Alabama House passes bill to allow Spirits ready-to-drink cocktails to be sold beside beer, wine
'Alabama consumers continue to seek out their favorite spirits ready-to-drink cocktails in grocery and convenience stores right alongside beer and wine,' Corey Staniscia, DISCUS vice president of state government relations, said. 'We applaud the House for taking another step in moving forward this consumer- and business-friendly measure that adds additional market access for adult spirits consumers in Alabama. We urge the Senate to take up and pass this measure to increase consumer convenience and keep the government out of picking winners and losers in the marketplace.'
Under current law, beer in Alabama can be sold in grocery and convenience stores along with wine and malt-based canned cocktails. Under this current law, spirits-based ready-to-drink cocktails are required to be sold at liquor stores.
HB 521 also lowers the tax rate for spirits ready-to-drink cocktails to $0.035, 'recognizing that these low-alcohol products should not carry the same tax rate as a full bottle of spirits,' the Distilled Spirits Council of the United States said.
The bill would also define a new category of ready-to-drink mixed liquor beverages containing no more than seven percent alcohol by volume, called 'mixed spirit beverages.'
You can read HB521, first read on April 3, and all it entails below:
Alabama-2025-HB521-IntroducedDownload
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indianapolis Star
21 minutes ago
- Indianapolis Star
Todd Young's political survival means never fully crossing Trump
Sen. Todd Young has been one of the most outspoken Republican critics of President Trump's tariff rollercoaster — within limits. "What I've been pushing for is more clarity so that our investors and businesses know when they can deploy capital and what return on investments they can project and all the rest of it," Young told NPR in April. Three months later, economic uncertainty reigns. Trump is still trying on new tariffs as casually as red ties and he's floating the idea of firing Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell over interest rates that are likely stuck in place because of the president's tariffs. Young's professed quest for clarity has stopped short of concrete action — even though he's the Republican senator you might most expect it from. Young opposed Trump's nomination for president, signed onto a bill to reassert congressional authority over tariffs and is a longtime advocate for congressional independence. Yet, when the Senate has taken up resolutions to push back against the president's tariff power, Young has voted with Trump. So far, Young's approach has turned out … fine. Tariffs are beginning to push prices up, but the overall effects have fallen far short of the worst-case scenarios that I and others have warned about. The economy's steady hum has justified Young's measured approach. Therein lies Young's tightrope act. He is balancing career aspirations against statesmanship, with no margin for error. He is betting on his own effectiveness, his reelection and America's resiliency under an erratic president. For Young to survive, all three elements must remain in equilibrium. Young's tolerance for the president's chaos is most maddening to Democrats and Never Trump Republicans who want to see Young use his power. Young is one of 53 Republican senators, a narrow majority that gives him an often consequential vote. He could pose a serious threat to Trump's agenda. He'd also be burning down his Senate career. Young almost certainly will face a Trump-friendly Republican primary challenge in 2028 when he'll make his case to Indiana voters who have overwhelmingly supported the president. MAGA Republicans will seize on Young's history of disloyalty, even though he has more recently positioned himself as a "team player" for Trump. With every Trump act that Young might oppose, the senator has to weigh the short-term efficacy of standing up to the president against the long-term gains he believes he can make as a behind-the-scenes policy grinder in the Senate. Young is focused on preserving and implementing the CHIPS and Science Act, a crucial Biden-era law to bring microchip manufacturing to the U.S. He wants to build more ships in America. He's warning that the U.S. is at risk of losing a biotechnology race with China and urging his colleagues to make it a higher priority. Briggs: Jim Banks would let Trump commit any crime you can imagine As I've written before, these are not the types of issues that land politicians on cable news, but it is the work that drives Young to keep going — presumably beyond 2028. "I'm motivated to try and get more big things done and inclined to keep trying to do that for a while," Young told me during a recent conversation. If Young directly challenges Trump on tariffs, or pretty much anything else, he could lose allies and become less productive on policy work. He'd also give fuel to Republican adversaries who'd like to further weaken his already damaged reelection prospects. If you view Young from outside the confines of MAGA, you can argue that principles should drive him toward courageous self-inflicted obsolescence. But you can just as easily argue that something would be lost if Young went down. Briggs: Mike Braun's tuition freeze for Indiana colleges is a marketing gimmick Young is navigating a political movement that has claimed the careers of so many other moderate Republicans. If he outlasts Trump, he could be the sole survivor in the tradition of former Sen. Richard Lugar. Young has sacrificed neither his conscience nor his influence. Would Young throw away his career, his future, to take a stand against Trump? What line would Trump have to cross? Young has maneuvered through six months of Trump's second term without showing his cards on those questions. Unlike so many other Republicans, Young remains upright, still keeping his balance.
Forbes
3 hours ago
- Forbes
From Side Hustle To Paycheck: Why Employers Are Hiring You For Your Passion Projects In 2025
In 2025, side hustles aren't just for extra cash – they're becoming a gateway to full-time jobs. With over half of Gen Z and Millennials juggling passion projects alongside day jobs, employers are starting to take notice. What once raised eyebrows in interviews is now opening doors, as recruiters increasingly view side hustles as signals of initiative and market-ready skills. This shift marks a new chapter in how hiring managers evaluate candidates. Resume gaps are being filled with freelance gigs, Etsy shops, personal podcasts, and YouTube channels. Here's why employers in 2025 are hiring you because of your side hustle, not in spite of it. 1. Side projects signal skill in action Your side hustle isn't just a hobby – it's evidence that you can turn an idea into something real. Whether you've launched a design portfolio on Behance, grown a niche newsletter, or taught yourself to code through late-night projects, recruiters are paying attention to what you've built. This aligns with a larger hiring trend: employers are focusing less on where you studied and more on what you can do. According to Deloitte's 2025 Gen Z and Millennial Survey, nearly 70% of Gen Z and 59% of Millennials say they regularly develop new skills outside of formal employment – often through personal initiatives. Passion projects show you can do much more than just follow instructions. 2. Gen Z and Millennials are leading the charge Side hustles are practically second nature to younger workers. Recent data shows that 57% of Gen Z and 50% of Millennials maintain a side hustle – far more than older generations. According to Intuit, nearly two-thirds of these workers plan to keep side gigs long-term, and 49% say their primary motivation is 'to be their own boss.' Another 42% say it's about following their passions. This shift isn't just economic – it's cultural. For Gen Z especially, building something of your own, whether it earns £50 or £5,000 a month, reflects identity, resilience, and drive. Employers attuned to this mindset see side hustles as proof of leadership and self-motivation – the very traits missing from many traditional aren't just isolated efforts – as explored in this recent Forbes article, some combinations of side hustles are earning Gen Z and Millennials thousands per month while building highly transferable career skills. In 2025, passion projects like newsletters, podcasts, and creative side gigs are becoming powerful ... More assets in the hiring process – not just hobbies. 3. Employers see passion and initiative In the past, hiring managers might have seen side hustles as distractions. In 2025, that mindset is fading fast. As one recruiter told Newsweek, 'For me, having a side hustle is what gives me confidence even in a tough job market.' Recruiters surveyed by GMAC via BusinessBecause also found that 61% of employers perceive Gen Z business-school graduates as just as professional as their predecessors – suggesting that personal projects don't harm credibility, they enhance it. A well-documented side hustle offers real‑world experience and authenticity, showing you live your values and practice skills outside corporate structures. 4. The gig economy mindset is reshaping full-time roles Younger professionals – especially Gen Z – are increasingly adopting a gig-style approach even in traditional jobs. A recent Investopedia piece notes that this generation is drawn to autonomy and varied income streams, with many building side incomes to maintain flexibility and independence. Add to that Deloitte's data: nearly 70% of Gen Z and 59% of Millennials develop new skills outside formal work, often via self-driven projects. And Intuit found 49% pursue side hustles to 'be their own boss' – signalling that a portfolio approach is not a fallback, but a career strategy. 5. Even seasoned professionals are jumping in Side hustles aren't just for early-career creatives or Gen Z TikTokers. Across industries, experienced professionals are picking up passion projects that reflect changing values – and the job market is embracing it. reports that 52% of Millennials now manage side hustles alongside their full-time jobs. From media lawyers running photography businesses to lab technicians monetising niche blogs, more workers are merging purpose with pay – and some are even being recruited because of it. For employers, this hybrid profile – entrepreneurial and purpose-driven – is increasingly attractive in fast-moving industries. These 'polyworkers' are motivated not just by money, but by growth, exploration, and future resilience. Even if burnout is a risk, many see the benefits – diversified income, skill development, and a stronger personal brand – as worth it. 6. How to showcase your side hustle in a job search If you want your side hustle to help land your next role, be intentional in how you present it: Your passion project could be your best career move As the hiring landscape evolves, the line between resume experience and personal projects continues to blur. In 2025, employers aren't just asking what you've done: they're asking what you've built. Gen Z is reshaping the world of work in bold, entrepreneurial ways – from side hustles to micro-career pivots – as highlighted in this recent Forbes trend report. And for employers, these self-starters are becoming the most compelling hires of all.
CNN
6 hours ago
- CNN
‘We learned some lessons': How Chuck Schumer and Democrats are gearing up for the next funding fight with Trump
Democrats will soon face a significant test of their willingness to take on President Donald Trump with a fall funding deadline fast-approaching. And this time, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer doesn't want to become his party's bogeyman. Months after a contentious fight that put him at the center of anti-Trump Democratic outrage, Schumer is already taking steps to avoid, once again, being put in an impossible position between Democratic voters gunning for an ugly shutdown fight with Trump and his party's long-time stance that Democrats should fund the government. This time, they don't want to find themselves with little leverage to get out of a government shutdown with a Republican president. Members say Schumer's strategy is to start laying the groundwork early for what will be a contentious and unpredictable post-August recess with the hope of avoiding the 'Democrats in disarray' narrative that plagued the party in the spring. 'We learned some lessons on what to do and not to do,' one Democratic senator said of the difference between now and the March funding fight. 'Schumer's working on trying to find a path that unifies us.' On Tuesday, Democrats held a lengthy caucus-wide meeting on the path ahead and the Senate minority leader met with his House counterpart, Hakeem Jeffries, later in the day. Members and aides caution there is no formal plan yet for how to tackle Democrats' next showdown with Trump, but it's clear Schumer wants to shield his party from the intense backlash it faced from their voters in March – and avoid his own black eye in the process. Finding consensus, however, won't be easy nor is it a guarantee in a diverse caucus where just nine members joined Schumer in voting with Republicans in March to keep the government open. Since then, Democrats' reasons for challenging Trump have only grown. Republicans passed a massive tax and spending cuts bill that included historic slashes to Medicaid and food programs with just GOP votes. Republicans also voted last week to claw back $9 billion in federal funds for foreign aid and public broadcasting that had already been appropriated by Congress. 'Here's where I am. Unless the Republicans agree to a no rescissions clause, a vote on an appropriations bill is a fake,' Sen. Angus King, an independent who caucuses with Democrats, told CNN. King was among those in the caucus who voted with Schumer and the GOP to keep the government open, but now King says he has not decided yet if he'd be willing to do that again in the fall. 'Why vote for an appropriation bill if two weeks from now they can submit a rescissions package and undo everything that is in the bill?' King asked. 'Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me. I am not going to be fooled twice.' The challenge for Democrats is that they are finding themselves between two realities. On the one hand, Office of Management and Budget Director Russ Vought and conservatives on Capitol Hill are signaling a willingness for steeper budget cuts that reflect the massive slashes from Trump's Department of Government Efficiency. On the other, Senate Democrats are also working cooperatively with Republicans on the appropriations panel to pass several of the bills to fund military and veterans, agriculture and the legislative branch with broad bipartisan support. And they realize that if the government does shut down –- they may not have the leverage to reopen it. 'There is a real tension between Russ Vought and OMB and the rescissions vote, which are going right at a stable, steady appropriations process and what has been happening on committee so far,' Delaware Sen. Chris Coons, the top Democrat on the Defense appropriations subcommittee, said. Tuesday night, most Senate Democrats joined Republicans on a procedural vote to advance the military and veterans spending bill on the floor, and Schumer signaled that Democrats don't want to stand in the way of advancing bipartisan spending bills that his members have worked hard on. But, there is still a number of factors outside of Schumer's control. For one, House Republicans will manage their appropriations process. Already, conservatives are laying the groundwork for a full revolt if Speaker Mike Johnson tries to move ahead with a stopgap government funding measure known as a continuing resolution rather than passing all 12 individual spending bills. And even if the House could pass the dozen bills with their tight majority, they would many are likely to be nonstarters in the Senate where Republicans need 60 votes to advance their bills. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries signaled this week that Democrats were in no mood to help Republicans pass those bills. 'It's my expectation that if Republicans tried to jam a highly partisan spending bill down the throats of the American people here in the House we'll reject it,' the New York Democrat said when asked by CNN if he would take the same tactic as last year in rejecting GOP spending bills. 'At the end of the day, Republicans control the trifecta,' Sen. Mark Warner, a Democrat, said of the unpredictability of the next few months for the party. In March, Schumer defended his decision to vote with Republicans to keep the government open. He argued that not doing so would give Trump more power, not less. And he downplayed the divisions within his ranks even as some members openly clashed with him over his decision. But in recent weeks, Schumer has signaled he's open to preparing a number of options depending on how the spending talks unfold, and Democratic members say he has been deeply engaged for weeks on how to manage the September fight. The minority leader held an impromptu press conference last week assailing comments from Vought that the appropriations process should be more partisan going forward. On the floor, Schumer warned Republicans that any passage of a spending cuts package with just GOP votes would poison the well for the September funding talks. Sen. Tim Kaine, a Democrat who voted against the stopgap funding bill in March, told CNN that Schumer clearly has taken lessons from the spring and carried them forward to this moment. 'I definitely know in the aftermath of that, he called all 47 of us. We were on recess the following week, he called all 47. What do you think? What should we do differently next time? I mean he's been very diligent in trying to seek advice and then also engage in significant discussions in the caucus about CRs and spending battles,' Kaine said. There are signs that some Senate Democrats – even those who were willing to vote for a stopgap measure to keep the government open last time – aren't as willing to repeat the move. A number of Democrats are also clamoring for Republicans to put in writing that any spending deal they agree to won't be reversed later with a GOP-only package to pull back funding for programs they don't like. 'I don't understand what it means to negotiate an appropriations deal with Republicans unless they have put in writing that there will be no rescissions and no impoundment,' Sen. Elizabeth Warren, a Massachusetts Democrat, said. But Democrats like Sen. Jeanne Shaheen, who voted with Schumer to keep the government open in the Spring, warned the most important thing is that Republicans and Democrats in the Senate agree that they, not the executive branch, should be making the spending calls. 'This really shouldn't be a partisan issue. It's a which branch of government are you in and what kind of oversight to you want to have over the executive?' she said. As for what Democrats learned from the spring fight, Shaheen offered one piece of guidance that she thinks Schumer is exercising now. 'I think in terms of lessons learned, I think the big lesson was we should have talked about it sooner and made it clear sooner what we thought was important to do.' In the House, some Democrats are also warning that early talk of a funding plan may help manage expectations from Democratic voters. 'A lot of people are looking for that silver bullet or that hidden stake that is going to take out Trump. Standing up on the appropriations bill is not going to be that,' Rep. Adam Smith, a Democrat from Washington, said. As for the GOP, many Republicans argue it's up to Democrats to decide how contentious the next eight weeks will be. 'Democrats need to decide do you want a deal? Do you want a shut down? Do you want a CR? What do you want to do? It's really not our choice,' House Appropriations Chairman Tom Cole said. 'I think a shutdown is a losing game for them. They should have learned that last time, but they beat up poor Chuck Schumer when he did the right thing, kept the government open and accepted the CR.'
