Think before you ask: Why ChatGPT legal queries can be used against you as court evidence
Unlike lawyers, AI tools are not bound by confidentiality or ethical obligations. This means that sharing sensitive legal concerns with a chatbot doesn't just offer unreliable advice; it may also create a discoverable digital trail. Before you confide in AI, it is important to understand the risks and why human legal counsel is still essential.
Your ChatGPT conversations are not legally confidential
In a recent appearance on the
This Past Weekend
podcast hosted by comedian Theo Von, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman made a candid admission: conversations with ChatGPT are not protected under any kind of legal privilege.
"Right now, if you talk to a therapist or a lawyer or a doctor, there's legal privilege for it," Altman explained. "There's doctor-patient confidentiality, there's legal confidentiality. And we haven't figured that out yet for when you talk to ChatGPT.
" This means if you type out a sensitive legal scenario, say, describing an incident that might amount to a crime or seeking strategic legal advice, that chat can potentially be disclosed in court.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Libas Purple Days Sale
Libas
Undo
According to Altman, OpenAI could be legally compelled to hand over your conversations, even if they've been deleted.
The consequences of this are serious. Legal experts like Jessee Bundy from Creative Counsel have warned users not to mistake AI for actual legal representation. "If you're pasting in contracts, asking legal questions, or asking [the chatbot] for strategy, you're not getting legal advice," Jessee E.
Bundy
posted on X (formerly Twitter). "You're generating discoverable evidence. No attorney-client privilege. No confidentiality. No ethical duty. No one to protect you." She added that ChatGPT may feel private and helpful, but unlike a licensed attorney, it has no legal obligation to act in your best interest, and it can't be held accountable for any incorrect advice it generates.
AI-Generated legal advice isn't actually legal advice
When Malte Landwehr, CEO of an AI company,
suggested
that ChatGPT could still provide useful legal input even if it's not confidential, Bundy strongly pushed back.
'ChatGPT can't give you legal advice,' she replied. 'Legal advice comes from a licensed professional who understands your specific facts, goals, risks, and jurisdiction. And is accountable for it. ChatGPT is a language model. It generates words that sound right based on patterns, but it doesn't know your situation, and it's not responsible if it's wrong.'
Calling
it 'legal Mad Libs,' Bundy stressed that relying on ChatGPT for legal issues is both risky and potentially self-incriminating.
Deleted chats with AI aren't safe from legal scrutiny
User conversations with AI chatbots, including those that have been deleted, may still be stored and subject to disclosure in legal proceedings. As highlighted by ongoing litigation, some companies are required to retain chat records, which could be subpoenaed in court. This includes potentially sensitive or personal exchanges.
At present, there is no legal obligation for AI platforms to treat user chats as confidential in the same way communications with a lawyer or therapist are protected.
Until laws are updated to account for AI interactions, users should be aware that anything typed into a chatbot could, in some cases, be used as evidence.
Why it's best to speak with a human lawyer instead of ChatGPT
For legal concerns, whether it's about a contract, criminal matter, or a rights dispute, it's essential to consult a licensed professional. Unlike AI, lawyers are bound by strict confidentiality, legal privilege, and ethical duties. AI-generated responses may feel private and helpful, but they are not protected, verified, or accountable.
While it may be tempting to turn to AI for convenience, doing so for legal issues could expose you to unnecessary risk.
As artificial intelligence becomes more common in everyday use, it's important to recognise its limitations, especially in areas involving legal or personal stakes. Conversations with AI are not protected under legal privilege, and in the eyes of the law, they can be accessed like any other form of communication. Until privacy and legal frameworks are in place for AI, it's safest to avoid using chatbots for legal questions.
For advice you can trust and that will remain confidential, always consult a qualified legal professional.
Also Read:
Microsoft reveals AI chatbots are rapidly impacting 40 jobs like writers, translators and more; is yours on the list
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
27 minutes ago
- Indian Express
TCS layoffs signal rising strain on Indian IT as AI disruption, US economic woes trigger uncertainty
The recent decision by tech major Tata Consultancy Services (TCS) to lay off 2 per cent of its workforce highlights the growing pressures on India's IT sector, driven by the fast-paced adoption of new technologies like artificial intelligence (AI) and ongoing economic uncertainty in the US, a key market for Indian tech companies. In the first quarter of FY26, a considerable number of IT companies posted weak top-line performance and a squeeze in margins due to the tariff-related uncertainties. Last week, IT bellwether TCS said that it will be laying off 12,000 employees, which is 2 per cent of its global workforce. The move is going to impact employees from the mid and senior levels. Framed as a push toward building a 'future-ready generation' through 'skilling and redeployment,' TCS's move is, in effect, a sweeping cost-cutting exercise. Analysts warn that as the use of AI continues to grow across the IT industry, a significant number of jobs could be at risk. With AI increasingly taking over tasks that were once handled manually — such as coding, data analysis and customer support — companies are likely to reassess workforce needs, potentially leading to widespread layoffs. Experts also point out that roles involving repetitive or process-driven functions are especially vulnerable, unless employees upskill or transition into areas where human oversight and creativity remain essential. 'Aggregate headcount saw a modest quarter-on-quarter increase in Q1 FY26, but several IT companies announced workforce reductions,' BNP Paribas Securities India said in a report. 'TCS laid off nearly 2 per cent of its employees, while HCL Technologies is adjusting its talent deployment outside India, particularly scaling down in the automotive engineering and R&D segment. Wipro incurred a restructuring charge of Rs 247 crore linked to severance payouts in Europe.' Understandably, the employee retrenchment has started the debate of GenAI starting to impact the workforce, it said. The layoffs in the Indian IT sector are increasingly becoming common mainly due to skill mismatches and deployment challenges. 'With growing pressure to reduce costs and align talent with AI-driven models, tech majors are slowing fresher hiring and trimming staff, signalling a structural shift in workforce strategy,' said Arun Kailasan, research analyst – Fundamental Research, Geojit Investments Ltd. Rather than going for lateral hiring, IT firms are focusing on upskilling their existing workforce in emerging areas like AI and generative AI to take care of project execution going ahead. Besides AI, other important factors for layoffs in the IT sector are the macroeconomic headwinds in the US due to tariff-related uncertainty and delay in rate cuts by the US Federal Reserve, resulting in a slower execution of projects by clients. These factors will affect the margins of domestic IT companies. 'During our April 2025 earnings call, we had called out delays in decision-making and projects start with respect to discretionary investments. This trend has continued and intensified to some extent in this quarter,' TCS chief executive officer and managing director, K Krithivasan, said during the Q1 FY26 earnings call. 'Global businesses were disrupted due to conflicts, economic uncertainties and supply chain issues. We saw cost pressures in our customers causing previously unseen project pauses, deferrals and decision delays that resulted in less than expected revenue conversion,' he said. In its recent policy announced on July 30, the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) kept the interest rate unchanged at 4.25-4.5 per cent. 'At the beginning of the year, there was an expectation that the US Fed would reduce rates by 50-100 basis points. This cut has been consistently getting extended. When interest rates are high, spending in the US gets impacted, including on IT. This has a bearing on the contracts awarded to Indian IT firms,' said an analyst. Analysts say that due to weak demand, IT companies are likely to slow down their hiring in the near future. 'With muted demand and tighter budgets, companies are focusing on optimising existing talent rather than expanding headcount. Hiring remains subdued, while utilisation rates are rising and attrition has stabilised. The shift is towards value-based deployment and reskilling for AI-driven roles, setting the stage for long-term workforce transformation,' Kailasan of Geojit Investments said. IT analysts said that domestic IT companies are likely to see soft earnings for the rest of 2025 amid volatile and uncertain geopolitical conditions. 'The main challenge remains the slowdown in decision-making among major US clients,' said Ashish Gupta, chief investment officer at Axis Mutual Fund. 'There's a lot of uncertainty around the outlook—questions about retail spending, how consumers will respond to potentially higher interest rates, and whether the US economy can maintain its momentum. The broader economic picture remains unclear.' A report by Nuvama Research said that the demand environment is expected to remain challenging for the next one to two quarters for the IT sector due to the macro — tariff-related — uncertainty. 'In the near term, we expect lack of clarity on macro to continue until most of the trade deals are announced. In general, a large part of the impact of delays was felt in Q1 FY26. The second quarter of FY26 can have some residual impact of the delays. If there are no further delays, Q2 FY26 will be at least better than the first quarter,' said Sumit Pokharna, vice president (Fundamental Research), Kotak Securities. IT sector experts anticipate recovery in 2026 as clarity on the US tariffs emerges and potential rate cuts by the US Federal Reserve help revive demand.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Video: Built at Rs 422 crore, Patna's new double-deck flyover sinks just 2 months after inauguration
A portion of a newly inaugurated double-deck flyover in Patna has sunk following days of heavy rain in the city, causing concern about the quality of construction and the city's overall drainage system. The flyover, built at a cost of Rs 422 crore, was inaugurated on 11 June. Barely two months later, part of it has visibly dipped, reportedly due to incessant rain since Saturday night, as per TOI. The sunken section has triggered a flurry of complaints from residents and civic bodies have begun damage assessment. Explore courses from Top Institutes in Please select course: Select a Course Category Data Science Product Management Artificial Intelligence Technology Digital Marketing Leadership Public Policy Healthcare Data Science MBA MCA Data Analytics Project Management Operations Management Others Cybersecurity Design Thinking CXO healthcare Management Finance PGDM Degree others Skills you'll gain: Duration: 10 Months E&ICT Academy, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati CERT-IITG Prof Cert in DS & BA with GenAI India Starts on undefined Get Details Skills you'll gain: Duration: 11 Months E&ICT Academy, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati CERT-IITG Postgraduate Cert in AI and ML India Starts on undefined Get Details Skills you'll gain: Duration: 11 Months IIT Madras CERT-IITM Advanced Cert Prog in AI and ML India Starts on undefined Get Details Skills you'll gain: Duration: 10 Months IIM Kozhikode CERT-IIMK DABS India Starts on undefined Get Details Skills you'll gain: Duration: 30 Weeks IIM Kozhikode SEPO - IIMK-AI for Senior Executives India Starts on undefined Get Details — ANI (@ANI) by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Moose Approaches Girl At Bus Stop In Dhaka - Watch What Happens Happy in Shape Undo Heavy Rain Turns City into a Pool Due to continuous downpour, several parts of Patna are facing severe waterlogging. Drain water overflowed into residential areas, halting daily life and affecting traffic. Several roads, including Boring Road, Bailey Road, Khazanchi Road, and Exhibition Road, are under ankle- to waist-deep water. Tree branches fell, vehicles broke down on flooded roads, and traffic congestion worsened across the city. Civic workers are reportedly struggling to manage the drainage load. Live Events 'Drain Water Entered Our Homes,' Say Angry Residents In Ramnagri More, Vyas Nagar, locals are upset with the Patna Municipal Corporation (PMC). Rohit Kumar, a resident, told TOI, 'Water entered most homes here. We complained to the PMC , but nothing has been done. Some of our things are already ruined.' Several areas including Pataliputra Colony, Kankarbagh, and Rajendra Nagar saw repeated complaints about drainage failure. According to TOI, water even flooded hospitals, schools, shops, and car showrooms. One resident, Sunny Shah, alleged that car dealers on Exhibition Road were blocking drains with plastic waste. 'It's affecting all of Ward 37,' he told TOI. Ministers and Officials Rush for Damage Control As per TOI, road construction minister Nitin Nabin and municipal commissioner Animesh Kumar Parashar visited flooded areas on Sunday. Nabin instructed officers to work in 'alert mode' and fix all mechanical or electric faults in drainage systems quickly. 'With Ganga water rising, draining rainwater has become more difficult,' he said. He also ordered BUIDCo and civic teams to ensure uninterrupted electricity supply at sump houses. Commissioner Parashar told TOI that 19 quick response teams are monitoring flood-prone zones across Patna. 'Drainage is being carried out promptly despite heavy rain,' he said. Highway Blocked, Power Supply Hit In Khusrupur block, a large tree fell on the Patna–Bakhtiyarpur State Highway-106, blocking traffic for over two hours. The incident also disrupted electricity in nearby areas, adding to the city's misery. While the rain has exposed gaps in infrastructure, the sinking of a major flyover just weeks after its inauguration has left citizens demanding answers, and accountability. Inputs from TOI
Economic Times
2 hours ago
- Economic Times
Anthropic CEO fires back at NVIDIA's Jensen Huang sparking explosive AI ethics clash. Calls his words 'the most outrageous lie'
AP In a heated exchange, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei refuted NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang's claims about his stance on AI governance, calling them an "outrageous lie." Amodei advocates for responsible AI development, emphasizing safety and transparency, while Huang champions open innovation and market-driven progress. In a sharply worded rebuttal that adds heat to an already simmering Silicon Valley rivalry, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei has accused NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang of twisting his words and intentions on AI governance and safety. Speaking on the Big Technology Podcast , Amodei slammed Huang's claim that Anthropic believes only it should be allowed to develop advanced AI systems. 'That's the most outrageous lie I've ever heard,' Amodei said, visibly frustrated. 'I've said nothing that anywhere near resembles the idea that this company should be the only one to build the technology.' The comments come amid a widening philosophical divide in the tech world—between those calling for controlled, measured AI deployment and others advocating for open innovation at full throttle. — BigTechPod (@BigTechPod) The feud escalated after Jensen Huang publicly accused Amodei of advocating for exclusive control over AI development. During VivaTech 2025 in Paris, Huang told reporters, 'He thinks AI is so scary, but only they should do it,' referring to Amodei's lobbying for export controls on semiconductor technology and repeated warnings about AI's disruptive potential. Amodei has indeed sounded the alarm on AI's capacity to wipe out as much as 20% of entry-level white-collar jobs in the next five years—a prediction he shared with Axios earlier this year. Huang, on the other hand, has remained consistently upbeat, insisting AI will transform rather than destroy jobs. 'I pretty much disagree with almost everything he says,' Huang said at the summit. On the podcast, Amodei elaborated on what he calls a 'race to the top'—an approach he believes all AI developers should follow. 'When you have a race to the bottom, it doesn't matter who wins—everyone loses,' he said. 'With a race to the top, it doesn't matter who wins because everyone wins.' He pointed to Anthropic's transparent policies, such as their 'Responsible Scaling Policy' and open-access interpretability research, as proof that the company is not hoarding progress behind closed doors. Instead, he argued, these initiatives were designed to encourage safer practices across the entire industry. 'We've released our work so others can build on it,' Amodei said. 'Sometimes that means giving up commercial advantages—but it's worth it for the field to grow responsibly.' There may also be financial motivations at play in this war of words. Amodei's support for semiconductor export controls to China could hinder NVIDIA's massive chip sales, particularly in the AI boom where demand for powerful GPUs is soaring. Huang, whose company stands to lose billions if such restrictions tighten, has not held back his criticism of Amodei. Amodei, however, is adamant that the friction isn't about limiting competition but about fostering responsibility in an industry where mistakes can have global consequences. 'It's just an incredible and bad faith distortion,' he said of Huang's the race toward superintelligence intensifies, the dispute between Amodei and Huang highlights an essential question: who gets to define 'safe' in the age of AI? While Meta, OpenAI, Google, and Anthropic continue pushing the frontiers of artificial intelligence, the real divide may not lie in model sizes or compute power—but in values. Should AI be guided by market dynamics and open-source contributions, as Huang believes? Or does it need more control and caution, as Amodei argues?
