More Powerful 2026 Cadillac Optiq Will Blow Away Audi Rival
Cadillac recently launched a performance version of its smallest EV, the Optiq-V. It runs the larger Lyriq-V surprisingly close in the performance stakes, but with a starting price of nearly $70,000, this Cadillac EV will be far out of reach for many. Fortunately, details about the normal Optiq lineup for the 2026 model year have been shared by GM Authority, and they're quite significant. For starters, a new rear-wheel-drive variant will be introduced, and it's fair to assume it will lower the price to entry for this Cadillac EV.
New RWD Model And More Powerful AWD Version
2025 Cadillac Optiq —
Source: Gabriel Ionica
The 2026 Cadillac Optiq with RWD will produce 315 horsepower and 332 lb-ft of torque. Impressively, that makes it more powerful than the 2025 Optiq AWD, which makes 300 hp. However, the latter is still more torquey, at 354 lb-ft.
The AWD Optiq has gotten a big boost in output. It now makes 440 hp and 498 lb-ft, easily outmuscling the previous version by 140 hp and 144 lb-ft. The 2025 Optiq AWD was already independently tested reaching 60 mph in 5.7 seconds, so this new AWD model could easily sneak in below five seconds for the benchmark sprint.
Both 2026 Optiqs will use an 85-kWh battery pack with a range of around 300 miles. Plugged into a DC fast charger, the EV will be able to add 79 miles of range in just 10 minutes. According to Inside EVs, the 2026 Optiq will also receive a NACS plug, allowing it to take advantage of the Tesla Supercharger network more easily.
Color Changes And Expected Lower Price
2025 Cadillac Optiq
2025 Cadillac Optiq
2025 Cadillac Optiq
The only other change involves exterior colors, with Crystal White Tricoat being replaced by Vibrant White Tricoat for 2026. Other than this, don't expect the already stylish Optiq to look any different.
Pricing isn't known yet, but the 2025 Optiq starts at $52,895. We expect the new RWD model to be cheaper, but not by much, since it's actually more powerful. Hopefully, this model starts at below $50,000. As for the new AWD model, its big power boost could raise its starting price to over $55k.
To put those estimates into perspective, Audi's smaller Q4 e-tron starts at $49,800 for the 2025 model year, but it only makes 282 hp in base form. If the base Optiq RWD is priced similarly, it easily looks like more bang for your buck. The dual-motor Q4 e-tron starts at $55,200, but its 335 hp is dwarfed by the upgraded Optiq dual-motor with 440 hp.
Production of the 2026 Cadillac Optiq is scheduled to start on August 25, but interested customers will be able to schedule orders about a month before that.
About the Author
Karl Furlong View Profile
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
8 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
States where fast food could get a lot more expensive due to new law
Ten states and the District of Columbia have banned a popular fast food to-go container that could mean takeouts are about to get more expensive for customers. Earlier this week, Delaware joined the cohort of states and the capital that have banned Styrofoam containers in the fast food industry. The restaurant industry has often leaned on the white, creaky material because it insulated food for roughly 14 cents per container, compared to a biodegradable option that typically runs for around 25 cents. 'It could be something that affects us when it comes to pricing [of our food],' Ezell Barnes, who owns a Delaware food truck called Zoagies, told Delaware Online. 'We already exist on razor-thin profit margins.' CEO of the Delaware Restaurant Association, Carrie Leishman, said the new ban could largely affect small businesses and potentially run them into the ground. 'The stain which this could place on a small business could end so many of them,' she told the outlet. 'What this bill really impacts is equity in the restaurant business,' she said. 'The impact upon our local ethnic minority communities, given its effects on these small restaurants, will be incredibly damaging.' CEO of the Delaware Restaurant Association, Carrie Leishman, said the new ban could largely affect small businesses and potentially run them into the ground The Delaware ban follows that of California, Oregon, and Rhode Island, which outlawed the material January 1, 2025. The first US state to ban the product was Maine in January 2021 However Leishman noted that 'most of Delaware's restaurants were already in compliance' with the law. The Delaware ban follows that of California, Oregon, and Rhode Island, which outlawed the material January 1, 2025. The first US state to ban the product was Maine in January 2021. The law was signed in 2019 by Governor Janet Mills, but didn't go into effect until 2021. The Delaware bill was signed in 2022, but went into effect on Tuesday. 'Polystyrene cannot be recycled like a lot of other products, so while that cup of coffee may be finished, the Styrofoam cup it was in is not,' Mill said in 2019. 'In fact, it will be around for decades to come and eventually it will break down into particles, polluting our environment, hurting our wildlife, and even detrimentally impacting our economy.' New York also signed its law in 2019 under former Governor Andrew Cuomo. It went into effect in 2022. A 2024 waste study by the Department of Sanitation in New York City showed that polystyrene - what Styrofoam is made of - decreased 54 percent by weight between 2017 and 2023. It is feared that the ban will impact small businesses like food trucks the most The containers are popular for containing a variety of takeout food The Empire State was one of the first states to ban plastic bags in March 2020, seeing a decrease of 67 percent between 2017 and 2023, the study found. California was the first to ban plastic bags in 2014 and will enact another law in 2026 prohibiting the sale of 'reusable' plastic bags that are thicker. The Golden State has vowed to cut single-use plastics by 25 percent by 2032 and to recycle 65 percent of what's left. It shift to recycled plastic in the same time frame, according to Cal Recycle. Californians throw out 290 Olympic pool-sized worth of plastic each day. Styrofoam takes 500 years to decompose and it cannot be recycled, like glass and certain types of plastic. The material also leaks large amounts of ozone in the atmosphere, which causes environmental and respiratory issues, according to Colgate University. Styrofoam is estimated to take up roughly 30 percent of the US' landfills, with around 5billion pounds of it, according to Heal The Planet.
Telegraph
15 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Musk's America Party could split Republicans, fear Trump allies
Elon Musk's plan to launch a new US political party could split the Republicans, Donald Trump's allies have warned. On Saturday, the 54-year-old Tesla boss announced he was setting up the America Party after his social media followers backed the idea in an online poll. Mr Musk, who until recently was a key Trump ally, said the party would adopt a 'laser focus' on winning a handful of Senate seats and House districts in a bid to sway key votes on legislation. 'Given the razor-thin legislative margins, that would be enough to serve as the deciding vote on contentious laws, ensuring that they serve the true will of the people,' he posted on X. On Sunday, Musk responded to a post about how he could 'break the two-party stranglehold' by writing: 'Not hard tbh [to be honest].' Not hard tbh — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) July 6, 2025 Laura Loomer, a leading Maga influencer who is close to Mr Trump, warned the move could trigger Republican defections and split the party's base. 'I predict Tucker Carlson, Marjorie Taylor Greene and Thomas Massie will join the new 'America Party' to spite President Trump,' she posted on X. Raheem Kassam, another prominent Maga supporter and former adviser to Nigel Farage, threatened to ditch Mr Musk's X platform if its algorithm skewed against Mr Trump. 'If Musk weaponizes X against Maga, I'm leaving this account as an automated news feed and shifting to TruthSocial tbh,' he wrote. Mr Musk said his decision to form the party stemmed from opposition to Mr Trump's new economic Bill, which includes tax cuts for the wealthy, significant reductions to Medicaid and the removal of subsidies for electric vehicles. The announcement follows the revival of his public feud with Mr Trump, who threatened to cancel the Tesla tycoon's government contracts and deport him back to South Africa. 'Elmo the Mook' Steve Bannon, Mr Trump's former chief strategist, questioned whether Mr Musk could even form a new party, given he was born abroad, and also repeated calls for him to be deported. 'The foul, the buffoon. Elmo the Mook, formerly known as Elon Musk, Elmo the Mook. He's today, in another smear, and this –only a foreigner could do this – think about it, he's got up on, he's got up on Twitter right now, a poll about starting an America Party, a non-American starting an America Party,' Mr Bannon said on his War Room podcast. He added: 'No, brother, you're not an American. You're a South African. We take enough time and prove the facts of that, you should be deported because it's a crime of what you did – among many.' Third parties have typically underperformed in US elections due to the country's first-past-the-post system, which favours Democrats and Republicans. Previous third-party presidential candidates like Ross Perot and Ralph Nader made headlines but little headway. But Mr Musk hopes that by securing a small number of Senate and House seats in next year's midterms, the America Party could act as kingmaker on tight legislative votes. Third party 'a mistake' Both main parties have struggled in recent years to push through laws because of internal dissent. This week, Mr Trump's 'big, beautiful Bill' met resistance from within, with Mr Massie and Brian Fitzpatrick voting against it in the House, before it eventually passed. Democrats have faced similar challenges, notably when Senator Joe Manchin blocked key parts of Joe Biden's climate legislation in 2022. Political strategists suggest Mr Musk's party could most damage Republicans. Dafydd Townley, a US politics expert, told Newsweek: 'Third parties do not tend to have a long lifetime in American politics.' He added that the America Party 'would likely split the Republican vote, potentially resulting in a Democrat-dominated House of Representatives, at least in the short term, due to the winner-takes-all electoral system'. Mr Musk's move has also attracted attention from existing third parties. Steven Nekhaila, chairman of the Libertarian National Committee, urged Musk to join their party instead. 'Making a new third party would be a mistake,' he told Politico. 'The Libertarian Party is the most set-up party to be the dissident subversive party.' Anthony Scaramucci, Mr Trump's former communications chief but now a vocal critic of the president, said he wanted to meet Mr Musk to discuss the new venture. The unveiling of the America Party has damaged Tesla, which has suffered in the stock market ever since Mr Musk entered the political fray and backed Mr Trump's re-election bid with hundreds of millions of dollars in support. Azoria Partner, an investment firm, said it would postpone plans to invest in Tesla and encouraged its board to rein in Mr Musk. 'I encourage the board to meet immediately and ask Elon to clarify his political ambitions and evaluate whether they are compatible with his full-time obligations to Tesla as CEO,' James Fishback, Azoria's chief executive, said.
Daily Mail
16 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
The TACO President? Why I refuse to bet against Trump the deal maker - or his chances of reeling in the biggest prize of all...
The TACO President? Trump will Always Chicken Out? That's been the slur levelled by some financial traders amid the many twists and turns of the tariff wars waged by the 47th president against America's competitors. The big threats, the really big threats, simply never come true has been the claim. Take the plans for a gargantuan 145 per cent levy on Chinese goods. These have settled at an effective rate of around 30 per cent, which is serious, but not so very different from the 25 per cent charged on imports under the Biden administration. But no one is calling Trump a chicken after the extraordinary bombing mission that took out much of Iran 's nuclear processing capacity last month. Flying B2 stealth bombers loaded with 30,000lb 'bunker busting' bombs into the heart of Iran was truly audacious move and one that it was widely predicted no president would dare to make. In truth, however, the claim that Trump was the TACO president was always false – and that's because, even now, Trump's critics still have no idea about how he actually works. Why bomb Iran, at the risk of angering his own MAGA base? Why do it when serious experts were warning that even those giant payloads might not have been enough to seriously knock the mullahs off course? Iran is almost certain to acquire a nuclear bomb at some stage down the road. But when it comes to Trump, it's all about the deal, stupid. And the Middle East is a great example of the president at work. However intractable the war in Gaza might seem, Trump wants an end to it. Now wheels are in motion. Hamas and Israel are already talking in Doha. The Israeli Prime Minister is due in Washington this week and, although he's not yet landed, Benjamin Netanyahu already knows the terms. Trump bombed Iran and now Netanyahu must fulfil his part of the deal bring the hostilities to a close, even though to do so, could collapse his government - and place not just his political career but his liberty in jeopardy. Hence another Trump intervention: those extraordinary demands that Israel drop charges of bribery and fraud still faced by Netanyahu – which he denies. Unwarranted interference in the justice system of a friendly power? Another late-night rush of blood to the head by an insomniac president? No, a signal from Trump that an end to the Gazan bloodshed is imperative, even if that means Israel's Prime Minister avoids a trial. Perhaps it's a coincidence, but an Israeli court has just delayed the trial on undisclosed diplomatic and security grounds. Whatever the criticisms of Trump, he has a deep abhorrence of needless killing. And he is driven by this conviction: there has to be a deal to get the outcome that works all round, even if that means using threats, drama and brinkmanship. It's true, of course, that his play in the Middle East might not work – but there again, it might. And no one else has come close to striking at the heart of Iran or bringing Irael to heel. Sure, Trump didn't end the war in Ukraine on day one. Sure, the Israeli hostages have yet to be returned, despite his threats and promises. But if one thing was certain about his moribund predecessor, Joe Biden, it's that nothing at all was going to happen. With fire after fire breaking out in the world kitchen, meanwhile, someone has to act. Ukraine, China, the destructive forces of globalisation and immigration, the failure of the West to spend on defence… on these and many other issues, Trump has forced a conversation that simply wasn't taking place. Which means that however theatrical his initial boasts might have been, America is already in a better situation. There is also a personal stake for the arch deal maker - of course. Trump has made no secret of his wish for a Nobel Peace Prize, or his belief that he merits the award for his leadership in the Middle East. And however outlandish such a prospect might seem, I, for one, am unlikely to bet against it.
