logo
Russia TV Cuts Short Donald Trump's Critique of Putin

Russia TV Cuts Short Donald Trump's Critique of Putin

Miami Herald29-04-2025
Russian state media has deliberately omitted U.S. President Donald Trump's criticism of its leader from its coverage, according to an independent Russian investigative outlet.
According to the news site Agentstvo, media controlled by the Kremlin has "censored" Trump by not reporting that the U.S. president has been criticizing Russian President Vladimir Putin since last week.
Newsweek has contacted the Kremlin for comment by email.
Relations between Washington and Moscow have thawed since Trump was sworn into office in January, but tensions are mounting as the U.S. leader attempts to broker peace talks to end the war. After Russia launched an attack on Ukraine's capital, Kyiv, last week, Trump publicly urged Putin to stop his attacks and expressed his disappointment in the leader for continuing military actions.
Last week, Trump urged Putin to "STOP!" after Russian forces launched an attack on Kyiv, killing at least 12 people.
"I am not happy with the Russian strikes on KYIV. Not necessary, and very bad timing. Vladimir, STOP! 5000 soldiers a week are dying," Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social. "Lets get the Peace Deal DONE!"
The Trump administration also warned it would abandon diplomatic efforts to end the war if Russia and Ukraine did not soon accept a Washington-brokered peace proposal.
However, Russian state television channels and Kremlin-controlled media-including Russia-1 and news agencies Tass and RIA Novosti-have omitted Trump's criticism of Putin from their coverage, according to Agentstvo. They left out Trump's calls for Putin to stop the attacks on Ukraine.
On Sunday, Vesti Nedeli, a program on Russia-1, selectively quoted Trump's criticism of Putin on social media, citing only the portions that excluded any criticism of the Russian president. Instead, the segment highlighted Trump's earlier remarks criticizing Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.
Trump criticized Zelensky on April 23 after Kyiv's leader said he wouldn't accept Russia's demands to legally recognize the annexation of Crimea. Russia annexed the Black Sea peninsula in 2014, but it remains internationally recognized as Ukrainian.
"Ukraine will not legally recognize the occupation of Crimea," Zelensky told reporters on April 22, adding, "It is against our constitution."
Trump and Zelensky met one-on-one at the Vatican on Saturday ahead of Pope Francis' funeral.
After that meeting, reporters asked Trump whether Zelensky might be willing to give up Crimea. The U.S. president responded: "Oh, I think so, yeah. Look, Crimea was 12 years ago."
Meanwhile, European and Ukrainian officials fear Trump is close to abandoning his efforts to put an end to the war, the Financial Times reported on Monday, citing people briefed on the discussions.
U.S. Vice President JD Vance told reporters in India on April 23: "We have engaged in an extraordinary amount of diplomacy and on-the-ground work. We really tried to understand things from the perspectives of both Ukrainians and Russians. I think that we put together a very fair proposal.
"It's time for them to either say yes or for the United States to walk away from this process. The current lines, somewhere close to them is where you're ultimately, I think, going to draw the new lines in the conflict."
Vance told Charlie Kirk, a co-founder of Turning Point USA, on his podcast on Monday: "If this doesn't stop, the Ukrainians aren't winning the war. I think there's this weird idea among the mainstream media that if this thing goes on for just another few years, the Russians will collapse, the Ukrainians will take their territory back, and everything will go back to the way that it was before the war, that is not the reality that we live in."
Plans are in motion for a meeting between Trump and Putin, with Trump indicating they could meet "shortly" following his visits to Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates in May.
Related Articles
NATO Fighter Jets Scrambled After Long-Range Russian StrikesPutin's Fear of Attacks on Victory Day Behind Abrupt Ceasefire: KyivMichael Gloss Obituary Removed After He Died Fighting for Russia'Frustrated' Trump Wants Putin to Go Further
2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

RILEY GAINES: Trump did right thing with DOE cuts, now Congress needs to get in the game
RILEY GAINES: Trump did right thing with DOE cuts, now Congress needs to get in the game

Fox News

timea few seconds ago

  • Fox News

RILEY GAINES: Trump did right thing with DOE cuts, now Congress needs to get in the game

Earlier this month, the Supreme Court gave the green light for his administration to slash nearly a third of the Department of Education's workforce. It's a big (and long overdue) step toward reining in decades of federal overreach that's taken power away from parents and local communities. Here's what happened: The Court lifted a lower court's block on Trump's executive order, which directed Secretary of Education Linda McMahon to start shutting the department down and returning control of education to the states. Essential services would stay intact. But the bloated bureaucracy? That's on the chopping block. And it should be. For years, the Department of Education has acted less like a support system and more like a control center. With around 4,000 employees, its main tasks have included writing regulations, managing student loans, and overseeing grants. Even its PR office has 89 staffers and costs taxpayers over $10 million a year. A quick number crunch shows a pretty glamorous salary for a not-so-glamorous job. That money's not going to raise reading scores or teach kids about the Constitution, that's for sure. That's why this restructuring matters. Student loan management is being handed over to the Treasury Department, where it belongs. A simplified repayment and collection system is already in motion. Meanwhile, other functions of the DOE are being reassigned to smaller, more efficient agencies. The goal? Streamline the system and put decision-making power back where it belongs: with parents and local authorities. Abolish the Department of Education entirely. But this is about more than just bureaucracy. It's about values. For years, bureaucrats in D.C. have decided what our kids learn, what values they're taught, and who's allowed to speak up in the classroom. That chapter is closing. Now it's time to restore education to the people it actually affects: families, teachers, and local leaders. For years, the DOE has pushed a radical agenda on schools across the country. In 2016, it sent a "Dear Colleague" letter to school districts, threatening to pull funding unless they allowed boys into girls' locker rooms, bathrooms, and sports teams. This wasn't about safety or fairness; it was about forcing schools to comply with a social ideology most parents never agreed to. Go back even further. This radicalization started under the Obama administration. In 2011, the DOE rewrote Title IX rules to lower due process standards in campus sexual harassment cases, leading to lawsuits and unjust expulsions. In 2014, it teamed up with the DOJ to pressure schools into enforcing racial discipline quotas regardless of whether actual discrimination existed. Teachers were forced to ignore disruptive behavior to avoid triggering federal investigations. And under Biden, it got worse. The DOE tried to expand Title IX to include "gender identity" and disregard "sex," pressuring schools to rewrite policies on housing, sports, and facilities until courts stepped in and said enough. None of these decisions came from Congress. They were mandates from unelected bureaucrats, better known as people you didn't vote for and can't hold accountable. That's not how a constitutional republic is supposed to work. Now, thanks to the Supreme Court, the door is open to real reform. Congress has the power to finish the job and eliminate the DOE for good. These layoffs are just the first move toward dismantling a department that has prioritized politics over education for far too long. For years, bureaucrats in D.C. have decided what our kids learn, what values they're taught, and who's allowed to speak up in the classroom. That chapter is closing. Now it's time to restore education to the people it actually affects: families, teachers, and local leaders. Local control means more freedom, better accountability, and real opportunities for students to succeed. It means pulling education out of Washington's grip and giving it back to the people who know their kids best. The Supreme Court did its part. Now it's Congress's turn. Let's finish what Trump started. Eliminate the Department of Education and build a system based on merit, fairness, and freedom. Our kids and, in turn, the future of America deserve nothing less. Editor's note: This column was first published on Outkick.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store