Santander axes 2,000 jobs and warns more cuts are possible
He told the PA news agency there 'might well be' more job cuts on the way by the end of 2025 as the bank continues its restructure.
But he said it was too early to say what impact the £2.65 billion deal recently announced by its Spanish owner to buy UK rival TSB would have on jobs and branches.
His comments came as the group reported a 5% fall in pre-tax profits to £764 million for the first six months of 2025, with provisions for liabilities and charges up 74% to £249 million, driven by 'higher transformation-related charges'.
The group announced last October it was axing more than 1,400 jobs across the UK bank in 2024 and has since warned around another 750 jobs were at risk after revealing in March that it was closing another 95 branches and reducing hours at 50 sites.
Mr Regnier told PA: 'Transformation is not a one-off thing.
'Whilst we have done a lot over the past year, our transformation journey will need to continue.'
He said the group would try to avoid compulsory redundancies where possible and added there were no immediate plans for further branch closures.
There has been speculation over whether Banco Santander's deal to buy TSB from Spanish rival Sabadell would lead to further job cuts and branch closures, with the tie-up expected to lead to at least £400 million in cost savings.
Mr Regnier said the group had 'made no decisions around branches because we are still waiting to complete the deal'.
But he said the takeover 'accelerates our transformation, allowing us to enhance our customer proposition and invest more in innovative products and our digital offering'.
The takeover is expected to complete in the first quarter of 2026.
Santander is also awaiting the outcome of a crucial Supreme Court judgment on the car finance commission scandal on Friday, which is set to have a bearing on the Financial Conduct Authority's plans for a compensation scheme.
The bank put by a £295 million provision in 2024 for the affair, which it said 'continues to reflect the Santander UK group's best estimate'.
But it cautioned the outcome could have to change following the judgment.
The group said: 'Santander UK will consider the outcome of the Supreme Court judgment and any subsequent steps the Financial Conduct Authority proposes to take once known, which could lead to a change in the value of the provision.
'As such, the ultimate financial impact could be materially higher or lower than the amount provided.'
Its half-year results showed mortgage loans were flat at £167.2 billion in the first half, though the bank expects a 'gradual return' to net mortgage lending in 2025, adding its pipeline was good heading into the second half.
The wider Banco Santander group reported record net income of 6.8 billion euros (£5.9 billion) for the first half, but revealed a 467 million euro (£403 million) charge for its Brazilian arm due to the country's economic outlook.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scottish Sun
13 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Fears Pep Guardiola's ‘imminent' divorce could hurt Man City as boss' relationship with wife continues to deteriorate
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) PEP Guardiola's divorce is set to be finalised 'imminently'. The Manchester City boss and wife Cristina Serra had hoped to keep their split friendly, but sources say there is now 'more urgency' as their relationship has deteriorated. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 5 Manchester City manager Pep Guardiola and his wife Cristina Serra are expected to finalise their divorce Credit: Getty 5 Pep's marriage woes coincided with his worst slump as a manager Credit: Getty 5 Pep with wife Cristina and daughter Maria at Wimbledon in 2024 Credit: AP Pep's marriage woes, reported by The Sun in January, coincided with his worst slump as a manager. And there are fears the troubles could overshadow the start of the new season. The Spaniard has already vowed to leave the Etihad after his contract runs out in 2027, saying he needs to 'focus on myself'. Insiders said his relationship with estranged wife Cristina has moved from 'friendly to cordial' amid 'complicated negotiations'. They expect details to be finalised in weeks and made official as early as next month. Respected Spanish journalists Laura Fa and Lorena Vazquez, who broke the story of their split, insisted there is no way back. Fa said: 'The signing of this divorce is going to be imminent. Evidently their relationship sentimentally has come to an end.' Vazquez said: 'The relationship has ceased to be friendly and has become cordial. We're not saying there's tension between them but the break-up has moved on to another level. 'There's perhaps more urgency to set a date for the end of this relationship.' Pep, 54, and Cristina, 52, have been together for 30 years and wed in 2014. Man City boss Pep Guardiola visits his new business venture Monarka Clinic Cristina, who runs her own fashion business, had failed to settle in Manchester and returned to Spain five years ago. Sources said they agreed to part in December just weeks after he penned a new contract. Cristina told friends it was the last straw. Pep refused to give up and when news of the split broke he was seen emerging from a team hotel still wearing his wedding ring. In March he flew to Barcelona for three days at the couple's £8.5million home. The estranged couple even hired the same lawyer in a bid to avoid a messy courtroom battle. Last month they joined kids Maria, 24, and Marius, 22, at the Oasis gig in Heaton Park. But there were no pictures of them together. Influencer Maria kept her mum's presence a closely-guarded secret by posting only photos of her and Pep at the concert. 5 Guardiola and his family recent attended an Oasis concert in Manchester, pictured with Richard Ashcroft Credit: x
Times
16 hours ago
- Times
Common sense has triumphed over compensation culture
Millions of motorists will not be able to claim car finance compensation after a landmark Supreme Court ruling on Friday. Judges rejected two out of the three cases that argued car dealers should have told customers about commission paid when they took out loans. It cannot be overstated how significant this ruling was — and how relieved Rachel Reeves will be. An enormous redress scheme — which could have opened the floodgates to compensation claims worth up to £44 billion — would have seriously tarnished the reputation of our financial services industry. It would also have made Britain a less desirable place to invest and damaged the growth that we so need. Yet ultimately it would have been you, the consumer, footing the bill through higher interest rates. The investigation into car finance mis-selling was initially focused on drivers whose car dealer had increased their interest rate to earn a bigger fee, charging something known as discretionary commission — a practice that was banned in 2021. But since the three cases went to the Supreme Court, there have been concerns that a ruling in favour of all of them would have allowed millions of drivers to claim for compensation. Friday's verdict means that only those who have genuinely been treated unfairly will be able to make a claim. The government has said it will work with regulators to unpack the Supreme Court's ruling and its impact on consumers, banks and the car industry. • I want to overpay my car finance, but Santander won't let me We have seen many commission-linked scandals over the years. Payment protection insurance (PPI) was a worthless product flogged to simply make money. Same with credit card cover. Mis-sold annuities, pensions and with-profits funds were all driven by salespeople's desire to make vast sums by giving bad advice that was often life-destroying. But can commission on car finance really be compared with these scandals? Hardly. This commission was linked to the sale of a car — a product used by the owner. Not once, not twice, but often every day, year in, year out. Most of these drivers didn't get a bad deal. They bought cars they liked on deals that were good and hassle-free. Not many drivers would have £50,000 lying around to buy a new car; loans allowed them to get behind the wheel of something new, while keeping payments affordable — and you can swap cars every few years. • UK litigation boom mainly benefits lawyers, insurers and funders Car finance has become a big business — more than nine in ten new cars are bought this way. New lending was worth £39.7 billion in the 12 months to May 2025 — up from £20 billion in 2008. I don't believe for a second that everyone who took out car finance suffered with buyer's remorse — especially those who weren't subject to discretionary commission. Redress is to compensate for a loss but have all these drivers really suffered a loss? The court ruling means that only those who have genuinely been mis-sold will be able to make a claim. If people have been ripped off, it's only right that they get compensation. But if you've been happy with your deal, should you really claim compensation? Surely most people know that the car salesman will get something in return for selling you a loan? 'I wouldn't have got car finance if I knew the salesman got commission' — said no one. If the Supreme Court had ruled in favour of all three cases it would have come at a great expense. The cost of compensation would have pushed up the price of loans. Small and medium-sized car loan firms may also have disappeared, leading to less competition and higher rates. And what would have happened to the car industry, largely propped up by these loans? If we haven't got car finance, what options do people have? You can buy a car with cash. But not all drivers have that kind of money, and it's often not a smart way to use your money if you do — new cars lose up to 20 per cent of their value the moment they're driven off the forecourt. You can, of course, buy a used car. But second-hand cars come with their own issues — they may not have a warranty and they could end up being expensive if they need lots of repairs. This sorry saga has highlighted a shocking compensation culture that Britain has managed to nurture in the wake of the PPI scandal. It's welcome news that common sense has prevailed. Ultimately, consumers will be the ones to benefit.
Glasgow Times
16 hours ago
- Glasgow Times
Renewables and fossil fuels not ‘either-or', says Reeves after Trump comments
On a visit to Lossiemouth on the North Sea coast in Moray, the Chancellor described oil and gas as 'incredibly important for the UK and our energy security'. Her appearance in Scotland followed a five-day visit from the US president, who called on the UK Government to 'incentivise the drillers, fast'. Chancellor Rachel Reeves said 'oil and gas is going to play an important role in our energy mix for decades to come' (Jane Barlow/PA) Mr Trump wrote on Truth Social: 'North Sea oil is a treasure chest for the United Kingdom. 'The taxes are so high, however, that it makes no sense.' Asked whether she would 'unlock' the 'treasure chest', Ms Reeves told the PA news agency: 'Oil and gas are incredibly important for the UK and our energy security. 'And oil and gas is going to play an important role in our energy mix for decades to come. 'It's why, alongside the private sector, we're investing in carbon capture and storage, which is absolutely essential for supporting energy intensive industries. 'But it's not either-or. 'At the same time, we're investing in clean homegrown energy, including at Berwick Bank in Scotland, which will create thousands of new jobs and power millions of homes. 'And that's what we need to do to make sure that our economy has this energy security that we need, that we bring down bills and bring more good jobs to Scotland.' US President Donald Trump was critical of wind farms during his visit to Scotland (Jane Barlow/PA) Berwick Bank in the North Sea has this week received a green light from the Scottish Government. The proposed wind farm, off the coast of East Lothian, could add more than 4.1 gigawatts of capacity, which according to developer SSE Renewables is enough electricity to power more than six million homes annually. But Mr Trump criticised existing wind farms during his visit, when he said: 'When we go to Aberdeen, you'll see some of the ugliest windmills you've ever seen, the height of a 50-storey building.' Gesturing with his hands, he added: 'You can take 1,000 times more energy out of a hole in the ground this big.' Conservative shadow Scottish secretary Andrew Bowie has written to Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, calling for a review of policies affecting the oil and gas industry. 'As President Trump has said, the UK's 'very high' tax on oil and gas companies is a deterrent to investment,' he wrote. Following his flying visit to Aberdeenshire with President Trump earlier this week, I've written to the Prime Minister urging him to heed the calls of all those he met on the EPL, overturn ban on licenses, ensure a future for our region & secure Britain's energy 👇 — Andrew Bowie (@AndrewBowie_MP) August 1, 2025 'The extension of the energy profits levy (EPL), coupled with uncertainty around future licensing and investment signals, has created a climate of instability that threatens jobs, innovation and the region's economic resilience. 'President Donald Trump's remarks during your visit – calling Aberdeen the 'oil capital of Europe' and urging the UK to 'bring it back' – reflect a sentiment shared by many in the region. 'May I urge you to consider the president's call to 'incentivise' domestic production of hydrocarbons? 'Oil and gas still have a vital role to play in our energy mix and economic future; British people would rather see the UK benefit from domestic exploration and drilling than import more from Norway and Qatar.' The West Aberdeenshire and Kincardine MP added: 'Will you urgently call a meeting in Downing Street to conduct the review in partnership with industry leaders, our world-leading supply chain business, and the local workforce to ensure a coherent and sustainable path forward?'
