
Taliban regime recognition
One hardly needs reminding of Russian sensitivity on the issue, given that the Afghan Taliban emerged from the womb of the Mujahideen who fought the Soviet occupation with the help of Pakistan and the US-led west for a decade, following which Russia (then the Soviet Union) finally decided to call it a day and withdrew in 1989 after Gorbachev assumed the leadership in Moscow.
Arguably, that defeat, or rather being fought to a stalemate, fed into the troubled waters afflicting the Soviet Union and its ultimate collapse. The intriguing question is, why has Russia, given this painful past, 'jumped the gun' in this regard before China, India or even Pakistan?**
For one, Russia is seeking to expand its diplomatic footprint globally, including south west Asia, in order to reverse the isolation into which the US-led west has been trying to push it since the outbreak of the Russia-Ukraine war.
Its decision to formally exchange ambassadors therefore smacks of realpolitik, strategic opportunism, and positioning itself to engage in economic cooperation with the region in the fields of energy, transport and infrastructure.
For Pakistan, troubled as it is by the conscious or tacit hosting of the Tehreek-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) and other hostile groups on Afghan soil, Russian lack of leverage over the Afghan Taliban in this regard offers little hope of the betterment of the fraught situation on the Afghan-Pakistan border.
Although recent diplomatic moves aided by China, including a visit to Kabul by Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar, show signs of improving diplomatic relations between the two neighbouring countries, this is still some way from Kabul halting completely the attacks on Pakistan by the TTP, Hafiz Gul Bahadar Group and other fundamentalist groups based on Afghan soil.
Russia's diplomatic initiative may well persuade other countries to follow suit. Moscow has recognised the Taliban regime as an acceptance of its de facto control of the country, with little or no resistance left to its stranglehold. Of the countries interested in recognition, China stands out most. Beijing's interest in rare earth and other minerals in Afghanistan is by now a matter of record.
China also seeks to blunt the presence and activities of religious extremist and fundamentalist groups such as Islamic State and al Qaeda based in Afghanistan lest this affliction spills over to its restless Xinjiang region, where an Islamic resistance movement has been controlled after much effort stretching over many years.
If the Afghan Taliban were to accept good advice, or be willing to learn from the past, they need look no further than Pakistan's experience of supporting proxies in the long war for control of Afghanistan.
Not only did Islamabad's Afghan proxies nurture and give birth to the Pakistani Taliban, by now even the so-called 'good' Taliban (TTP, etc) have long since turned against it. If Kabul hopes to use the TTP and similar groups to change Pakistan into a mirror of what it has implemented in its own territory, it should heed the well-meaning warning about proxies being double-edged swords, as Pakistan can ruefully testify from its own experience.
Pakistan has clearly stated after the Russian recognition announcement that it is in no hurry to extend recognition, pending the hoped for improvement in the behaviour of the Afghan Taliban regime in scotching the cross-border attacks of the TTP, etc. If that is the case, that recognition by Islamabad may be some way down the road because Kabul's ostensible moves to prevent cross-border attacks by the TTP and others seem more window dressing than consistent, serious policy.
As to the Afghan people themselves, precious little except hope for economic and other betterment in a country afflicted with want and hunger, in the wake of Moscow's decision can be heard from those interviewed in Afghanistan in this regard.
On the other hand, not surprisingly, Afghan women hold little hope of any betterment under the patriarchal, male chauvinist order the Taliban have once again imposed. In short, those hopeful of better days and those gloomy at the prospects for the future amongst the Afghan people in the aftermath of Russian recognition can only be pitied and prayed for.
Afghanistan not only shows no signs of ending the dark night it has been enveloped in after the (second) Taliban takeover, Kabul is being rewarded with recognition (actual and potential) by countries whose own interests (as usual, no great surprise there) override any other principle.
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Business Recorder
41 minutes ago
- Business Recorder
Trump criticizes Putin after approving more weapons for Ukraine
WASHINGTON: President Donald Trump said on Tuesday he had approved sending U.S. defensive weapons to Ukraine and was considering additional sanctions on Moscow, underscoring his frustration with Russian President Vladimir Putin over the growing death toll in Russia's war with Ukraine. Trump, who pledged as a presidential candidate to end the war within a day, has not been able to follow through on that promise and efforts by his administration to broker peace have come up short. Trump directed his ire at Putin on Tuesday during a meeting with cabinet officials at the White House. 'I'm not happy with Putin. I can tell you that much right now,' Trump said, noting that Russian and Ukrainian soldiers were dying in the thousands. 'We get a lot of bullshit thrown at us by Putin … He's very nice all the time, but it turns out to be meaningless,' Trump said Trump says Ukraine will need Patriot missiles for its defense, chides Putin Trump said he was considering whether to support a bill in the Senate that would impose steep sanctions on Russia over the war. 'I'm looking at it very strongly,' he said. The bill, whose lead sponsors are Republican Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina and Democratic Senator Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut, would also punish other countries that trade with Moscow, imposing 500% tariffs on nations that buy Russian oil, gas, uranium and other exports. Defensive weapons against russian advances Trump said on Monday that the United States would send more weapons to Ukraine, primarily defensive ones, to help it defend itself against Russian advances. On Tuesday he said he had approved such a move. 'We're sending some defensive weapons to Ukraine, and I've approved that,' he said. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy said on Tuesday he had ordered an expansion of contacts with the United States to ensure critical deliveries of military supplies, primarily air defence. 'We currently have all the necessary political statements and decisions and we must implement them as quickly as possible to protect our people and positions,' he said. Europe must 'step up' as US halts some arms to Ukraine: EU chief 'These are critical deliveries that mean saving lives and protecting Ukrainian cities and villages. I expect results from these contacts very soon. And this week, we are preparing formats for meetings of our military and political teams.' Zelenskiy has repeatedly urged Ukraine's Western allies to impose tougher sanctions on Moscow to force the Kremlin to agree to a ceasefire as a step towards reaching an end to the war, now 40 months old. A decision by the Pentagon to halt some shipments of critical weapons to Ukraine prompted warnings by Kyiv last week that the move would weaken its ability to defend against Russia's intensifying airstrikes and battlefield advances. Trump, who was seated next to Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, was asked on Tuesday who had ordered that pause. 'I don't know. Why don't you tell me?' Trump responded.


Express Tribune
an hour ago
- Express Tribune
Talks with Kabul
Listen to article While the terror fissures with Kabul are far from being resolved, the good point is that the estranged neighbours are talking. The consensus to break the ice and address the imbroglio is a welcome development, and the first round of additional secretary-level talks held in Islamabad was a case in point. The nod to further the understanding reached between the two sides on April 19 at the foreign ministers level and to focus on trade, transit cooperation, security and connectivity is the way to go. A positive outcome from the bureaucratic parleys was the recognition from the Afghan leadership that terrorism, especially the presence of non-state actors such as TTP and their cross-border activism, needs decisive action and the onus is on the Taliban to act in real-time for peace in the region. Kabul and Islamabad luckily also took a holistic look at talks and trans-regional initiatives, such as the Uzbekistan-Afghanistan-Pakistan railway framework agreement, were discussed, apart from the return of Afghan refugees. It was consoling to learn that since January 2024, Pakistan has issued over 500,000 visas for medical, tourism, business and educational purposes. This lawful understanding is a leap forward, and will come to undermine the traps that are laid by drug-and-human traffickers — something that has sabotaged normal relations to this day. Kabul has a responsibility to dispense in two strategic arenas: flushing out terrorists and ensuring that refugees return with due solemnity. This will come to buoy the goodwill and help focus on geo-economics in a more concentrated manner. Taliban 2.0 must realise that regional states are eager to patch up with them, and their debut recognition by Moscow is a cheering moment. However, Pakistan's stance that it is not in a rush to follow suit is based on the far-sighted premise that until and unless terrorism is done away with, there is no point in striking a de jure relationship. The sagacity of Afghan Taliban is up for test: it remains to be seen if they maintain status quo in their dealing with the militants or exhibit statesmanship to free the region from revulsion and bloodbath.


Express Tribune
6 hours ago
- Express Tribune
ICC issues arrest warrants for Taliban leaders over rights abuses
The International Criminal Court (ICC) has issued arrest warrants for two senior Taliban leaders in Afghanistan, including the group's supreme spiritual leader, Haibatullah Akhundzada. The court announced on Tuesday that there are reasonable grounds to believe that Akhundzada and Abdul Hakim Haqqani, the Taliban's Chief Justice, have committed crimes against humanity. Specifically, they are accused of persecution on gender grounds, targeting women, girls, and individuals who do not conform to the Taliban's policies on gender, gender identity, or expression. According to the ICC, the alleged crimes involve a systematic campaign of repression and discrimination since the Taliban's return to power in 2021. Read More: First round of Pak-Afghan talks concludes, focusing on trade, security Since taking power in 2021, the Taliban government has imposed severe restrictions on women, which the United Nations has described as a form of "gender apartheid." The Taliban has also permitted the public flogging of women for alleged offences. In December 2024, the Taliban announced the closure of all national and international non-governmental organisations (NGOs) operating in Afghanistan that employ Afghan women. Also Read: Pakistan urges decisive Afghan action on terror This decision, which further tightens the group's restrictions on women, comes just over two years after the Taliban initially ordered NGOs to suspend employing Afghan women, citing alleged violations of dress codes.