Two poker players who engaged in £730k 'chip dumping' scandal given bans
Poker players Jesse Yaginuma and James Carroll have been banned for chip dumping following their involvement in a collusion scandal. Yaginuma triumphed over Carroll at the final table of the World Series of Poker 's $1,500 Millionaire Maker in Las Vegas last month.
A statement from WSOP released on Monday declared that there would be no winner and no bracelet awarded, with the first and second place prize money being divided equally. That resulted in both players pocketing £828,000, but the controversy arises from the £730,000 bonus that Yaginuma earned on top.
Rumours of a potential ban began to swirl online shortly afterwards, with PokerOrg confirming a lifetime ban from Caesars properties and, with that, the WSOP in Las Vegas. It remains unclear whether the duo will also face bans from other non-Caesars WSOP events such as WSOP Paradise in the Bahamas in December.
Yaginuma seemed set for celebrations, having at one point held less than 10% of the total chips in play before staging an extraordinary comeback to clinch his victory. He appeared to have scooped the main prize of just over £915,000, along with an extra £730,000 thanks to a ClubWPT Gold promotion.
Of the two heads-up players, only Yaginuma was eligible for the ClubWPT Gold promotion, having secured a Gold Rush ticket from the sweeps coin poker site. That meant he was entitled to the bonus if he won the tournament.
But swathes of online fans noticed some dubious hands in the heads-up match that raised eyebrows.
Carroll, who pocketed a runner-up prize of around £750,000, was accused of making several puzzling decisions as the finale reached its climax. His behaviour was deemed particularly odd given that he had previously built up such a substantial lead.
Chip dumping in poker is when a player intentionally loses hands to favour their opponent. It's done to transfer funds to one's opponent, either through deliberate folding or irrational betting.
One of the most contentious hands saw Yaginuma take the lead for the first time after winning a pot with 174m chips at stake. With the blinds set at 1.5m and 3m, Yaginuma called the big blind pre-flop with a Jack (clubs) and an eight (spades), prompting Carroll to raise to 13m with a six (clubs) and a three (diamonds), which his opponent called.
The flop produced a 10 (clubs), five (clubs) and Jack (spades), leading Carroll to bet another 17m, which was called again. Both players checked when a seven of clubs came out on the turn, then raised the stakes once more when Yaginuma called Carroll's 57m bet after the river produced a Queen (spades).
GGPoker ambassador Daniel Negreanu discussed the bans on his vlog, stating the decision was made by Nevada Gaming and Caesars and had nothing to do with the WSOP.
The WSOP in Vegas is set to run at Caesars properties for another 19 years, however, with Negreanu adding: "They're not going to be able to play the World Series for I don't know how long.'
So far, neither player embroiled in the controversy has released a public statement addressing the bans. Yaginuma was interviewed by ClubWPT Gold about the bonus payout, where he said: 'It's been amazing; it's been a wild ride. When I actually realised I had a chance, it was surreal. It was exciting, of course, and it felt like an out-of-body experience.'
The ClubWPT Gold's social media confirmed they would honour the £730,000 prize despite there being no official winner, increasing the number of Gold Rush tickets it gave out.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scottish Sun
a day ago
- Scottish Sun
More protests held outside migrant hotels across UK as anger over crisis continues to rise
Hundreds clashed outside The Bell Hotel in Epping, Essex HOTELS STAND-OFF More protests held outside migrant hotels across UK as anger over crisis continues to rise MORE protests have been held outside migrant hotels across the country yesterday as anger over the issue continues to rise. Another demonstration was held nearby to the Brittania International Hotel in Canary Wharf, East London — which had been revealed earlier this week to be set to house asylum-seekers. Advertisement 4 Further protests have been held outside migrant hotels across the UK Credit: Gary Stone 4 A man is held by cops during the demonstration by The Bell Hotel, Epping Credit: LNP 4 The two groups of protesters in Epping face off against each other Credit: PA The large group of various ethnicities held a banner saying: 'Stop calling us far right. "Protect our women and children.' Meanwhile, rival groups clashed outside The Bell Hotel in Epping, Essex. Around 300 anti-migrant protesters had been kept in one fenced-off pen while around 500 in the pro-migrant group were in another, with cops between them. Advertisement Around 500 officers from 31 forces across England and Wales attended — with three arrests reported by Essex Police, including a woman on suspicion of a racially aggravated public order offence. It was the latest incident in Epping since Ethiopian asylum-seeker Hadush Gerberslasie Kebatu was accused of sexual assault. He has denied three charges. Elsewhere, around 250 protested near the Brook Hotel in Norwich, while more than 200 stood outside a migrant hotel in Altrincham, Gtr Manchester. Advertisement Other gatherings over the weekend have been reported in Portsmouth, Bournemouth and Leeds. Migrant hotel protests spread across the country with more planned today as cops clamp down on weekend of stand-offs 4 A demonstration was held nearby to the Brittania International Hotel in Canary Wharf, East London Credit: Gary Stone Four in 10 sex attack charges non-Brits Exclusive by Jack Elsom NEARLY four in ten people charged over sex attacks in London in the last seven years are foreign nationals, police figures show. Non-Brits are thought to be behind 2,809 out of 7,798 such crimes — 36 per cent — but make up less than a quarter of the city's population. A further 358 charged are of unknown nationality, meaning the foreigner total may be higher. Brits accounted for 4,631 charges. The largest cohort of foreign suspects were Romanian at 308, but Afghans are the most prolific by share of population at 89. The Centre for Migration Control obtained figures on nationalities of those charged with sex offences since 2018. It said: 'The spike in sexual offences against women and girls is directly attributable to our open borders.' The Home Office said: 'We continue to deport foreign nationals who commit heinous crimes in the UK.'
Metro
2 days ago
- Metro
Prince Andrew among 100 people who could be dragged into Epstein scandal
Ghislaine Maxwell is said to have been formally questioned about Prince Andrew for the first time during a marathon nine-hour meeting with the US Deputy Attorney General. The 63-year-old was interviewed about her former friend the Duke of York as he came up in a 'laundry list' of more than 100 people linked to paedophile Jeffrey Epstein. Maxwell, who is serving a 20-year sentence for sex trafficking, answered all of the questions 'honestly and truthfully', according to a source. Epstein's former girlfriend is not thought to have previously been formally questioned about Prince Andrew. It is not known what answers she gave, although it's reported 'she wants the truth to come out.' A source said: 'This is the first time anyone has asked Ghislaine about any of the men. 'She told the truth and didn't back away from any questions. 'She wants the truth to come out.' The Duke has always strenuously denied allegations by Virginia Giuffre that he sexually abused her when she was aged just 17 and while she was the victim of billionaire Epstein's sex trafficking ring. The senior royal paid a multi-million sum to Ms Giuffre in an out-of-court settlement, with no admission of wrongdoing. She died by suicide earlier this year. Maxwell has continued to be at the centre of the Epstein scandal as she serves 20 years at Tallahassee Federal Prison in Florida for her part in the sex trafficking ring. The two-day meeting with the US Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche took place this week on the orders of Donald Trump, who is currently on a private visit to his golf courses in Scotland. The US president has been engulfed in the saga by promising to release the full Epstein Files before failing to do so. The questioning of Maxwell is part of the Justice Department's effort to dispel backlash over the Trump administration's handling of the files. A source told the Mail on Sunday: 'Ghislaine has never told her story to anyone in government before. At times it was very emotional but she answered every question asked of her. 'The limited immunity deal is a huge risk for her because this case is so politicised she only has immunity so long as she hasn't lied. 'She answered everything truthfully but she is taking a risk. 'She was asked about a laundry list of people including Prince Andrew, Bill Gates, Les Wexner, Bill Clinton, Alan Dershowitz, Leon Black and a who's who of powerful Wall Street moneymen and financiers. 'There were Silicon Valley names in there along with world leaders, other non-British royals aside from Andrew and famous names from the world of showbusiness. 'It's ironic that Elon Musk kicked this whole thing off when he fell out with Trump and then made that post on X about Trump allegedly preventing the release of the full Epstein documents as some sort of 'cover-up'. 'Well, Elon is in there, as is his brother. 'It was a monumental moment for Ghislaine to finally be asked about these people and to tell the truth.' Maxwell is due to have a new plea for an appeal before the US Supreme Court submitted tomorrow. She has been called to testify before a Congressional Committee on August 11. The source said: 'Of course she wants a pardon, what prisoner doesn't? 'But that isn't something which has been discussed. 'The president could commute her sentence in return for her cooperation. No one knows what will happen now. Todd Blanche will sit down with president Trump when he returns from Scotland and that is when the discussions about any potential deal will take place.' Prince Andrew reached the settlement with Ms Giuffre in February 2022, with the agreement being made on a without liability status — meaning it does not amount to an admission of guilt. More Trending At the time, Andrew pledged to 'demonstrate his regret for his association with Epstein' by supporting the 'fight against the evils of sex trafficking, and by supporting its victims'. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Donald Trump's attorney general will 'reach out to' Ghislaine Maxwell over Epstein files MORE: Trump 'told his name appears multiple times' in Epstein files' MORE: Ghislaine Maxwell 'answers every single question' in Epstein file jail grilling
North Wales Live
3 days ago
- North Wales Live
Meat that wasn't what was promised sold to restaurants across Wales
A defendant sold what he claimed was halal meat to Indian restaurants and takeaways but it wasn't. Helim Miah, 46, has been jailed for over four years after an investigation also revealed "extremely poor food hygiene conditions". Today Merthyr Tydfil Crown Court heard that Miah and co-defendant Noaf Rahman, 46, sold halal-labelled chicken from their wholesale food business but investigations later revealed their suppliers did not provide halal meat. The pair continued to falsely advertise and sell the chicken as halal to customers. The court heard Cardiff and the Vale Shared Regulatory Services seized 2,840 kilograms of frozen meat from Universal Foods (Wholesale) Ltd, based at Bessemer Close, Cardiff, in January, 2019, reports WalesOnline. You can sign up for all the latest court stories here An investigation revealed a string of food hygiene issues. These included very poor food hygiene practices, evidence that some poultry had been defrosted and refrozen, chicken two years past its sell-by date, no evidence of temperature records, evidence of pest activity and transportation of unmarked meat in unclean vehicles which weren't refrigerated or fit for purpose. Rahman pleaded guilty to multiple food hygiene offences but Miah pleaded not guilty and stood trial at Merthyr Crown Court in April this year. He denied any involvement in the day-to-day processing of the business but was found guilty of 10 charges including running a food business dishonestly - falsely selling non-Halal meat as Halal, mislabelling expiry dates, ignoring hygiene rules, and failing to track food origins - putting public health and trust at risk. Judge Vanessa Francis sentenced Miah, of Kilcredaun House, Cardiff, to 56 months in prison. His co-defendant, Rahman, of Eddystone Close, Cardiff, was sentenced to a 24-month suspended sentence. Cllr Norma Mackie, cabinet member responsible for Shared Regulatory Services at Cardiff Council, said: "This story will be deeply concerning to our Muslim community. Eating halal is a requirement in the Islamic religion, and to take part in such a fraud shows the complete disregard these men had for the community." She added: "The investigation revealed extremely poor food hygiene conditions that could have caused serious harm to their customers. This case raises important questions about how food suppliers are held accountable for the accuracy of their halal claims, the need for greater consumer awareness, and the importance of verifying the authenticity of halal certifications. She added: "If anyone has concerns about the traceability of the food products they are buying from a wholesaler, please contact Shared Regulatory Services on 0300 123 6696."
