘Authoritarian Breakthrough'

The No Kings Playbook to Confront Trump's ‘Authoritarian Breakthrough'

Yahoo2 days ago
The 'No Kings' movement is shifting gears to counter what they're calling the 'authoritarian breakthrough' of Donald Trump's second presidency.On Wednesday evening, the No Kings movement hosted a video conference call for more than 130,000 pro-democracy activists. The call seeks to build off the success of mass anti-Trump street protests — which also continued Thursday evening with more than 1,600 nationwide 'Good Trouble Lives On' demonstrations, inspired by Civil Rights icon John Lewis.
The 90-minute video conference was organized to train activists in principles of 'strategic non-cooperation,' which aims to gum up the works of the increasingly dark and dictatorial Trump administration. The call was organized by the progressive grassroots organization Indivisible, and featured a trainer from Choose Democracy, Daniel Hunter, whose bio touts past work with pro-democracy activists living under authoritarian regimes, such as in Myanmar.
The tone of the conference was significantly more somber than similar recent webinars organized by Indivisible. It painted United States' democracy as confronting an existential crisis — and pegged the odds of overcoming Trump's ambition at not much better than a 'coin-flip.'
'We're in a moment of authoritarian breakthrough,' said Hunter, who defined that term as a 'window in which a would-be authoritarian is attempting to rapidly consolidate power' in an effort to 'eliminate checks' that prevent them from operating with impunity.
Hunter ticked through six characteristics of authoritarian breakthrough, all of which are currently in play. This dictatorial to-do list includes 'directing investigations against critics'; 'giving license to lawbreaking'; 'regulatory retaliation'; 'deploying [the] military domestically'; 'federal law enforcement overreach'; and holding tight to power, i.e. 'the autocrat won't leave.'
Trump is hewing to this well-worn playbook, Hunter said, by pardoning violent Jan. 6 felons, sending masked Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents to round up law-abiding immigrants, deploying the National Guard and Marines into Los Angeles, making 'capricious threats' to deport U.S. citizens like Rosie O'Donnell, and openly plotting an unconstitutional third term.The pro-democracy trainer offered the encouragement that 'Trump didn't write this playbook. This is a global phenomena … the growth of autocracies.' He added that the experiences of allies across the globe offer strategies that have succeeded in turning back Trumpian figures in their own countries.But the odds of success are sobering. The training included a study of 35 countries that experienced 'democratic backsliding' in the last 30 years, and their track records for overcoming the authoritarian assault. Without a movement of mass 'civil resistance,' less than eight percent of countries were successful at righting the democratic ship of state. Active civil resistance — such as the movement that No Kings is building in the U.S. — has historically increased the odds to 52 percent. 'I don't love those numbers,' said Hunter, but he added that the payoff for victory can be profound. Successful resistance movements typically forge societies that are 'more democratic' on the other side — offering 'an advancement' rather than a return to the status quo ante.
'Our task right now is to build and activate a powerful opposition' based on 'mass defiance in a lot of places,' Hunter said, with the goal of 'interrupting the regime' by 'getting into the gears through nonviolent tactics.' He insisted that organizers and activists need to commit themselves to resistance now: 'We're in a bit of a race against time,' he said, adding more hopefully: 'We have window.'A fellow pro-democracy organizer, Maria Stephan of the Horizons Project, assured the assembled crowd that there's a rich history of successful resistance movements to take inspiration from. These include not only foreign examples, like Chile overcoming the brutal regime of the fascist dictator Augusto Pinochet, but also the all-American struggle that ended legal segregation. Stephan pointed to America's 'own civil rights activists who dismantled racial authoritarianism in the Jim Crow South using legal and legislative strategies, but also boycotts, strikes, sit-ins, freedom rides, and other campaigns of non-violent resistance.'
The 'Achilles heel' of authoritarians, Stephan said, is their dependence on popular passivity — on normal people, who feel isolated, fearful, and disempowered, who choose to go along rather than taking risks and rocking the boat.The challenge for pro-democracy activists is to forge connection, solidarity, and build truly popular resistance that can offer safety in numbers and embolden other Americans to fight the democratic backslide — seeking to regain momentum for a government that serves the people's interests, not those of Trump and his cronies.
For Stephan that means activating broad-based resistance across the different 'pillars' of society — from labor and faith communities; to business interests and educational institutions; to the nation's civil service workers and members of the military.Trump's efforts to cow big-business CEOs, oust university leaders, mass-fire civil servants, and deploy the military against the people of Los Angeles, demonstrate how each of the pillars is vulnerable to being co-opted into the administration's authoritarian project. But Stephan underscored the power of popular resistance to 'shift the incentives' and create a popular counterweight to presidential pressure. 'We need to get the institutional enablers of authoritarianism to withdraw their support from the authoritarian system and to get behind a democracy based on the will of the people.'
For everyday people, Stephan highlighted three main avenues for resistance: First are strategies of 'protest and persuasion' (think: street demonstrations or T-shirt ready slogans like 'Melt ICE') that communicate popular resistance. Second, is building up positive local infrastructure, whether that means supporting immigrant-friendly local businesses or providing mutual aid to neighbors in need. The third is the broad category of 'non-cooperation.' This can come from outside of institutions, as with boycotts, or from inside, as when civil servants or even soldiers refuse to carry out illegal or immoral orders.
As a small-scale proof of concept, Stephan pointed to the successful pressure campaign by Annapolis alumni and retired military commanders that beat back Trump's efforts to strip the Naval Academy's library of books by black authors like Maya Angelou (while leaving, e.g. Hitler's treatise Mein Kampf on the shelves).
The way that Harvard University's powerful alumni network has spurred the university administration to fight Trump's assault on academic freedom, rather than capitulate like Columbia, is another example. Stephan also pointed to ongoing consumer boycotts of Tesla (over Elon Musk's traumatizing tenure in the Trump administration) and Target (for its rollback of diversity initiatives) as 'acts of non-cooperation that are making a difference in this country' as they cost those companies billions.The webinar was not just a conceptual orientation, but a call to action. Leaders asked participants to commit to taking the evening's online organizing and make it physical by hosting a gathering with like-minded activists in their own communities. The organizers hoped to get 1,000 house-party pledges. The evening's tally soared past 5,000.The meeting closed with an energizing message from a longtime activist Ash-Lee Woodard Henderson, who encouraged new participants not to get flummoxed by the lingo or overwhelmed by the opposition. 'It's not complex, my friends,' she said. 'Don't let these evil people make you feel like it's rocket science to get to democracy — when it's actually just fingerpainting,'
'It's actually our culture,' she added. 'And the majority of the people in this country agree with us.'
More from Rolling Stone
Trump Claims He 'Never Wrote a Picture in My Life.' He Actually Drew Plenty of Them
Team Trump Was on 'F-cking Warpath' to Kill Story About Salacious Letter to Epstein
The White House's Epstein 'Hoax' Explanation Makes Zero Sense
Best of Rolling Stone
The Useful Idiots New Guide to the Most Stoned Moments of the 2020 Presidential Campaign
Anatomy of a Fake News Scandal
The Radical Crusade of Mike Pence
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Miranda Devine: Trump wins the Epstein battle — as the left, media foolishly believe prez on the skids
Miranda Devine: Trump wins the Epstein battle — as the left, media foolishly believe prez on the skids

New York Post

time3 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Miranda Devine: Trump wins the Epstein battle — as the left, media foolishly believe prez on the skids

If you listened to the rest of the media — both mainstream and social media — you would think Donald Trump was on the skids, that MAGA was at last turning on the president over the so-called Epstein Files. But nothing could be further from the truth, according to polling the president crowed about over the weekend and, also, according to history. Every single time his enemies count him out, Trump roars back with a vengeance. The latest effort last week to try to smear him as a sexual deviant and damage his marriage by tying him to child sex predator Jeffrey Epstein is a case in point. The Wall Street Journal story Thursday was tame by comparison to the lurid rumors and wishful thinking that ripped through Washington, DC, and newly anti-Trump Elon Musk's X all week. The story claimed Trump had contributed a letter to a leather-bound book created for Epstein's 50th birthday in 2003 by the pervert financier's gal pal Ghislaine Maxwell. The typewritten letter reportedly involved an imaginary conversation between Trump and Epstein that included the lines 'Enigmas never age' and 'Happy Birthday — and may every day be another wonderful secret.' In its description of the letter, which it did not publish, the WSJ said there was also a doodle of a naked woman and Trump's signature. Trump denied writing the letter or drawing the picture, calling it 'FAKE,' before launching a $10 billion libel action. Trump said: 'These are not my words, not the way I talk.' Ditched 'creep' long ago I can't express my own views about the merits or otherwise of the story for legal reasons since The Post and the WSJ share the same parent company. But I can say it's a nothing burger. So what if Trump wrote the letter, or not? The date is 2003, five years before Epstein was convicted of prostituting a child and was registered as a sex offender, before the world found out what a monster he really was. It's no secret that Trump was chummy with Epstein in his heyday in Manhattan and Palm Beach, when the late pervert was a social-climbing financier throwing star-studded parties. Epstein was a fixture of elite East Coast social circles in the 1990s. It would be strange if Trump didn't know him. But the saga shows Trump in a good light because, years before Epstein's 2008 arrest and sweetheart plea deal, Trump banned him from his Mar-a-Lago club 'for being a creep,' says White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt. According to legal filings and a 2020 book by lawyer Bradley Edwards, who represented several Epstein victims, Trump threw out Epstein around 2004, for sexually assaulting the daughter of a friend and Mar-a-Lago member. The New York Times claims Trump and Epstein also fell out over business around the same time when they competed to buy a house in Palm Beach, forcing up the price and annoying Trump. Either way, there is no dispute that Trump cut ties with Epstein more than 20 years ago, which distinguishes him from other high-flying Epstein pals, such as Prince Andrew, former bank CEO Jes Staley and Bill Gates, who kept up the association even after Epstein was convicted. It was during Trump's first presidency that federal prosecutors came after Epstein again, charging him in July 2019 with sex trafficking and conspiracy to traffic minors for sex. One of the main prosecutors was none other than Maurene Comey, the daughter of notorious FBI Director James Comey, whom Trump had sacked two years earlier. James Comey is now in the crosshairs of the FBI, along with former CIA Director John Brennan, after current CIA Director John Ratcliffe referred them for criminal investigation two weeks ago over freshly declassified evidence that highlights their roles in the Russia collusion hoax. Maurene Comey was fired Wednesday, one day before the WSJ story was published, and one day after the White House was alerted to the story. She told colleagues in an email that her ouster was 'unexpected' and unexplained. Comey was also the lead prosecutor of Ghislaine Maxwell in 2021 over her role in Epstein's sex trafficking. According to the WSJ, the 'birthday book' Maxwell compiled was in the files examined by the DOJ during the investigations of Epstein and Maxwell. Every week, Post columnist Miranda Devine sits down for exclusive and candid conversations with the most influential disruptors in Washington. Subscribe here! There is no indication of anything more than a circumstantial link between Comey's ouster and the WSJ story, but the timing is intriguing. Like everything else with Epstein, people are inclined to see links where there are none. After the WSJ story broke Thursday, Trump asked Attorney General Pam Bondi to release 'any and all pertinent grand jury testimony, subject to court approval' that was gathered by New York federal prosecutors in 2019. But just because people associated with Epstein doesn't make them complicit in his crimes. The DOJ and FBI have said there is no 'Epstein client list,' as in a list of men to whom he pimped out underage girls. What does exist is Epstein's 'little black book,' bulging with 1,971 names, uncovered in 2009 when his butler tried to sell it. It has been the subject of intense reporting, but you can't judge the names guilty just because Epstein had their number. 'There are a lot of names associated with Epstein that had nothing to do with Epstein's conduct,' broadcaster Bill O'Reilly said last week, quoting Trump. 'They maybe had lunch with him or maybe had some correspondence. 'If that name gets out, those people are destroyed — because there's not going to be any context. The media doesn't care about context — so you can't do that.' Many of the now-adult victims of Epstein were cheated of their chance to confront their tormentor in court because he died in pretrial detention. But the judge allowed them to testify in the Manhattan federal courtroom where Epstein would have been tried, to tell the world what his sexual depravity meant. I was in that courtroom in August 2019 to witness this display of feminine courage as 17 young women lined up at a microphone, heads held high, to place their suffering on the record. Six others had their lawyers read out letters. Through tears and shaky voices, they told their stories so we would understand the toll of broken trust. 'I was nothing more than a teenage prostitute. I was his slave,' said one victim who was a 16-year-old virgin when she says Epstein raped her. The most outspoken victim, Virginia Giuffre, who reportedly committed suicide three months ago, told the court: 'Epstein did not act alone.' Get Miranda's latest take Sign up for Devine Online, the newsletter from Miranda Devine Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Want even more news? Check out more newsletters Giuffre, who fell prey to Epstein at 16, alleged she was 'passed around like a platter of fruit' to 'powerful men,' including Prince Andrew, who settled out of court after she sued him for sexual abuse. She accused other powerful men, but never Trump. In fact, in her 2015 memoir, she explicitly ruled out Trump. As much as the liberal media is salivating at the prospect of another Get-Trump pile-on, there is just nothing there. 'X is not reality' Meanwhile, the same media is ignoring the latest bombshell revelation in the Russiagate scandal unveiled last week by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, where the evidence of wrongdoing by President Barack Obama and his henchmen exists and is compelling. Trump is having the last laugh, anyway, as CNN pollster Harry Enten pointed out last week. 'If anything Donald Trump's approval rating has gone up since this whole Epstein saga started,' Enten said. 'He is at the apex or close to it in terms of his popularity [with Republicans], Epstein Files complaints or not. Who knew Twitter and X are not reality.' It just goes to prove the noisiest loudmouths who claim to represent MAGA just represent themselves.

Lutnick: US ‘going to love the deals that President Trump and I are doing'
Lutnick: US ‘going to love the deals that President Trump and I are doing'

The Hill

time3 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Lutnick: US ‘going to love the deals that President Trump and I are doing'

Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said on Sunday that the public is 'going to love the deals that President Trump and I are doing' as the administration promises forthcoming breakthroughs on tariffs. 'Well, you heard in our polling some of the perceptions of the economy,' CBS News' Margaret Brennan told Lutnick on 'Face the Nation.' 'Sixty-one percent of Americans believe the administration is putting too much focus on tariffs, 70 percent say the administration is not doing enough to lower prices and 60 percent oppose new tariffs on imported goods.' 'This is a centerpiece to your policy plan. How do you reverse public opposition?' she asked. 'Oh, they're going to love the deals that President Trump and I are doing. I mean, they're just going to love them. You know, the president figured out the right answer, and sent letters to these countries, said this is going to fix the trade deficit,' Lutnick responded. 'This will go a long way to fixing the trade deficit, and that's gotten these countries to the table and they're going to open their markets or they're going to pay the tariff,' he added. Trump's whiplash approach to threatening and imposing tariffs has at times rattled the markets. The president has sent letters to dozens of countries warning of tariffs ranging from 20 to 50 percent to be imposed beginning Aug. 1 unless new deals are reached. 'For 80 years, America's leaders let countries put tariffs on our products and we did nothing,' Lutnick said Tuesday in a post on the social platform X. 'Now under President Trump's leadership, American consumers and businesses are going to be competing on a level playing field. America will come out ahead,' he added.

Everyone Had Same Reaction To President Trump's Golf Trip Announcement
Everyone Had Same Reaction To President Trump's Golf Trip Announcement

Yahoo

time5 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Everyone Had Same Reaction To President Trump's Golf Trip Announcement

Everyone Had Same Reaction To President Trump's Golf Trip Announcement originally appeared on The Spun. President Trump's golf trip total is trending on social media following a report by the Associated Press. The President of the United States likes to golf. Everyone knows that. But how many golf trips has the President of the United States actually taken in 2025? President Trump, 79, took office in late January. Since then, he's taken close to 40 golf trips. That averages out to about 7 trips per month, more or less. From the report: When Trump hits the road, it's most often to his properties for weekend trips built around golf in Palm Beach, Florida; Bedminster, New Jersey; or Sterling, Virginia, near Washington's Dulles International Airport and close enough to motorcade from the White House. The president has logged 14 Florida trips, 13 to Virginia and eight to New Jersey. After summer arrived, he has favored Bedminster or day trips to Sterling over steamy Mar-a-Lago in Florida. Biden headed to his home in Wilmington, Delaware, many weekends early in his term. He sometimes went to a golf club, but attended Mass nearly every weekend. That's a lot of golf, though no one is surprised by it. One source close to President Trump said he might love golf more than anything else. Unsurprisingly, he's taking heat from some. "Trump's golf trips cost taxpayers millions. Why doesn't he cut those instead of the National Weather Service?" one fan wrote. "The same admin that slashed $59M for migrant housing in May spends $3.4M per golf trip. Priorities: punish the vulnerable, pamper the powerful. Fiscal theater with human costs," one fan added. "In his first administration it cost over $150 million. And the right said things when once per month Biden went back to Delaware," one fan added. "The amount Trump golfs he should be in the PGA mopping up Rory McElroy. Maybe that's how we get the money back..... Make him train and then hand over the prize money to the American taxpayer?" one fan added. What do you make of President Trump's golf trips number? Everyone Had Same Reaction To President Trump's Golf Trip Announcement first appeared on The Spun on Jul 20, 2025 This story was originally reported by The Spun on Jul 20, 2025, where it first appeared.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store