Rental bikes, cars causing accidents, killing taxi biz, scrap them: Goa minister Atanasio Monserrate
Goa's taxi owners and union leaders gathered in large numbers outside the Junta House to protest against the draft Goa Transport Aggregator Guidelines, 2025. Hundreds of them queued up to submit their objections against the guidelines, which they see as favouring app-based taxi firms such as Ola, Uber and Rapido.
While the taxi operators tried to put pressure on the transport department, ministers and local MLAs, revenue minister Atanasio 'Babush' Monserrate refused to buy into their argument. 'The rent-a-car and rent-a-bike operators are creating a nuisance. Today, all sorts of accidents are taking place, and people are dying because of rent-a-bike and rent-a-car. No one seems to be talking about it,' said Monserrate.
'Let us stop rental bikes and cars totally.'
App-based taxi services and cab aggregators will help streamline the taxi business, but the best solution would be to halt all rental vehicle services, which are 'killing the taxi business' for local Goans, he said after meeting taxi owners from Panaji, Taleigao and St Cruz.
'All parking spaces in Panaji have been occupied by rent-a-cab operators. It is the failure of the transport department.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
5 Books Warren Buffett Wants You to Read In 2025
Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List
Undo
The director should take care of this first. I challenge the transport department to look into this," said Monserrate.
Taxi operators said that their biggest concern about the aggregator policy is that it will eat into their business and reduce their income. The taxi operators also said that the app or an aggregator cannot guarantee customers in far-flung areas such as Sanguem and Bicholim.
Given the number of taxi operators lined up to submit their objections, the transport department set up a dedicated counter on the footpath outside the building to accept the inputs and suggestions.
'We have set a target to submit 6,000 to 8,000 representations. Our brothers will continue to submit their suggestions over the next two days,' said Chetan Kamat, a taxi operator.
Meanwhile, Monserrate urged the taxi operators to keep 'an open mind' and try out the taxi aggregators before rejecting the govt's proposals. 'Their apprehension is that they will not get business. Let the department tell them about the pros and cons,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
31 minutes ago
- Time of India
SC backs mother's right to gift self-acquired property to son
Hyderabad: In a ruling that strengthens the property rights of Hindu women, the Supreme Court has brought closure to a bitter family dispute by upholding a mother's decision to gift her self-acquired property to one of her sons. The apex court dismissed a special leave petition filed by her youngest son, who had challenged the validity of the gift deed on the grounds that the property was joint family property. At the heart of the dispute lies a prime three-storeyed residence in Jubilee Hills, spread across 1,182 square yards. The property was purchased in 1988 by Susheela Agarwal in her own name, a key fact that ultimately shaped the outcome of the legal battle. You Can Also Check: Hyderabad AQI | Weather in Hyderabad | Bank Holidays in Hyderabad | Public Holidays in Hyderabad Calling the verdict a landmark moment, advocate Dishit Bhattacharjee—representing the second son—said, "This judgment is a clear affirmation of women's autonomy over their property and a strong deterrent against baseless partition claims." In 2022, Susheela gifted the property through a registered deed to her eldest son. Her youngest son, Bajranglal Agarwal, objected, claiming that the property had been bought by their late father in the mother's name and that she had no independent means to finance such a purchase. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 15 Most Beautiful Female Athletes in the World Click Here Undo He sought a partition, asserting that the asset formed part of the joint family property. However, both the trial court and the Telangana high court summarily rejected the suit under Order VII, Rule 11 of the Civil Procedure Code, stating it failed to establish a valid cause of action and was barred under section 14(1) of the Hindu Succession Act. The high court bench, headed by Justice Moushumi Bhattacharya, observed that the petitioner had previously accepted his mother's authority over the property when she had drafted a will in August 2022, dividing it equally among her three sons. The twist came when the mother revised her will and executed a gift deed in December 2022, granting the entire property to her eldest son. While the second son respected her decision, the youngest son launched a legal challenge, reversing his earlier stance and contending that the property belonged to the joint family. During the proceedings, the mother's counsel produced clear documentation showing that the purchase in 1988 was made from her personal funds, with payments made via her own cheques—establishing her exclusive ownership. Invoking section 14(1) of the Hindu Succession Act, which grants Hindu women full ownership over property acquired by them, the courts consistently upheld her right to deal with the property as she pleased. With the Supreme Court's refusal to admit the appeal, the ruling now stands as final. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Friendship Day wishes , messages and quotes !
Time of India
42 minutes ago
- Time of India
HC stays govt notice on creation of STF police stns
1 2 Kolkata: A division bench of Calcutta High Court's Jalpaiguri circuit bench has stayed a Bengal govt gazette notification announcing the creation of two Special Task Force (STF) police stations and tying them up with two existing courts in two parts of the state. The state had set up the designated police stations — one in north Bengal and the other in south — to register FIRs and investigate offences under special acts like Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, Arms Act, Unlawful Activities Prevention Act and Prevention of Money Laundering Act. "The entire scheme of BNSS has been sought to be frustrated, prima facie" by such a notification, said a bench of justices Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya and Uday Kumar, ordering an interim stay on it till Sept 15 or until further orders. You Can Also Check: Kolkata AQI | Weather in Kolkata | Bank Holidays in Kolkata | Public Holidays in Kolkata "Access to justice is not a fancy right. If the notification is to be given force, then a person living in a remote area will never report an offence," Justice Bhattacharyya observed. The bench, however, held that FIRs already registered with the two STF police stations and the investigation thereafter would not be affected by the stay order but their fate shall depend on the outcome of the writ petition. The state, by a notification on Jan 31, created one STF police station at the STF HQ in Salt Lake for all south Bengal districts from Murshidabad to East Midnapore, other than areas under the jurisdiction of Kolkata Police, and the other at Ambikanagar in Siliguri for all north Bengal districts. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 5 Books Warren Buffett Wants You To Read in 2025 Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo By a subsequent notification on May 16, the govt tied up these police stations with the ACJM court, Bidhannagar and ACJM court, Siliguri. The additional advocate general pleaded that the executive action was well within the powers of state govt. However, the bench underscored the distinction between "local jurisdiction" of courts and determination of "local area" of police stations under BNSS. Having referred to the distinction, the bench held that the state had "picked and chosen" the local limits of police stations "at its whims". Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Friendship Day wishes , messages and quotes !
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Ex-Trump prosecutor Jack Smith under investigation for alleged illegal political activity; here's what you need to know
Jack Smith , the former special counsel who investigated then-candidate Donald Trump before his reelection to a second term, is now being investigated by federal officials. Following the reports by other news organizations, the investigation was confirmed on Saturday (August 2, 2025) by the Office of Special Counsel , an independent federal agency. Smith was named special counsel to investigate Trump by then-Attorney General Merrick Garland in November 2022. Explore courses from Top Institutes in Please select course: Select a Course Category others Healthcare Management healthcare Others Cybersecurity Product Management Leadership Technology Degree Data Science MCA Finance MBA Design Thinking Public Policy Artificial Intelligence Data Analytics Project Management Data Science CXO PGDM Digital Marketing Operations Management Skills you'll gain: Duration: 16 Weeks Indian School of Business CERT - ISB Cybersecurity for Leaders Program India Starts on undefined Get Details Trump and his Republican allies, including Sen. Tom Cotton, have, without offering evidence of wrongdoing, accused Smith of violating the Hatch Act , a federal law that bans certain public officials from engaging in political activity. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like The Best Method for a Flat Stomach After 50 (It's Genius!) Lulutox Undo Smith prosecuted two federal cases against Trump Smith prosecuted two federal cases against Republican candidate Trump in the lead-up to the November 2024 presidential election. Smith ultimately dropped the cases; neither one had gone to trial after Trump was reelected, which would have shielded him from prosecution according to longstanding Justice Department practice. Smith then subsequently resigned as special counsel. Live Events Cotton, R-Ark., on Wednesday asked the Office of Special Counsel to investigate Smith, alleging that his conduct was designed to help then-President Joe Biden and his vice president, Kamala Harris, both Democrats. Biden had dropped his bid for reelection following his disastrous performance in a campaign debate against Trump and tapped Harris to succeed him on the ticket. Trump won the election and returned to the White House for a second term. The New York Post was first to report on the investigation into Smith.
