MMA star Conor McGregor loses appeal in rape civil case
Image: Jim Watson/AFP
Mixed martial arts fighter Conor McGregor lost an appeal in Ireland on Thursday over a civil court ruling last year awarding damages to a woman who accused him of rape.
Three judges at the Court of Appeal in Dublin dismissed all the grounds for appeal raised by McGregor, 36.
Jurors at Dublin's High Court in November awarded damages of almost 250,000 euros ($258,000) to Nikita Hand, 35, who alleged that McGregor raped her in a hotel in the Irish capital in 2018.
The court heard allegations that McGregor "brutally raped and battered" Hand. The Irish sports star has insisted they had consensual sex.
Get your news on the go, click
here to join the IOL News WhatsApp channel.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
However Hand lost an assault lawsuit against a second man.
Following the November ruling, McGregor was ordered to pay the entire costs of the case, estimated at around 1.5 million euros ($1.58 million).
He appealed the jury's decision, seeking a re-trial of the civil case against him.
McGregor, a vocal figure in the Irish anti-immigration movement who in March met US President Donald Trump in the White House during a Saint Patrick's Day visit, was not in court during a month of appeal hearings.
His legal team argued that judicial errors occurred in the original trial, including in how he was cross-examined.
After the ruling, Hand told reporters that the appeal had "retraumatised" her but that she can now "finally move on and try to heal".
"To every survivor out there, I know how hard it is, but please don't be silenced, you deserve to be heard, you also deserve justice," she said.
Nicknamed "The Notorious," McGregor is one of the biggest stars in the history of the Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) mixed martial arts circuit, formerly holding the featherweight and lightweight titles.
The Irishman was sued in a US court in January, accused of sexual assault at an NBA game in Miami in 2023.
He has announced plans to run in Ireland's presidential election this year.
The vote to elect the country's next president – a largely ceremonial role without executive power – must be held by mid-November but he faces a number of steep hurdles to get on the ballot.
AFP
Get your news on the go, click
here to join the IOL News WhatsApp channel.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
8 hours ago
- IOL News
Western Cape High Court overturns fraud convictions against Good Hope Construction sole member
Ridwaan Rajah has been acquitted of charges against him Image: File Ridwaan Rajah, the sole member of Good Hope Plasterers CC trading as Good Hope Construction, has been acquitted of fraud, theft, and perjury following an appeal to the Western Cape High Court. The judgment, delivered on 12 September 2024, set aside the earlier convictions handed down by the Bellville Specialised Commercial Crimes Court. According to court papers, the charges stem from a 2010 contract between Good Hope Construction and the National Department of Public Works (DPW) to renovate buildings in the parliamentary precinct. As part of the project, Good Hope Construction appointed Winlite Aluminium Windows and Doors as a subcontractor to construct four curtain screens. The DPW agreed to make an advance payment of R519,037.90 for materials to be held offsite by Winlite, subject to a guarantee being provided. Court records show that Winlite was paid R467,131.11 by Good Hope Construction, with a 10% retention applied in line with common building industry practice. However, Winlite failed to complete the work and was subsequently liquidated. The DPW later omitted the advance payment from the final statement of account. In 2015, Good Hope Construction approached the High Court to compel the DPW to include the advance in the final account. The court granted the order by agreement, and the DPW paid the outstanding amount. Following a Special Investigating Unit (SIU) probe under Presidential Proclamation R54 of 2014, criminal charges were brought against Rajah and his company. The State alleged that Rajah misrepresented facts in the affidavit submitted during the civil application and that the second payment constituted theft. According to the High Court judgment, the State's case relied heavily on the testimony of the SIU's forensic investigator, Samuel Adams, who later conceded under cross-examination that a key invoice (Exhibit V) confirmed the payment had indeed been for materials held offsite. Adams also testified that, had he been aware of this invoice earlier, the investigation would not have proceeded. The High Court found that the State had failed to call witnesses with direct knowledge of the final account or to provide evidence proving criminal intent. It further noted that the DPW had not opposed the 2015 application and had agreed to the payment, which was legally ordered by the High Court. The court ruled that the retention of 10% by the contractor was in line with the subcontract agreement and not unlawful. The judgment emphasised that the Regional Court had misdirected itself by failing to consider the full evidentiary context and by relying on incorrect assumptions about contractual obligations and construction industry norms. The appeal court concluded that the State had not proven its case beyond a reasonable doubt and that the versions presented by the appellants were reasonably possibly true. The appeal was upheld and all convictions were set aside. Weekend Argus
The South African
13 hours ago
- The South African
Limpopo pig farmer's trial postponed as accused turns witness
The High Court in Polokwane postponed the trial of three men to Thursday. The state accuses them of murdering two women and dumping their bodies in a pigsty on a Limpopo farm. Limpopo pig farmer Zachariah Olivier, farm supervisor Rudolph de Wet, and Zimbabwean national William Musora face charges of murder, attempted murder, defeating the ends of justice, illegal possession of a firearm, and unlawful possession of ammunition. Musora faces an additional charge under the Immigration Act. The state alleges the men shot and killed Maria Makgato and Lucia Ndlovu in August last year at Onverwacht farm, outside Polokwane. A third woman reportedly escaped. The victims had allegedly gone to the farm to collect expired food for the pigs. According to the prosecution, the accused dumped the women's bodies in a pigsty, where the pigs consumed them. During brief court proceedings on Monday, 20-year-old De Wet, a supervisor on the farm, turned state witness under Section 204. His lawyer, Muhammed Farouk Valjee, told the court that De Wet will testify that Olivier fatally shot the women and forced him, under duress, to dispose of their bodies. The state is expected to withdraw charges against De Wet once he gives his testimony. Olivier and Musora, aged 60 and 50 respectively, remain in custody and have yet to enter their pleas. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
eNCA
17 hours ago
- eNCA
Brazil judge puts ex-president Bolsonaro under house arrest
BRAZIL - A Brazilian judge on Monday placed former president Jair Bolsonaro under house arrest for breaking a social media ban, escalating a dramatic standoff between the court and the politician, who is accused of plotting a coup. Bolsonaro is on trial at the Supreme Court for allegedly plotting to cling onto power after losing 2022 elections to President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva. President Donald Trump has sought to punish Brazil, a longtime US ally, for what he sees as a politically motivated "witch hunt" targeting Bolsonaro by imposing eye-watering tariffs on Latin America's biggest economy. The 70-year-old Bolsonaro is banned from social media for the duration of the proceedings, and third parties are barred from sharing his public remarks. But on Sunday, his allies defied the order by sharing footage online of a call between the former army captain and his eldest son Flavio at a solidarity rally in Rio de Janeiro. Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes reacted furiously, declaring that the judiciary would not allow a defendant to "treat it like a fool" because of his "political and economic power." Criticizing Bolsonaro's "repeated failure" to comply with the court's restrictions on him during the trial, he placed him under house arrest at his home in the capital Brasilia. He also barred the country's former leader (2019-2022) from receiving visitors, apart from his lawyers, and from using mobile phones, and warned that any new transgression would lead to him being detained. Several mobile phones were seized at his home on Monday, the police said. The new restrictions were expected to be met with fury in Washington. Writing on X, Bolsonaro's politician son Eduardo Bolsonaro, who successfully lobbied Washington to take punitive action against Brazil over the case, declared: "Brazil is no longer a democracy." He called Moraes, who is presiding over Bolsonaro's trial and has styled himself a defender of Brazilian democracy in the face of the far right, an "out-of-control psychopath." Last month, Moraes ordered Bolsonaro to wear an ankle bracelet and instituted the social media ban. Trump responded in unprecedented fashion by banning Moraes from the United States and freezing his assets in US banks. - 'Thank you Trump' - AFP | Sergio Lima Trump's pressure campaign has angered many Brazilians but endeared him to Bolsonaro's conservative base. At rallies in Rio, Brasilia and Sao Paulo on Sunday, some demonstrators waved US flags or held signs reading "Thank you Trump." Bolsonaro himself did not attend the rallies, having been ordered by the Supreme Court to stay home at night and at weekends throughout the trial. Prosecutors say he and seven co-accused tried to overturn his 2022 election defeat in a plot that only failed because the military did not get on board. He faces a 40-year sentence if convicted at the trial, which is expected to wrap up in the coming weeks. Bolsonaro's supporters stormed Brazil's congress in January 2023, after Lula was inaugurated, ransacking the chambers and attacking police, in scenes reminiscent of an attack by Trump supporters on the US Capitol two years before. Despite his trial, Bolsonaro is hoping to make a Trump-style comeback in 2026 presidential elections, despite being barred from running. Lula, 79, has said he could seek a fourth term, health permitting.
