What happened to Leonie Emery? A family's seven year wait for answers
Photo:
Supplied
Malanena Emery wants answers.
It's been seven years since she last heard from her daughter Leonie Emery, then 25.
In the months that followed she didn't hear from the mother of four. By June 2018 she posted on Facebook asking if anyone had seen or heard from her.
Believing her daughter, who had recently served a sentence of imprisonment for arson, may have been in prison, she says she tried writing to her, even wishing her a happy birthday.
It wasn't until early 2019 she was told her daughter wasn't in prison. She then went to police and reported her missing, telling them no-one had heard from her for about a year.
Then, in April 2025, police made a significant announcement.
"Police have examined several possible scenarios but believe it is most likely that Leonie has been the victim of foul play," Detective Senior Sergeant Rob Hunkin said.
Malanena is frustrated no-one has been held responsible for her daughter's disappearance, and is desperate for closure.
Leonie Emery was last heard from seven years ago.
Photo:
Supplied
Leonie was a free spirit who regularly moved around.
She grew up in Paeroa, and spent several years living with her grandfather so she could be closer to her cousins.
"She was smart, outgoing and she got on well with people," Malanena says.
"She was everybody's friend."
In 2003 she moved back in with her mother shortly after her little sister was born. About three years later she went back to living with her grandfather.
However, after she got into trouble with police she moved back to Whangārei and went to Te Kamo High School.
In year 10, she was expelled so her mother helped get her a job on a farm doing some relief milking with her brother.
She eventually moved in with her brother and his partner for a few months before moving back home.
"I didn't mind, she was helpful with her siblings helping around with housework and shopping when she wasn't working.
"You could ask her to do anything she would never complain," Malanena says.
Shortly after, Leonie started dating a man - her family believed she was happy, and was starting to make a new life for herself.
Tragically, things began to change after her first baby girl was stillborn.
Leonie struggled to cope in the aftermath, turning to alcohol to help ease the pain.
"Her daughter's death hit her really hard which caused those demons," Malanena says of Leonie's struggle with alcohol and her anger.
Later that year she gave birth to another child, and would later have three more children.
However, in 2014 there was a violent alcohol-fuelled incident where Leonie stabbed her partner in the arm with a fork. The couple then separated.
In 2016, Leonie was jailed on an arson charge. Around the same time the children were placed in their father's care.
Her family says Leonie was a changed person when she got out of prison.
"The first thing she did was go looking for her children," her mother says.
There were issues between Leonie and her ex-partner and while she began to move around a lot she kept in close contact with her mum.
By late 2017 however, things began to take a positive turn for Leonie and she started a new relationship with a truck driver.
"I thought things were going good for her," Malanena says.
However once again her relationship ended following a violent confrontation.
He told police he dropped her off outside a police station on December 21, 2017.
Leonie Emery's mother reported her missing in February 2019.
Photo:
Supplied
Leonie spent Christmas with a cousin in South Auckland's Papakura. On Boxing Day she was invited to go to Waikokowai in North Waikato for New Years.
Her last post on Facebook was on January 3, 2018. It was a photo of a dog tied up to a tree.
"Free to a good home. Preferably ideal for farming, needs training. Reason why I'm advertising her is because I find it cruel for her to be tied up like this when she will be a good working dog."
Police said it was believed Leonie was picked up around January 12 by a woman who was described as being Māori and looking like a "female rugby player" in a light blue Nissan Pulsar type hatchback.
Two weeks later, on January 26 she went to a party at a relative's home in Ngāruawāhia.
While at the party she was allegedly assaulted by a group of young women.
She later arrived back in Papakura between January 26 and February 4. No-one reported seeing her or talking to her again.
"It's so emotional," Malanena begins as she thinks back to early 2018 as she first started becoming concerned for her daughter.
The days turned into weeks, then to months with no word from Leonie.
"Who would ever think it would happen to your child?"
In June 2018, Malanena took to Facebook asking if anyone had heard from or seen Leonie.
She also went searching herself. In late 2018, she and a friend went to a set of units in Bombay Hills where Leonie had previously been living.
Malanena was unsure which flat it was, so she knocked on several doors. At one of the properties was a young couple who said Leonie had moved.
Given her recent time in prison, Malanena wondered if she had been imprisoned for something else as there was a warrant out for her arrest.
She believes she first wrote to Auckland Region Women's Corrections Facility in June/July 2018 asking Leonie to touch base and wishing her happy birthday and got no reply.
She also tried messaging her on Facebook with no luck.
Worried she had sent the letter to the wrong prison, she sent another letter down to Arohata Prison in Wellington.
She also emailed Corrections in February 2019 asking if her daughter was there.
Deputy Commissioner of Women's Prisons Kym Grierson confirmed to RNZ Malanena emailed Corrections on February 12, 2019.
"We wrote back to her on the same day to let her know that Leonie was not in prison.
"On February 15, 2019, she wrote to us again, asking us to let her know whether Leonie had been in prison at all, and if so, where she went afterwards."
Grierson said Corrections responded on the same day to let her know that in accordance with their obligations under the Official Information Act and the Privacy Act, they were unable to provide any personal information relating to Leonie without her written consent.
Corrections also received contact from another member of Leonie's family on December 10 2018.
On that occasion Corrections responded the same day and told them that Leonie was not in prison.
"We have not been able to identify any record of any correspondence from Malanena Emery to Arohata Prison or Auckland Region Women's Corrections Facility," Grierson said.
After being told by Corrections her daughter was not in prison Malanena visited a police station on February 22 and reported her daughter missing and made a statement to police outlining her concerns.
In late February, 2019, she took to Facebook and said she had come to a "dead end".
Leonie was not in the Corrections or police database. She said she had filed a missing person's report and once again appealed for anyone with information to contact her or police.
In 2021 police issued a renewed public appeal into Leonie's disappearance and said they had "grave concerns" for her welfare.
"Police are keeping an open mind as to the circumstances surrounding Leonie's disappearance and this is still being treated as a missing persons case," Detective Senior Sergeant Rob Hunkin said.
Police had carried out "significant inquiries" into Leonie's disappearance and were "determined" to find out what happened to her.
Malanena says there were no further significant updates from police until this year when she was told police were going to be appealing for more information on an episode of Cold Case.
Hunkin said in a statement in April investigators had undertaken "extensive inquiries" to try and understand Leonie's movements and what might have happened.
"Police have examined several possible scenarios but believe it is most likely that Leonie has been the victim of foul play."
Police also revealed a forensic analysis of a property linked to Leonie in Bombay Hills indicated blood had been cleaned up at the location.
Police were appealing for the woman who picked Leonie up from Ngāruawāhia and for anyone who was at the party where she was allegedly assaulted to come forward.
Leonie appeared at her cousin's home in Papakura between January 26 and February 4.
"Police believe that this is the last sighting of Leonie so understanding how she traveled the 75km from Ngāruawāhia to Papakura is of vital importance to the investigation."
They also wanted to know where she went when she left Papakura, and who she was with.
Malanena says she is frustrated it took police six years after Leonie was reported missing to announce they believed it was foul play.
"I don't know if it was because of the investigation or maybe they didn't have enough to go on."
She was "shocked" to hear of the results of the forensic analysis in Bombay Hills, and wants to know when police uncovered the information.
"If they had figured it was foul play back then [in 2018] would they have done more for her?
"Would they have actually went looking for more evidence?... Is it going to get us closer to ever finding out what happened to her? Or just more questions, no answers."
In a statement to RNZ Hunkin said police continued to treat the investigation, dubbed Operation Exeter, as a "missing persons case".
"It is important to note that Leonie's disappearance was only reported to police about 12 months after she was last in contact with her whānau.
"Given that unfortunate time lapse, the reconstruction of her last known movements has been a challenge."
What happened to Leonie was still to be determined, he said.
"One of the possible scenarios our investigation has to consider is her being the victim of foul play."
The investigation has been active and assigned to an investigator since Leonie was reported missing.
"Leonie's whānau and the wider public will appreciate that this is still an active investigation and there will be some sensitivities to our work.
"Given we have not ruled out foul play, there is naturally some information that will not be in the public domain for operational security."
In relation to the forensic evidence recovered in the Bombay Hills, Hunkin said the origin and relevance of the evidence was "one of many active lines of enquiry in the investigation".
"We are keeping an open mind because that location and the said evidence might have no relevance at all to Leonie's disappearance.
"Police will continue to keep Leonie's whānau across developments in this investigation, as we continue to seek answers they so rightfully deserve."
Malanena lies awake at night wondering what happened to her daughter, where she is, and who may have been responsible.
"In my mind and reality I've been searching… I've been wondering, and most my thoughts take me to those places.
"I end up getting up and just going, you know, searching for my daughter, searching for answers."
Malanena suffered a stroke last year. Since then, she has been unable to go searching for her daughter, but has continued to make public appeals.
Last month she wrote on Facebook saying she had a message for the people who were the last ones to see her daughter.
"Why didn't you take her to the hospital like any person wud do? Especially when you knew how she met her death!" (sic).
She asked for anyone involved to disclose where her daughter's body was.
Malanena says the last seven years had been "devastation". She had two of Leonie's children in her custody, the other two were with a caregiver.
She said only one of Leonie's children, her eldest, could vividly remember her.
Malanena has been honest with them about their mother's disappearance.
Leonie would have been 33 this week. Her mother concedes it is difficult to have confidence seven years on, but is desperate for answers.
"It would mean a lot to us. We would be able to put her to rest," she says.
"I just want my daughter back."
Police ask that anyone with information about Leonie's disappearance to contact them online now or call 105 using the reference number 190222/9022.
Information can also be provided anonymously via Crime Stoppers on 0800 555 111.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
2 hours ago
- RNZ News
Lawyer censured for slapping one colleague's bottom, touching another's back
By Al Williams, Open Justice reporter of File photo. Photo: 123rf A lawyer who slapped a junior male colleague on the bottom and touched a female colleague's lower back during a social function has been censured. The lawyer, a partner at an unnamed firm, urged a New Zealand Law Society standards committee to consider his behaviour in context, stating that more freedom should be allowed for conduct at an out-of-office social function than during the usual working day. However, the committee found his conduct was disrespectful and discourteous towards the employees, who were both junior to him. According to a recently released decision, the behaviour occurred in the context of socialising by some staff members after a team function arranged by their firm. The partner generally accepted that some of his behaviour was inappropriate, that he had blurred professional boundaries, and had consumed excess alcohol that night. However, he did not see that as a breach of professional standards or an abuse of power towards either colleague. According to the standards committee's decision, the lawyer submitted that slapping the male employee on the bottom was "paying [him] respect" and "blokey", and that he was behaving as a friend rather than a partner in the firm. "The committee sees absolutely no circumstance in which physical contact of this type towards any colleague could be described as respectful behaviour. "The committee also considers this behaviour risks perpetuating a workplace culture that the profession is at pains to transform in relation to interactions between colleagues." The lawyer accepted that he placed his hand on the female employee's lower back as she passed through a door. In his view, doing so was "an innocuous courtesy", and he intended "nothing sexual or sinister" by it. The committee did not ascribe any sexual intent to the lawyer's actions, but found it was clear that the female employee was uncomfortable at the time and afterwards. The committee considered that physical touch on the lower back carried an element of intimacy and overfamiliarity that may reasonably have been interpreted as inappropriate by her or a reasonable observer. While there were some contexts in which this would be acceptable to both parties involved, it was likely to be perceived as flirtatious and inappropriate in others, the decision said. The lawyer's evidence was that she approached him to show him a team photograph on her phone, and he assumed her reason for doing so was for him to comment on it. Referring to the photo, the lawyer commented that the woman was "beautiful" and said that, in that context, it was not intended to be disrespectful or discourteous. The committee accepted that the woman was anticipating a comment on the group photo, but not that she was inviting a comment on her own appearance to the exclusion of others (when there was nothing to draw attention to her over any other team member in the photo). The lawyer's contention that his comment was respectful and courteous in the context was not accepted. The committee considered it was more likely than not that the lawyer's judgement about what was appropriate was impaired. "When coupled with his admitted blurring of professional boundaries, his consumption of alcohol meant he was not well placed to exercise the judgement required of him." While the committee did not identify a specific abuse of any power imbalance, it said that didn't mean an imbalance did not exist "by virtue of their roles as partner and junior members of staff". The committee considered that the team's social function, including ongoing socialising that occurred after the formal portion of the function, was a professional, collegial occasion. It found that the lawyer's conduct across the three incidents demonstrated conduct towards both employees that was disrespectful and discourteous. It was generally conduct "that would be regarded by lawyers of good standing as being unacceptable and unprofessional". Due to mitigating factors present in the case, the committee said it did not consider it necessary to impose any penalty. This story originally appeared in the New Zealand Herald.
RNZ News
4 hours ago
- RNZ News
Drug farmer built 'shanty' on Waikato swampland to harvest cannabis plots
By Belinda Feek, Open Justice reporter of Huntly men Jason Evans and Jayson Woods were charged after police discovered their cannabis growing operation on the shores of Lake Waahi in Huntly. Photo: Google Maps A drug farmer built a makeshift structure on the edge of a Waikato lake so he could row out and check on his cannabis plots, which he claims were at some point worth more than $200,000. In March 2021, Jason Edward Evans, 46, spent about eight weeks building the "shanty", which sat on the shores of Lake Waahi in Huntly. He and co-offender, champion New Zealand powerlifter Jayson George Woods, then used wooden pallets to get access around the cannabis plots on the swamplands surrounding the lake. Hamilton District Court recently heard that after building the structure, Evans lived in it for at least three weeks while he tended to his crop, harvesting the plants and setting up drying racks. Parts of the area were only accessible via boat. Then, in February 2022, police discovered about 1000 cannabis plants in six different spots in the lake area, describing the cultivation as a "large-scale commercial cannabis" operation. The discovery led police to Evans and Woods. When searching Evans' home in April that year, officers also found 15 x 500ml bottles of cannabis oil, $2480 cash, ammunition, 1kg of cannabis cabbage, 10 vials of steroids, and bottles of Jungle Juice and Rush. Jungle Juice and Rush are leather cleaning products but they can also be misused for other purposes. Evans told police he had harvested more than $200,000 worth of cannabis plants from his lakeside plots and that the cannabis oil and steroids were for his personal use. Aggravating Evans' situation, he was later busted with methamphetamine, cocaine, a firearm and prohibited firearm magazines this year, while on bail for the earlier offending. He was caught with those items when a firefighter was looking for a missing cat under a bed after a suspicious fire at Evans' Huntly property. The firefighter noticed a .22 rifle under the bed and reported it to police. The rifle was loaded with six rounds of ammunition, and, as it can hold 25 cartridges, is classified as a prohibited magazine. In a black bag, officers found 1.3g of cocaine, 172mg of meth, a meth pipe, Evans' passport, driver's licence, bank cards, medication and his phone. In his garage, they discovered a lathe surrounded by more ammunition, including a Ruger magazine, silencer and other firearms parts. After the earlier cannabis discovery, police also searched Woods' Huntly home and found 216 vials of prescription-only steroids and more than 300 unidentified pills. Officers also found a "small fully functional indoor cannabis grow room" in his garage, which had 18 seedlings, lights, power ballast, a timer and a mobile air con unit. A packet of unopened bullets and $4250 were also seized. Woods, 33, accepted there were "a couple of ounces of weed" at his house and said the steroids were his. According to court documents, he said he took them "because he is a New Zealand powerlifter". At Evans' recent sentencing, his counsel, Jasper Rhodes, said in explaining the 1000-plant discovery that it was grown in the wild and only about half of it would be "usable head". "It can only be harvested once a year because of the weather," he said, before stating that it was different from a hydroponic set-up in which all plants could be harvested. Judge Arthur Tompkins pointed out that, despite that, Evans had told police he had harvested more than $200,000 worth of cannabis. Rhodes said Evans was "primarily growing for personal use". He submitted that the operation was a "one-off, unsophisticated" situation with Evans "going in and out" to the hut by kayak. "This little hut [had] no glass, no windows, no walls, basically a shanty in the middle of the bush, compared with a person who is growing in hydroponic set-ups purely for personal gain with more plants." However, Rhodes accepted the drug offending Evans committed while on bail was an aggravating feature. He said Evans had the weapons and ammunition because he'd been the victim of attempted burglaries, break-ins and a violent home invasion in which he "almost died". As for the fire, that was investigated as arson, he said. "Without suggesting he was right to have a gun, he was right that he thought he was under threat," Rhodes said. "He had a reason, not a legitimate reason," the judge replied. Rhodes pushed for an end sentence of around 18 months, which would mean his client could walk out of prison, on time served, in about a month. But, on numerous charges, including cultivation of cannabis, possession of class A, B and C drugs, unlawful possession of firearms, prohibited magazines and ammunition, Judge Tompkins jailed Evans for two years and three months. Woods was sentenced earlier to 11 months' home detention on charges including cannabis cultivation for his involvement. * This story originally appeared in the New Zealand Herald .
RNZ News
5 hours ago
- RNZ News
One injured, shot fired in armed robbery at Whangārei bar
Photo: 123RF The owner of a Whangārei pub says a customer is injured and staff are traumatised after an armed robbery last night. Craig Woods who owns the Kensington Tavern said a man with a gun burst into the premises about 9.30pm, went behind the bar and ordered staff to give him the till's cash drawer. He said two staff and three customers were still at the pub as it was closing. "The staff did the correct thing by giving them the till, and it all happened pretty quickly. But one of the patrons intervened. The offender sort of broke free, and so the patron backed off." St John said it took one person to hospital with moderate injuries. Detective Sergeant Ryan Cooper who is the head of the Tactical Crime Unit said officers were called to the bar at 10pm, after a man entered the bar holding a firearm and demanded money. He then fired a shot towards the roof of the bar and assaulted one of the patrons, before taking cash from one of the bar's tills. He then fled the scene in a white Toyota Aqua or a similar model, driven by a second person. The car had stolen licence plates attached, registration KHA69. The injured person was transported to hospital, but has been discharged. Police said they are urgently working to locate the two offenders, and anyone with information is urged to contact 105 online or via phone, quoting file number 250726/2971. Information can also be provided anonymously via Crime Stoppers on 0800 555 111. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
